Christmas is NOT about Santa Claus, reindeer, ornaments, and gifts.
That's what the greedy businesses want it to be so they can get wealthy.
We do not go to gift stores, decorate, or waste electricity on colored
lights. We do not kill trees to put in our home. We do not do Black
Friday, or do "Christmas shopping". We do not associate with Santa Claus
actors, or watch movies about that fake side of the holiday.

Christmas IS about Jesus Christ. That means peace, love, family and
happiness. My family does not give store bought gifts. But we share
things we make. These are often foods, since we all need to eat. But
they can also be toys, things to wear, pets, or items to put in our
home.

I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
candy etc.

What can I make?

Recipes appreciated.

On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:57:07 -0600, Marilyn >
wrote:


>I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
>time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
>candy etc.

Cookies and candy. LOL.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anci...aelite_cuisine

I don't think you really want to follow through with this idea, nobody
will enjoy the food, assuming you can even source authentic
ingredients.

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 05:02:28 +0700, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:57:07 -0600, Marilyn >
>wrote:
>
>
>>I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
>>time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
>>candy etc.
>
>Cookies and candy. LOL.
>
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anci...aelite_cuisine
>
>I don't think you really want to follow through with this idea, nobody
>will enjoy the food, assuming you can even source authentic
>ingredients.

She could at least serve coca cola. I'm sure Jesus drank that. It
would be unpatriotic not to.

On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:57:07 -0600, Marilyn >
wrote:

>Christmas is NOT about Santa Claus, reindeer, ornaments, and gifts.
>That's what the greedy businesses want it to be so they can get wealthy.
>We do not go to gift stores, decorate, or waste electricity on colored
>lights. We do not kill trees to put in our home. We do not do Black
>Friday, or do "Christmas shopping". We do not associate with Santa Claus
>actors, or watch movies about that fake side of the holiday.
>
>Christmas IS about Jesus Christ. That means peace, love, family and
>happiness. My family does not give store bought gifts. But we share
>things we make. These are often foods, since we all need to eat. But
>they can also be toys, things to wear, pets, or items to put in our
>home.
>
>I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
>time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
>candy etc.
>
>What can I make?
>
>Recipes appreciated.

Well if you want to make and prepare foods that are jesus themed then
that is incredibly simple... Get your entire family around a table and
imagine a table full of food then imagine yourself eating it then
imagine yourself as being completely full. Then lie to each other and
say that was the best meal ever. Then proceed to murder each other (or
at least imagine you murder each other because jesus never lived or
died so have fun!!

PS. Jesus never had a time in history the catholic church made the
entire thing up. Jesus was a mythical being recreated in a Jewish
image that was based on the Egyptian god Horus.

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 05:02:28 +0700, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:57:07 -0600, Marilyn >
>wrote:
>
>
>>I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
>>time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
>>candy etc.
>
>Cookies and candy. LOL.
>
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anci...aelite_cuisine
>
>I don't think you really want to follow through with this idea, nobody
>will enjoy the food, assuming you can even source authentic
>ingredients.


Well since jesus was completely a imagined being then any foods that
could be imagined would be suitable...
For instance I have a pumpkin growing in my herb garden that I never
planted and it is constantly weeping dark chocolate... In another herb
garden I have a watermelon sized steak that is perfectly grilled and
it just keeps getting bigger and bigger! I even have a coffee tree
that does not produce sap it produces coffee by the cup with 1 sugar
and 1 cream already mixed in and stirred an not too hot but definitely
not cold.

I have one of those little kiddy pools and every morning there are
fresh cauliflower that appear like magic...

Ya see imagined things can be fun, or in the case of a god/jesus they
may be evil and murder you, rape your children, rape your wife,
torture your parents then murder then also. I mean that is if that
christian god has its way.

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 3:58:39 PM UTC-6, Marilyn wrote:
>
> Christmas is NOT about Santa Claus, reindeer, ornaments, and gifts.
>
> What can I make?
>
> Recipes appreciated.
>
Blah, blah, blah. If troll Marilyn is really interested in "foods that would
be suitable for Jesus in his time in history" she(?) has the internet at her(?)
fingertips to search for historical foods.

Another lazy ass wanting someone else to do the searching for her(?).

