On 1/29/2018 12:18 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, January 29, 2018 at 5:15:09 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
>>
>> Looks very good to me. When I used to use a grill to cook
>> chicken, I would always blacken the hell out of them. Just one
>> last generous brush of bbq sauce would turn them right ant so
>> delicious.
>
> Chicken with so much honey in the marinade would be tough to make over the grill. Sous vide allows one to use extra sugar without creating a bitter, burnt, chicken. The chicken skin came out crispy and chewy. Sous vide can make chicken skin that's highly caramelized yet not burnt. That's pretty special.
>
> My daughter made some wontons filled with cream cheese and fake crab. It's young people food.
>
> https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...z17SdSheScjOJP
>

I feel young enough to eat about 5 of those, please...

;-)

l not -l wrote:
>
> On 29-Jan-2018, wrote:
>
>> Gary wrote:
>>> dsi1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It came out exactly as I was aiming for.
>>>> https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...o8MARvxplvsuMX
>>>
>>> Looks very good to me.
>>
>> Looks eggzactly like diseased testicles, a different disease
>> for
>> each.
> It is interesting that you know so much about diseased testicles.
> Does your knowledge come from looking at your own, from sneaking
> admiring glances in the men's room or from "close encounters"?
>
Probably all of the above.


I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...

"l not -l" wrote:
>Penmart wrote:
>> Gary wrote:
>> >dsi1 wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It came out exactly as I was aiming for.
>> >> https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...o8MARvxplvsuMX
>> >
>> >Looks very good to me.
>>
>> Looks eggzactly like diseased testicles, a different disease
>> for each.
>
>It is interesting that you know so much about diseased testicles.
> Does your knowledge come from looking at your own, from sneaking
>admiring glances in the men's room or from "close encounters"?

Actually I know this from your dental hygienist sister, each time your
sister sucks my dick she complains about having to pluck pubic hairs
from your stinking rotting teeth.

wrote:
> "l not -l" wrote:
>> Penmart wrote:
>>> Gary wrote:
>>>> dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It came out exactly as I was aiming for.
>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...o8MARvxplvsuMX
>>>>
>>>> Looks very good to me.
>>>
>>> Looks eggzactly like diseased testicles, a different disease
>>> for each.
>>
>> It is interesting that you know so much about diseased testicles.
>> Does your knowledge come from looking at your own, from sneaking
>> admiring glances in the men's room or from "close encounters"?
>
> Actually I know this from your dental hygienist sister, each time your
> sister sucks my dick she complains about having to pluck pubic hairs
> from your stinking rotting teeth.
>
Well, yoose gave a long monologue about eating hair pie yooself. I think
yoose called it "low impact oral sex" or something like that.

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:24:49 -0600, Hank Rogers >
wrote:

>l not -l wrote:
>>
>> On 29-Jan-2018, wrote:
>>
>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Looks very good to me.
>>>
>>> Looks eggzactly like diseased testicles, a different disease
>>> for
>>> each.
>> It is interesting that you know so much about diseased testicles.
>> Does your knowledge come from looking at your own, from sneaking
>> admiring glances in the men's room or from "close encounters"?
>>
>Probably all of the above.
>
>
>I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...

Either Sheldon's *** or he posted a picture of his *** brother by
mistake:
https://postimg.org/image/z86gftzph/

On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:

> Probably all of the above.
>
>
> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>

As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that someone
who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:42:12 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>
>> Probably all of the above.
>>
>>
>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>
>
>As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that someone
>who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.

Self-hatred, denial and all that.

On 2018-01-29 6:48 PM, Broce wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:42:12 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>
>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>
>>
>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that someone
>> who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>
> Self-hatred, denial and all that.


I always thought that is was humorously ironic that *** people would
blame anti *** sentiments on someone being a closeted ***. They are
disparaging people by suggesting that they are like them.

On 1/29/2018 4:20 PM, Broce wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:24:49 -0600, Hank Rogers >
> wrote:
>
>> l not -l wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29-Jan-2018, wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks very good to me.
>>>>
>>>> Looks eggzactly like diseased testicles, a different disease
>>>> for
>>>> each.
>>> It is interesting that you know so much about diseased testicles.
>>> Does your knowledge come from looking at your own, from sneaking
>>> admiring glances in the men's room or from "close encounters"?
>>>
>> Probably all of the above.
>>
>>
>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>
> Either Sheldon's *** or he posted a picture of his *** brother by
> mistake:
> https://postimg.org/image/z86gftzph/
>

Lol, a Cuba Libre and a sombrero - he went Cubano on us!

