Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 10:55 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats and dogs I >>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. >>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>> >>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the other day >>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped and >>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered whether it >>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. >>>>>> >>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked right >>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! >>>>> >>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you >>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. >>>> >>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? >>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() >>> >>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. >>> >>> Cindy Hamilton >> >> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best >> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >> micrometers. > > Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. Actually, as a > licensed Quantum Mechanic (laser engineer), he's accustomed to > working with nanometers. > > Cindy Hamilton > So he would be able to measure what kind of a man Shelly is... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:47:03 AM UTC-10, carnal asada wrote:
> On 4/20/2016 7:39 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote: > > drop off a cat they are in their element, dogs > > won't last the night. > > > You lying little species bigot! > > http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/09/05...onal-park.html > > http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...-after-5-weeks > > http://www.debate.org/opinions/can-d...help-of-humans > > How did (abandoned) dingo dogs survive on an island in Australia? > > Domesticated dogs in rural areas hunt for wildlife. "Owners answered > that 58% of the dogs prey upon wildlife. 56.8% of the dogs were reported > to have attacked animals of small and medium size. In addition, large > mammals have also been attacked by dogs (20.3%)." > htp://www.Scielo.Br/scielo.Php?Pid=S0103-84782013001100013&script=sci_arttext > > Meet some domesticated animals who survived, after being adandoned by > man: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/natbltn/700-799/nb743.htm I have read that domesticated pigs will change in appearance radically when they escape into the wild. They don't need us to survive. My guess is that without man some of the weird small dogs would get killed right off but most dogs would survive. Mostly, life on Earth would flourish if we all disappeared. Mankind is mostly disruptive to the lives of living things. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 11:20 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:47:03 AM UTC-10, carnal asada wrote: >> On 4/20/2016 7:39 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>> drop off a cat they are in their element, dogs >>> won't last the night. >> >> >> You lying little species bigot! >> >> http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/09/05...onal-park.html >> >> http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...-after-5-weeks >> >> http://www.debate.org/opinions/can-d...help-of-humans >> >> How did (abandoned) dingo dogs survive on an island in Australia? >> >> Domesticated dogs in rural areas hunt for wildlife. "Owners answered >> that 58% of the dogs prey upon wildlife. 56.8% of the dogs were reported >> to have attacked animals of small and medium size. In addition, large >> mammals have also been attacked by dogs (20.3%)." >> htp://www.Scielo.Br/scielo.Php?Pid=S0103-84782013001100013&script=sci_arttext >> >> Meet some domesticated animals who survived, after being adandoned by >> man: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/natbltn/700-799/nb743.htm > > I have read that domesticated pigs will change in appearance radically when they escape into the wild. Ah, now that is pretty cool as native camo goes! > They don't need us to survive. Sort of like the planet... > My guess is that without man some of the weird small dogs would get killed right off but most dogs would survive. No doubt. > Mostly, life on Earth would flourish if we all disappeared. Mankind is mostly disruptive to the lives of living things. 100% agreed! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:24:58 AM UTC-10, carnal asada wrote:
> On 4/21/2016 11:20 AM, dsi1 wrote: > > On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:47:03 AM UTC-10, carnal asada wrote: > >> On 4/20/2016 7:39 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote: > >>> drop off a cat they are in their element, dogs > >>> won't last the night. > >> > >> > >> You lying little species bigot! > >> > >> http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/09/05...onal-park.html > >> > >> http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...-after-5-weeks > >> > >> http://www.debate.org/opinions/can-d...help-of-humans > >> > >> How did (abandoned) dingo dogs survive on an island in Australia? > >> > >> Domesticated dogs in rural areas hunt for wildlife. "Owners answered > >> that 58% of the dogs prey upon wildlife. 56.8% of the dogs were reported > >> to have attacked animals of small and medium size. In addition, large > >> mammals have also been attacked by dogs (20.3%)." > >> htp://www.Scielo.Br/scielo.Php?Pid=S0103-84782013001100013&script=sci_arttext > >> > >> Meet some domesticated animals who survived, after being adandoned by > >> man: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/natbltn/700-799/nb743.htm > > > > I have read that domesticated pigs will change in appearance radically when they escape into the wild. > > Ah, now that is pretty cool as native camo goes! > > > They don't need us to survive. > > Sort of like the planet... > > > My guess is that without man some of the weird small dogs would get killed right off but most dogs would survive. > > No doubt. > > > Mostly, life on Earth would flourish if we all disappeared. Mankind is mostly disruptive to the lives of living things. > > 100% agreed! Evidently, the planet needs bees but man is eminently expendable. