In article . Net>,
says...
>
>
> There are three people over seventy in this house. We haven?t taken the
> shots yet but will when we don?t have to jump through hoops, or my wife
> and/or SIL schedule us. The good news is that everyone who takes the vaccine
> before us lessens our chances of catching the virus.

No, it doesn't. A vaccinated person can still catch (and pass on)
the virus, the vaccine just reduces the severity of illness and makes
them less likely to need hospital care. Vaccination means you're more
likely to survive it so will reduce the death rate.
here.

Don't delay vaccination, because as more vaccinated wrongly
immagine they are now immune, they will be less careful and put you at
higher risk.

Janet UK

On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 08:49:50 -0000, Janet > wrote:

>In article . Net>,
says...
>>
>>
>> There are three people over seventy in this house. We haven?t taken the
>> shots yet but will when we don?t have to jump through hoops, or my wife
>> and/or SIL schedule us. The good news is that everyone who takes the vaccine
>> before us lessens our chances of catching the virus.
>
> No, it doesn't. A vaccinated person can still catch (and pass on)
>the virus, the vaccine just reduces the severity of illness and makes
>them less likely to need hospital care. Vaccination means you're more
>likely to survive it so will reduce the death rate.
>here.
>
> Don't delay vaccination, because as more vaccinated wrongly
>immagine they are now immune, they will be less careful and put you at
>higher risk.

Clearly, you are unaware of the fact that the vaccination also
contains a substance that makes you embrace Marxism!

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 2/28/2021 4:30 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 08:49:50 -0000, Janet > wrote:
>
>> In article . Net>,
>> says...
>>>
>>>
>>> There are three people over seventy in this house. We haven?t taken the
>>> shots yet but will when we don?t have to jump through hoops, or my wife
>>> and/or SIL schedule us. The good news is that everyone who takes the vaccine
>>> before us lessens our chances of catching the virus.
>>
>> No, it doesn't. A vaccinated person can still catch (and pass on)
>> the virus, the vaccine just reduces the severity of illness and makes
>> them less likely to need hospital care. Vaccination means you're more
>> likely to survive it so will reduce the death rate.
>> here.
>>
>> Don't delay vaccination, because as more vaccinated wrongly
>> immagine they are now immune, they will be less careful and put you at
>> higher risk.
>
> Clearly, you are unaware of the fact that the vaccination also
> contains a substance that makes you embrace Marxism!
>

True, but Bill Gates will be controlling us with the chip implanted with
it.

On 2/28/2021 10:20 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 2/28/2021 4:30 AM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 08:49:50 -0000, Janet > wrote:
>>
>>> In article . Net>,
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are three people over seventy in this house. We haven?t taken the
>>>> shots yet but will when we don?t have to jump through hoops, or my wife
>>>> and/or SIL schedule us. The good news is that everyone who takes the
>>>> vaccine
>>>> before us lessens our chances of catching the virus.
>>>
>>> Â*Â*Â* No, it doesn't.Â* A vaccinated person can still catch (and pass on)
>>> the virus, the vaccine just reduces the severity of illnessÂ* andÂ* makes
>>> them less likely to need hospital care. Vaccination means you're more
>>> likely to survive it so will reduce the death rate.
>>> here.
>>>
>>> Â*Â*Â* Don't delay vaccination, becauseÂ* as more vaccinated wrongly
>>> immagine they are now immune, they will be less careful andÂ* put you at
>>> higher risk.
>>
>> Clearly, you are unaware of the fact that the vaccination also
>> contains a substance that makes you embrace Marxism!
>>
>
> True, but Bill Gates will be controlling us with the chip implanted with
> it.

Have you read Dean Koontz' Jane Hawk novels ? Some truly scary shit
in there , most of which is possible with current technology .
--
Snag
In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
We shot them

Snag wrote:
> Have you read Dean Koontz' Jane Hawk novels ? Some truly scary shit in
> there , most of which is possible with current technology .

