Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 May 2021 15:33:05 -0600, wolfy's new skateboard
> wrote: >On 5/29/2021 2:57 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >> On Sat, 29 May 2021 14:26:11 -0600, wolfy's new skateboard >> > wrote: >> >>> On 5/29/2021 1:29 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>>> >>>> Extreme right-wing, idolizing Christianity, angry with everybody. >>>> You're the Boner Troll, aren't you? >>>> >>> I've no particular truck with any given iteration of Christianity, save >>> for the chronicled historical lessons and basic truths as told in the >>> Holy Bible. >> >> Uh oh, don't tell me you're a creationist on top of everything else. > >Intelligent design encompasses all manner of creations - even terraforming. > >Elon believes in that - do you? > >https://www.space.com/elon-musk-nuke...raforming.html > >Nuking Mars is still on Elon Musk's wish list, it would seem. > >Four years ago, the SpaceX founder and CEO went on "The Late Show With >Stephen Colbert" and discussed a strategy for making the Red Planet more >livable: detonating nuclear bombs over its poles. The explosions would >vaporize a fair chunk of Mars' ice caps, liberating enough water vapor >and carbon dioxide — both potent greenhouse gases — to warm up the >planet substantially, the idea goes. > >This terraforming concept is apparently still bouncing around in Musk's >head, because on Thursday (Aug. 15), he tweeted, seemingly unprompted, >"Nuke Mars!" A few hours later, he followed up with another tweet: >"T-shirt soon." > >>> And a goodly number of those have been repackaged to fit group dogmas or >>> used as building blocks for new faiths like LDS. >>> >>> But I also have no animus in my heart for anyone's religion or faith as >>> long as it respects basic human liberty and the right to exercise free will. >>> >>> Iow, I'm an American to the core, something that brings out the very >>> worst in foreign secular trollers and always will. >> >> "American to the core"... lol. You tell 'em, buddy! > >Gladly, "lil matey"... >>> It's lamentable that you lot, the Kiwis and Canucks too, lacked the >>> spine to break free of the reptilian royalist criminals that remain in >>> conquering ownership of your "commonwealth" pseudo-nations; but you may >>> continue to express your embarrassment by taking ill-crafted and >>> uneducated potshots at our milieu while your own rights vanish like the >>> droplets of a summer shower on hot asphalt. >> >> Very flowery. > >As transient as a petunia your rights are... > >> I thope (that's think and hope) that Australia will >> choose to become a republic when the Queen passes away. > >She's already been deposed. > >>> And, if the situation calls for it, I can be whichever troll de jour >>> your topical cowardice and factual abandonment requires to fuel your >>> insipid inanities here. >>> >>> Suffice to say, with literally thousands of SPAM posts to your credit, >>> the notion that you posses even the slightest moral high ground or >>> intellectual credibility is a ruse played out only upon your own >>> controlling neediness and attendant rhetorical rim shots. >> >> You know that those spam posts are not from me. > >No one knows any such thing - you made sure of that. > >> They're either from >> you or from another troll. You know that because you're not stupid >> and/or because you produce them yourself. > >Wow, when caught out for SPAMing relentlessly your next best defense is >to blame it on ME? > >That's almost amusing, but really just pathetic. > > >>> You're not really a very smart man, or even one with time to become so. >> >> I'll have to learn to live with that ![]() > >I suspect that accommodation was one made at birth for you. > >>> But you do inspire enmity wherever you go, so at least consistency is a >>> trait you can lay claim to when this is all said and done. >>> >>> That's a thing then mate, do hold on tightly to it. >> >> Enmity? > >It's your byword here. > >> I was having a civil discussion with you and you started >> calling me names. So don't you enmity me. > >You were having a "civil" deny/delete and obfuscate - and nothing more. > >Now it's on your terms troll, enjoy. Ask them, theyre here. "You can stop saying that now. Thank you." -- This is a message from the other Dave Smith. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT I RIPPED an HOUR Nordictracking! Did it well too! | General Cooking | |||
I got a job today | General Cooking | |||
Today's fun | Preserving | |||
Today | Diabetic |