On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:18:28 -0500, Bob > wrote:

>
>Hey, Mu_sclehead, Chung didn't agree with this. Said that just
>calories doesn't tell him how much food was being consumed. Better go
>check what the official word is here. You forgot to mention your
>2PoundPOWDiet. Try to keep up. Think WWCD. What would Chung do?
>
>Bob

Sorry, Bobbie no time to read you. I have to Xpost youtr TROLLING to
all those buddies of yours who think your shit doesn't stink.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960222.html
Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:27:18 -0500, Bob > wrote:

>
>The deleted <hiss> this time is because Mu_cus has endorsed a
>*CALORIE-BASED* approach rather than Chung's sci-fi 2PD and I
>mentioned it. Chung *has* to get it out of circulation, so <snip> and
><hiss> it is. I'd like to thank Chung for all this <snipping> because
>it shows the level of his instability and it gives me a chance to
>mention the content of the <hiss> and reinforce the information.
>
>>>Bob Pastorio
>
>I like how subtly he adds my last name to the sig line. Very subtle
>and wonderfully crafty. A certain rodent-cunning in action.
>
>Poor unbalanced Chung.
>
>Bob

Meet Bob Pastorio.

Bob likes to think he is an upscale, right on kind of guy. But in the
darkness, he would prefer to endanger the lives of cardiac care
patients so he TROLLS sci.med.cardiology dozens of times each day.

Now you know all you need to know about this king-sized egomaniac.


http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960222.html
Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 02:13:24 -0500, Bob > wrote:

>Mike Coleman wrote:
>
>> Last Shot At The Mu_n > writes:
>>
>>>And how does one get to the point where these few calories can be
>>>consumed and one can live with these reduced food intakes?
>>
>> Well, if for example you limit yourself to fresh fruits and vegetables, you
>> might actually find it rather difficult to consume 1600-2000 kcals per day.
>
>Might be even more difficult after you consider how much time that
>would leave you after the bathroom visits.
>
>>>http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp
>>
>> Interesting, though I think "nutrient density" makes more sense as a measure
>> that simple weight.
>
>Oh, sure, Mike. You're gonna trot out that old calorie thing, aren't
>you? That's so yesterday, with all that arithmetic and counting and all.
>
>No. Chung's cute little toy diet makes more sense for today's
>population. Except for that calculating and remembering how much
>you've already eaten today and how much you have left. And you have to
>use base 16 for your figuring. See how much better it is? No worrying
>about vitamins or minerals or anything like that. No more milligrams
>and stuff like that.
>
>What could be smarter? Besides, "nutrient density" sounds so, I dunno,
>scientific and all.
>
>Bob

Meet Bob Pastorio.

Bob likes to think he is an upscale, right on kind of guy. But in the
darkness, he would prefer to endanger the lives of cardiac care
patients so he TROLLS sci.med.cardiology dozens of times each day.

Now you know all you need to know about this king-sized egomaniac.


http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960222.html
Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

"Home, Home On The Mu_n" > wrote:
> Sorry, Bobbie no time to read you. I have to Xpost youtr TROLLING to
> all those buddies of yours who think your shit doesn't stink.
>
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960222.html
> Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

As long as you freely admit you're the one who's intentionally crossposting,
then we'll know who to ultimately blame.