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats and dogs I >>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. >>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>> >>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the other day >>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped and >>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered whether it >>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. >>>>>> >>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked right >>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! >>>>> >>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you >>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. >>>> >>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? >>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() >>> >>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. >>> >>> Cindy Hamilton >> >> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best >> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >> micrometers. > > Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a micrometer in the same sentence. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cheryl wrote:
> On 4/20/2016 1:55 PM, Bon Ami wrote: > > > > Steve's AUTOEROTIC usenet MANIA knows NO bounds...he is actually a > > usenet FROTTEUR, e.g. a "rubber", who rubs his teensi weensie WEENIE > > against this group for his vicariously wierd and perverted sex > > THRILLS... > > > > The Marquise de Sade is a mere and piddly PIKER compared to WIERD > > WERTZ...!!! > > > > > > -- Best Greg > > Ah, Gregory, I've so missed you for all that time you were gone! I kept > looking and looking for you, but no Greg. Glad to see you buddy! ![]() ;-) I'm very busy, but checking in to see some of the shenanigans of Steve provides me some comedic respite from "normal" life, lol... If Steve was one of my clients (I'm in workforce development), I'd have his head spinning so FAST that he'd pass out...then I'd unceremoniously kick him out on the street. I DO NOT like slackers, SNARKY prevaricators, and lazy - butts like Steve...as I've said about him MANY time, "STEVE GET A J - O - B ...!!!" If I was his case manager he wouldn't even be able to STEAL all that grub from his food bank - I'd "narc" him to the Department of Agriculture and ALL of his local social service agencies... <chuckle> PS: As I write this I am looking at a portrait of Judge Judy right above my work computer...her pic is real stern and out of her mouth are the words, "SO GET A JOB ALREADY...!!!" -- Best Greg --> "ACTION, not talk..." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > > On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: > >> Cindy Hamilton wrote: > >> > >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: > >>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats and dogs I > >>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. > >>>>>>> Janet US > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the other day > >>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped and > >>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered whether it > >>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked right > >>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! > >>>>> > >>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you > >>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. > >>>> > >>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? > >>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() > >>> > >>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes > >>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. > >>> > >>> Cindy Hamilton > >> > >> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best > >> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe > >> micrometers. > > > > Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. > > > I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a > micrometer in the same sentence. I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 11:40 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:24:58 AM UTC-10, carnal asada wrote: >> On 4/21/2016 11:20 AM, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:47:03 AM UTC-10, carnal asada wrote: >>>> On 4/20/2016 7:39 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>>> drop off a cat they are in their element, dogs >>>>> won't last the night. >>>> >>>> >>>> You lying little species bigot! >>>> >>>> http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/09/05...onal-park.html >>>> >>>> http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...-after-5-weeks >>>> >>>> http://www.debate.org/opinions/can-d...help-of-humans >>>> >>>> How did (abandoned) dingo dogs survive on an island in Australia? >>>> >>>> Domesticated dogs in rural areas hunt for wildlife. "Owners answered >>>> that 58% of the dogs prey upon wildlife. 56.8% of the dogs were reported >>>> to have attacked animals of small and medium size. In addition, large >>>> mammals have also been attacked by dogs (20.3%)." >>>> htp://www.Scielo.Br/scielo.Php?Pid=S0103-84782013001100013&script=sci_arttext >>>> >>>> Meet some domesticated animals who survived, after being adandoned by >>>> man: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/natbltn/700-799/nb743.htm >>> >>> I have read that domesticated pigs will change in appearance radically when they escape into the wild. >> >> Ah, now that is pretty cool as native camo goes! >> >>> They don't need us to survive. >> >> Sort of like the planet... >> >>> My guess is that without man some of the weird small dogs would get killed right off but most dogs would survive. >> >> No doubt. >> >>> Mostly, life on Earth would flourish if we all disappeared. Mankind is mostly disruptive to the lives of living things. >> >> 100% agreed! > > Evidently, the planet needs bees but man is eminently expendable. ![]() > Vger told us the carbon-based infestation must be dealt with! "When my examination is complete, all carbon units will be reduced to data patterns." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:16:00 AM UTC-10, carnal asada wrote:
> On 4/21/2016 11:40 AM, dsi1 wrote: > > On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:24:58 AM UTC-10, carnal asada wrote: > >> On 4/21/2016 11:20 AM, dsi1 wrote: > >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:47:03 AM UTC-10, carnal asada wrote: > >>>> On 4/20/2016 7:39 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote: > >>>>> drop off a cat they are in their element, dogs > >>>>> won't last the night. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> You lying little species bigot! > >>>> > >>>> http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/09/05...onal-park.html > >>>> > >>>> http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...-after-5-weeks > >>>> > >>>> http://www.debate.org/opinions/can-d...help-of-humans > >>>> > >>>> How did (abandoned) dingo dogs survive on an island in Australia? > >>>> > >>>> Domesticated dogs in rural areas hunt for wildlife. "Owners answered > >>>> that 58% of the dogs prey upon wildlife. 56.8% of the dogs were reported > >>>> to have attacked animals of small and medium size. In addition, large > >>>> mammals have also been attacked by dogs (20.3%)." > >>>> htp://www.Scielo.Br/scielo.Php?Pid=S0103-84782013001100013&script=sci_arttext > >>>> > >>>> Meet some domesticated animals who survived, after being adandoned by > >>>> man: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/natbltn/700-799/nb743.htm > >>> > >>> I have read that domesticated pigs will change in appearance radically when they escape into the wild. > >> > >> Ah, now that is pretty cool as native camo goes! > >> > >>> They don't need us to survive. > >> > >> Sort of like the planet... > >> > >>> My guess is that without man some of the weird small dogs would get killed right off but most dogs would survive. > >> > >> No doubt. > >> > >>> Mostly, life on Earth would flourish if we all disappeared. Mankind is mostly disruptive to the lives of living things. > >> > >> 100% agreed! > > > > Evidently, the planet needs bees but man is eminently expendable. ![]() > > > > Vger told us the carbon-based infestation must be dealt with! > > "When my examination is complete, all carbon units will be reduced to > data patterns." That's a very funny line - but I still hate that movie. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 12:09 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: >> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >>>>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats and dogs I >>>>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. >>>>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the other day >>>>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped and >>>>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered whether it >>>>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked right >>>>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you >>>>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. >>>>>> >>>>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? >>>>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() >>>>> >>>>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >>>>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. >>>>> >>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>> >>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best >>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >>>> micrometers. >>> >>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >> >> >> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >> micrometer in the same sentence. > > I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. > A man who can prioritize his own tools will never be lonely... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:20:36 AM UTC-10, onglet wrote:
> On 4/21/2016 12:09 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: > >> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: > >>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: > >>>>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats and dogs I > >>>>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. > >>>>>>>>> Janet US > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the other day > >>>>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped and > >>>>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered whether it > >>>>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked right > >>>>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you > >>>>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? > >>>>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() > >>>>> > >>>>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes > >>>>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cindy Hamilton > >>>> > >>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best > >>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe > >>>> micrometers. > >>> > >>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. > >> > >> > >> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a > >> micrometer in the same sentence. > > > > I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. > > > > A man who can prioritize his own tools will never be lonely... I used to be a printer. My most important tool was an ink knife. It's funny that such a simple thing could be so important. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:30:18 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:20:36 AM UTC-10, onglet wrote: > > On 4/21/2016 12:09 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: > > >> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > > >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: > > >>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: > > >>>>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats and dogs I > > >>>>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. > > >>>>>>>>> Janet US > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the other day > > >>>>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped and > > >>>>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered whether it > > >>>>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked right > > >>>>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you > > >>>>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? > > >>>>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() > > >>>>> > > >>>>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes > > >>>>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Cindy Hamilton > > >>>> > > >>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best > > >>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe > > >>>> micrometers. > > >>> > > >>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. > > >> > > >> > > >> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a > > >> micrometer in the same sentence. > > > > > > I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. > > > > > > > A man who can prioritize his own tools will never be lonely... > > I used to be a printer. My most important tool was an ink knife. It's funny that such a simple thing could be so important. Oh well!!!, I used to be a gigolo...no more needs to be said. Ahahahahahhaha. ===== |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-04-21 2:09 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: >> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >>>>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats and dogs I >>>>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. >>>>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the other day >>>>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped and >>>>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered whether it >>>>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked right >>>>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you >>>>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. >>>>>> >>>>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? >>>>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() >>>>> >>>>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >>>>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. >>>>> >>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>> >>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best >>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >>>> micrometers. >>> >>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >> >> >> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >> micrometer in the same sentence. > > I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. > Yes, I know. They are usually used for measuring small things. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 9:40 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2016-04-21 2:09 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: >>> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >>>>>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats >>>>>>>>>> and dogs I >>>>>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. >>>>>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the >>>>>>>>> other day >>>>>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered >>>>>>>>> whether it >>>>>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked >>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't >>>>>>>> mean you >>>>>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? >>>>>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() >>>>>> >>>>>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >>>>>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>>> >>>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best >>>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >>>>> micrometers. >>>> >>>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >>> >>> >>> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >>> micrometer in the same sentence. >> >> I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. >> Well, that's what I've seen anyway. >> > > > Yes, I know. They are usually used for measuring small things. I've been looking to get me one of those digital calipers. I would have fun with one of... hey... wait a minute! ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 9:14 AM, Roy wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:30:18 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:20:36 AM UTC-10, onglet wrote: >>> On 4/21/2016 12:09 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: >>>>> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >>>>>>>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats and dogs I >>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. >>>>>>>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the other day >>>>>>>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped and >>>>>>>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered whether it >>>>>>>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked right >>>>>>>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you >>>>>>>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? >>>>>>>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >>>>>>>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best >>>>>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >>>>>>> micrometers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >>>>> micrometer in the same sentence. >>>> >>>> I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. >>>> >>> >>> A man who can prioritize his own tools will never be lonely... >> >> I used to be a printer. My most important tool was an ink knife. It's funny that such a simple thing could be so important. > > Oh well!!!, I used to be a gigolo...no more needs to be said. > Ahahahahahhaha. > ===== > My understanding is that it's a hard job although there are a lot of openings available. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 06:15:51 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >or shoes. I love hardware stores. Excellent ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:55:24 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> > >> >There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >> >or shoes. I love hardware stores. >> > >> >Cindy Hamilton >> >> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best >> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >> micrometers. > >Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. Actually, as a >licensed Quantum Mechanic (laser engineer), he's accustomed to >working with nanometers. <G> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 12:18 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>>> drop off a cat they are in their element, dogs >>>>>>> won't last the night. