On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>
>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
>
> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
>
> Happy now?
>

I'm not going to be happy until I can spend more time with John. Naked
on the beach with him is just wonderful. It is not perverted when two
people love each other and love being naked together.

--Bryan

On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, bwiansimmons wrote:

> On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>>
>>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
>>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
>>
>> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
>>
>> Happy now?
>>
>>
> I[...] with John. Naked on the beach with him

That's a pretty ****-poor imitation of Bryan. You should have included a
segment from his new failed kayaking e-book "Payback Mountain", where he
grossly inflates the effects of decades-old misunderstandings and plays
them out here for our daily edification.

On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 1:49:36 PM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, bwiansimmons wrote:
>
> > On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> >> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
> >>
> >>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
> >>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
> >>
> >> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
> >>
> >> Happy now?
> >>
> >>
> > I[...] with John. Naked on the beach with him
>
> That's a pretty ****-poor imitation of Bryan. You should have included a
> segment from his new failed kayaking e-book "Payback Mountain", where he
> grossly inflates the effects of decades-old misunderstandings and plays
> them out here for our daily edification.
>
Mike, you are the failed writer, and I do mean *the* failed writer. That's
not surprising since you have problems with reading comprehension.
Plus, you're not very witty. You're mostly just really boring.
>
--Bryan

Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, bwiansimmons wrote:
>
>> On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>>>
>>>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
>>>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
>>>
>>> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
>>>
>>> Happy now?
>>>
>>>
>> I[...] with John. Naked on the beach with him
>
> That's a pretty ****-poor imitation of Bryan. You should have included a
> segment from his new failed kayaking e-book "Payback Mountain", where he
> grossly inflates the effects of decades-old misunderstandings and plays
> them out here for our daily edification.
>
>

I prefer a failed children's ebook. Maybe I am biased because I
don't have any children.

Still a childrens author must have some appeal.

Even if the setting is in da LOO, with a pedophile male nurse.

On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 4:36:57 PM UTC-5, Hank Rogers wrote:
> Mike Duffy wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, bwiansimmons wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
> >>>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
> >>>
> >>> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
> >>>
> >>> Happy now?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I[...] with John. Naked on the beach with him
> >
> > That's a pretty ****-poor imitation of Bryan. You should have included a
> > segment from his new failed kayaking e-book "Payback Mountain", where he
> > grossly inflates the effects of decades-old misunderstandings and plays
> > them out here for our daily edification.
> >
> >
> I prefer a failed children's ebook. Maybe I am biased because I
> don't have any children.
>
> Still a childrens author must have some appeal.
>
> Even if the setting is in da LOO, with a pedophile male nurse.
>
It'd be hilarious to do a spoof children's picture book that had a
pedophile male nurse. I've thought for a few years that it would be
funny to do over the top spoofs, have them vanity pressed, then put
them on the shelves in book stores and especially the book
departments of Wal Mart, Target, etc. where they'd more than likely
go unbought, but then they'd end up in a secondary market.
Of course, you'd need to have lots of excess money.

One idea I found especially funny was romance novels that in every
way seemed like the standard fare, but have the sex scenes involve
anal sex. Imagine the titles, *Duked By an Earl*, or *The Viscount's
Shameful Desire*, or *To Please a Greek Prince*, or *To Go Where
the Duchess Would Not*, or *The Rear Admiral Who Loved Me*.

Everything would seem completely standard to the genre until the
point of the sex scene. Then I thought, there'd likely be a small
subset of readers who'd find it appealing, and that was even more
amusing.

The self help book genre could also be spoofed. The book(s)
could give absurd advice for turning around an unsuccessful
life.

Then there's supernatural spoofs. *The Secret Zodiac* could use
real star maps, but made up constellations, and posit that the
persons in power have used this alternative astrology for centuries
to maintain their power and guide the course of human history,
citing bogus claims about the past.

