God or Natu Whatever is, exists in Nature and happens with a
necessity imposed by the laws of Nature. There is nothing beyond
Nature; miracles and the supernatural are an impossibility.

This proves there is no god.

Jeßus > wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 10:29:50 +1000, dolphin burp
> > wrote:
>
>> dolf: "No Barry, you have that arse-about (ie. contrary to wha
>
> WTF has this got to do with the groups your cross posted this shit to?
> Just **** off, you demented freak.
>

You were acting against our ANZAC values and traditions when you couldn't
even get the date right of this post:

SEE ALSO: "The Illegality Defence: Has Your Insured Been Misbehaving on
this Anzac Day of 25 April 2016?"

-
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...005 515364934

So speak no more c@nt!

- dolf

dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> dolf: "No Barry,

ENDLESS Drivel deleted. Relevant info to RFC added.

MMMMM----- Recipe via Meal-Master (tm) v8.05

Title: Anadama Bread
Categories: Breadmaker
Yield: 1 Loaf

MMMMM------------------MICHAEL HATALA RJHP21A-----------------------

MMMMM---------------------FOR 1-1/2 LB. LOAF--------------------------
1 pk Yeast
3 1/2 c Bread flour
1/3 c Yellow cornmeal
1 1/2 c Boiling water
1/3 c Molasses
1 ts Salt
2 ts Butter

Place cornmeal into a bowl. Carefully pour boiling water into
cornmeal, stirring to make sure it is smooth. Let stand for about 30
minutes.
Stir in molasses, salt and butter. Place yeast into the B/M pan,
bread flour, then cornmeal mixture. Select white bread and push
start. NOTE: An early American recipe. This has become a favorite in
many homes.

From Loafing It by DAK

MMMMM

On 4/30/2016 4:59 PM, cshenk wrote:
> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
(cross-posting snipped)

What's up with this crap?

Jill

>> dolf: "No Barry,
>
> ENDLESS Drivel deleted. Relevant info to RFC added.
>
> MMMMM----- Recipe via Meal-Master (tm) v8.05
>
> Title: Anadama Bread
> Categories: Breadmaker
> Yield: 1 Loaf
>
> MMMMM------------------MICHAEL HATALA RJHP21A-----------------------
>
> MMMMM---------------------FOR 1-1/2 LB. LOAF--------------------------
> 1 pk Yeast
> 3 1/2 c Bread flour
> 1/3 c Yellow cornmeal
> 1 1/2 c Boiling water
> 1/3 c Molasses
> 1 ts Salt
> 2 ts Butter
>
> Place cornmeal into a bowl. Carefully pour boiling water into
> cornmeal, stirring to make sure it is smooth. Let stand for about 30
> minutes.
> Stir in molasses, salt and butter. Place yeast into the B/M pan,
> bread flour, then cornmeal mixture. Select white bread and push
> start. NOTE: An early American recipe. This has become a favorite in
> many homes.
>
> From Loafing It by DAK
>
> MMMMM
>

On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 18:33:22 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 4/30/2016 4:59 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>(cross-posting snipped)
>
>What's up with this crap?

Just ignore it Jill. I'm familiar with this dolf guy, he's completely
unhinged and I think he posted here because a few serial trolls have
shown up here recently.

Just so you know I'm serious when I say he's nuts:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php...364934&fref=nf

But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.

And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
quelled, inclusive of where he posts.

As is just and right to do...

cshenk > wrote:
> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> dolf: "No Barry,

My auto spell correction inserted an improper word:

But the depraved and perverse individual did post to two religious groups.

And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
quelled, inclusive of where he posts.

As is just and right to do...

cshenk > wrote:
> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> dolf: "No Barry,

On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:04:45 -0500, dolf > wrote:

>But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>
>And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>
>As is just and right to do...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting

>cshenk > wrote:
>> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> dolf: "No Barry,

=-=-
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy
little classification in the DSM*."
David Melville
(*Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)

On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:17:31 -0500, dolf > wrote:

>My auto spell correction inserted an improper word:
>
>But the depraved and perverse individual did post to two religious groups.
>
>And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>
>As is just and right to do...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting

>cshenk > wrote:
>> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> dolf: "No Barry,
>
>
>

=-=-
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy
little classification in the DSM*."
David Melville
(*Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)

And your presence within religious newsgroups do not meet the prerequisite
requirement for participation and neither does your depraved and perverse
conduct accord to acceptable standards.

- dolf

Heisenberg > wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:04:45 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>
>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>
>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>
>> As is just and right to do...
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>
>> cshenk > wrote:
>>> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> dolf: "No Barry,
>

And your presence within religious newsgroups do not meet the prerequisite
requirement for participation and neither does your depraved and perverse
conduct accord to acceptable standards.

- dolf

Heisenberg > wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:17:31 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>
>> My auto spell correction inserted an improper word:
>>
>> But the depraved and perverse individual did post to two religious groups.
>>
>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>
>> As is just and right to do...
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>
>> cshenk > wrote:
>>> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> dolf: "No Barry,
>>
>>
>>
>

On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 20:42:57 -0500, dolf > wrote:

>And your presence within religious newsgroups do not meet the prerequisite
>requirement for participation and neither does your depraved and perverse
>conduct accord to acceptable standards.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting

>- dolf
>
>Heisenberg > wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:04:45 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>>
>>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>>
>>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>>
>>> As is just and right to do...
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>>
>>> cshenk > wrote:
>>>> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>
>>>>> dolf: "No Barry,
>>

=-=-
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy
little classification in the DSM*."
David Melville
(*Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)

On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 20:42:58 -0500, dolf > wrote:

>And your presence within religious newsgroups do not meet the prerequisite
>requirement for participation and neither does your depraved and perverse
>conduct accord to acceptable standards.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting

>- dolf
>
>Heisenberg > wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:17:31 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>>
>>> My auto spell correction inserted an improper word:
>>>
>>> But the depraved and perverse individual did post to two religious groups.
>>>
>>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>>
>>> As is just and right to do...
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>>
>>> cshenk > wrote:
>>>> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>>
>>>>> dolf: "No Barry,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

=-=-
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy
little classification in the DSM*."
David Melville
(*Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)

On 4/30/2016 5:04 PM, dolf wrote:
> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>
> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>
> As is just and right to do...
>
> cshenk > wrote:
>> dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> dolf: "No Barry,
>

Yes, dolf is definitely unhinged.
LOL

jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 4/30/2016 4:59 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > dolf wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> (cross-posting snipped)
>
> What's up with this crap?
>
> Jill

At one point we made the kids go away by posting recipes back to their
drivel.


