I'm entitled to preserve my dignity and public reputation when it is
irrationally being impugned by an individual such as you--and I will
continue to do so, until you have no further enjoyment from your perverse
conduct.
Quoting is a matter of sensibilities and can done in a variety of ways.
And neither is top posting an infringement especially when the viewpoint
advanced is of a higher prerogative and as a positional statement has
transcendence. ۬
Those above are arbitrary techniques, but the accepted standards which
governs your non-participation are not arbitrary and neither are they
mitigated by your posting a www-page link as claims of my infractions.
I say again Barry, "And even as they did not like to retain God in their
knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which
are not convenient;" [Romans 1:28]
Isn't the name Heisenberg which you use associated with methamphetamine
culture and indirectly with a need for a Nazi and fascist re-education?
Then it's somewhat hypocritical for you to be engaging in a disparity of
people's names when you bear such a tainted identity yourself.
۬- dolf
Heisenberg > wrote:
> On Sun, 01 May 2016 14:29:15 -0500, dolf > wrote:
>
>> dolf: "Find some other topic to post your f@cking senile diatribe in, and
>> cease your abuse here!
>
> It is important that you click on
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting
>
>> It's your absurd behaviour that is at issue. I have labored to refine my
>> statements until I have arrived at an acceptable retort and they meet a
>> desired level of clarity, such that they cannot be ignored and will
>> traverse the world.
>>
>> But you pretend that things remain the same. The alternate as a true
>> realization will come to you eventually and I will not be held responsible
>> for its manifold harm to your wellbeing:
>>
>> Because it was always a matter of your willfulness and choosing."
>>
>> dolf: "Where [are my comments] *lacking in being a unified whole* which has
>> a cohesion (ie. the action or fact of forming a *united whole*) and
>> coherency (ie. the quality of being logical and consistent; the quality of
>> *forming a unified whole*) as indicative of an *integrity* and soundness of
>> mind?
>>
>> Point it out if you are so capable."
>>
>> INTEGRITY (noun):
>> the state of *being whole and undivided*:
>> • the condition of *being unified* or sound in construction:
>>
>> dolf: "Once you deservedly have that label of DEVIANCY ascribed to you,
>> anything else as a behaviour (eg. such as your repetitiveness) is then just
>> consequential to it, in being a continuing reality of an existing state of
>> perversity:
>>
>> DEVIANCY (noun):
>> the fact or state of diverging from *usual* or *accepted standards*,
>> especially in social or sexual behaviour.
>>
>> PERVERSE (adjective)
>> contrary to the *accepted* or *expected standard* or practice; sexually
>> perverted."
>>
>> dolf: "You are the one who is making a derision (ie. contemptuous ridicule
>> or mockery) of me, by publicly proclaiming your ignorance as a virtue and
>> an exonerated state of being.
>>
>> My mind was only set upon Spiritual things as that which I uttered and you
>> are entirely incapable of any comprehension of it, as it above you.
>>
>> Yet you can't even find one statement, other than your own self evident
>> deprivation (ie. the lack or denial of something considered to be a
>> necessity; [archaic] the action of depriving someone of office, especially
>> an ecclesiastical office) that is driven by such a spirit of randomness
>> (ie. made, done, or happening without method or conscious decision;
>> [informal] odd, *unusual*, or *unexpected*) that you by such an act of
>> delusion convey it as a disparity (ie. a great difference)--to then be
>> considered an aberration (ie. a departure from what is normal, *usual*, or
>> *expected*, typically an unwelcome one), a derangement (ie. make [someone]
>> insane; *cause [something] to act irregularly*) and not conducive to its
>> collective totality as unity of being?"
>>
>> dolf: "What is your empathy and motivation (ie. a reason or reasons for
>> *acting or behaving in a particular way*) with the story which would now
>> cause you to squawk (ie. *complain or protest* about something)?"
>>
>> RL Measures: "Do atheists ever tire of kvetching?"
>>
>> kvetch (noun):
>> a person who complains a great deal.
>> a *complaint*.
>>
>> verb:
>> complain persistently.
>>
>> ORIGIN 1960s: North Informal; from Yiddish kvetsh (noun), kvetshn (verb),
>> from Middle High German: quetschen, literally ‘crush’.
>>
>> dolf: "Wanke nicht, mein Vaterland (ie. Do not falter, my fatherland: a
>> sort of 'battle song' for freedom and independence). As I have already
>> said, that I shall look at the dread upon their faces, and see that which
>> they never thought would happen, come to pass: "For thou, LORD, hast made
>> me glad through thy work: I will triumph in the works of thy hands.
>>
>> O LORD, how great are thy works! and thy thoughts are very deep.
>>
>> A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this.
>>
>> When the wicked spring as the grass, and when all the workers of iniquity
>> do flourish; it is that they shall be destroyed for ever:
>>
>> But thou, LORD, art most high for evermore.
>>
>> For, lo, thine enemies, O LORD, for, lo, thine enemies shall perish; all
>> the workers of iniquity shall be scattered.
>>
>> But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be
>> anointed with fresh oil.
>>
>> Mine eye also shall see my desire on mine enemies, and mine ears shall hear
>> my desire of the wicked that rise up against me.
>>
>> The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar
>> in Lebanon.
>>
>> Those that be planted in the house of the LORD shall flourish in the courts
>> of our God.
>>
>> They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and
>> flourishing;
>>
>> To shew that the LORD is upright: he is my rock, and there is no
>> unrighteousness in him." [Psalm 92:4-15 (KJV)]
>>
>> MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: "In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of
>> morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or
>> omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations. Deciding what (if
>> anything) counts as 'morally obligatory' is a principal concern of ethics."
>>
>> dolf: "And you now, being entirely driven by such a prospect of an orgy as
>> my debasement of them, do you have a desire to join in the rape and
>> pillage?
>>
>> It's all blown and done.
>>
>> Read it all, suck it in and realize that there is no eternal reward for
>> you. Then you ought to now f@ck off and die."
>>
>> EXCERPTS FROM: "Roman Catholic Non-Belief as a 'Cock and Bull' Story of
>> Atheistic Redemption"
>>
>> -
>> https://www.facebook.com/permalink.p...005 515364934
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>>
>>
>> Colonel Edmund J. Burke > wrote:
>>> On 4/30/2016 5:04 PM, dolf wrote:
>>>> But the depraved and preserve individual did post to two religious groups.
>>>>
>>>> And we will, as a greater right than you have, pursue him until he is
>>>> quelled, inclusive of where he posts.
>>>>
>>> Yes, dolf is definitely unhinged.
>>> LOL
>
> He proves it with every post