I'm sorry, but the two homosexuals who won the opportunity to host the
new cooking show, simply are creepy. They look like they touch each
others cocks between takes. The skinny guy has bug eyes, and is so
effete it is laughable. I'm sure they finger bang each other before
they prep. CHRIST! I hope this show falls flat, and they can suck each
other in private instead of homo-ing it up, and ruining the world for
the rest of us. I think one of them had cancer anyway. Most likely ***
cancer. You homos, pleae, keep it to yourselves. ****ing faggots.

-Monika

wrote:
> I'm sorry, but the two homosexuals who won the opportunity to host the
> new cooking show, simply are creepy. They look like they touch each
> others cocks between takes. The skinny guy has bug eyes, and is so
> effete it is laughable. I'm sure they finger bang each other before
> they prep. CHRIST! I hope this show falls flat, and they can suck each
> other in private instead of homo-ing it up, and ruining the world for
> the rest of us. I think one of them had cancer anyway. Most likely ***
> cancer. You homos, pleae, keep it to yourselves. ****ing faggots.
>
> -Monika
>


What do you think the "g" stands for in gmail? (Hint: it ain't google)

Best regards,
Bob

Bob,

You are no doubt a fag apologist.

Best regards,
Monika

In article . com>,
wrote:

> Bob,
>
> You are no doubt a fag apologist.
>
> Best regards,
> Monika

I'm very sorry to hear of your problem. Does your medical plan cover
mental therapy? I would suggest giving that a try. It's not good to go
through life with so much anger.

Dan,

Are you the host of the show? Isn't the one of hosts name Dan?
I hope this is you so I can tell you personally to go back
to your *** hospice. Gays should not be allowed to handle food
for public consumption, let alone host a TV show. Jesus, Food TV
is awful, awful, awful. You will burn in hell. Fag. I hope
you are the host. Your TV show will fail. The majority of americans
will not tolerate a *** show. Die in sin fag.

On Wed 28 Sep 2005 08:23:50p, wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> Dan,
>
> Are you the host of the show? Isn't the one of hosts name Dan?
> I hope this is you so I can tell you personally to go back
> to your *** hospice. Gays should not be allowed to handle food
> for public consumption, let alone host a TV show. Jesus, Food TV
> is awful, awful, awful. You will burn in hell. Fag. I hope
> you are the host. Your TV show will fail. The majority of americans
> will not tolerate a *** show. Die in sin fag.

<plonk>

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
_____________________________

http://tinypic.com/dzijap.jpg

Popie-In-The-Bowl

On 28 Sep 2005 20:23:50 -0700, wrote:

>Dan,
>
>Are you the host of the show? Isn't the one of hosts name Dan?
>I hope this is you so I can tell you personally to go back
>to your *** hospice. Gays should not be allowed to handle food
>for public consumption, let alone host a TV show. Jesus, Food TV
>is awful, awful, awful. You will burn in hell. Fag. I hope
>you are the host. Your TV show will fail. The majority of americans
>will not tolerate a *** show. Die in sin fag.

Gee. I didn't know any of Fred Phelps' family were named Monika.

<plonk>
--
-denny-

"I don't like it when a whole state starts
acting like a marital aid."
"John R. Campbell" in a Usenet post.

wrote:
> The majority of americans will not tolerate a *** show. Die in sin fag.

This must be why Queer Eye For The Straight Guy did so bad in the
ratings department. Oh, wait, it got record ratings for the network it
was on (Bravo). You must be an idiot, as you have been proven wrong
BEFORE you started talking. I suggest start taking your medication
again. You are apparently unable to deal with reality without it.

Dean G.

wrote:
> Bob,
>
> You are no doubt a fag apologist.
>
> Best regards,
> Monika
>


Actually, I agree with you regarding the "keep it to yourselves" part.
However, as Queen Gertrude said (_Hamlet_, Act III scene II), "The lady
doth protest too much."

