On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:46:00 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 1:38:30 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 15:28:35 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 12:20:08 PM UTC-10,
>> >> No it is a bit of common sense, Fact is harry potter can not exist so
>> >> that rules out the magical jesus. As far as the rest there may have
>> >> been a person, in fact there most likely have been several that all
>> >> did different things and one name got credit for it all. I am not
>> >> talking about healing the blind or creating magical food, I am talking
>> >> about there being one or more people that were just preachers of that
>> >> day. There was no actual jesus christ, that part is completely
>> >> fiction. The name christ comes from christos which means anointed one
>> >> and anyone at that time could have been rubbed with oil or water or
>> >> whatever. In fact with all the crazy superstitions at that time I
>> >> would suspect that there were many christos at that time.
>> >>
>> >> In fact tactus mentioned christos but the catholics took that as one
>> >> person in particular, which chances are it was not a specific person
>> >> named jesus christ of the potter clan that was supposed to have powers
>> >> of the potter.
>> >> The catholics realized that the people needed a hero so they used this
>> >> christos changed to christ and imbued it with the stories of past
>> >> gods, in fact almost verbatim that of Horus the god son of god Osiris.
>> >> I mean almost verbatim from birth to death.
>> >>
>> >> So there was not ever a jesus christ, it was 100 % an imaginary fairy
>> >> tale or myth or a BS story, take your pick.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tov2tLSFq5k
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>> >
>> >Well Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny do not exist. Fairies too. Jesus was just a preacher 2000 years ago that had a good group of publicists. That makes more sense that him being some kind of Easter Bunny or Harry Potter folktale. I have no problem with you believing he's Santa Claus. You'd be a lot more believable if you didn't have an agenda - being an atheist preacher and all.
>>
>> You're a theist preacher. Is that better?
>
>I'm no preacher because I don't really give a shit about the beliefs of others. Just because I'm more knowledgeable about the world's religion doesn't mean I'm a religious freak. Mostly, it means that I've taken classes in world religion. My son knows a lot more about religion than I do. I've never seen him carrying a bible. Sorry to burst your bubble of religious misattribution. Evidently, you know nothing about me. Better luck next time.

If only you were as superior to everybody as you think