Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Friends,
I have learned from this estimated group, among others from Mike Petro's excellent postings, that there have not been any black/shu puerhs prior to 1973, when the Kunming Tea Factory made the first test production of black puerh. Therefore I got very surprised when a friend of mine arrived from China with a quite expensive ($500) brick of black/shu puerh. The seller of the brick, a native Chinese and a long-time business partner of her stated that this shu puerh was from 1970. She said that he even showed her some kind of certificate of authenticity (which she anyway could not verify as she does not know any Chinese). I am wondering what kind of puerh did she buy. Did she get screwed, or is it some kind of real rarity? Is it a cooked/shu puerh at all? Please take a look of these pictures, and if you have any clues about the age, type and factory of this brick, please share it with me! You can see the pictures he http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...u_brick_01.jpg http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...u_brick_02.jpg Unfortunately this is the highest resolution Photobucket allows to upload. If anyone would like to see the pictures in a higher resolution whith a readable text, let me know, and I can mail it to anyone. Thank you for your help, Gyorgy |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gyorgy Sajo" > writes:
> Dear Friends, > > I have learned from this estimated group, among others from Mike Petro's > excellent postings, that there have not been any black/shu puerhs prior to > 1973, when the Kunming Tea Factory made the first test production of black > puerh. > > Therefore I got very surprised when a friend of mine arrived from China with > a quite expensive ($500) brick of black/shu puerh. The seller of the brick, > a native Chinese and a long-time business partner of her stated that this > shu puerh was from 1970. She said that he even showed her some kind of > certificate of authenticity (which she anyway could not verify as she does > not know any Chinese). > > I am wondering what kind of puerh did she buy. Did she get screwed, or is it > some kind of real rarity? Is it a cooked/shu puerh at all? Please take a > look of these pictures, and if you have any clues about the age, type and > factory of this brick, please share it with me! You can see the pictures > he > > http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...u_brick_01.jpg > http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...u_brick_02.jpg > > Unfortunately this is the highest resolution Photobucket allows to upload. > If anyone would like to see the pictures in a higher resolution whith a > readable text, let me know, and I can mail it to anyone. The big green letters say Dian (i.e., Yunnan) Pu Cha. I'm certainly no expert in authenticating supposedly old packaging for Pu'er, but I was surprised to see the informality of "Pu Cha" rather than Pu'er Cha". Sorry, but the smaller characters are too much of a struggle for me at the moment. /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1970 is 39 years ago.
go look at a newspaper from 40 years ago, it yellows and dries out. imho, the packaging is less than 2 years old. there is no evidence of aging, or drying of the paper. i do not know about the cake itself, but the package is new. |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the second picture clearly shows the paper is still pliable, no
wrinkles or creases but smooth curves. still has a new shine to the paper. almost like it is waxed |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You might be right, but then have a look at this one at Taobao:
http://tinyurl.com/d8sxop The paper looks as fresh and pliable like the one I have posted. Nevertheless the seller states that it is an old brick from the 70'es, and asks for it the huge amount of 11.440Y ($1700). So who knows for sure?... Gyorgy > skrev i en meddelelse ... > the second picture clearly shows the paper is still pliable, no > wrinkles or creases but smooth curves. > still has a new shine to the paper. almost like it is waxed > > |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The packaging and brick looks too crisp to me. At best it was sold as
a 70s meaning before Dec 31 1979 and some from Hong Kong still around, supposedly. The resolution isnt good enough for me to decipher the characters under the Star. Im sure a native speaker could make more of the inscription. I posted a couple of days ago The Strangest Factory Name where I mentioned Yun Pu. It was odd to me Pu by itself like here. Jim On Feb 27, 4:27 pm, Lewis Perin > wrote: > "Gyorgy Sajo" > writes: > > Dear Friends, > > > I have learned from this estimated group, among others from Mike Petro's > > excellent postings, that there have not been any black/shu puerhs prior to > > 1973, when the Kunming Tea Factory made the first test production of black > > puerh. > > > Therefore I got very surprised when a friend of mine arrived from China with > > a quite expensive ($500) brick of black/shu puerh. The seller of the brick, > > a native Chinese and a long-time business partner of her stated that this > > shu puerh was from 1970. She said that he even showed her some kind of > > certificate of authenticity (which she anyway could not verify as she does > > not know any Chinese). > > > I am wondering what kind of puerh did she buy. Did she get screwed, or is it > > some kind of real rarity? Is it a cooked/shu puerh at all? Please take a > > look of these pictures, and if you have any clues about the age, type and > > factory of this brick, please share it with me! You can see the pictures > > he > > >http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...u_brick_01.jpg > >http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...u_brick_02.jpg > > > Unfortunately this is the highest resolution Photobucket allows to upload. > > If anyone would like to see the pictures in a higher resolution whith a > > readable text, let me know, and I can mail it to anyone. > > The big green letters say Dian (i.e., Yunnan) Pu Cha. I'm certainly > no expert in authenticating supposedly old packaging for Pu'er, but I > was surprised to see the informality of "Pu Cha" rather than Pu'er > Cha". Sorry, but the smaller characters are too much of a struggle > for me at the moment. > > /Lew > --- > Lew Perin / |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is the TaoBao link. Ill try to make sense this weekend unless
