On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 13:52:45 -0600,
wrote:


1: Hmm, my server apparently accepts binaries on non-binary groups.
2: Hope you enjoyed your cauliflower dinner.

On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:11:42 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 13:52:45 -0600,
wrote:
>
>
>1: Hmm, my server apparently accepts binaries on non-binary groups.
>2: Hope you enjoyed your cauliflower dinner.

I eat A LOT of cauliflower, sorry if the picture was a little blurry
but I really was in a hurry to eat it.

It made sesame chicken taste poorly. well to be honest they actually
tasted very similar but the cauliflower version had very little fat
and no cholesterol, no gluten so it was in the end so so much more
enjoyable

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:25:34 -0600,
wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:11:42 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 13:52:45 -0600,
wrote:
>>
>>
>>1: Hmm, my server apparently accepts binaries on non-binary groups.
>>2: Hope you enjoyed your cauliflower dinner.
>
>I eat A LOT of cauliflower, sorry if the picture was a little blurry
>but I really was in a hurry to eat it.
>
>It made sesame chicken taste poorly. well to be honest they actually
>tasted very similar but the cauliflower version had very little fat
>and no cholesterol, no gluten so it was in the end so so much more
>enjoyable

What did it

On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:25:34 -0600,
wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:11:42 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 13:52:45 -0600,
wrote:
>>
>>
>>1: Hmm, my server apparently accepts binaries on non-binary groups.
>>2: Hope you enjoyed your cauliflower dinner.
>
>I eat A LOT of cauliflower, sorry if the picture was a little blurry
>but I really was in a hurry to eat it.
>
>It made sesame chicken taste poorly. well to be honest they actually
>tasted very similar but the cauliflower version had very little fat
>and no cholesterol, no gluten so it was in the end so so much more
>enjoyable

What did it NOT have compared to normal seseame chicken? I'm guessing
some carbs? Don't worry so much about dietary cholesterol,
particularly if you're eating fairly low carb.

On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:00:33 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:25:34 -0600,
wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:11:42 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 13:52:45 -0600,
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>1: Hmm, my server apparently accepts binaries on non-binary groups.
>>>2: Hope you enjoyed your cauliflower dinner.
>>
>>I eat A LOT of cauliflower, sorry if the picture was a little blurry
>>but I really was in a hurry to eat it.
>>
>>It made sesame chicken taste poorly. well to be honest they actually
>>tasted very similar but the cauliflower version had very little fat
>>and no cholesterol, no gluten so it was in the end so so much more
>>enjoyable
>
>What did it NOT have compared to normal seseame chicken? I'm guessing
>some carbs? Don't worry so much about dietary cholesterol,
>particularly if you're eating fairly low carb.

Well there is this
Chicken Breast: 284 Calories
calories: 284.
Protein: 53.4 grams.
Carbs: 0 grams.
Fat: 6.2 grams.

A serving is 1 cup, or about 100 grams, of chopped cauliflower. One
serving of raw or cooked cauliflower has:
25 calories.
0 grams of fat.
5 grams of carbohydrates.
2 grams of dietary fiber.
2 grams of sugar.
2 grams of protein.
30 milligrams of sodium.


I am telling you now that carbs mean nothing. I mean nothing at all.
Cutting or increasing your carbs does nothing. That is at least for
me. I added A LOT of carbs I mean A LOT! I must have added 30-50 grams
of carbs and I have lost 11 lbs in the last three weeks.

It was the cut in fats and cholesterol and the addition of fiber is
what I believe helped me out.

All of these numbers for both groups do not count the sauce or sesame
seeds.

You must also understand the differences in the different kinds of
carbs. There are the natural carbs such as those found in fruits and
veg and then there are refined carbs like those found in processed
foods like sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juices, pastries, white
bread, white pasta, white rice and others

There is one bad thing about me eating so much cauliflower though....

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

"Jeßus" wrote:
>
> wrote:
> > added A LOT of carbs I mean A LOT! I must have added 30-50 grams
> > of carbs and I have lost 11 lbs in the last three weeks.
>
> That may or may not have anything to do with why you lost weight in
> that period of time.

Losing weight is a simple formula of eating less calories
than you burn. Many fad diets advovate mostly protein,
mostly fat, even mostly carbs. They all work but none are
healthy in the long run.

Best diet is to eat a good balance and just reduce your
calories per day. Eat way less to lose weight and then
increase same to maintain.

Also when dieting and even as we age, more exercise is
important too.

On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:10:28 -0500, Gary > wrote:

>"Jeßus" wrote:
>>
>> wrote:
>> > added A LOT of carbs I mean A LOT! I must have added 30-50 grams
>> > of carbs and I have lost 11 lbs in the last three weeks.
>>
>> That may or may not have anything to do with why you lost weight in
>> that period of time.
>
>Losing weight is a simple formula of eating less calories
>than you burn.

It is... but your description is a little oversimplified.

>Many fad diets advovate mostly protein,
>mostly fat, even mostly carbs. They all work but none are
>healthy in the long run.

Calories and carbs are not at all the same when it comes to weight
loss and health. Both terms are something of an oversimplification.
'Carbs' from a potato (for example) is a lot different than from white
bread.

>Best diet is to eat a good balance and just reduce your
>calories per day. Eat way less to lose weight and then
>increase same to maintain.

Yes, I agree (with the above caveat).

>Also when dieting and even as we age, more exercise is
>important too.

You'll never lose weight in a meaningful, REAL way unless you also get
sufficient exercise.

On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 08:44:03 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:10:28 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>
>>Losing weight is a simple formula of eating less calories
>>than you burn.
>
>It is... but your description is a little oversimplified.
>
>>Many fad diets advovate mostly protein,
>>mostly fat, even mostly carbs. They all work but none are
>>healthy in the long run.
>
>Calories and carbs are not at all the same when it comes to weight
>loss and health. Both terms are something of an oversimplification.
>'Carbs' from a potato (for example) is a lot different than from white
>bread.
>
>>Best diet is to eat a good balance and just reduce your
>>calories per day. Eat way less to lose weight and then
>>increase same to maintain.
>
>Yes, I agree (with the above caveat).
>
>>Also when dieting and even as we age, more exercise is
>>important too.
>
>You'll never lose weight in a meaningful, REAL way unless you also get
>sufficient exercise.

I can lose 10 kilos (20 lbsses?) without exercising. But maybe that's
not real and meaningful.