The best one is a book that unifies the mythologies of the Mormons
and the Church of Scientology, where their cosmologies are merely
misunderstood approximations of the one true faith, and in the end
days they will merge, and the second degree chosen ones, the
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh Day Adventists, will assume their
rightful place as middle managers in God's new kingdom.
>
--Bryan

On Thu, 20 May 2021 16:19:55 -0700 (PDT), Bryan Simmons
> wrote:

>On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 4:36:57 PM UTC-5, Hank Rogers wrote:
>> Mike Duffy wrote:
>> > On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, bwiansimmons wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
>> >>>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
>> >>>
>> >>> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
>> >>>
>> >>> Happy now?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> I[...] with John. Naked on the beach with him
>> >
>> > That's a pretty ****-poor imitation of Bryan. You should have included a
>> > segment from his new failed kayaking e-book "Payback Mountain", where he
>> > grossly inflates the effects of decades-old misunderstandings and plays
>> > them out here for our daily edification.
>> >
>> >
>> I prefer a failed children's ebook. Maybe I am biased because I
>> don't have any children.
>>
>> Still a childrens author must have some appeal.
>>
>> Even if the setting is in da LOO, with a pedophile male nurse.
>>
>It'd be hilarious to do a spoof children's picture book that had a
>pedophile male nurse.

If done right, it could be hilarious. But humor is verboten in this
retarded age of woke, so nobody would stock it on their shelves, much
less print it.

On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 6:38:23 PM UTC-5, Jim Lahey wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2021 16:19:55 -0700 (PDT), Bryan Simmons
> > wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 4:36:57 PM UTC-5, Hank Rogers wrote:
> >> Mike Duffy wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, bwiansimmons wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> >> >>> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
> >> >>>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Happy now?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >> I[...] with John. Naked on the beach with him
> >> >
> >> > That's a pretty ****-poor imitation of Bryan. You should have included a
> >> > segment from his new failed kayaking e-book "Payback Mountain", where he
> >> > grossly inflates the effects of decades-old misunderstandings and plays
> >> > them out here for our daily edification.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> I prefer a failed children's ebook. Maybe I am biased because I
> >> don't have any children.
> >>
> >> Still a childrens author must have some appeal.
> >>
> >> Even if the setting is in da LOO, with a pedophile male nurse.
> >>
> >It'd be hilarious to do a spoof children's picture book that had a
> >pedophile male nurse.
> If done right, it could be hilarious. But humor is verboten in this
> retarded age of woke, so nobody would stock it on their shelves, much
> less print it.
>
Well yeah, if you called the Down Syndrome pediatric client retarded.
>
--Bryan

On Thu, 20 May 2021 16:54:27 -0700 (PDT), Bryan Simmons
> wrote:

>On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 6:38:23 PM UTC-5, Jim Lahey wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 May 2021 16:19:55 -0700 (PDT), Bryan Simmons
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 4:36:57 PM UTC-5, Hank Rogers wrote:
>> >> Mike Duffy wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, bwiansimmons wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>> >> >>> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
>> >> >>>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Happy now?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >> I[...] with John. Naked on the beach with him
>> >> >
>> >> > That's a pretty ****-poor imitation of Bryan. You should have included a
>> >> > segment from his new failed kayaking e-book "Payback Mountain", where he
>> >> > grossly inflates the effects of decades-old misunderstandings and plays
>> >> > them out here for our daily edification.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> I prefer a failed children's ebook. Maybe I am biased because I
>> >> don't have any children.
>> >>
>> >> Still a childrens author must have some appeal.
>> >>
>> >> Even if the setting is in da LOO, with a pedophile male nurse.
>> >>
>> >It'd be hilarious to do a spoof children's picture book that had a
>> >pedophile male nurse.
>> If done right, it could be hilarious. But humor is verboten in this
>> retarded age of woke, so nobody would stock it on their shelves, much
>> less print it.
>>
>Well yeah, if you called the Down Syndrome pediatric client retarded.

LOL. You seriously think you could publish a humorous take on a
pedophile male nurse in this day and age of intolerance?

