On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:25 -0800 (PST), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 3:08:51 AM UTC-10, Snag wrote:
>> On 2/27/2021 12:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:

>> >
>> > You might want to revise your figures on the fatality rate. It is currently about 1.8%. The numbers I'm using is 28,411,273 cases, 508,127 deaths.
>> >
>>
>> I believe if you investigate that , you'll find those numbers were
>> produced before they changed the way they counted fatalities - those who
>> died "with" vs those that died "from" .
>> --
>> Snag
>> In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
>> We shot them
>
>The number of people that died with Covid-19 = 508,127
>The number of people that died from Covid-19 = 11,400
>That leaves about half a million people with unexplained deaths? That's awfully weird.


I am betting the intersection of sets of those who think the Covid
death numbers are so low and that Orange Face won the election is 100%

On 2/27/2021 12:10 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:25 -0800 (PST), dsi1
> > wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 3:08:51 AM UTC-10, Snag wrote:
>>> On 2/27/2021 12:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> You might want to revise your figures on the fatality rate. It is currently about 1.8%. The numbers I'm using is 28,411,273 cases, 508,127 deaths.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I believe if you investigate that , you'll find those numbers were
>>> produced before they changed the way they counted fatalities - those who
>>> died "with" vs those that died "from" .
>>> --
>>> Snag
>>> In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
>>> We shot them
>>
>> The number of people that died with Covid-19 = 508,127
>> The number of people that died from Covid-19 = 11,400
>> That leaves about half a million people with unexplained deaths? That's awfully weird.
>
>
> I am betting the intersection of sets of those who think the Covid
> death numbers are so low and that Orange Face won the election is 100%
>


The proper way to look at this is years of life lost. It would put
things into proper perspective.

On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:36:42 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:

>On 2/27/2021 12:10 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:25 -0800 (PST), dsi1
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 3:08:51 AM UTC-10, Snag wrote:
>>>> On 2/27/2021 12:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You might want to revise your figures on the fatality rate. It is currently about 1.8%. The numbers I'm using is 28,411,273 cases, 508,127 deaths.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believe if you investigate that , you'll find those numbers were
>>>> produced before they changed the way they counted fatalities - those who
>>>> died "with" vs those that died "from" .
>>>> --
>>>> Snag
>>>> In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
>>>> We shot them
>>>
>>> The number of people that died with Covid-19 = 508,127
>>> The number of people that died from Covid-19 = 11,400
>>> That leaves about half a million people with unexplained deaths? That's awfully weird.
>>
>>
>> I am betting the intersection of sets of those who think the Covid
>> death numbers are so low and that Orange Face won the election is 100%
>>
>
>
>The proper way to look at this is years of life lost. It would put
>things into proper perspective.

Make up whatever you want when you want to play. Why would you want to
look at it that way? Why do you think that is proper perspective?

That isn't a stat that is used to discuss disease mortality/morbidity,
but have fun with your data.

Since other diseases are not analyzed this way, it'd be hard to do
comparisons.

On 2/27/2021 12:46 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:36:42 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/2021 12:10 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:25 -0800 (PST), dsi1
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 3:08:51 AM UTC-10, Snag wrote:
>>>>> On 2/27/2021 12:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You might want to revise your figures on the fatality rate. It is currently about 1.8%. The numbers I'm using is 28,411,273 cases, 508,127 deaths.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe if you investigate that , you'll find those numbers were
>>>>> produced before they changed the way they counted fatalities - those who
>>>>> died "with" vs those that died "from" .
>>>>> --
>>>>> Snag
>>>>> In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
>>>>> We shot them
>>>>
>>>> The number of people that died with Covid-19 = 508,127
>>>> The number of people that died from Covid-19 = 11,400
>>>> That leaves about half a million people with unexplained deaths? That's awfully weird.
>>>
>>>
>>> I am betting the intersection of sets of those who think the Covid
>>> death numbers are so low and that Orange Face won the election is 100%
>>>
>>
>>
>> The proper way to look at this is years of life lost. It would put
>> things into proper perspective.
>
> Make up whatever you want when you want to play. Why would you want to
> look at it that way? Why do you think that is proper perspective?
>
> That isn't a stat that is used to discuss disease mortality/morbidity,
> but have fun with your data.
>
> Since other diseases are not analyzed this way, it'd be hard to do
> comparisons.
>

you are wrong.