On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:37:18 -0600,
wrote:

>On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 05:02:28 +0700, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:57:07 -0600, Marilyn >
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
>>>time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
>>>candy etc.
>>
>>Cookies and candy. LOL.
>>
>>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anci...aelite_cuisine
>>
>>I don't think you really want to follow through with this idea, nobody
>>will enjoy the food, assuming you can even source authentic
>>ingredients.
>
>
>Well since jesus was completely a imagined being then any foods that
>could be imagined would be suitable...

Debatable whether or not he was a completely a imagined being, or
whether his background and exploits have been highly exaggerated, etc.


>For instance I have a pumpkin growing in my herb garden that I never
>planted and it is constantly weeping dark chocolate... In another herb
>garden I have a watermelon sized steak that is perfectly grilled and
>it just keeps getting bigger and bigger! I even have a coffee tree
>that does not produce sap it produces coffee by the cup with 1 sugar
>and 1 cream already mixed in and stirred an not too hot but definitely
>not cold.
>
>I have one of those little kiddy pools and every morning there are
>fresh cauliflower that appear like magic...
>
>Ya see imagined things can be fun, or in the case of a god/jesus they
>may be evil and murder you, rape your children, rape your wife,
>torture your parents then murder then also. I mean that is if that
>christian god has its way.

I'm a an atheist myself, and much prefer Buddhism. But your
antagonistic obsession with religion is a bit much for my tastes... or
maybe it's just the analogies you use. Anyway, I'm off for my morning
walk now.

On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 12:37:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 05:02:28 +0700, Jeßus > wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:57:07 -0600, Marilyn >
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
> >>time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
> >>candy etc.
> >
> >Cookies and candy. LOL.
> >
> >https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anci...aelite_cuisine
> >
> >I don't think you really want to follow through with this idea, nobody
> >will enjoy the food, assuming you can even source authentic
> >ingredients.
>
>
> Well since jesus was completely a imagined being then any foods that
> could be imagined would be suitable...
> For instance I have a pumpkin growing in my herb garden that I never
> planted and it is constantly weeping dark chocolate... In another herb
> garden I have a watermelon sized steak that is perfectly grilled and
> it just keeps getting bigger and bigger! I even have a coffee tree
> that does not produce sap it produces coffee by the cup with 1 sugar
> and 1 cream already mixed in and stirred an not too hot but definitely
> not cold.
>
> I have one of those little kiddy pools and every morning there are
> fresh cauliflower that appear like magic...
>
> Ya see imagined things can be fun, or in the case of a god/jesus they
> may be evil and murder you, rape your children, rape your wife,
> torture your parents then murder then also. I mean that is if that
> christian god has its way.
>
> --
>
> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

I think you're a little off on the "imagined being" part. I've never heard anybody suggest that Jesus didn't exist. Some of his life might have been "juiced up" a tiny bit but that happens to most figures in history.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k

On 11/7/2019 5:47 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 3:58:39 PM UTC-6, Marilyn wrote:
>>
>> Christmas is NOT about Santa Claus, reindeer, ornaments, and gifts.
>>
The subject line says she would like to "make come Jesus foods".

AFAIK, Jesus hasn't come for at least 2000 years. Interpret that
however you wish.

>> What can I make?
>>
>> Recipes appreciated.
>>
> Blah, blah, blah. If troll Marilyn is really interested in "foods that would
> be suitable for Jesus in his time in history" she(?) has the internet at her(?)
> fingertips to search for historical foods.
>
> Another lazy ass wanting someone else to do the searching for her(?).
>
I truly have no idea what Jesus might have eaten in December. Don't
much care, either. I have no specific biblical recipes for his/her "Not
Christmas". I don't have recipes for anyone elses Christmas, either.

Jill

wrote:
> On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 3:58:39 PM UTC-6, Marilyn wrote:
>>
>> Christmas is NOT about Santa Claus, reindeer, ornaments, and gifts.
>>
>> What can I make?
>>
>> Recipes appreciated.
>>
> Blah, blah, blah. If troll Marilyn is really interested in "foods that would
> be suitable for Jesus in his time in history" she(?) has the internet at her(?)
> fingertips to search for historical foods.
>
> Another lazy ass wanting someone else to do the searching for her(?).
>

Why don't we fix her ass up with Popeye?