On 5/20/2021 7:19 PM, Bryan Simmons wrote:
> On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 4:36:57 PM UTC-5, Hank Rogers wrote:
>> Mike Duffy wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, bwiansimmons wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
>>>>>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
>>>>>
>>>>> Happy now?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I[...] with John. Naked on the beach with him
>>>
>>> That's a pretty ****-poor imitation of Bryan. You should have included a
>>> segment from his new failed kayaking e-book "Payback Mountain", where he
>>> grossly inflates the effects of decades-old misunderstandings and plays
>>> them out here for our daily edification.
>>>
>>>
>> I prefer a failed children's ebook. Maybe I am biased because I
>> don't have any children.
>>
>> Still a childrens author must have some appeal.
>>
>> Even if the setting is in da LOO, with a pedophile male nurse.
>>
> It'd be hilarious to do a spoof children's picture book that had a
> pedophile male nurse. I've thought for a few years that it would be
> funny to do over the top spoofs, have them vanity pressed, then put
> them on the shelves in book stores and especially the book
> departments of Wal Mart, Target, etc. where they'd more than likely
> go unbought, but then they'd end up in a secondary market.
> Of course, you'd need to have lots of excess money.
>
> One idea I found especially funny was romance novels that in every
> way seemed like the standard fare, but have the sex scenes involve
> anal sex. Imagine the titles, *Duked By an Earl*, or *The Viscount's
> Shameful Desire*, or *To Please a Greek Prince*, or *To Go Where
> the Duchess Would Not*, or *The Rear Admiral Who Loved Me*.
>
> Everything would seem completely standard to the genre until the
> point of the sex scene. Then I thought, there'd likely be a small
> subset of readers who'd find it appealing, and that was even more
> amusing.
>
> The self help book genre could also be spoofed. The book(s)
> could give absurd advice for turning around an unsuccessful
> life.
>
> Then there's supernatural spoofs. *The Secret Zodiac* could use
> real star maps, but made up constellations, and posit that the
> persons in power have used this alternative astrology for centuries
> to maintain their power and guide the course of human history,
> citing bogus claims about the past.
>
> The best one is a book that unifies the mythologies of the Mormons
> and the Church of Scientology, where their cosmologies are merely
> misunderstood approximations of the one true faith, and in the end
> days they will merge, and the second degree chosen ones, the
> Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh Day Adventists, will assume their
> rightful place as middle managers in God's new kingdom.
>>
> --Bryan
>

Oh man, that would be funny to put pervert kiddie books in the store. I
wonder if they will just put you in the loony bin or jail. I think jail
would really be funny when the boys find out what you did. Take some KY
with you.

--Bryan

On Friday, May 21, 2021 at 1:38:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> On 5/20/2021 7:19 PM, Bryan Simmons wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 4:36:57 PM UTC-5, Hank Rogers wrote:
> >> Mike Duffy wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, bwiansimmons wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
> >>>>>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Happy now?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I[...] with John. Naked on the beach with him
> >>>
> >>> That's a pretty ****-poor imitation of Bryan. You should have included a
> >>> segment from his new failed kayaking e-book "Payback Mountain", where he
> >>> grossly inflates the effects of decades-old misunderstandings and plays
> >>> them out here for our daily edification.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I prefer a failed children's ebook. Maybe I am biased because I
> >> don't have any children.
> >>
> >> Still a childrens author must have some appeal.
> >>
> >> Even if the setting is in da LOO, with a pedophile male nurse.
> >>
> > It'd be hilarious to do a spoof children's picture book that had a
> > pedophile male nurse. I've thought for a few years that it would be
> > funny to do over the top spoofs, have them vanity pressed, then put
> > them on the shelves in book stores and especially the book
> > departments of Wal Mart, Target, etc. where they'd more than likely
> > go unbought, but then they'd end up in a secondary market.
> > Of course, you'd need to have lots of excess money.
> >
> > One idea I found especially funny was romance novels that in every
> > way seemed like the standard fare, but have the sex scenes involve
> > anal sex. Imagine the titles, *Duked By an Earl*, or *The Viscount's
> > Shameful Desire*, or *To Please a Greek Prince*, or *To Go Where
> > the Duchess Would Not*, or *The Rear Admiral Who Loved Me*.
> >
> > Everything would seem completely standard to the genre until the
> > point of the sex scene. Then I thought, there'd likely be a small
> > subset of readers who'd find it appealing, and that was even more
> > amusing.
> >
> > The self help book genre could also be spoofed. The book(s)
> > could give absurd advice for turning around an unsuccessful
> > life.
> >
> > Then there's supernatural spoofs. *The Secret Zodiac* could use
> > real star maps, but made up constellations, and posit that the
> > persons in power have used this alternative astrology for centuries
> > to maintain their power and guide the course of human history,
> > citing bogus claims about the past.
> >
> > The best one is a book that unifies the mythologies of the Mormons
> > and the Church of Scientology, where their cosmologies are merely
> > misunderstood approximations of the one true faith, and in the end
> > days they will merge, and the second degree chosen ones, the
> > Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh Day Adventists, will assume their
> > rightful place as middle managers in God's new kingdom.
> >>
> > --Bryan
> >
> Oh man, that would be funny to put pervert kiddie books in the store. I
> wonder if they will just put you in the loony bin or jail. I think jail
> would really be funny when the boys find out what you did. Take some KY
> with you.
>
I wouldn't put *that one* in a store. I just thought of that right before I
wrote it, but it reminded me of the other spoofs I'd thought up previously.
Do you have a problem with any of the others?
>
> --Bryan
>
--Bryan