I know the metaphor kind of falls apart when I refer to you as "the
lady", but I think you get the idea, Lesbo. ["g"mail. How obvious can
you get?]

With apologies to any real *** people here,
Bob

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:33:06 -0500, zxcvbob wrote:

> ["g"mail. How obvious can you get?]

HEY! I'm not amused.

sf replied to zxcvbob:

>> ["g"mail. How obvious can you get?]
>
> HEY! I'm not amused.

So he hit a g spot? ;-)

Bob

wrote:
> Bob,
>
> You are no doubt a fag apologist.
>
> Best regards,
> Monika
>

And you are a bigot and probably a cheerleader for hate crimes against
the *** community.


jim

And you are, no doubt, an unapologetic shit.

Good Bye, Monika. It is good not to know you.

No regards,
Dean G.

Stop feeding the trolls. You are giving credibility to something ugly
and malicious and I know that I am doing the same, but I hope that
this will be the end of it.

Margaret Suran wrote:

> Stop feeding the trolls. You are giving credibility to something ugly
> and malicious and I know that I am doing the same, but I hope that this
> will be the end of it.

I'd really like to know the best way to cook trolls? I'm thinking
roasted but maybe braised would be ok too?

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:02:01 -0400, ~patches~
> wrote:

>Margaret Suran wrote:
>
>> Stop feeding the trolls. You are giving credibility to something ugly
>> and malicious and I know that I am doing the same, but I hope that this
>> will be the end of it.
>
>I'd really like to know the best way to cook trolls? I'm thinking
>roasted but maybe braised would be ok too?

En brochette, of course!

Boron

You obviously shouldn't be watching this show. You are clearly and totally
out of line.

--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
_____________________________

http://tinypic.com/dzijap.jpg

Popie-In-The-Bowl

In article >,
Wayne Boatwright > wrote:

> You obviously shouldn't be watching this show. You are clearly and totally
> out of line.

I know this is a cooking newsgroup, but do trolls really need to be fed
so much here. I think not.

> wrote in message
oups.com...
> I'm sorry, but the two homosexuals who won the opportunity to host the
> new cooking show, simply are creepy. They look like they touch each
> others cocks between takes. The skinny guy has bug eyes, and is so
> effete it is laughable. I'm sure they finger bang each other before
> they prep. CHRIST! I hope this show falls flat, and they can suck each
> other in private instead of homo-ing it up, and ruining the world for
> the rest of us. I think one of them had cancer anyway. Most likely ***
> cancer. You homos, pleae, keep it to yourselves. ****ing faggots.


It's not new. Three Dog Bakery was quite a concept. Two *** guys making
designer dog biscuits.

Paul

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
news:ZIJ_e.17031$SG3.6888@trnddc07...
>
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> > I'm sorry, but the two homosexuals who won the opportunity to host the
> > new cooking show, simply are creepy. They look like they touch each
> > others cocks between takes. The skinny guy has bug eyes, and is so
> > effete it is laughable. I'm sure they finger bang each other before
> > they prep. CHRIST! I hope this show falls flat, and they can suck each
> > other in private instead of homo-ing it up, and ruining the world for
> > the rest of us. I think one of them had cancer anyway. Most likely ***
> > cancer. You homos, pleae, keep it to yourselves. ****ing faggots.
>
>
> It's not new. Three Dog Bakery was quite a concept. Two *** guys making
> designer dog biscuits.

Oh almost forgot - I'm not legitimizing your homphobia. Just remembering a
very unusual show.

Paul

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 04:07:23 GMT, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> news:ZIJ_e.17031$SG3.6888@trnddc07...
> >
> >
> > It's not new. Three Dog Bakery was quite a concept. Two *** guys making
> > designer dog biscuits.
>
> Oh almost forgot - I'm not legitimizing your homphobia. Just remembering a
> very unusual show.
>
It was a show? I never saw it, so I thought it was a real bakery!

wrote:
> I'm sorry, [snip nonsense]

Why don't you sign your usual name to this? Ashamed? Afraid? -aem

writes:

>I think one of them had cancer anyway. Most likely *** cancer.