>
> > > dolf: "No Barry,
> >
> > ENDLESS Drivel deleted. Relevant info to RFC added.
> >
> > MMMMM----- Recipe via Meal-Master (tm) v8.05
> >
> > Title: Anadama Bread
> > Categories: Breadmaker
> > Yield: 1 Loaf
> >
> > MMMMM------------------MICHAEL HATALA
> > RJHP21A-----------------------
> >
> > MMMMM---------------------FOR 1-1/2 LB.
> > LOAF-------------------------- 1 pk Yeast
> > 3 1/2 c Bread flour
> > 1/3 c Yellow cornmeal
> > 1 1/2 c Boiling water
> > 1/3 c Molasses
> > 1 ts Salt
> > 2 ts Butter
> >
> > Place cornmeal into a bowl. Carefully pour boiling water into
> > cornmeal, stirring to make sure it is smooth. Let stand for about
> > 30 minutes.
> > Stir in molasses, salt and butter. Place yeast into the B/M pan,
> > bread flour, then cornmeal mixture. Select white bread and push
> > start. NOTE: An early American recipe. This has become a favorite
> > in many homes.
> >
> > From Loafing It by DAK
> >
> > MMMMM
> >



--

dolf: "Find some other topic to post your f@cking senile diatribe in, and
cease your abuse here!

It's your absurd behaviour that is at issue. I have labored to refine my
statements until I have arrived at an acceptable retort and they meet a
desired level of clarity, such that they cannot be ignored and will
traverse the world.

But you pretend that things remain the same. The alternate as a true
realization will come to you eventually and I will not be held responsible
for its manifold harm to your wellbeing:

Because it was always a matter of your willfulness and choosing."

dolf: "Where [are my comments] *lacking in being a unified whole* which has
a cohesion (ie. the action or fact of forming a *united whole*) and
coherency (ie. the quality of being logical and consistent; the quality of
*forming a unified whole*) as indicative of an *integrity* and soundness of
mind?

Point it out if you are so capable."

INTEGRITY (noun):
the state of *being whole and undivided*:
€¢ the condition of *being unified* or sound in construction:

dolf: "Once you deservedly have that label of DEVIANCY ascribed to you,
anything else as a behaviour (eg. such as your repetitiveness) is then just
consequential to it, in being a continuing reality of an existing state of
perversity:

DEVIANCY (noun):
the fact or state of diverging from *usual* or *accepted standards*,
especially in social or sexual behaviour.

PERVERSE (adjective)
contrary to the *accepted* or *expected standard* or practice; sexually
perverted."

dolf: "You are the one who is making a derision (ie. contemptuous ridicule
or mockery) of me, by publicly proclaiming your ignorance as a virtue and
an exonerated state of being.

My mind was only set upon Spiritual things as that which I uttered and you
are entirely incapable of any comprehension of it, as it above you.

Yet you can't even find one statement, other than your own self evident
deprivation (ie. the lack or denial of something considered to be a
necessity; [archaic] the action of depriving someone of office, especially
an ecclesiastical office) that is driven by such a spirit of randomness
(ie. made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision;
[informal] odd, *unusual*, or *unexpected*) that you by such an act of
delusion convey it as a disparity (ie. a great difference)--to then be
considered an aberration (ie. a departure from what is normal, *usual*, or
*expected*, typically an unwelcome one), a derangement (ie. make [someone]
insane; *cause [something] to act irregularly*) and not conducive to its
collective totality as unity of being?"

dolf: "What is your empathy and motivation (ie. a reason or reasons for
*acting or behaving in a particular way*) with the story which would now
cause you to squawk (ie. *complain or protest* about something)?"

RL Measures: "Do atheists ever tire of kvetching?"

kvetch (noun):
a person who complains a great deal.
a *complaint*.

verb:
complain persistently.

ORIGIN 1960s: North Informal; from Yiddish kvetsh (noun), kvetshn (verb),
from Middle High German: quetschen, literally "crush.

dolf: "Wanke nicht, mein Vaterland (ie. Do not falter, my fatherland: a
sort of 'battle song' for freedom and independence). As I have already
said, that I shall look at the dread upon their faces, and see that which
they never thought would happen, come to pass: "For thou, LORD, hast made
me glad through thy work: I will triumph in the works of thy hands.

O LORD, how great are thy works! and thy thoughts are very deep.

A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this.

When the wicked spring as the grass, and when all the workers of iniquity
do flourish; it is that they shall be destroyed for ever:

But thou, LORD, art most high for evermore.

For, lo, thine enemies, O LORD, for, lo, thine enemies shall perish; all
the workers of iniquity shall be scattered.

But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be
anointed with fresh oil.

Mine eye also shall see my desire on mine enemies, and mine ears shall hear
my desire of the wicked that rise up against me.

The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar
in Lebanon.

Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts
of our God.

They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and
flourishing;

To shew that the LORD is upright: he is my rock, and there is no
unrighteousness in him." [Psalm 92:4-15 (KJV)]

MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: "In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of
morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or
omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations. Deciding what (if
anything) counts as 'morally obligatory' is a principal concern of ethics."

dolf: "And you now, being entirely driven by such a prospect of an orgy as
my debasement of them, do you have a desire to join in the rape and
pillage?

It's all blown and done.

Read it all, suck it in and realize that there is no eternal reward for
you. Then you ought to now f@ck off and die."

EXCERPTS FROM: "Roman Catholic Non-Belief as a 'Cock and Bull' Story of
Atheistic Redemption"

-
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...005 515364934

- dolf



Colonel Edmund J. Burke > wrote:
> On 4/30/2016 5:04 PM, dolf wrote:
>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>
>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>
> Yes, dolf is definitely unhinged.
> LOL
>
>

On Sun, 01 May 2016 14:29:15 -0500, dolf > wrote:

>dolf: "Find some other topic to post your f@cking senile diatribe in, and
>cease your abuse here!

It is important that you click on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting

