In article <4jkaa2lkvch7u1msplniktf8gpvduufob4@iad>,
Animals say Buh-bye to Star > wrote:

> Starlet was fond of affirming in her usual diva style, whenever the
> subject of vegetarianism or Peta came up, that she was "the top of the
> food chain," and could therefore eat anything and anyone she felt
> like. It's a privilege that comes with being at the top, after all.

Yeah; so she was right on this subject. What's the problem?

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:56:15 -0700, Anim8rFSK wrote:

> In article <4jkaa2lkvch7u1msplniktf8gpvduufob4@iad>,
> Animals say Buh-bye to Star > wrote:
>
> > Starlet was fond of affirming in her usual diva style, whenever the
> > subject of vegetarianism or Peta came up, that she was "the top of the
> > food chain," and could therefore eat anything and anyone she felt
> > like. It's a privilege that comes with being at the top, after all.
>
> Yeah; so she was right on this subject. What's the problem?

Nuttin' honey. Now she can go back to being a lawyer and make a
couple more bazillion dollars.

--

Ham and eggs.
A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.