I have several old Dean Koontz books. Good author. I liked his books
better than Stephen King's books. I used to tell people that Dean Koontz
wrote like a grown up Stephen King.

I've never heard of Jane Hawk. Maybe I should try one.

On 3/1/2021 5:26 AM, Gary wrote:
> Â*Snag wrote:
>> Â* Have you read Dean Koontz' Jane Hawk novels ? Some truly scary shit in
>> there , most of which is possible with current technology .
>
> I have several old Dean Koontz books. Good author. I liked his books
> better than Stephen King's books. I used to tell people that Dean Koontz
> wrote like a grown up Stephen King.
>
> I've never heard of Jane Hawk. Maybe I should try one.
>
>
>
>
>
>

It's a series of 5 novels about Jane's fight against evil oppressive
technology in her quest for justice , truth , and freedom . The
surveillance technology in the book is possible (and probably in use)
right now ...
--
Snag
In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
We shot them

Gary wrote:

> Snag wrote:
> > Have you read Dean Koontz' Jane Hawk novels ? Some truly scary
> > shit in there , most of which is possible with current technology .
>
> I have several old Dean Koontz books. Good author. I liked his books
> better than Stephen King's books. I used to tell people that Dean
> Koontz wrote like a grown up Stephen King.
>
> I've never heard of Jane Hawk. Maybe I should try one.

Same feeling. Steven King books generally are not very good with rare
exception. They DO make good movies overall.

On 3/1/2021 8:53 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Gary wrote:
>
>> Snag wrote:
>>> Have you read Dean Koontz' Jane Hawk novels ? Some truly scary
>>> shit in there , most of which is possible with current technology .
>>
>> I have several old Dean Koontz books. Good author. I liked his books
>> better than Stephen King's books. I used to tell people that Dean
>> Koontz wrote like a grown up Stephen King.
>>
>> I've never heard of Jane Hawk. Maybe I should try one.
>
> Same feeling. Steven King books generally are not very good with rare
> exception. They DO make good movies overall.
>

King did a collaboration with Peter Straub called Black House that was
very good . Wife and I are big Koontz fans , we have somewhere around
(or over...) of his novels in our book collection .
--
Snag
In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
We shot them

On 3/1/2021 9:53 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Gary wrote:
>
>> Snag wrote:
>>> Have you read Dean Koontz' Jane Hawk novels ? Some truly scary
>>> shit in there , most of which is possible with current technology .
>>
>> I have several old Dean Koontz books. Good author. I liked his books
>> better than Stephen King's books. I used to tell people that Dean
>> Koontz wrote like a grown up Stephen King.
>>
>> I've never heard of Jane Hawk. Maybe I should try one.
>
> Same feeling. Steven King books generally are not very good with rare
> exception. They DO make good movies overall.

In the early 1980's, I saw him live here for a lecture at the Oceanfront
Library (I think). It was mainly his biography and for aspiring authors.
I seem to remember that he said he didn't start writing until he was
about age 40. First manuscript was sent out to book publishers and all
of them rejected it. Rather than give up, he sent it back to the same
companies a second time. Second time, one picked it up. That started his
career as a successful author.

Also...that night he started out by saying, "Do excuse me. I have a cold
but don't worry, I brought plenty of vitamin B with me."

He opened up his sports jacket to reveal 6 pockets sewn inside and each
one contained a can of beer. LOL Vitamin B(eer) That was funny.

A couple of days later in the newspaper's "Letters to the Editor," it
was all complaints about his "offensive" beer joke.

"There were children there! What kind of example was that to show?"

I was there and didn't see any children in the crowd. Even if there was
a few, big deal. It's the parents job to explain things to their children.

And this "politically correct" nonsense has only gotten worse and worse
ever since.