>It's your absurd behaviour that is at issue. I have labored to refine my
>statements until I have arrived at an acceptable retort and they meet a
>desired level of clarity, such that they cannot be ignored and will
>traverse the world.
>
>But you pretend that things remain the same. The alternate as a true
>realization will come to you eventually and I will not be held responsible
>for its manifold harm to your wellbeing:
>
>Because it was always a matter of your willfulness and choosing."
>
>dolf: "Where [are my comments] *lacking in being a unified whole* which has
>a cohesion (ie. the action or fact of forming a *united whole*) and
>coherency (ie. the quality of being logical and consistent; the quality of
>*forming a unified whole*) as indicative of an *integrity* and soundness of
>mind?
>
>Point it out if you are so capable."
>
>INTEGRITY (noun):
>the state of *being whole and undivided*:
>• the condition of *being unified* or sound in construction:
>
>dolf: "Once you deservedly have that label of DEVIANCY ascribed to you,
>anything else as a behaviour (eg. such as your repetitiveness) is then just
>consequential to it, in being a continuing reality of an existing state of
>perversity:
>
>DEVIANCY (noun):
>the fact or state of diverging from *usual* or *accepted standards*,
>especially in social or sexual behaviour.
>
>PERVERSE (adjective)
>contrary to the *accepted* or *expected standard* or practice; sexually
>perverted."
>
>dolf: "You are the one who is making a derision (ie. contemptuous ridicule
>or mockery) of me, by publicly proclaiming your ignorance as a virtue and
>an exonerated state of being.
>
>My mind was only set upon Spiritual things as that which I uttered and you
>are entirely incapable of any comprehension of it, as it above you.
>
>Yet you can't even find one statement, other than your own self evident
>deprivation (ie. the lack or denial of something considered to be a
>necessity; [archaic] the action of depriving someone of office, especially
>an ecclesiastical office) that is driven by such a spirit of randomness
>(ie. made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision;
>[informal] odd, *unusual*, or *unexpected*) that you by such an act of
>delusion convey it as a disparity (ie. a great difference)--to then be
>considered an aberration (ie. a departure from what is normal, *usual*, or
>*expected*, typically an unwelcome one), a derangement (ie. make [someone]
>insane; *cause [something] to act irregularly*) and not conducive to its
>collective totality as unity of being?"
>
>dolf: "What is your empathy and motivation (ie. a reason or reasons for
>*acting or behaving in a particular way*) with the story which would now
>cause you to squawk (ie. *complain or protest* about something)?"
>
>RL Measures: "Do atheists ever tire of kvetching?"
>
>kvetch (noun):
>a person who complains a great deal.
>a *complaint*.
>
>verb:
>complain persistently.
>
>ORIGIN 1960s: North Informal; from Yiddish kvetsh (noun), kvetshn (verb),
>from Middle High German: quetschen, literally ‘crush’.
>
>dolf: "Wanke nicht, mein Vaterland (ie. Do not falter, my fatherland: a
>sort of 'battle song' for freedom and independence). As I have already
>said, that I shall look at the dread upon their faces, and see that which
>they never thought would happen, come to pass: "For thou, LORD, hast made
>me glad through thy work: I will triumph in the works of thy hands.
>
>O LORD, how great are thy works! and thy thoughts are very deep.
>
>A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this.
>
>When the wicked spring as the grass, and when all the workers of iniquity
>do flourish; it is that they shall be destroyed for ever:
>
>But thou, LORD, art most high for evermore.
>
>For, lo, thine enemies, O LORD, for, lo, thine enemies shall perish; all
>the workers of iniquity shall be scattered.
>
>But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be
>anointed with fresh oil.
>
>Mine eye also shall see my desire on mine enemies, and mine ears shall hear
>my desire of the wicked that rise up against me.
>
>The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar
>in Lebanon.
>
>Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts
>of our God.
>
>They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and
>flourishing;
>
>To shew that the LORD is upright: he is my rock, and there is no
>unrighteousness in him." [Psalm 92:4-15 (KJV)]
>
>MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: "In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of
>morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or
>omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations. Deciding what (if
>anything) counts as 'morally obligatory' is a principal concern of ethics."
>
>dolf: "And you now, being entirely driven by such a prospect of an orgy as
>my debasement of them, do you have a desire to join in the rape and
>pillage?
>
>It's all blown and done.
>
>Read it all, suck it in and realize that there is no eternal reward for
>you. Then you ought to now f@ck off and die."
>
>EXCERPTS FROM: "Roman Catholic Non-Belief as a 'Cock and Bull' Story of
>Atheistic Redemption"
>
>-
>https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...005 515364934
>
>- dolf
>
>
>
>Colonel Edmund J. Burke > wrote:
>> On 4/30/2016 5:04 PM, dolf wrote:
>>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>>
>>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>>
>> Yes, dolf is definitely unhinged.
>> LOL

He proves it with every post.

=-=-
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy
little classification in the DSM*."
David Melville
(*Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)

I'm entitled to preserve my dignity and public reputation when it is
irrationally being impugned by an individual such as you--and I will
continue to do so, until you have no further enjoyment from your perverse
conduct.

Quoting is a matter of sensibilities and can done in a variety of ways.

And neither is top posting an infringement especially when the viewpoint
advanced is of a higher prerogative and as a positional statement has
transcendence. ۬
Those above are arbitrary techniques, but the accepted standards which
governs your non-participation are not arbitrary and neither are they
mitigated by your posting a www-page link as claims of my infractions.

I say again Barry, "And even as they did not like to retain God in their
knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which
are not convenient;" [Romans 1:28]

Isn't the name Heisenberg which you use associated with methamphetamine
culture and indirectly with a need for a Nazi and fascist re-education?

Then it's somewhat hypocritical for you to be engaging in a disparity of
people's names when you bear such a tainted identity yourself.
۬- dolf