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:30:53 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:



>I've never heard anybody suggest that Jesus didn't exist.

Then clean the shit out of your ears:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Jesu...utf-8&oe=utf-8

On 11/7/2019 4:57 PM, Marilyn wrote:
> Christmas is NOT about Santa Claus, reindeer, ornaments, and gifts.
> That's what the greedy businesses want it to be so they can get wealthy.
> We do not go to gift stores, decorate, or waste electricity on colored
> lights. We do not kill trees to put in our home. We do not do Black
> Friday, or do "Christmas shopping". We do not associate with Santa Claus
> actors, or watch movies about that fake side of the holiday.
>
> Christmas IS about Jesus Christ. That means peace, love, family and
> happiness. My family does not give store bought gifts. But we share
> things we make. These are often foods, since we all need to eat. But
> they can also be toys, things to wear, pets, or items to put in our
> home.
>
> I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
> time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
> candy etc.
>
> What can I make?
>
> Recipes appreciated.
>

This is easy. He was born on Christmas day so the most suitable food
would be mother's milk.

The rest of the crowd would be drinking beer and wine. Probably would
cook up a lamb for a celebration.

On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:57:07 -0600, Marilyn wrote:

> What can I make?

One loaf of bread & a few fish ought to do it.

Mike_Duffy wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:57:07 -0600, Marilyn wrote:
>
>> What can I make?
>
> One loaf of bread & a few fish ought to do it.
>

Don't forget the wine. Jeasus could whip some up out of thin air I
suppose, but good to let the old guy rest sometimes.

On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 4:58:39 PM UTC-5, Marilyn wrote:
> Christmas is NOT about Santa Claus, reindeer, ornaments, and gifts.
> That's what the greedy businesses want it to be so they can get wealthy.
> We do not go to gift stores, decorate, or waste electricity on colored
> lights. We do not kill trees to put in our home. We do not do Black
> Friday, or do "Christmas shopping". We do not associate with Santa Claus
> actors, or watch movies about that fake side of the holiday.
>
> Christmas IS about Jesus Christ. That means peace, love, family and
> happiness. My family does not give store bought gifts. But we share
> things we make. These are often foods, since we all need to eat. But
> they can also be toys, things to wear, pets, or items to put in our
> home.
>
> I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
> time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
> candy etc.
>
> What can I make?
>
> Recipes appreciated.

Here you go:

<http://www.kitchenofpalestine.com/>

Avoid tomatoes and hot peppers; they were brought over from the New World.

Cindy Hamilton

In article >,
says...
> Christmas IS about Jesus Christ. That means peace, love, family and
> happiness. My family does not give store bought gifts. But we share
> things we make. These are often foods, since we all need to eat. But
> they can also be toys, things to wear, pets, or items to put in our
> home.
>
> I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
> time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
> candy etc.

Five loaves and some fish, all cooked on an open fire/barbecue
washed down with some wine.

Toys; anything handmade from wood.
Pets; sheep, cattle, donkeys.
Things to wear; swaddlies. Like deconstructed onesies.
No candy, sugar cane hadn't been discovered yet.

Janet UK

On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 9:40:16 AM UTC-5, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
> > Christmas IS about Jesus Christ. That means peace, love, family and
> > happiness. My family does not give store bought gifts. But we share
> > things we make. These are often foods, since we all need to eat. But
> > they can also be toys, things to wear, pets, or items to put in our
> > home.
> >
> > I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
> > time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
> > candy etc.
>
> Five loaves and some fish, all cooked on an open fire/barbecue
> washed down with some wine.
>
> Toys; anything handmade from wood.
> Pets; sheep, cattle, donkeys.
> Things to wear; swaddlies. Like deconstructed onesies.
> No candy, sugar cane hadn't been discovered yet.

They had honey and dates, though.

Cindy Hamilton

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 07:13:18 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 9:40:16 AM UTC-5, Janet wrote:
>> In article >,
>> says...
>> > Christmas IS about Jesus Christ. That means peace, love, family and
>> > happiness. My family does not give store bought gifts. But we share
>> > things we make. These are often foods, since we all need to eat. But
>> > they can also be toys, things to wear, pets, or items to put in our
>> > home.
>> >
>> > I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
>> > time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
>> > candy etc.
>>
>> Five loaves and some fish, all cooked on an open fire/barbecue
>> washed down with some wine.
>>
>> Toys; anything handmade from wood.
>> Pets; sheep, cattle, donkeys.
>> Things to wear; swaddlies. Like deconstructed onesies.
>> No candy, sugar cane hadn't been discovered yet.
>
>They had honey and dates, though.