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 19:10:26 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2018-01-29 6:48 PM, Broce wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:42:12 -0500, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>
>>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>>>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>>
>>>
>>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that someone
>>> who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>>
>> Self-hatred, denial and all that.
>
>
>I always thought that is was humorously ironic that *** people would
>blame anti *** sentiments on someone being a closeted ***. They are
>disparaging people by suggesting that they are like them.

Sometimes it is the case and then one can point that out.

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:18:46 GMT, "l not -l" > wrote:

>
>On 29-Jan-2018, wrote:
>
>> "l not -l" wrote:
>> >Penmart wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Looks eggzactly like diseased testicles, a different
>> >> disease
>> >> for each.
>> >
>> >It is interesting that you know so much about diseased
>> >testicles.
>> > Does your knowledge come from looking at your own, from
>> > sneaking
>> >admiring glances in the men's room or from "close encounters"?
>>
>> Actually I know this from your dental hygienist sister, each
>> time your
>> sister sucks my dick she complains about having to pluck pubic
>> hairs
>> from your stinking rotting teeth.
>You're among friends, you no don't have to hide your
>homosexuality from us. We've known for a very long time that
>your sex talk is all just to hide your real nature.

Exactly. Look at how that snooty guy... forgot his name... he thought
he bought real sourdough bread from the supermarket... from the
desert, was received here. Like a warm bath.

On 2018-01-29 4:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>
>> Probably all of the above.
>>
>>
>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>
>
> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that someone
> who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.

A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most in
others what he despises most in himself."

(or herself, obviously).

graham wrote:
> On 2018-01-29 4:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>
>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>
>>
>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that someone
>> who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>
> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most in
> others what he despises most in himself."
>
> (or herself, obviously).

Exactly.

On 2018-01-29 8:53 PM, graham wrote:
> On 2018-01-29 4:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>
>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>
>>
>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that someone
>> who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>
> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most in
> others what he despises most in himself."
>
> (or herself, obviously).

Which psychologist said that?

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:42:36 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2018-01-29 8:53 PM, graham wrote:
>> On 2018-01-29 4:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>
>>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>>>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>>
>>>
>>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that someone
>>> who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>>
>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most in
>> others what he despises most in himself."
>>
>> (or herself, obviously).
>
>Which psychologist said that?

All of them. 101.

On 2018-01-29 9:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-01-29 8:53 PM, graham wrote:
>> On 2018-01-29 4:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>
>>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>>>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>>
>>>
>>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that
>>> someone who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>>
>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most
>> in others what he despises most in himself."
>>
>> (or herself, obviously).
>
> Which psychologist said that?

Just wondering. I have an Honours BA in Psychology and I can't recall
any psychologist ever saying that.

On 2018-01-29 7:58 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-01-29 9:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2018-01-29 8:53 PM, graham wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-29 4:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>>>>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that
>>>> someone who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>>>
>>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most
>>> in others what he despises most in himself."
>>>
>>> (or herself, obviously).
>>
>> Which psychologist said that?
>
> Just wondering. I have an Honours BA in Psychology and I can't recall
> any psychologist ever saying that.

Did you ever practise?

On 2018-01-29 10:19 PM, graham wrote:
> On 2018-01-29 7:58 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2018-01-29 9:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-29 8:53 PM, graham wrote:
>>>> On 2018-01-29 4:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>>>>>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that
>>>>> someone who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>>>>
>>>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most
>>>> in others what he despises most in himself."
>>>>
>>>> (or herself, obviously).
>>>
>>> Which psychologist said that?
>>
>> Just wondering. I have an Honours BA in Psychology and I can't recall
>> any psychologist ever saying that.
>
> Did you ever practise?

No, but I am still waiting to hear you quoted?

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:28:57 -0500, Dave Smith wrote:

> On 2018-01-29 10:19 PM, graham wrote:
>> On 2018-01-29 7:58 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-29 9:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2018-01-29 8:53 PM, graham wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most
>>>>> in others what he despises most in himself."
>>>>>
>>>>> (or herself, obviously).
>>>>
>>>> Which psychologist said that?
>>>
>>> Just wondering. I have an Honours BA in Psychology and I can't recall
>>> any psychologist ever saying that.
>>
>> Did you ever practise?
>
> No, but I am still waiting to hear you quoted?

There are over 42,000 licensed psychologists in North America. In your
education, did you study what all 42,000 psychologists have said
during their lifetimes?

His name was not Bob. And I'm sure thousands of psychologists have
said that phrase, or something very similar - including some Bobs.