Heisenberg > wrote:
> On Sun, 01 May 2016 14:29:15 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>
>> dolf: "Find some other topic to post your f@cking senile diatribe in, and
>> cease your abuse here!
>
> It is important that you click on
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>
>> It's your absurd behaviour that is at issue. I have labored to refine my
>> statements until I have arrived at an acceptable retort and they meet a
>> desired level of clarity, such that they cannot be ignored and will
>> traverse the world.
>>
>> But you pretend that things remain the same. The alternate as a true
>> realization will come to you eventually and I will not be held responsible
>> for its manifold harm to your wellbeing:
>>
>> Because it was always a matter of your willfulness and choosing."
>>
>> dolf: "Where [are my comments] *lacking in being a unified whole* which has
>> a cohesion (ie. the action or fact of forming a *united whole*) and
>> coherency (ie. the quality of being logical and consistent; the quality of
>> *forming a unified whole*) as indicative of an *integrity* and soundness of
>> mind?
>>
>> Point it out if you are so capable."
>>
>> INTEGRITY (noun):
>> the state of *being whole and undivided*:
>> • the condition of *being unified* or sound in construction:
>>
>> dolf: "Once you deservedly have that label of DEVIANCY ascribed to you,
>> anything else as a behaviour (eg. such as your repetitiveness) is then just
>> consequential to it, in being a continuing reality of an existing state of
>> perversity:
>>
>> DEVIANCY (noun):
>> the fact or state of diverging from *usual* or *accepted standards*,
>> especially in social or sexual behaviour.
>>
>> PERVERSE (adjective)
>> contrary to the *accepted* or *expected standard* or practice; sexually
>> perverted."
>>
>> dolf: "You are the one who is making a derision (ie. contemptuous ridicule
>> or mockery) of me, by publicly proclaiming your ignorance as a virtue and
>> an exonerated state of being.
>>
>> My mind was only set upon Spiritual things as that which I uttered and you
>> are entirely incapable of any comprehension of it, as it above you.
>>
>> Yet you can't even find one statement, other than your own self evident
>> deprivation (ie. the lack or denial of something considered to be a
>> necessity; [archaic] the action of depriving someone of office, especially
>> an ecclesiastical office) that is driven by such a spirit of randomness
>> (ie. made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision;
>> [informal] odd, *unusual*, or *unexpected*) that you by such an act of
>> delusion convey it as a disparity (ie. a great difference)--to then be
>> considered an aberration (ie. a departure from what is normal, *usual*, or
>> *expected*, typically an unwelcome one), a derangement (ie. make [someone]
>> insane; *cause [something] to act irregularly*) and not conducive to its
>> collective totality as unity of being?"
>>
>> dolf: "What is your empathy and motivation (ie. a reason or reasons for
>> *acting or behaving in a particular way*) with the story which would now
>> cause you to squawk (ie. *complain or protest* about something)?"
>>
>> RL Measures: "Do atheists ever tire of kvetching?"
>>
>> kvetch (noun):
>> a person who complains a great deal.
>> a *complaint*.
>>
>> verb:
>> complain persistently.
>>
>> ORIGIN 1960s: North Informal; from Yiddish kvetsh (noun), kvetshn (verb),
>> from Middle High German: quetschen, literally ‘crush’.
>>
>> dolf: "Wanke nicht, mein Vaterland (ie. Do not falter, my fatherland: a
>> sort of 'battle song' for freedom and independence). As I have already
>> said, that I shall look at the dread upon their faces, and see that which
>> they never thought would happen, come to pass: "For thou, LORD, hast made
>> me glad through thy work: I will triumph in the works of thy hands.
>>
>> O LORD, how great are thy works! and thy thoughts are very deep.
>>
>> A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this.
>>
>> When the wicked spring as the grass, and when all the workers of iniquity
>> do flourish; it is that they shall be destroyed for ever:
>>
>> But thou, LORD, art most high for evermore.
>>
>> For, lo, thine enemies, O LORD, for, lo, thine enemies shall perish; all
>> the workers of iniquity shall be scattered.
>>
>> But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be
>> anointed with fresh oil.
>>
>> Mine eye also shall see my desire on mine enemies, and mine ears shall hear
>> my desire of the wicked that rise up against me.
>>
>> The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar
>> in Lebanon.
>>
>> Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts
>> of our God.
>>
>> They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and
>> flourishing;
>>
>> To shew that the LORD is upright: he is my rock, and there is no
>> unrighteousness in him." [Psalm 92:4-15 (KJV)]
>>
>> MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: "In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of
>> morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or
>> omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations. Deciding what (if
>> anything) counts as 'morally obligatory' is a principal concern of ethics."
>>
>> dolf: "And you now, being entirely driven by such a prospect of an orgy as
>> my debasement of them, do you have a desire to join in the rape and
>> pillage?
>>
>> It's all blown and done.
>>
>> Read it all, suck it in and realize that there is no eternal reward for
>> you. Then you ought to now f@ck off and die."
>>
>> EXCERPTS FROM: "Roman Catholic Non-Belief as a 'Cock and Bull' Story of
>> Atheistic Redemption"
>>
>> -
>> https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...005 515364934
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>>
>>
>> Colonel Edmund J. Burke > wrote:
>>> On 4/30/2016 5:04 PM, dolf wrote:
>>>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>>>
>>>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>>>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>>>
>>> Yes, dolf is definitely unhinged.
>>> LOL
>
> He proves it with every post

Cease your repeated postings Dolf!



On Sun, 01 May 2016 18:52:25 -0500, dolf > wrote:

>I'm entitled to preserve my dignity and public reputation when it is
>irrationally being impugned by an individual such as you--and I will
>continue to do so, until you have no further enjoyment from your perverse
>conduct.
>
>Quoting is a matter of sensibilities and can done in a variety of ways.
>
>And neither is top posting an infringement especially when the viewpoint
>advanced is of a higher prerogative and as a positional statement has
>transcendence. ?
>Those above are arbitrary techniques, but the accepted standards which
>governs your non-participation are not arbitrary and neither are they
>mitigated by your posting a www-page link as claims of my infractions.
>
>I say again Barry, "And even as they did not like to retain God in their
>knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which
>are not convenient;" [Romans 1:28]
>
>Isn't the name Heisenberg which you use associated with methamphetamine
>culture and indirectly with a need for a Nazi and fascist re-education?
>
>Then it's somewhat hypocritical for you to be engaging in a disparity of
>people's names when you bear such a tainted identity yourself.
>?- dolf
>
>
>Heisenberg > wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 May 2016 14:29:15 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>>
>>> dolf: "Find some other topic to post your f@cking senile diatribe in, and
>>> cease your abuse here!
>>
>> It is important that you click on
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>>
>>> It's your absurd behaviour that is at issue. I have labored to refine my
>>> statements until I have arrived at an acceptable retort and they meet a
>>> desired level of clarity, such that they cannot be ignored and will
>>> traverse the world.
>>>
>>> But you pretend that things remain the same. The alternate as a true
>>> realization will come to you eventually and I will not be held responsible
>>> for its manifold harm to your wellbeing:
>>>
>>> Because it was always a matter of your willfulness and choosing."
>>>
>>> dolf: "Where [are my comments] *lacking in being a unified whole* which has
>>> a cohesion (ie. the action or fact of forming a *united whole*) and
>>> coherency (ie. the quality of being logical and consistent; the quality of
>>> *forming a unified whole*) as indicative of an *integrity* and soundness of
>>> mind?
>>>
>>> Point it out if you are so capable."
>>>
>>> INTEGRITY (noun):
>>> the state of *being whole and undivided*:
>>> ? the condition of *being unified* or sound in construction:
>>>
>>> dolf: "Once you deservedly have that label of DEVIANCY ascribed to you,
>>> anything else as a behaviour (eg. such as your repetitiveness) is then just
>>> consequential to it, in being a continuing reality of an existing state of
>>> perversity:
>>>
>>> DEVIANCY (noun):
>>> the fact or state of diverging from *usual* or *accepted standards*,
>>> especially in social or sexual behaviour.
>>>
>>> PERVERSE (adjective)
>>> contrary to the *accepted* or *expected standard* or practice; sexually
>>> perverted."
>>>
>>> dolf: "You are the one who is making a derision (ie. contemptuous ridicule
>>> or mockery) of me, by publicly proclaiming your ignorance as a virtue and
>>> an exonerated state of being.
>>>
>>> My mind was only set upon Spiritual things as that which I uttered and you
>>> are entirely incapable of any comprehension of it, as it above you.
>>>
>>> Yet you can't even find one statement, other than your own self evident
>>> deprivation (ie. the lack or denial of something considered to be a
>>> necessity; [archaic] the action of depriving someone of office, especially
>>> an ecclesiastical office) that is driven by such a spirit of randomness
>>> (ie. made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision;
>>> [informal] odd, *unusual*, or *unexpected*) that you by such an act of
>>> delusion convey it as a disparity (ie. a great difference)--to then be
>>> considered an aberration (ie. a departure from what is normal, *usual*, or
>>> *expected*, typically an unwelcome one), a derangement (ie. make [someone]
>>> insane; *cause [something] to act irregularly*) and not conducive to its
>>> collective totality as unity of being?"
>>>
>>> dolf: "What is your empathy and motivation (ie. a reason or reasons for
>>> *acting or behaving in a particular way*) with the story which would now
>>> cause you to squawk (ie. *complain or protest* about something)?"
>>>
>>> RL Measures: "Do atheists ever tire of kvetching?"
>>>
>>> kvetch (noun):
>>> a person who complains a great deal.
>>> a *complaint*.
>>>
>>> verb:
>>> complain persistently.
>>>
>>> ORIGIN 1960s: North Informal; from Yiddish kvetsh (noun), kvetshn (verb),
>>> from Middle High German: quetschen, literally ?crush?.
>>>
>>> dolf: "Wanke nicht, mein Vaterland (ie. Do not falter, my fatherland: a
>>> sort of 'battle song' for freedom and independence). As I have already
>>> said, that I shall look at the dread upon their faces, and see that which
>>> they never thought would happen, come to pass: "For thou, LORD, hast made
>>> me glad through thy work: I will triumph in the works of thy hands.
>>>
>>> O LORD, how great are thy works! and thy thoughts are very deep.
>>>
>>> A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this.
>>>
>>> When the wicked spring as the grass, and when all the workers of iniquity
>>> do flourish; it is that they shall be destroyed for ever:
>>>
>>> But thou, LORD, art most high for evermore.
>>>
>>> For, lo, thine enemies, O LORD, for, lo, thine enemies shall perish; all
>>> the workers of iniquity shall be scattered.
>>>
>>> But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be
>>> anointed with fresh oil.
>>>
>>> Mine eye also shall see my desire on mine enemies, and mine ears shall hear
>>> my desire of the wicked that rise up against me.
>>>
>>> The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar
>>> in Lebanon.
>>>
>>> Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts
>>> of our God.
>>>
>>> They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and
>>> flourishing;
>>>
>>> To shew that the LORD is upright: he is my rock, and there is no
>>> unrighteousness in him." [Psalm 92:4-15 (KJV)]
>>>
>>> MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: "In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of
>>> morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or
>>> omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations. Deciding what (if
>>> anything) counts as 'morally obligatory' is a principal concern of ethics."
>>>
>>> dolf: "And you now, being entirely driven by such a prospect of an orgy as
>>> my debasement of them, do you have a desire to join in the rape and
>>> pillage?
>>>
>>> It's all blown and done.
>>>
>>> Read it all, suck it in and realize that there is no eternal reward for
>>> you. Then you ought to now f@ck off and die."
>>>
>>> EXCERPTS FROM: "Roman Catholic Non-Belief as a 'Cock and Bull' Story of
>>> Atheistic Redemption"
>>>
>>> -
>>> https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...005 515364934
>>>
>>> - dolf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Colonel Edmund J. Burke > wrote:
>>>> On 4/30/2016 5:04 PM, dolf wrote:
>>>>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>>>>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, dolf is definitely unhinged.
>>>> LOL
>>
>> He proves it with every post

=-=-
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy
little classification in the DSM*."
David Melville
(*Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)

I did read one of your articles but the argumentation as justification for
conduct was very weak and seemed to be driven by a person living a 2
dimensional existence when the reality is different...

Heisenberg > wrote:
> Cease your repeated postings Dolf!
>

Welcome to the world of top posting...

So this technique is a encompassing variation on my last approach...

He are some problems you face:

1) You are the one initiating repetitive posts;
2) Your signature too long;
3) Your posting new content to quoted content ratio is too low;
4) You routinely express no new or progression in thought; and
5) You are posting anonymously:

- dolf


>
> On Sun, 01 May 2016 18:52:25 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>
>> I'm entitled to preserve my dignity and public reputation when it is
>> irrationally being impugned by an individual such as you--and I will
>> continue to do so, until you have no further enjoyment from your perverse
>> conduct.
>>
>> Quoting is a matter of sensibilities and can done in a variety of ways.
>>
>> And neither is top posting an infringement especially when the viewpoint
>> advanced is of a higher prerogative and as a positional statement has
>> transcendence. ?
>> Those above are arbitrary techniques, but the accepted standards which
>> governs your non-participation are not arbitrary and neither are they
>> mitigated by your posting a www-page link as claims of my infractions.
>>
>> I say again Barry, "And even as they did not like to retain God in their
>> knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which
>> are not convenient;" [Romans 1:28]
>>
>> Isn't the name Heisenberg which you use associated with methamphetamine
>> culture and indirectly with a need for a Nazi and fascist re-education?
>>
>> Then it's somewhat hypocritical for you to be engaging in a disparity of
>> people's names when you bear such a tainted identity yourself.
>> ?- dolf
>>
>>
>> Heisenberg > wrote:
>>> On Sun, 01 May 2016 14:29:15 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>>>
>>>> dolf: "Find some other topic to post your f@cking senile diatribe in, and
>>>> cease your abuse here!
>>>
>>> It is important that you click on
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>>>
>>>> It's your absurd behaviour that is at issue. I have labored to refine my
>>>> statements until I have arrived at an acceptable retort and they meet a
>>>> desired level of clarity, such that they cannot be ignored and will
>>>> traverse the world.
>>>>
>>>> But you pretend that things remain the same. The alternate as a true
>>>> realization will come to you eventually and I will not be held responsible
>>>> for its manifold harm to your wellbeing:
>>>>
>>>> Because it was always a matter of your willfulness and choosing."
>>>>
>>>> dolf: "Where [are my comments] *lacking in being a unified whole* which has
>>>> a cohesion (ie. the action or fact of forming a *united whole*) and
>>>> coherency (ie. the quality of being logical and consistent; the quality of
>>>> *forming a unified whole*) as indicative of an *integrity* and soundness of
>>>> mind?
>>>>
>>>> Point it out if you are so capable."
>>>>
>>>> INTEGRITY (noun):
>>>> the state of *being whole and undivided*:
>>>> ? the condition of *being unified* or sound in construction:
>>>>
>>>> dolf: "Once you deservedly have that label of DEVIANCY ascribed to you,
>>>> anything else as a behaviour (eg. such as your repetitiveness) is then just
>>>> consequential to it, in being a continuing reality of an existing state of
>>>> perversity:
>>>>
>>>> DEVIANCY (noun):
>>>> the fact or state of diverging from *usual* or *accepted standards*,
>>>> especially in social or sexual behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> PERVERSE (adjective)
>>>> contrary to the *accepted* or *expected standard* or practice; sexually
>>>> perverted."
>>>>
>>>> dolf: "You are the one who is making a derision (ie. contemptuous ridicule
>>>> or mockery) of me, by publicly proclaiming your ignorance as a virtue and
>>>> an exonerated state of being.
>>>>
>>>> My mind was only set upon Spiritual things as that which I uttered and you
>>>> are entirely incapable of any comprehension of it, as it above you.
>>>>
>>>> Yet you can't even find one statement, other than your own self evident
>>>> deprivation (ie. the lack or denial of something considered to be a
>>>> necessity; [archaic] the action of depriving someone of office, especially
>>>> an ecclesiastical office) that is driven by such a spirit of randomness
>>>> (ie. made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision;
>>>> [informal] odd, *unusual*, or *unexpected*) that you by such an act of
>>>> delusion convey it as a disparity (ie. a great difference)--to then be
>>>> considered an aberration (ie. a departure from what is normal, *usual*, or
>>>> *expected*, typically an unwelcome one), a derangement (ie. make [someone]
>>>> insane; *cause [something] to act irregularly*) and not conducive to its
>>>> collective totality as unity of being?"
>>>>
>>>> dolf: "What is your empathy and motivation (ie. a reason or reasons for
>>>> *acting or behaving in a particular way*) with the story which would now
>>>> cause you to squawk (ie. *complain or protest* about something)?"
>>>>
>>>> RL Measures: "Do atheists ever tire of kvetching?"
>>>>
>>>> kvetch (noun):
>>>> a person who complains a great deal.
>>>> a *complaint*.
>>>>
>>>> verb:
>>>> complain persistently.
>>>>
>>>> ORIGIN 1960s: North Informal; from Yiddish kvetsh (noun), kvetshn (verb),
>>>> from Middle High German: quetschen, literally ?crush?.
>>>>
>>>> dolf: "Wanke nicht, mein Vaterland (ie. Do not falter, my fatherland: a
>>>> sort of 'battle song' for freedom and independence). As I have already
>>>> said, that I shall look at the dread upon their faces, and see that which
>>>> they never thought would happen, come to pass: "For thou, LORD, hast made
>>>> me glad through thy work: I will triumph in the works of thy hands.
>>>>
>>>> O LORD, how great are thy works! and thy thoughts are very deep.
>>>>
>>>> A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this.
>>>>
>>>> When the wicked spring as the grass, and when all the workers of iniquity
>>>> do flourish; it is that they shall be destroyed for ever:
>>>>
>>>> But thou, LORD, art most high for evermore.
>>>>
>>>> For, lo, thine enemies, O LORD, for, lo, thine enemies shall perish; all
>>>> the workers of iniquity shall be scattered.
>>>>
>>>> But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be
>>>> anointed with fresh oil.
>>>>
>>>> Mine eye also shall see my desire on mine enemies, and mine ears shall hear
>>>> my desire of the wicked that rise up against me.
>>>>
>>>> The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar
>>>> in Lebanon.
>>>>
>>>> Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts
>>>> of our God.
>>>>
>>>> They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and
>>>> flourishing;
>>>>
>>>> To shew that the LORD is upright: he is my rock, and there is no
>>>> unrighteousness in him." [Psalm 92:4-15 (KJV)]
>>>>
>>>> MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: "In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of
>>>> morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or
>>>> omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations. Deciding what (if
>>>> anything) counts as 'morally obligatory' is a principal concern of ethics."
>>>>
>>>> dolf: "And you now, being entirely driven by such a prospect of an orgy as
>>>> my debasement of them, do you have a desire to join in the rape and
>>>> pillage?
>>>>
>>>> It's all blown and done.
>>>>
>>>> Read it all, suck it in and realize that there is no eternal reward for
>>>> you. Then you ought to now f@ck off and die."
>>>>
>>>> EXCERPTS FROM: "Roman Catholic Non-Belief as a 'Cock and Bull' Story of
>>>> Atheistic Redemption"
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...005 515364934
>>>>
>>>> - dolf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Colonel Edmund J. Burke > wrote:
>>>>> On 4/30/2016 5:04 PM, dolf wrote:
>>>>>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>>>>>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, dolf is definitely unhinged.
>>>>> LOL
>>>
>>> He proves it with every post
>

On Mon, 02 May 2016 05:03:47 -0500, dolf > wrote:

>I did read one of your articles but the argumentation as justification for
>conduct was very weak and seemed to be driven by a person living a 2
>dimensional existence when the reality is different...
>
>Heisenberg > wrote:
>> Cease your repeated postings Dolf!
>>
>
>Welcome to the world of top posting...
>
>So this technique is a encompassing variation on my last approach...
>
>He are some problems you face:

Only with you.

>1) You are the one initiating repetitive posts;
>2) Your signature too long;
>3) Your posting new content to quoted content ratio is too low;
>4) You routinely express no new or progression in thought; and
>5) You are posting anonymously:

Is that what people say about you?

>- dolf
>
>
>>
>> On Sun, 01 May 2016 18:52:25 -0500, dolf > wrote:

You should read
https://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting

Are you up to it Dolf?

