Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Embassy, September 28th, 2005
By Sarah McGregor New, 'Moral' Food Aid Policy Takes Effect New strategy aimed more at the world's poor and less at Canadian farmers, gives Canada the moral high ground at upcoming WTO summit In a new policy praised by NGOs and agricultural groups, much of Canada's food aid budget will now benefit the starving people of the Third World before it is used to enhance Canadian agribusinesses. Developing countries will source half of Canada's food aid budget in a strategy the International Cooperation Minister says will nourish hungry people abroad more quickly and pressure other nations to follow suit. Non-governmental organizations had been campaigning tirelessly to change the long-standing federal policy that withheld 90 per cent of the food aid budget for Canadian producers. Only 10 per cent could be purchased overseas. The new policy allows for a 50-50 split of Candian food aid. Last week, those NGOs applauded the development agency for the more flexible quota, saying it will cut transportation costs, boost agriculture sales in poor nations, and get food into empty stomachs rapidly. The policy takes effect immediately, and it has already been used by at least one organization. The Canadian Foodgrains Bank, anticipating the new rules, decided this summer to purchase $1.25 million worth of maize from South Africa's bumper crop to address the drought-induced food crises in Zambia and Malawi. "We are pleased the government responded to our requests to make the necessary changes," says Jim Cornelius, Executive Director of the Winnipeg-based organization. Aileen Carroll, the minister in charge of the Canadian International Development Agency calls the new rule a "victory" and an important policy change. "I think it's taking us in a direction that we have to go" The minister says her agency had been seriously exploring the possibility of loosening restrictions since she took office about 21-months ago. But what clinched the deal was a nod from Canada's powerful agriculture sector that it didn't oppose the loss in business. The country's total food aid programs amounts this year to about $130 million, however it only accounts for about 0.3 per cent of total agriculture sales. "The Canadian Federation of Agriculture adopted a resolution [this] summer that we would support [the policy] because it makes the food aid dollar better and still provides an outlet for some surplus," says Marvin Shauf, vice-president of the CFA, which represents 200,000 Canadian farmers. "It also sets an example for the rest of the world to use food aid where food aid is needed, not as a marketing tool." With that, Ms. Carroll won the support of Canada's Agriculture Minister, Andy Mitchell. But International Trade also had concerns about retooling important policies during the ongoing Doha round of the World Trade Organization. (Interestingly, last week's announcement coincided with a debate that exploded at the WTO over whether the U.S. food aid program, which gives donations in the form of food rather than cash, is a domestic subsidy. Also last week, the U.S. Senate dismissed a White House bill to allow more food aid to be bought abroad, according to the New York Times.) In Ottawa, Conservative International Development Critic Helena Guergis says she fully supports untying aid. However, she questions why Canada would eliminate a possible ace card in the negotiations leading to December's WTO Ministerial Summit in Hong Kong. "What else are they bringing to the table then?" she asks. Ms. Carroll says, quite the opposite, it will put Canada on the moral high ground and bolster it as a country that plays by the rules. "It reinforces Canada's position that we don't subsidize... that we don't have trade-distorting policies," she says. Mark Fried, communications and advocacy coordinator of Oxfam Canada, agrees. "I don't see it as much of a bargaining chip," he says. "The rules are not about tied aid, but the concern is rather the use of food aid in order to undercut exporters, which is a very different problem." He adds: "I think (the Canadian WTO delegation) can get more mileage out of doing the right thing and showing the U.S. that it can be done politically." And so, International Trade Minister Jim Peterson was satisfied. "Canada is showing that we're ready to be leaders in food aid reform," he says, in an email statement to Embassy. "Canada's decision to untie food aid is about acting and not just talking." The policy change is also thought to have other positive spin-offs. A list of countries eligible to source the food aid includes least developed, low-income and lower-income countries. It purposefully bypasses nations known to provide trade-distorting domestic assistance. That measure will also act as an incentive to farmers in the developing world to reap bigger harvests that could be bought with the Canadian dime, says Stu Clark, a policy analyst with the Foodgrains Bank. It was virtually impossible to find any negative reaction to the news, and Mr. Fried adds that the 50 per cent threshold is fair because purchasing food in Canada sometimes makes sense. Trevor Rowe, spokesperson for the North American arm of the World Food Program, says Canada is a significant contributor to the UN agency and the country's latest move will help alleviate food shortages in southern Africa. "It means we will be able to respond faster. It plays a critical role in ensuring that the crisis doesn't get out of hand," he says. The Zambian Charg=E9 d'Affaires in Ottawa, Lubasi Nyambe, who just arrived last month to open a new embassy, says he supports the policy change because it will encourage the continent to spread foodstuffs from areas of high productivity to low. "We will be able to source within the country and that is the most important thing," he says "It will help in the redistribution of food because there are some areas of surplus and some areas of deficit." Ms. Carroll says to prepare for more positive changes as the agency rolls out its promises in the International Policy Statement published in April. "It shows that we are determined to implement the IPS," she says. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|