On 2018-01-29 8:28 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-01-29 10:19 PM, graham wrote:
>> On 2018-01-29 7:58 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-29 9:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2018-01-29 8:53 PM, graham wrote:
>>>>> On 2018-01-29 4:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize
>>>>>>> it himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that
>>>>>> someone who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>>>>>
>>>>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises
>>>>> most in others what he despises most in himself."
>>>>>
>>>>> (or herself, obviously).
>>>>
>>>> Which psychologist said that?
>>>
>>> Just wondering. I have an Honours BA in Psychology and I can't recall
>>> any psychologist ever saying that.
>>
>> Did you ever practise?
>
> No, but I am still waiting to hear you quoted?
>
Why? Do you know every one of them?
It was over 30 years ago and although I remember his first name, I'm
damned if I can remember his surname. That statement almost certainly
came from the wisdom acquired from years of practice, not from a textbook.

On Monday, January 29, 2018 at 3:53:49 PM UTC-10, graham wrote:
>
> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most in
> others what he despises most in himself."
>
> (or herself, obviously).

There ain't nothing wrong with being ***. What is wrong is spewing forth macho anti-*** verbiage in a futile attempt to convince folks that you're not gayer than aunt yer Joan's party dress.

On 1/29/2018 7:34 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> Homosexuals use that insult all the time.
>
> -sw
> ost
> >
> 3/18/2011 3:49 PM
> Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162
> readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs
> fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com
>
>
> Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.
>
> -sw
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
> There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
https://www.centraltexasfoodbank.org...ntation-057jpg
>
> Hide the Ho Ho's!!!!!!!!!!
>
> - sw

On 1/29/2018 8:19 PM, graham wrote:
> On 2018-01-29 7:58 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2018-01-29 9:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-29 8:53 PM, graham wrote:
>>>> On 2018-01-29 4:42 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>> On 2018-01-29 5:24 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Probably all of the above.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe he is a heavily closeted ***. He may not even realize it
>>>>>> himself. He thinks the entire world except himself is ***, so ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As if that is not the gayest insult around.... to suggest that
>>>>> someone who is vocally anti *** is actually closeted ***.
>>>>
>>>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most
>>>> in others what he despises most in himself."
>>>>
>>>> (or herself, obviously).
>>>
>>> Which psychologist said that?
>>
>> Just wondering. I have an Honours BA in Psychology and I can't recall
>> any psychologist ever saying that.
>
> Did you ever practise?

....only on truckers...

On 1/29/2018 9:32 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, January 29, 2018 at 3:53:49 PM UTC-10, graham wrote:
>>
>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises most in
>> others what he despises most in himself."
>>
>> (or herself, obviously).
>
> There ain't nothing wrong with being ***. What is wrong is spewing forth macho anti-*** verbiage in a futile attempt to convince folks that you're not gayer than aunt yer Joan's party dress.
>
+1!

On 2018-01-29 11:32 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, January 29, 2018 at 3:53:49 PM UTC-10, graham wrote:
>>
>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises
>> most in others what he despises most in himself."
>>
>> (or herself, obviously).
>
> There ain't nothing wrong with being ***. What is wrong is spewing
> forth macho anti-*** verbiage in a futile attempt to convince folks
> that you're not gayer than aunt yer Joan's party dress.
>

I just find it curious that some people will accuse someone of covering
up their homosexuality by suggesting they are doing it because they are
actually ***. They are insulting them with the accusation that they are
***. There is considerable irony to that.

On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 4:43:10 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>
> I just find it curious that some people will accuse someone of covering
> up their homosexuality by suggesting they are doing it because they are
> actually ***. They are insulting them with the accusation that they are
> ***. There is considerable irony to that.

These people still haven't come to grips with their own sexuality. They are highly conflicted and full of pain - this makes them ornery and mean. It's a hell of a burden to have bear.

On 1/30/2018 9:07 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 4:43:10 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>> I just find it curious that some people will accuse someone of covering
>> up their homosexuality by suggesting they are doing it because they are
>> actually ***. They are insulting them with the accusation that they are
>> ***. There is considerable irony to that.
>
> These people still haven't come to grips with their own sexuality. They are highly conflicted and full of pain - this makes them ornery and mean. It's a hell of a burden to have bear.
>


Now given you're instructing a chief bully boi of RFC on this,
well...shake the skull and see what falls out of his adamantly absurd
head...

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:07:51 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 4:43:10 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>> I just find it curious that some people will accuse someone of covering
>> up their homosexuality by suggesting they are doing it because they are
>> actually ***. They are insulting them with the accusation that they are
>> ***. There is considerable irony to that.
>
>These people still haven't come to grips with their own sexuality. They are highly conflicted and full of pain - this makes them ornery and mean. It's a hell of a burden to have bear.

