On 8/17/2019 4:52 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:21:56 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>> I found my second copy of the RFC cookbook. I don't recall why I have two
>>
>> I know someone asked about getting one but I don't recall who but I
>> think it was more than one person.
>>
>> Here's the deal. email me at within the next 24 hours.
>> Just need your name, I'll get the address later if it is yours.
>>
>> If more than one person responds it will be a random drawing of the
>> names. No money involved, I'll pay the postage.
>
> At this point, since it's not going to be making any more money (and
> hasn't for 20 years). Scan it and post it in the limited public
> domain (for us to find). Or send it to me and I'll scan and upload
> it. And send it to Cathy to post on the RFC website. And I'll even
> send it along to whomever you designate to receive the hardcopy (or
> back to you).
>
> Any persons wishing that their contributions not be reproduced in
> this way, or wishing certain phrases (names, email addresses) may
> have it excluded from the digital edition.
>
> -sw
>
> -sw
>
The one person that wanted a copy did contact me. Other than that,
interest seems minimal but if you want to do the scanning, it can be
arranged. 150 pages
Let me know

In article >, Ed Pawlowski
> wrote:

> The one person that wanted a copy did contact me. Other than that,
> interest seems minimal but if you want to do the scanning, it can be
> arranged. 150 pages
> Let me know

It seems like Steve offered a hell of a deal for RFC to me. It's a
nontrivial project. That's all I have to say.

leo

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 02:53:32 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:51:40 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>> On 8/17/2019 4:52 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:21:56 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>
>>>> I found my second copy of the RFC cookbook. I don't recall why I have two
>>>>
>>>> I know someone asked about getting one but I don't recall who but I
>>>> think it was more than one person.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the deal. email me at within the next 24 hours.
>>>> Just need your name, I'll get the address later if it is yours.
>>>>
>>>> If more than one person responds it will be a random drawing of the
>>>> names. No money involved, I'll pay the postage.
>>>
>>> At this point, since it's not going to be making any more money (and
>>> hasn't for 20 years). Scan it and post it in the limited public
>>> domain (for us to find). Or send it to me and I'll scan and upload
>>> it. And send it to Cathy to post on the RFC website. And I'll even
>>> send it along to whomever you designate to receive the hardcopy (or
>>> back to you).
>>>
>>> Any persons wishing that their contributions not be reproduced in
>>> this way, or wishing certain phrases (names, email addresses) may
>>> have it excluded from the digital edition.
>>>
>> The one person that wanted a copy did contact me. Other than that,
>> interest seems minimal but if you want to do the scanning, it can be
>> arranged. 150 pages
>> Let me know
>
>Spiral bound, IIRC? What are the dimensions of paper (minus
>binding)?
>
>I don't really care for it, but if there IS interest, I will do it
>for others. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
>
>-sw

I would definitely be interested in a copy please.

On 8/19/2019 3:53 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:51:40 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>> On 8/17/2019 4:52 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:21:56 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>
>>>> I found my second copy of the RFC cookbook. I don't recall why I have two
>>>>
>>>> I know someone asked about getting one but I don't recall who but I
>>>> think it was more than one person.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the deal. email me at within the next 24 hours.
>>>> Just need your name, I'll get the address later if it is yours.
>>>>
>>>> If more than one person responds it will be a random drawing of the
>>>> names. No money involved, I'll pay the postage.
>>>
>>> At this point, since it's not going to be making any more money (and
>>> hasn't for 20 years). Scan it and post it in the limited public
>>> domain (for us to find). Or send it to me and I'll scan and upload
>>> it. And send it to Cathy to post on the RFC website. And I'll even
>>> send it along to whomever you designate to receive the hardcopy (or
>>> back to you).
>>>
>>> Any persons wishing that their contributions not be reproduced in
>>> this way, or wishing certain phrases (names, email addresses) may
>>> have it excluded from the digital edition.
>>>
>> The one person that wanted a copy did contact me. Other than that,
>> interest seems minimal but if you want to do the scanning, it can be
>> arranged. 150 pages
>> Let me know
>
> Spiral bound, IIRC? What are the dimensions of paper (minus
> binding)?
>
> I don't really care for it, but if there IS interest, I will do it
> for others. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
>
> -sw
>
Spiral bound 8 1/2 x 5 1/2

Steve wrote:
IIRC? What are the dimensions of paper (minus
> binding)?
>
> I don't really care for it, but if there IS interest, I will do it
> for others. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
>
> -sw
>
Spiral bound 8 1/2 x 5 1/2

Steve. Im interested. Can i ping you on
Facebook?