On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:00:22 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:

>On 2/27/2021 12:46 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:36:42 -0800, Taxed and Spent
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/27/2021 12:10 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:25 -0800 (PST), dsi1
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 3:08:51 AM UTC-10, Snag wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/27/2021 12:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might want to revise your figures on the fatality rate. It is currently about 1.8%. The numbers I'm using is 28,411,273 cases, 508,127 deaths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe if you investigate that , you'll find those numbers were
>>>>>> produced before they changed the way they counted fatalities - those who
>>>>>> died "with" vs those that died "from" .
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Snag
>>>>>> In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
>>>>>> We shot them
>>>>>
>>>>> The number of people that died with Covid-19 = 508,127
>>>>> The number of people that died from Covid-19 = 11,400
>>>>> That leaves about half a million people with unexplained deaths? That's awfully weird.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am betting the intersection of sets of those who think the Covid
>>>> death numbers are so low and that Orange Face won the election is 100%
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The proper way to look at this is years of life lost. It would put
>>> things into proper perspective.
>>
>> Make up whatever you want when you want to play. Why would you want to
>> look at it that way? Why do you think that is proper perspective?
>>
>> That isn't a stat that is used to discuss disease mortality/morbidity,
>> but have fun with your data.
>>
>> Since other diseases are not analyzed this way, it'd be hard to do
>> comparisons.
>>
>
>you are wrong.

Go on- prove me wrong. Something from the CDC, perhaps?

On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:00:22 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:

>On 2/27/2021 12:46 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:36:42 -0800, Taxed and Spent
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/27/2021 12:10 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:25 -0800 (PST), dsi1
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 3:08:51 AM UTC-10, Snag wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/27/2021 12:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might want to revise your figures on the fatality rate. It is currently about 1.8%. The numbers I'm using is 28,411,273 cases, 508,127 deaths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe if you investigate that , you'll find those numbers were
>>>>>> produced before they changed the way they counted fatalities - those who
>>>>>> died "with" vs those that died "from" .
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Snag
>>>>>> In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
>>>>>> We shot them
>>>>>
>>>>> The number of people that died with Covid-19 = 508,127
>>>>> The number of people that died from Covid-19 = 11,400
>>>>> That leaves about half a million people with unexplained deaths? That's awfully weird.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am betting the intersection of sets of those who think the Covid
>>>> death numbers are so low and that Orange Face won the election is 100%
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The proper way to look at this is years of life lost. It would put
>>> things into proper perspective.
>>
>> Make up whatever you want when you want to play. Why would you want to
>> look at it that way? Why do you think that is proper perspective?
>>
>> That isn't a stat that is used to discuss disease mortality/morbidity,
>> but have fun with your data.
>>
>> Since other diseases are not analyzed this way, it'd be hard to do
>> comparisons.
>>
>
>you are wrong.

I apologize and have now seen some YLL calcs.

On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 10:10:55 AM UTC-10, Boron Elgar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 10:55:25 -0800 (PST), dsi1
> > wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 3:08:51 AM UTC-10, Snag wrote:
> >> On 2/27/2021 12:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>
> >> >
> >> > You might want to revise your figures on the fatality rate. It is currently about 1.8%. The numbers I'm using is 28,411,273 cases, 508,127 deaths.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I believe if you investigate that , you'll find those numbers were
> >> produced before they changed the way they counted fatalities - those who
> >> died "with" vs those that died "from" .
> >> --
> >> Snag
> >> In 1775, the British demanded we give them our guns.
> >> We shot them
> >
> >The number of people that died with Covid-19 = 508,127
> >The number of people that died from Covid-19 = 11,400
> >That leaves about half a million people with unexplained deaths? That's awfully weird.
> I am betting the intersection of sets of those who think the Covid
> death numbers are so low and that Orange Face won the election is 100%

OTOH, it might be better to live in a fantasy world than face reality. The reality is that a large part of people who get this virus might suffer from a wide variety of long term problems - including heart, lung, and brain, problems. Perhaps it will turn many Americans into raving lunatics - thus clearing the way for El Presidente de por Vida Trump in 2024