Mary never had a date.

Bruce wrote:
> Mary never had a date.

Her new husband sure got ****ed off when he found out she was
already pregnant.

Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 07:13:18 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>> On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 9:40:16 AM UTC-5, Janet wrote:
>>> In article >,
>>> says...
>>>> Christmas IS about Jesus Christ. That means peace, love, family and
>>>> happiness. My family does not give store bought gifts. But we share
>>>> things we make. These are often foods, since we all need to eat. But
>>>> they can also be toys, things to wear, pets, or items to put in our
>>>> home.
>>>>
>>>> I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
>>>> time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
>>>> candy etc.
>>>
>>> Five loaves and some fish, all cooked on an open fire/barbecue
>>> washed down with some wine.
>>>
>>> Toys; anything handmade from wood.
>>> Pets; sheep, cattle, donkeys.
>>> Things to wear; swaddlies. Like deconstructed onesies.
>>> No candy, sugar cane hadn't been discovered yet.
>>
>> They had honey and dates, though.
>
> Mary never had a date.
>

Not even Popeye?

On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 11:44:26 AM UTC-6, Gary wrote:
>
> Bruce wrote:
>
> > Mary never had a date.
>
> Her new husband sure got ****ed off when he found out she was
> already pregnant.
>
But he got over it rather quickly and Jesus had little brothers and sisters.

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:24:59 -0800 (PST), "
> wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 11:44:26 AM UTC-6, Gary wrote:
>>
>> Bruce wrote:
>>
>> > Mary never had a date.
>>
>> Her new husband sure got ****ed off when he found out she was
>> already pregnant.
>>
>But he got over it rather quickly and Jesus had little brothers and sisters.

What, more hippies?

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:30:53 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 12:37:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 05:02:28 +0700, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:57:07 -0600, Marilyn >
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>I want to prepare some foods that would be suitable for Jesus in his
>> >>time in history. This can be cooked dishes, deserts, beverages, cookies,
>> >>candy etc.
>> >
>> >Cookies and candy. LOL.
>> >
>> >https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anci...aelite_cuisine
>> >
>> >I don't think you really want to follow through with this idea, nobody
>> >will enjoy the food, assuming you can even source authentic
>> >ingredients.
>>
>>
>> Well since jesus was completely a imagined being then any foods that
>> could be imagined would be suitable...
>> For instance I have a pumpkin growing in my herb garden that I never
>> planted and it is constantly weeping dark chocolate... In another herb
>> garden I have a watermelon sized steak that is perfectly grilled and
>> it just keeps getting bigger and bigger! I even have a coffee tree
>> that does not produce sap it produces coffee by the cup with 1 sugar
>> and 1 cream already mixed in and stirred an not too hot but definitely
>> not cold.
>>
>> I have one of those little kiddy pools and every morning there are
>> fresh cauliflower that appear like magic...
>>
>> Ya see imagined things can be fun, or in the case of a god/jesus they
>> may be evil and murder you, rape your children, rape your wife,
>> torture your parents then murder then also. I mean that is if that
>> christian god has its way.
>>
>> --
>>
>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>
>I think you're a little off on the "imagined being" part. I've never heard anybody suggest that Jesus didn't exist. Some of his life might have been "juiced up" a tiny bit but that happens to most figures in history.
>
No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
would suspect that there were many christos at that time.

In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
of the potter.
The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.

So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.



>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>
> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
> of the potter.
> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>
> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>
>
>
> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>
> --
>
> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>>
>> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>> of the potter.
>> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>>
>> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>>
>>
>>
>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>>
>> --
>>
>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>
>Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.

You're a theist preacher. Is that better?

On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>
> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
> >>
> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
> >> of the potter.
> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
> >>
> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
> >
> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>
> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?

I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>> >>
>> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>> >> of the potter.
>> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>> >>
>> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>> >
>> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>>
>> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>
>I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.