Well, I have just decided that you don't exist. Stupidity like this
has to create a black hole of DUH that you can't escape from.

Stacia

wrote:
> I'm sorry, but the two homosexuals who won the opportunity to host the
> new cooking show, simply are creepy. They look like they touch each
> others cocks between takes. The skinny guy has bug eyes, and is so
> effete it is laughable. I'm sure they finger bang each other before
> they prep. CHRIST! I hope this show falls flat, and they can suck each
> other in private instead of homo-ing it up, and ruining the world for
> the rest of us. I think one of them had cancer anyway. Most likely ***
> cancer. You homos, pleae, keep it to yourselves. ****ing faggots.
>
> -Monika

Honey, *** bashing went out in the 70's...

-L.

Oh dear, your post was amusing, even clever, but you quickly ruined your
cred by descending so quickly into trashy homophobic pap. Too bad,
best,
Richard.
> wrote in message
oups.com...
> I'm sorry, but the two homosexuals who won the opportunity to host the
> new cooking show, simply are creepy. They look like they touch each
> others cocks between takes. The skinny guy has bug eyes, and is so
> effete it is laughable. I'm sure they finger bang each other before
> they prep. CHRIST! I hope this show falls flat, and they can suck each
> other in private instead of homo-ing it up, and ruining the world for
> the rest of us. I think one of them had cancer anyway. Most likely ***
> cancer. You homos, pleae, keep it to yourselves. ****ing faggots.
>
> -Monika
>

r
> wrote in message
oups.com...
> I'm sorry, but the two homosexuals who won the opportunity to host the
> new cooking show, simply are creepy. They look like they touch each
> others cocks between takes. The skinny guy has bug eyes, and is so
> effete it is laughable. I'm sure they finger bang each other before
> they prep. CHRIST! I hope this show falls flat, and they can suck each
> other in private instead of homo-ing it up, and ruining the world for
> the rest of us. I think one of them had cancer anyway. Most likely ***
> cancer. You homos, pleae, keep it to yourselves. ****ing faggots.
>
> -Monika
>

wrote:

> I'm sorry, but the two homosexuals who won the opportunity to host the
> new cooking show,


Begone, trolling homophobe.

*plonk*


Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

In article .com>,
says...
> I'm sorry, but the two homosexuals who won the opportunity to host the
> new cooking show, simply are creepy. They look like they touch each
> others cocks between takes. The skinny guy has bug eyes, and is so
> effete it is laughable. I'm sure they finger bang each other before
> they prep. CHRIST! I hope this show falls flat, and they can suck each
> other in private instead of homo-ing it up, and ruining the world for
> the rest of us. I think one of them had cancer anyway. Most likely ***
> cancer. You homos, pleae, keep it to yourselves. ****ing faggots.
>
> -Monika

Take your homophobic tripe elsewhere. I think it's very progressive for
Food Network.

But I don't see much chemistry between the two of them.

And miss thing, look around you. I bet that in your circle of friends
that are at least two or more *** people and you don't even know.

Stupid homophobic troll:

What's *** cooking? Special ingredients?
Happy recipes? Cute cookware?
Laughing while dicing?

gloria p

Puester wrote:
> Stupid homophobic troll:
>
> What's *** cooking? Special ingredients?
> Happy recipes? Cute cookware?
> Laughing while dicing?

*** cooking is the same as heterosexual cooking but with a whole lot
more crisco.

Sheldon

Sheldon wrote:

> *** cooking is the same as heterosexual cooking but with a whole lot
> more crisco.

....and the glaze goes on the doughnuts *after* the game of ring toss.
(Sorry, I couldn't resist. It was all I could do to withhold the "spotted
dick" and "hot cross buns" jokes.)

Bob