someone beats me to it. ~3000Y is $375. http://tinyurl.com/cdta2w Jim On Feb 28, 7:53 am, wrote: > The packaging and brick looks too crisp to me. At best it was sold as > a 70s meaning before Dec 31 1979 and some from Hong Kong still > around, supposedly. The resolution isnt good enough for me to > decipher the characters under the Star. Im sure a native speaker > could make more of the inscription. I posted a couple of days ago The > Strangest Factory Name where I mentioned Yun Pu. It was odd to me Pu > by itself like here. > > Jim > > On Feb 27, 4:27 pm, Lewis Perin > wrote: > > > "Gyorgy Sajo" > writes: > > > Dear Friends, > > > > I have learned from this estimated group, among others from Mike Petro's > > > excellent postings, that there have not been any black/shu puerhs prior to > > > 1973, when the Kunming Tea Factory made the first test production of black > > > puerh. > > > > Therefore I got very surprised when a friend of mine arrived from China with > > > a quite expensive ($500) brick of black/shu puerh. The seller of the brick, > > > a native Chinese and a long-time business partner of her stated that this > > > shu puerh was from 1970. She said that he even showed her some kind of > > > certificate of authenticity (which she anyway could not verify as she does > > > not know any Chinese). > > > > I am wondering what kind of puerh did she buy. Did she get screwed, or is it > > > some kind of real rarity? Is it a cooked/shu puerh at all? Please take a > > > look of these pictures, and if you have any clues about the age, type and > > > factory of this brick, please share it with me! You can see the pictures > > > he > > > >http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...u_brick_01.jpg > > >http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...u_brick_02.jpg > > > > Unfortunately this is the highest resolution Photobucket allows to upload. > > > If anyone would like to see the pictures in a higher resolution whith a > > > readable text, let me know, and I can mail it to anyone. > > > The big green letters say Dian (i.e., Yunnan) Pu Cha. I'm certainly > > no expert in authenticating supposedly old packaging for Pu'er, but I > > was surprised to see the informality of "Pu Cha" rather than Pu'er > > Cha". Sorry, but the smaller characters are too much of a struggle > > for me at the moment. > > > /Lew > > --- > > Lew Perin / |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, pulled the trigger too soon. Some more expensive, some less.
http://tinyurl.com/brb6du Jim On Feb 28, 9:14 am, wrote: > Here is the TaoBao link. Ill try to make sense this weekend unless > someone beats me to it. ~3000Y is $375. > > http://tinyurl.com/cdta2w > > Jim |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you Jim, great job! Yes, this is the one, at least the package is
exactly the same. So there is no need to upload a picture in higher resolution. I have translated the first page that you have linked to with Babelfish. It says that it is a ripe puerh brick that was made in the 70'es (and not in 1970 proper) by the "Courageous sea" factory, which corresponds to the Meng Hai Tea Factory according to Mike Petro's list of "Common Factory Names". Is it correct? Gyorgy > skrev i en meddelelse ... > Sorry, pulled the trigger too soon. Some more expensive, some less. > > http://tinyurl.com/brb6du > > Jim > > On Feb 28, 9:14 am, wrote: >> Here is the TaoBao link. Ill try to make sense this weekend unless >> someone beats me to it. ~3000Y is $375. >> >> http://tinyurl.com/cdta2w >> >> Jim |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 28, 11:14*am, wrote:
> Here is the TaoBao link. *Ill try to make sense this weekend unless > someone beats me to it. *~3000Y is $375. > > http://tinyurl.com/cdta2w > > Jim Not to take away from the excellent legwork you've done, but I think 3000Y is more like $440 USD right now... so ~$500 seems close and not as ripped off as it first seemed. - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not to mention the ones that are offered for 11.440Y, which is almost $1700!
Of course one can not know if anyone is ready to pay this price for one brick of old tea leaves, but if it is a realistic price, than $500 was a steal. Or a proof for that the brick is a fake... :-) Gyorgy "dxt178" > skrev i en meddelelse ... On Feb 28, 11:14 am, wrote: > Here is the TaoBao link. Ill try to make sense this weekend unless > someone beats me to it. ~3000Y is $375. > > http://tinyurl.com/cdta2w > > Jim Not to take away from the excellent legwork you've done, but I think 3000Y is more like $440 USD right now... so ~$500 seems close and not as ripped off as it first seemed. - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was 2005 exchange rates when I got my last shipment from China
Post. The declining dollar is never more apparent when exchanged. Ive never been able to figure out why the dollar was always weak against the pound. Thats another country that is bankrupt like us and doesnt know it. Jim On Feb 28, 11:26 am, dxt178 > wrote: > On Feb 28, 11:14 am, wrote: > > > Here is the TaoBao link. Ill try to make sense this weekend unless > > someone beats me to it. ~3000Y is $375. > > >http://tinyurl.com/cdta2w > > > Jim > > Not to take away from the excellent legwork you've done, but I think > 3000Y is more like $440 USD right now... so ~$500 seems close and not > as ripped off as it first seemed. > > - Dominic |
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All the time I see products coming out of China that aren't what they say
they are. I was looking at some transmitting tubes at a local electronics shop... they said MADE IN USA in big letters on the side. I asked the dealer if that was true and he said, "No, I buy them in China, they just put that stuff on them." Unless you see some other outside reason to believe it, I would not believe that any product from China is what the label claims it to be. If you believe that just because the tea comes with a certificate saying it's from 1970 that it actually is, I have some Rolexes to sell you. >I am wondering what kind of puerh did she buy. Did she get screwed, or is it >some kind of real rarity? Is it a cooked/shu puerh at all? Please take a >look of these pictures, and if you have any clues about the age, type and >factory of this brick, please share it with me! You can see the pictures >he Break it up and drink it. If it tastes good, it's good. How much is good tasting tea worth to you? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
And now, from the 1970's... | General Cooking | |||
1970 Lafite 3L | Wine | |||
1970 wine to buy now? (!) | Wine | |||
TN Echezeaux 1970, DRC | Wine | |||
Loose green puerh and pressed teas that are not puerh. | Tea |