>>> I'm entitled to preserve my dignity and public reputation when it is
>>> irrationally being impugned by an individual such as you--and I will
>>> continue to do so, until you have no further enjoyment from your perverse
>>> conduct.
>>>
>>> Quoting is a matter of sensibilities and can done in a variety of ways.
>>>
>>> And neither is top posting an infringement especially when the viewpoint
>>> advanced is of a higher prerogative and as a positional statement has
>>> transcendence. ?
>>> Those above are arbitrary techniques, but the accepted standards which
>>> governs your non-participation are not arbitrary and neither are they
>>> mitigated by your posting a www-page link as claims of my infractions.
>>>
>>> I say again Barry, "And even as they did not like to retain God in their
>>> knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which
>>> are not convenient;" [Romans 1:28]
>>>
>>> Isn't the name Heisenberg which you use associated with methamphetamine
>>> culture and indirectly with a need for a Nazi and fascist re-education?
>>>
>>> Then it's somewhat hypocritical for you to be engaging in a disparity of
>>> people's names when you bear such a tainted identity yourself.
>>> ?- dolf
>>>
>>>
>>> Heisenberg > wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 01 May 2016 14:29:15 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> dolf: "Find some other topic to post your f@cking senile diatribe in, and
>>>>> cease your abuse here!
>>>>
>>>> It is important that you click on
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>>>>
>>>>> It's your absurd behaviour that is at issue. I have labored to refine my
>>>>> statements until I have arrived at an acceptable retort and they meet a
>>>>> desired level of clarity, such that they cannot be ignored and will
>>>>> traverse the world.
>>>>>
>>>>> But you pretend that things remain the same. The alternate as a true
>>>>> realization will come to you eventually and I will not be held responsible
>>>>> for its manifold harm to your wellbeing:
>>>>>
>>>>> Because it was always a matter of your willfulness and choosing."
>>>>>
>>>>> dolf: "Where [are my comments] *lacking in being a unified whole* which has
>>>>> a cohesion (ie. the action or fact of forming a *united whole*) and
>>>>> coherency (ie. the quality of being logical and consistent; the quality of
>>>>> *forming a unified whole*) as indicative of an *integrity* and soundness of
>>>>> mind?
>>>>>
>>>>> Point it out if you are so capable."
>>>>>
>>>>> INTEGRITY (noun):
>>>>> the state of *being whole and undivided*:
>>>>> ? the condition of *being unified* or sound in construction:
>>>>>
>>>>> dolf: "Once you deservedly have that label of DEVIANCY ascribed to you,
>>>>> anything else as a behaviour (eg. such as your repetitiveness) is then just
>>>>> consequential to it, in being a continuing reality of an existing state of
>>>>> perversity:
>>>>>
>>>>> DEVIANCY (noun):
>>>>> the fact or state of diverging from *usual* or *accepted standards*,
>>>>> especially in social or sexual behaviour.
>>>>>
>>>>> PERVERSE (adjective)
>>>>> contrary to the *accepted* or *expected standard* or practice; sexually
>>>>> perverted."
>>>>>
>>>>> dolf: "You are the one who is making a derision (ie. contemptuous ridicule
>>>>> or mockery) of me, by publicly proclaiming your ignorance as a virtue and
>>>>> an exonerated state of being.
>>>>>
>>>>> My mind was only set upon Spiritual things as that which I uttered and you
>>>>> are entirely incapable of any comprehension of it, as it above you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet you can't even find one statement, other than your own self evident
>>>>> deprivation (ie. the lack or denial of something considered to be a
>>>>> necessity; [archaic] the action of depriving someone of office, especially
>>>>> an ecclesiastical office) that is driven by such a spirit of randomness
>>>>> (ie. made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision;
>>>>> [informal] odd, *unusual*, or *unexpected*) that you by such an act of
>>>>> delusion convey it as a disparity (ie. a great difference)--to then be
>>>>> considered an aberration (ie. a departure from what is normal, *usual*, or
>>>>> *expected*, typically an unwelcome one), a derangement (ie. make [someone]
>>>>> insane; *cause [something] to act irregularly*) and not conducive to its
>>>>> collective totality as unity of being?"
>>>>>
>>>>> dolf: "What is your empathy and motivation (ie. a reason or reasons for
>>>>> *acting or behaving in a particular way*) with the story which would now
>>>>> cause you to squawk (ie. *complain or protest* about something)?"
>>>>>
>>>>> RL Measures: "Do atheists ever tire of kvetching?"
>>>>>
>>>>> kvetch (noun):
>>>>> a person who complains a great deal.
>>>>> a *complaint*.
>>>>>
>>>>> verb:
>>>>> complain persistently.
>>>>>
>>>>> ORIGIN 1960s: North Informal; from Yiddish kvetsh (noun), kvetshn (verb),
>>>>> from Middle High German: quetschen, literally ?crush?.
>>>>>
>>>>> dolf: "Wanke nicht, mein Vaterland (ie. Do not falter, my fatherland: a
>>>>> sort of 'battle song' for freedom and independence). As I have already
>>>>> said, that I shall look at the dread upon their faces, and see that which
>>>>> they never thought would happen, come to pass: "For thou, LORD, hast made
>>>>> me glad through thy work: I will triumph in the works of thy hands.
>>>>>
>>>>> O LORD, how great are thy works! and thy thoughts are very deep.
>>>>>
>>>>> A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this.
>>>>>
>>>>> When the wicked spring as the grass, and when all the workers of iniquity
>>>>> do flourish; it is that they shall be destroyed for ever:
>>>>>
>>>>> But thou, LORD, art most high for evermore.
>>>>>
>>>>> For, lo, thine enemies, O LORD, for, lo, thine enemies shall perish; all
>>>>> the workers of iniquity shall be scattered.
>>>>>
>>>>> But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be
>>>>> anointed with fresh oil.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mine eye also shall see my desire on mine enemies, and mine ears shall hear
>>>>> my desire of the wicked that rise up against me.
>>>>>
>>>>> The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar
>>>>> in Lebanon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts
>>>>> of our God.
>>>>>
>>>>> They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and
>>>>> flourishing;
>>>>>
>>>>> To shew that the LORD is upright: he is my rock, and there is no
>>>>> unrighteousness in him." [Psalm 92:4-15 (KJV)]
>>>>>
>>>>> MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: "In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of
>>>>> morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or
>>>>> omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations. Deciding what (if
>>>>> anything) counts as 'morally obligatory' is a principal concern of ethics."
>>>>>
>>>>> dolf: "And you now, being entirely driven by such a prospect of an orgy as
>>>>> my debasement of them, do you have a desire to join in the rape and
>>>>> pillage?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's all blown and done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Read it all, suck it in and realize that there is no eternal reward for
>>>>> you. Then you ought to now f@ck off and die."
>>>>>
>>>>> EXCERPTS FROM: "Roman Catholic Non-Belief as a 'Cock and Bull' Story of
>>>>> Atheistic Redemption"
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...005 515364934
>>>>>
>>>>> - dolf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Colonel Edmund J. Burke > wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/30/2016 5:04 PM, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>>>>>>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, dolf is definitely unhinged.
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>> He proves it with every post
>>
>

=-=-
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy
little classification in the DSM*."
David Melville
(*Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)

I'm going to take a respite from responding further to Barry O'ORADY as I
intend to enjoy reading a just arrived book titled: "Seeing Things As They
Are" (c) 2015 by John R. Searle.

It may give me some further insights into what I have already noticed with
you "No Barry, you have that arse-about (ie. contrary to what is usual,
expected, or logical), and your responses are being driven only by the
contextual affection as a phantom, which the words superficially impart to
your mind, rather than by a knowledge of their intent as meaning. Because
the term "cock and bull story" is an implausible story used as an
explanation or excuse."