I see you've met my faggot brother and his faggot accomplices.... even
after exiting their closets they still abhor their own faggotness and
other faggots as well. There is absolutely nothing *** about a
faggot. Being five years oldere it wasn't until my mid teens that i
realized my brother was strange but I still didn't know he's a faggot,
my mother would say don't mind him, he's just a "queer duck". Being
five years older we really had very little to do with each other. It
wasn't until my mid twenties that I realized he's a fag.

On 1/30/2018 11:42 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:07:51 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 4:43:10 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> I just find it curious that some people will accuse someone of covering
>>> up their homosexuality by suggesting they are doing it because they are
>>> actually ***. They are insulting them with the accusation that they are
>>> ***. There is considerable irony to that.
>>
>> These people still haven't come to grips with their own sexuality. They are highly conflicted and full of pain - this makes them ornery and mean. It's a hell of a burden to have bear.
>
> I see you've met my faggot brother and his faggot accomplices.... even
> after exiting their closets they still abhor their own faggotness and
> other faggots as well. There is absolutely nothing *** about a
> faggot. Being five years oldere it wasn't until my mid teens that i
> realized my brother was strange but I still didn't know he's a faggot,
> my mother would say don't mind him, he's just a "queer duck". Being
> five years older we really had very little to do with each other. It
> wasn't until my mid twenties that I realized he's a fag.
>

Yes, and???

I mean if he's not hitting on you why does it matter?

On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 8:42:52 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:

>
> I see you've met my faggot brother and his faggot accomplices.... even
> after exiting their closets they still abhor their own faggotness and
> other faggots as well. There is absolutely nothing *** about a
> faggot. Being five years oldere it wasn't until my mid teens that i
> realized my brother was strange but I still didn't know he's a faggot,
> my mother would say don't mind him, he's just a "queer duck". Being
> five years older we really had very little to do with each other. It
> wasn't until my mid twenties that I realized he's a fag.

There ain't nothing wrong with being ***. What is wrong is spewing forth macho anti-*** verbiage in a futile attempt to convince folks that you're not gayer than yer aunt Joan's party dress.

On 1/30/2018 12:16 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 8:42:52 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
>
>>
>> I see you've met my faggot brother and his faggot accomplices.... even
>> after exiting their closets they still abhor their own faggotness and
>> other faggots as well. There is absolutely nothing *** about a
>> faggot. Being five years oldere it wasn't until my mid teens that i
>> realized my brother was strange but I still didn't know he's a faggot,
>> my mother would say don't mind him, he's just a "queer duck". Being
>> five years older we really had very little to do with each other. It
>> wasn't until my mid twenties that I realized he's a fag.
>
> There ain't nothing wrong with being ***. What is wrong is spewing forth macho anti-*** verbiage in a futile attempt to convince folks that you're not gayer than yer aunt Joan's party dress.
>

LOL!

And if his brother didn't abuse him why all the angst anyway?

On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 9:18:04 AM UTC-10, CaÃ*da de la casa wrote:
>
> LOL!
>
> And if his brother didn't abuse him why all the angst anyway?

Something very bad must have happened.

One of my great joys in life is that I see my kids looking after one another. My kids will have some help and support even when I'm not there. Some parents like to play off their kids against each other in order to manipulate them. That is evil.

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:45:12 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2018-01-29 11:32 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>> On Monday, January 29, 2018 at 3:53:49 PM UTC-10, graham wrote:
>>>
>>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises
>>> most in others what he despises most in himself."
>>>
>>> (or herself, obviously).
>>
>> There ain't nothing wrong with being ***. What is wrong is spewing
>> forth macho anti-*** verbiage in a futile attempt to convince folks
>> that you're not gayer than aunt yer Joan's party dress.
>>
>
>I just find it curious that some people will accuse someone of covering
>up their homosexuality by suggesting they are doing it because they are
>actually ***.

"accuse", "suggesting"... sometimes it's simply true.

>They are insulting them with the accusation that they are
>***. There is considerable irony to that.

"insulting", "considerable irony"... sometimes it's simply true.

On 1/30/2018 12:28 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 9:18:04 AM UTC-10, CaÃ*da de la casa wrote:
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> And if his brother didn't abuse him why all the angst anyway?
>
> Something very bad must have happened.

Indeed.

My guess is that perhaps he was teased when the older kids found out his
brother was ***.

Kids are very hurtful that way and they may have called him *** too.