It is so funny that people think because they have taken classes about
religion they know a good deal about it, when in fact they know very
little. I am willing to bet that you did not know most of that stuff I
posted in my last post. I am also fairly sure you dont know that the
entire story of a jesus christ was written some 300 years after it was
supposed to have lived and the ONLY proof of a christ or "Christos"
was what tactus had written that was incorrectly used or just plain
lied about by the catholics that wrote the new testament.

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:59:27 PM UTC-10, wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>
> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
> >> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
> >> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
> >> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
> >> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
> >> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
> >> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
> >> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
> >> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
> >> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
> >> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
> >> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
> >> >>
> >> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
> >> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
> >> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
> >> >> of the potter.
> >> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
> >> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
> >> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
> >> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
> >> >>
> >> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
> >> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
> >> >
> >> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
> >>
> >> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
> >
> >I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.
>
> It is so funny that people think because they have taken classes about
> religion they know a good deal about it, when in fact they know very
> little. I am willing to bet that you did not know most of that stuff I
> posted in my last post. I am also fairly sure you dont know that the
> entire story of a jesus christ was written some 300 years after it was
> supposed to have lived and the ONLY proof of a christ or "Christos"
> was what tactus had written that was incorrectly used or just plain
> lied about by the catholics that wrote the new testament.
>
> --
>
> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

If you wish to believe Jesus is a fairytale that's fine with me.

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>> >>
>> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>> >> of the potter.
>> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>> >>
>> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>> >
>> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>>
>> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>
>I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.

If only you were as superior to everybody as you think

On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 2:06:19 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>
> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
> >> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
> >> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
> >> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
> >> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
> >> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
> >> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
> >> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
> >> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
> >> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
> >> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
> >> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
> >> >>
> >> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
> >> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
> >> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
> >> >> of the potter.
> >> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
> >> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
> >> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
> >> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
> >> >>
> >> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
> >> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
> >> >
> >> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
> >>
> >> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
> >
> >I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.
>
> If only you were as superior to everybody as you think

Not to worry, you'll always be number 2. Rejoice!

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:17:55 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 2:06:19 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>> >>
>> >> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>> >
>> >I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.
>>
>> If only you were as superior to everybody as you think
>
>Not to worry, you'll always be number 2. Rejoice!

Yay! Better stay sharp!

On 2019-11-08 7:17 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
> On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 2:06:19 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:

>> If only you were as superior to everybody as you think
>
> Not to worry, you'll always be number 2. Rejoice!
>

Wow. That was a generous assessment.

On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 2:23:09 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2019-11-08 7:17 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
> > On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 2:06:19 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>
> >> If only you were as superior to everybody as you think
> >
> > Not to worry, you'll always be number 2. Rejoice!
> >
>
> Wow. That was a generous assessment.

I just can't help it - I live to make other people happy.

dsi1 wrote:
> On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>>
>> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>> of the potter.
>> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>>
>> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>>
>>
>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>>
>> --
>>
>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>
> Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>

Exactly. Hiwaiians don't have any supernatural deities, and have
never worshiped any gods. Ever.

wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>>>>> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>>>>> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>>>>> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>>>>> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>>>>> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>>>>> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>>>>> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>>>>> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>>>>> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>>>>> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>>>>> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>>>>> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>>>>> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>>>>> of the potter.
>>>>> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>>>>> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>>>>> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>>>>> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>>>>>
>>>>> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>>>>> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>>>>
>>>> Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>>>
>>> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>>
>> I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.
>
> It is so funny that people think because they have taken classes about
> religion they know a good deal about it, when in fact they know very
> little. I am willing to bet that you did not know most of that stuff I
> posted in my last post. I am also fairly sure you dont know that the
> entire story of a jesus christ was written some 300 years after it was
> supposed to have lived and the ONLY proof of a christ or "Christos"
> was what tactus had written that was incorrectly used or just plain
> lied about by the catholics that wrote the new testament.
>
> --
>
> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>

Damn! I thought the Southern baptists and the churches of christ
wrote the whole goddamned bible.

Now you tell me they didn't even write the new testament?

Shit!