- dolf

Heisenberg > wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2016 05:03:47 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>
>> I did read one of your articles but the argumentation as justification for
>> conduct was very weak and seemed to be driven by a person living a 2
>> dimensional existence when the reality is different...
>>
>> Heisenberg > wrote:
>>> Cease your repeated postings Dolf!
>>>
>>
>> Welcome to the world of top posting...
>>
>> So this technique is a encompassing variation on my last approach...
>>
>> He are some problems you face:
>
> Only with you.
>
>> 1) You are the one initiating repetitive posts;
>> 2) Your signature too long;
>> 3) Your posting new content to quoted content ratio is too low;
>> 4) You routinely express no new or progression in thought; and
>> 5) You are posting anonymously:
>
> Is that what people say about you?
>
>> - dolf
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 01 May 2016 18:52:25 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>
> You should read
> https://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html
> and
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>
> Are you up to it Dolf?
>
>>>> I'm entitled to preserve my dignity and public reputation when it is
>>>> irrationally being impugned by an individual such as you--and I will
>>>> continue to do so, until you have no further enjoyment from your perverse
>>>> conduct.
>>>>
>>>> Quoting is a matter of sensibilities and can done in a variety of ways.
>>>>
>>>> And neither is top posting an infringement especially when the viewpoint
>>>> advanced is of a higher prerogative and as a positional statement has
>>>> transcendence. ?
>>>> Those above are arbitrary techniques, but the accepted standards which
>>>> governs your non-participation are not arbitrary and neither are they
>>>> mitigated by your posting a www-page link as claims of my infractions.
>>>>
>>>> I say again Barry, "And even as they did not like to retain God in their
>>>> knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which
>>>> are not convenient;" [Romans 1:28]
>>>>
>>>> Isn't the name Heisenberg which you use associated with methamphetamine
>>>> culture and indirectly with a need for a Nazi and fascist re-education?
>>>>
>>>> Then it's somewhat hypocritical for you to be engaging in a disparity of
>>>> people's names when you bear such a tainted identity yourself.
>>>> ?- dolf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Heisenberg > wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 01 May 2016 14:29:15 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> dolf: "Find some other topic to post your f@cking senile diatribe in, and
>>>>>> cease your abuse here!
>>>>>
>>>>> It is important that you click on
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's your absurd behaviour that is at issue. I have labored to refine my
>>>>>> statements until I have arrived at an acceptable retort and they meet a
>>>>>> desired level of clarity, such that they cannot be ignored and will
>>>>>> traverse the world.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But you pretend that things remain the same. The alternate as a true
>>>>>> realization will come to you eventually and I will not be held responsible
>>>>>> for its manifold harm to your wellbeing:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because it was always a matter of your willfulness and choosing."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dolf: "Where [are my comments] *lacking in being a unified whole* which has
>>>>>> a cohesion (ie. the action or fact of forming a *united whole*) and
>>>>>> coherency (ie. the quality of being logical and consistent; the quality of
>>>>>> *forming a unified whole*) as indicative of an *integrity* and soundness of
>>>>>> mind?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Point it out if you are so capable."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> INTEGRITY (noun):
>>>>>> the state of *being whole and undivided*:
>>>>>> ? the condition of *being unified* or sound in construction:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dolf: "Once you deservedly have that label of DEVIANCY ascribed to you,
>>>>>> anything else as a behaviour (eg. such as your repetitiveness) is then just
>>>>>> consequential to it, in being a continuing reality of an existing state of
>>>>>> perversity:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DEVIANCY (noun):
>>>>>> the fact or state of diverging from *usual* or *accepted standards*,
>>>>>> especially in social or sexual behaviour.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PERVERSE (adjective)
>>>>>> contrary to the *accepted* or *expected standard* or practice; sexually
>>>>>> perverted."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dolf: "You are the one who is making a derision (ie. contemptuous ridicule
>>>>>> or mockery) of me, by publicly proclaiming your ignorance as a virtue and
>>>>>> an exonerated state of being.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My mind was only set upon Spiritual things as that which I uttered and you
>>>>>> are entirely incapable of any comprehension of it, as it above you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet you can't even find one statement, other than your own self evident
>>>>>> deprivation (ie. the lack or denial of something considered to be a
>>>>>> necessity; [archaic] the action of depriving someone of office, especially
>>>>>> an ecclesiastical office) that is driven by such a spirit of randomness
>>>>>> (ie. made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision;
>>>>>> [informal] odd, *unusual*, or *unexpected*) that you by such an act of
>>>>>> delusion convey it as a disparity (ie. a great difference)--to then be
>>>>>> considered an aberration (ie. a departure from what is normal, *usual*, or
>>>>>> *expected*, typically an unwelcome one), a derangement (ie. make [someone]
>>>>>> insane; *cause [something] to act irregularly*) and not conducive to its
>>>>>> collective totality as unity of being?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dolf: "What is your empathy and motivation (ie. a reason or reasons for
>>>>>> *acting or behaving in a particular way*) with the story which would now
>>>>>> cause you to squawk (ie. *complain or protest* about something)?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RL Measures: "Do atheists ever tire of kvetching?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kvetch (noun):
>>>>>> a person who complains a great deal.
>>>>>> a *complaint*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> verb:
>>>>>> complain persistently.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ORIGIN 1960s: North Informal; from Yiddish kvetsh (noun), kvetshn (verb),
>>>>>> from Middle High German: quetschen, literally ?crush?.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dolf: "Wanke nicht, mein Vaterland (ie. Do not falter, my fatherland: a
>>>>>> sort of 'battle song' for freedom and independence). As I have already
>>>>>> said, that I shall look at the dread upon their faces, and see that which
>>>>>> they never thought would happen, come to pass: "For thou, LORD, hast made
>>>>>> me glad through thy work: I will triumph in the works of thy hands.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> O LORD, how great are thy works! and thy thoughts are very deep.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When the wicked spring as the grass, and when all the workers of iniquity
>>>>>> do flourish; it is that they shall be destroyed for ever:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But thou, LORD, art most high for evermore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For, lo, thine enemies, O LORD, for, lo, thine enemies shall perish; all
>>>>>> the workers of iniquity shall be scattered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be
>>>>>> anointed with fresh oil.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mine eye also shall see my desire on mine enemies, and mine ears shall hear
>>>>>> my desire of the wicked that rise up against me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar
>>>>>> in Lebanon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts
>>>>>> of our God.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and
>>>>>> flourishing;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To shew that the LORD is upright: he is my rock, and there is no
>>>>>> unrighteousness in him." [Psalm 92:4-15 (KJV)]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: "In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of
>>>>>> morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or
>>>>>> omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations. Deciding what (if
>>>>>> anything) counts as 'morally obligatory' is a principal concern of ethics."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dolf: "And you now, being entirely driven by such a prospect of an orgy as
>>>>>> my debasement of them, do you have a desire to join in the rape and
>>>>>> pillage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's all blown and done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Read it all, suck it in and realize that there is no eternal reward for
>>>>>> you. Then you ought to now f@ck off and die."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EXCERPTS FROM: "Roman Catholic Non-Belief as a 'Cock and Bull' Story of
>>>>>> Atheistic Redemption"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...005 515364934
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - dolf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Colonel Edmund J. Burke > wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/30/2016 5:04 PM, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>>>>>>>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, dolf is definitely unhinged.
>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> He proves it with every post
>>>
>>
>