On Fri, 21 May 2021 12:36:02 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:

> I wouldn't put *that one* in a store.

You wouldn't 'do' anything other than type on your computer, as usual.

This time with someone making fun of your name and posting lack of style.

Someone I can only agree with, but will not guess who.

On Thu, 20 May 2021 16:36:48 -0500, Hank Rogers wrote:

> I prefer a failed children's ebook. Maybe I am biased because

Read mine. Of course I am biased because I wrote it.

I do not want to say a lot about it because I do not want to ruin the
ending for anyone. Realistically, though, that seems not to become likely.

I've been neglecting to put my web-site url in my messages these last few
years. I suppose I need to re-fresh my narcissistic tendencies.

http://mduffy.x10host.com/dogdayafternoon.htm

On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:03:41 -0400, wrote:

>On 5/19/2021 9:20 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:06:42 -0700, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>>
>>> The operative word is, "the." If I am *the* pervert,
>>> then he isn't *the* pervert. That's grade school
>>
>> Okay, Bryan. You can both each be *a* pervert.
>>
>> Happy now?
>>
>
>I'm not going to be happy until I can spend more time with John. Naked
>on the beach with him is just wonderful. It is not perverted when two
>people love each other and love being naked together.
>
>--Bryan
Ask them, theyre here. "You can stop saying that now. Thank you."

On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 11:03:48 AM UTC-5, wrote:
....
> I'm not going to be happy until I can spend more time with John. Naked
> on the beach with him is just wonderful. It is not perverted when two
> people love each other and love being naked together.
>
> --Bryan

It's more an issue of mutual consent. And you are correct Bryan. Being naked at several Naked Hippie Floats were among my fondest memories.

John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

On Thu, 20 May 2021 16:23:14 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe >
wrote:

>On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 11:03:48 AM UTC-5, wrote:
>...
>> I'm not going to be happy until I can spend more time with John. Naked
>> on the beach with him is just wonderful. It is not perverted when two
>> people love each other and love being naked together.
>>
>> --Bryan
>
>It's more an issue of mutual consent. And you are correct Bryan. Being naked at several Naked Hippie Floats were among my fondest memories.
>
>John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

You still manage to amaze me with how stupid you really are.
Seriously.

On 5/20/2021 7:23 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
> On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 11:03:48 AM UTC-5, wrote:
> ...
>> I'm not going to be happy until I can spend more time with John. Naked
>>
>> --Bryan
>
> It's more an issue of mutual consent. And you are correct Bryan. Being naked at several Naked Hippie Floats were among my fondest memories.
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>

THIS is how desperate for attention you are from Bryan, John. You
didn't even notice it's a nymshifter and a fake post? Posted from
@neodome.net and the name which is obvious to ALL is 'bwians", not
"bryan". Good lord, you really are that oblivious. These days Bryan
gets naked with his wife. You get naked with your Nordic Track. No one
cares about either occurrence.