> One of my great joys in life is that I see my kids looking after one another. My kids will have some help and support even when I'm not there. Some parents like to play off their kids against each other in order to manipulate them. That is evil.
>

Yes it is, your kids are having a solid and nurturing experience, and so
should all kids.

"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 9:18:04 AM UTC-10, CaÃ*da de la casa wrote:
>
> LOL!
>
> And if his brother didn't abuse him why all the angst anyway?

Something very bad must have happened.

One of my great joys in life is that I see my kids looking after one
another. My kids will have some help and support even when I'm not there.
Some parents like to play off their kids against each other in order to
manipulate them. That is evil.

====
I could not agree more, my kids genuinely care about each other and help
each other when they can, and some parents pick out one and continually
compare the others to the chosen one, which always causes hard feelings.

Cheri

On 1/30/2018 1:11 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "dsi1" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 9:18:04 AM UTC-10, CaÃ*da de la casa wrote:
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> And if his brother didn't abuse him why all the angst anyway?
>
> Something very bad must have happened.
>
> One of my great joys in life is that I see my kids looking after one
> another. My kids will have some help and support even when I'm not
> there. Some parents like to play off their kids against each other in
> order to manipulate them. That is evil.
>
> ====
> I could not agree more, my kids genuinely care about each other and help
> each other when they can, and some parents pick out one and continually
> compare the others to the chosen one, which always causes hard feelings.
>
> Cheri

That is the very definition of child abuse.

I have no problem believing your kids had solid rearing, you have no
spite in you that I can see.

On 2018-01-30 2:42 PM, Broce wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:45:12 -0500, Dave Smith

>>>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises
>>>> most in others what he despises most in himself."
>>>>
>>>> (or herself, obviously).
>>>
>>> There ain't nothing wrong with being ***. What is wrong is spewing
>>> forth macho anti-*** verbiage in a futile attempt to convince folks
>>> that you're not gayer than aunt yer Joan's party dress.
>>>
>>
>> I just find it curious that some people will accuse someone of covering
>> up their homosexuality by suggesting they are doing it because they are
>> actually ***.
>
> "accuse", "suggesting"... sometimes it's simply true.
>
>> They are insulting them with the accusation that they are
>> ***. There is considerable irony to that.
>
> "insulting", "considerable irony"... sometimes it's simply true.
>


It's true that they are trying to insult the person making anti ***
comments by suggesting that they are ***.

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:16:07 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2018-01-30 2:42 PM, Broce wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:45:12 -0500, Dave Smith
>
>>>>> A psychologist once explained it to me thus: "A person despises
>>>>> most in others what he despises most in himself."
>>>>>
>>>>> (or herself, obviously).
>>>>
>>>> There ain't nothing wrong with being ***. What is wrong is spewing
>>>> forth macho anti-*** verbiage in a futile attempt to convince folks
>>>> that you're not gayer than aunt yer Joan's party dress.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I just find it curious that some people will accuse someone of covering
>>> up their homosexuality by suggesting they are doing it because they are
>>> actually ***.
>>
>> "accuse", "suggesting"... sometimes it's simply true.
>>
>>> They are insulting them with the accusation that they are
>>> ***. There is considerable irony to that.
>>
>> "insulting", "considerable irony"... sometimes it's simply true.
>>
>
>
>It's true that they are trying to insult the person making anti ***
>comments by suggesting that they are ***.

If they are insulting the person -rather than just stating a perceived
fact- it's not because they're ***, but because they're ***, trying to
hide it and talking anti-*** in the process.

On 2018-01-30 5:24 PM, Broce wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:16:07 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>

>> It's true that they are trying to insult the person making anti ***
>> comments by suggesting that they are ***.
>
> If they are insulting the person -rather than just stating a perceived
> fact- it's not because they're ***, but because they're ***, trying to
> hide it and talking anti-*** in the process.

It's one thing to suggest that someone who rants about gays is probably
***. It is something else to direct that comment to an individual who
makes anti *** comments. In the latter case, you are directing it at
the person as an insult, calling him ***.

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 18:08:46 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2018-01-30 5:24 PM, Broce wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:16:07 -0500, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>
>>> It's true that they are trying to insult the person making anti ***
>>> comments by suggesting that they are ***.
>>
>> If they are insulting the person -rather than just stating a perceived
>> fact- it's not because they're ***, but because they're ***, trying to
>> hide it and talking anti-*** in the process.
>
>It's one thing to suggest that someone who rants about gays is probably
>***. It is something else to direct that comment to an individual who
>makes anti *** comments. In the latter case, you are directing it at
>the person as an insult, calling him ***.

No, I think you misunderstand.