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 21:18:49 -0600, Hank Rogers >
wrote:

wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>>>>>> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>>>>>> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>>>>>> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>>>>>> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>>>>>> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>>>>>> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>>>>>> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>>>>>> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>>>>>> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>>>>>> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>>>>>> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>>>>>> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>>>>>> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>>>>>> of the potter.
>>>>>> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>>>>>> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>>>>>> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>>>>>> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>>>>>> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>>>>>
>>>>> Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>>>>
>>>> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>>>
>>> I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.
>>
>> It is so funny that people think because they have taken classes about
>> religion they know a good deal about it, when in fact they know very
>> little. I am willing to bet that you did not know most of that stuff I
>> posted in my last post. I am also fairly sure you dont know that the
>> entire story of a jesus christ was written some 300 years after it was
>> supposed to have lived and the ONLY proof of a christ or "Christos"
>> was what tactus had written that was incorrectly used or just plain
>> lied about by the catholics that wrote the new testament.
>>
>> --
>>
>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>>
>
>Damn! I thought the Southern baptists and the churches of christ
>wrote the whole goddamned bible.
>
>Now you tell me they didn't even write the new testament?
>
>Shit!

just saying that all christians are idiots because they worship a
story about an imaginary person, oh yeah ALL christians are catholic
because they all worship a book complexly authored but the RCC.

Boy those christian people do not eleven know their own religion!

Hey is bob here? I wanted to ask him about how to make the kool aid.

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:06:14 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>wrote:
>
>>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>>> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>>> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>>> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>>> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>>> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>>> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>>> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>>> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>>> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>>> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>>> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>>> >>
>>> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>>> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>>> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>>> >> of the potter.
>>> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>>> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>>> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>>> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>>> >>
>>> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>>> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >>
>>> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>>> >
>>> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>>>
>>> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>>
>>I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.
>
>If only you were as superior to everybody as you think

I wonder if he realizes that christians say the same thing usually
right before they go on a genocidal killing spree!

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:17:55 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 2:06:19 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>> >> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>> >> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>> >> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>> >> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>> >> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>> >> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>> >> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>> >> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>> >> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>> >> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>> >> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>> >> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>> >> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>> >> >> of the potter.
>> >> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>> >> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>> >> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>> >> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>> >> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>> >> >
>> >> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>> >>
>> >> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>> >
>> >I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.
>>
>> If only you were as superior to everybody as you think
>
>Not to worry, you'll always be number 2. Rejoice!

bad thing about the guy that is #2...
They usually always smell really bad, no I mean really really bad. You
could almost say they smell like shit.

Anyone interested in a pizza recipe?

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:29:19 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 2:23:09 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2019-11-08 7:17 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
>> > On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 2:06:19 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> >> If only you were as superior to everybody as you think
>> >
>> > Not to worry, you'll always be number 2. Rejoice!
>> >
>>
>> Wow. That was a generous assessment.
>
>I just can't help it - I live to make other people happy.


Wait oh wait, Right now I am wearing a T-shirt that says SARCASM,.just
one of my many talents. I am going to go out on a limb and say that
you have this talent also?

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:06:07 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:59:27 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>> >> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>> >> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>> >> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>> >> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>> >> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>> >> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>> >> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>> >> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>> >> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>> >> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>> >> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>> >> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>> >> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>> >> >> of the potter.
>> >> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>> >> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>> >> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>> >> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>> >> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>> >> >
>> >> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>> >>
>> >> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>> >
>> >I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.
>>
>> It is so funny that people think because they have taken classes about
>> religion they know a good deal about it, when in fact they know very
>> little. I am willing to bet that you did not know most of that stuff I
>> posted in my last post. I am also fairly sure you dont know that the
>> entire story of a jesus christ was written some 300 years after it was
>> supposed to have lived and the ONLY proof of a christ or "Christos"
>> was what tactus had written that was incorrectly used or just plain
>> lied about by the catholics that wrote the new testament.
>>
>> --
>>
>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>
>If you wish to believe Jesus is a fairytale that's fine with me.

Dude it is not a matter of belief. The story of Jesus Christ is
verbatim of the Egyptian god Horus, from birth to death, no matte how
many theist sites say that it is not the same there is a version of
the story that is exactly the same. There are so many different
stories about the one god. Funny thing is though the story of jesus
christ is also very much like the story of Hercules. The god comes
down rapes a human woman (just like the christian god) then gives
birth to a son who is a man of the people. Or a hero to the people.
The story of jesus christ is also very much like Thor. The same story
has been told so many times...

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____