At the very least, figure out how to recognize the shifters and ignore
them. And don't say it is Google's fault. It's your desperation and
lack of self-control that keeps it all going like the freaking'
Energizer Bunny.

Jill

On Thu, 20 May 2021 20:43:47 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 5/20/2021 7:23 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 11:03:48 AM UTC-5, wrote:
>> ...
>>> I'm not going to be happy until I can spend more time with John. Naked
>>>
>>> --Bryan
>>
>> It's more an issue of mutual consent. And you are correct Bryan. Being naked at several Naked Hippie Floats were among my fondest memories.
>>
>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>
>
>THIS is how desperate for attention you are from Bryan, John. You
>didn't even notice it's a nymshifter and a fake post? Posted from
and the name which is obvious to ALL is 'bwians", not
>"bryan". Good lord, you really are that oblivious. These days Bryan
>gets naked with his wife. You get naked with your Nordic Track. No one
>cares about either occurrence.
>
>At the very least, figure out how to recognize the shifters and ignore
>them. And don't say it is Google's fault. It's your desperation and
>lack of self-control that keeps it all going like the freaking'
>Energizer Bunny.
>
>Jill

A more detailed reason from Jill why I'm stunned at your stupidity,
John Kuthe. And ONLY DAYS AGO YOU REPEATEDLY TOLD BRYAN TO STOP
STAKLING YOU! What a complete imbecile you are

jmcquown wrote:

> THIS is how desperate for attention you are from Bryan, John. You
> didn't even notice it's a nymshifter and a fake post? Posted from
> @neodome.net and the name which is obvious to ALL is 'bwians", not
> "bryan". Good lord, you really are that oblivious. These days Bryan
> gets naked with his wife. You get naked with your Nordic Track. No
> one cares about either occurrence.
>
> At the very least, figure out how to recognize the shifters and
> ignore them. And don't say it is Google's fault. It's your
> desperation and lack of self-control that keeps it all going like the
> freaking' Energizer Bunny.

You know who also keep him going? The people who keep replying to his
every word, such as... uhm... Jill McQuown.

--
The real Brazzza posts with uni-berlin.de - individual.net

Brazzza wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
>> THIS is how desperate for attention you are from Bryan, John. You
>> didn't even notice it's a nymshifter and a fake post? Posted from
>> @neodome.net and the name which is obvious to ALL is 'bwians", not
>> "bryan". Good lord, you really are that oblivious. These days Bryan
>> gets naked with his wife. You get naked with your Nordic Track. No
>> one cares about either occurrence.
>>
>> At the very least, figure out how to recognize the shifters and
>> ignore them. And don't say it is Google's fault. It's your
>> desperation and lack of self-control that keeps it all going like the
>> freaking' Energizer Bunny.
>
> You know who also keep him going? The people who keep replying to his
> every word, such as... uhm... Jill McQuown.
>

But you got a nice whiff of her ass, right master doctor?


Have another!

On 21 May 2021 02:53:33 GMT, "Brazzza" >
wrote:

>jmcquown wrote:
>
>> THIS is how desperate for attention you are from Bryan, John. You
>> didn't even notice it's a nymshifter and a fake post? Posted from
>> @neodome.net and the name which is obvious to ALL is 'bwians", not
>> "bryan". Good lord, you really are that oblivious. These days Bryan
>> gets naked with his wife. You get naked with your Nordic Track. No
>> one cares about either occurrence.
>>
>> At the very least, figure out how to recognize the shifters and
>> ignore them. And don't say it is Google's fault. It's your
>> desperation and lack of self-control that keeps it all going like the
>> freaking' Energizer Bunny.
>
>You know who also keep him going? The people who keep replying to his
>every word, such as... uhm... Jill McQuown.


Why do you talk like a faggot and not like a real man, Bruce?

On 5/20/2021 4:23 PM, KOOKthe is a sicked perverted asshole:

> It's

Shut the **** up, you sick pervert. You need to have your face rammed
in.