On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 11:20:02 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 2/28/2021 4:30 AM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 08:49:50 -0000, Janet > wrote:
>>
>>> In article . Net>,
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are three people over seventy in this house. We haven?t taken the
>>>> shots yet but will when we don?t have to jump through hoops, or my wife
>>>> and/or SIL schedule us. The good news is that everyone who takes the vaccine
>>>> before us lessens our chances of catching the virus.
>>>
>>> No, it doesn't. A vaccinated person can still catch (and pass on)
>>> the virus, the vaccine just reduces the severity of illness and makes
>>> them less likely to need hospital care. Vaccination means you're more
>>> likely to survive it so will reduce the death rate.
>>> here.
>>>
>>> Don't delay vaccination, because as more vaccinated wrongly
>>> immagine they are now immune, they will be less careful and put you at
>>> higher risk.
>>
>> Clearly, you are unaware of the fact that the vaccination also
>> contains a substance that makes you embrace Marxism!
>>
>
>True, but Bill Gates will be controlling us with the chip implanted with
>it.

You sarcasm isn't too far off the mark, actually. And guess who is
buying up as much of America's agricultural land right now? Bill is a
busy busy man these days, interestingly all his interests appear to be
setting himself up in the food, medical spheres across the
world.....with a foot in every critical door he needs for future
domination.

Even India has told Bill to **** off from their country and not come
back. But western counties have all got their tongue straight up his
ass hole, asking "is that deep enough, sir?"
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-i...-idUSKBN15N13K

--

The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Sunday, February 28, 2021 at 6:20:10 AM UTC-10, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 2/28/2021 4:30 AM, Bruce wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 08:49:50 -0000, Janet > wrote:
> >
> >> In article >,
> >> says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> There are three people over seventy in this house. We haven?t taken the
> >>> shots yet but will when we don?t have to jump through hoops, or my wife
> >>> and/or SIL schedule us. The good news is that everyone who takes the vaccine
> >>> before us lessens our chances of catching the virus.
> >>
> >> No, it doesn't. A vaccinated person can still catch (and pass on)
> >> the virus, the vaccine just reduces the severity of illness and makes
> >> them less likely to need hospital care. Vaccination means you're more
> >> likely to survive it so will reduce the death rate.
> >> here.
> >>
> >> Don't delay vaccination, because as more vaccinated wrongly
> >> immagine they are now immune, they will be less careful and put you at
> >> higher risk.
> >
> > Clearly, you are unaware of the fact that the vaccination also
> > contains a substance that makes you embrace Marxism!
> >
> True, but Bill Gates will be controlling us with the chip implanted with
> it.
Bill Gates has been controlling yoose guys since the late 80's with the chip implanted in yoose computers running Windows OS. He don't need no stinkin' implants! He's made yoose guys fearful of a world without Windows. Now that's what I call mind control!

On 2021 Feb 28, , Janet wrote
(in .net>):

> Don't delay vaccination, because as more vaccinated wrongly
> immagine they are now immune, they will be less careful and put you at
> higher risk.

I haven´t done the research, but I suspected as much. We´re still doing
facemasks, hand washing and social distancing. We don´t expect to stop for
a long time, even when vaccinated.
But thanks! I already intuitively believed what you just posted.
Good news! I broke a three tooth bridge in front during this debacle, and
nobody can see me smile :-)

leo

On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 08:49:50 -0000, Janet > wrote:

> No, it doesn't. A vaccinated person can still catch (and pass on)
>the virus, the vaccine just reduces the severity of illness and makes
>them less likely to need hospital care. Vaccination means you're more
>likely to survive it so will reduce the death rate.
>here.

LOL. Just AMAZING how this ONE virus is somehow different to all other
viruses in the way it's managed and treated. All the rules change,
just for one virus. lol.

> Don't delay vaccination, because as more vaccinated wrongly
>immagine they are now immune, they will be less careful and put you at
>higher risk.

Yes. Don't delay. Stay scared at all times!

--

The real Bruce posts with Eternal September