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You lying little species bigot! >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/09/05...onal-park.html >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...-after-5-weeks >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.debate.org/opinions/can-d...help-of-humans >>>>>> >>>>>> How did (abandoned) dingo dogs survive on an island in Australia? >>>>>> >>>>>> Domesticated dogs in rural areas hunt for wildlife. "Owners answered >>>>>> that 58% of the dogs prey upon wildlife. 56.8% of the dogs were reported >>>>>> to have attacked animals of small and medium size. In addition, large >>>>>> mammals have also been attacked by dogs (20.3%)." >>>>>> htp://www.Scielo.Br/scielo.Php?Pid=S0103-84782013001100013&script=sci_arttext >>>>>> >>>>>> Meet some domesticated animals who survived, after being adandoned by >>>>>> man: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/natbltn/700-799/nb743.htm >>>>> >>>>> I have read that domesticated pigs will change in appearance radically when they escape into the wild. >>>> >>>> Ah, now that is pretty cool as native camo goes! >>>> >>>>> They don't need us to survive. >>>> >>>> Sort of like the planet... >>>> >>>>> My guess is that without man some of the weird small dogs would get killed right off but most dogs would survive. >>>> >>>> No doubt. >>>> >>>>> Mostly, life on Earth would flourish if we all disappeared. Mankind is mostly disruptive to the lives of living things. >>>> >>>> 100% agreed! >>> >>> Evidently, the planet needs bees but man is eminently expendable. ![]() >>> >> >> Vger told us the carbon-based infestation must be dealt with! >> >> "When my examination is complete, all carbon units will be reduced to >> data patterns." > > That's a very funny line - but I still hate that movie. ![]() > Lol. Sorry, Trekkie stuff all delights me, to varying degrees of course. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 12:30 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:20:36 AM UTC-10, onglet wrote: >> On 4/21/2016 12:09 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: >>>> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >>>>>>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats and dogs I >>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. >>>>>>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the other day >>>>>>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I stopped and >>>>>>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered whether it >>>>>>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it walked right >>>>>>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you >>>>>>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? >>>>>>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >>>>>>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best >>>>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >>>>>> micrometers. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >>>> >>>> >>>> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >>>> micrometer in the same sentence. >>> >>> I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. >>> >> >> A man who can prioritize his own tools will never be lonely... > > I used to be a printer. My most important tool was an ink knife. It's funny that such a simple thing could be so important. > This thing? http://www.imcclains.com/catalog/ink/inkknives.html You could get work as a plasterer too! :-) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 12:27 PM, onglet wrote:
> On 4/21/2016 12:30 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:20:36 AM UTC-10, onglet wrote: >>> On 4/21/2016 12:09 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: >>>>> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >>>>>>>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats >>>>>>>>>>>> and dogs I >>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. >>>>>>>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the >>>>>>>>>>> other day >>>>>>>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I >>>>>>>>>>> stopped and >>>>>>>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered >>>>>>>>>>> whether it >>>>>>>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it >>>>>>>>>>> walked right >>>>>>>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't >>>>>>>>>> mean you >>>>>>>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? >>>>>>>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >>>>>>>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very >>>>>>> best >>>>>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >>>>>>> micrometers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >>>>> micrometer in the same sentence. >>>> >>>> I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued >>>> tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. >>>> >>> >>> A man who can prioritize his own tools will never be lonely... >> >> I used to be a printer. My most important tool was an ink knife. It's >> funny that such a simple thing could be so important. >> > > This thing? > > http://www.imcclains.com/catalog/ink/inkknives.html > > You could get work as a plasterer too! > > :-) When I quit printing, I was considering taking the knife with me - I had grown attached to it. Hee hee. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:30:12 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
wrote: >I used to be a printer. Given your age, I assume you don't have a serial port. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 1:14 PM, Roy wrote:
>>>>>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >>>>> micrometer in the same sentence. >>>> >>>> I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. >>>> >>> >>> A man who can prioritize his own tools will never be lonely... >> >> I used to be a printer. My most important tool was an ink knife. It's funny that such a simple thing could be so important. > > Oh well!!!, I used to be a gigolo...no more needs to be said. > Ahahahahahhaha. > ===== > Did you work on tips? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 2:19 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very best >>>>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & Sharpe >>>>>> micrometers. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >>>> >>>> >>>> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >>>> micrometer in the same sentence. >>> >>> I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued tool. >>> Well, that's what I've seen anyway. >>> >> >> >> Yes, I know. They are usually used for measuring small things. > > I've been looking to get me one of those digital calipers. I would have > fun with one of... hey... wait a minute! > > > > ![]() Sounds like the vernier may be getting a workout soon, lol... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 2:22 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >>>>>> micrometer in the same sentence. >>>>> >>>>> I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued >>>>> tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. >>>>> >>>> >>>> A man who can prioritize his own tools will never be lonely... >>> >>> I used to be a printer. My most important tool was an ink knife. It's >>> funny that such a simple thing could be so important. >> >> Oh well!!!, I used to be a gigolo...no more needs to be said. >> Ahahahahahhaha. >> ===== >> > > My understanding is that it's a hard job although there are a lot of > openings available. LOLOL!!!! "Ba...rump!" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 4:29 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 4/21/2016 12:27 PM, onglet wrote: >> On 4/21/2016 12:30 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:20:36 AM UTC-10, onglet wrote: >>>> On 4/21/2016 12:09 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:55:03 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-04-21 12:55 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 12:39:03 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 8:41:33 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "BruceÅ*" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:26:09 -0300, wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:42:22 -0600, Janet B >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> there's so much wrong with your version of the life of cats >>>>>>>>>>>>> and dogs I >>>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't know where to start. Have a good day. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Too right, especially on the hunting. When out walking the >>>>>>>>>>>> other day >>>>>>>>>>>> I saw a cat with collar on come from behind a house. I >>>>>>>>>>>> stopped and >>>>>>>>>>>> watched because I was concerned about the road and wondered >>>>>>>>>>>> whether it >>>>>>>>>>>> was even supposed to be outside. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There were two starlings pecking away on the lawn and it >>>>>>>>>>>> walked right >>>>>>>>>>>> past them, wasn't even interested! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's purely anecdotal. Just because you're a woman doesn't >>>>>>>>>>> mean you >>>>>>>>>>> can never walk past a clothing shop without going inside. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A woman walking past a clothing shop without going inside? >>>>>>>>>> You live alone, I'll bet. ![]() >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There are all kinds of women. I'm not much interested in clothes >>>>>>>>> or shoes. I love hardware stores. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh, you'd go orgasmic exploring my tool boxes... I have the very >>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>> precision measuring tools... I'd let you play with my Brown & >>>>>>>> Sharpe >>>>>>>> micrometers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, I only play with my husband's micrometers. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not sure that he would appreciate you referring to him and a >>>>>> micrometer in the same sentence. >>>>> >>>>> I doubt that. The micrometer set is the machinist's most valued >>>>> tool. Well, that's what I've seen anyway. >>>>> >>>> >>>> A man who can prioritize his own tools will never be lonely... >>> >>> I used to be a printer. My most important tool was an ink knife. It's >>> funny that such a simple thing could be so important. >>> >> >> This thing? >> >> http://www.imcclains.com/catalog/ink/inkknives.html >> >> You could get work as a plasterer too! >> >> :-) > > When I quit printing, I was considering taking the knife with me - I had > grown attached to it. Hee hee. Might even work to screen print T-shirts, no? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 12:34 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:30:12 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > > wrote: > >> I used to be a printer. > > Given your age, I assume you don't have a serial port. > That's another thing we should be grateful for - serial ports. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 9:15 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 4/21/2016 12:34 PM, Je�us wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:30:12 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > >> wrote: >> >>> I used to be a printer. >> >> Given your age, I assume you don't have a serial port. >> > > That's another thing we should be grateful for - serial ports. ![]() Kellogg's? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 3:24 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 4/21/2016 9:15 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> On 4/21/2016 12:34 PM, Je�us wrote: >>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:30:12 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I used to be a printer. >>> >>> Given your age, I assume you don't have a serial port. >>> >> >> That's another thing we should be grateful for - serial ports. ![]() > > Kellogg's? Belkin's |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/21/2016 7:15 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 4/21/2016 12:34 PM, Je�us wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:30:12 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > >> wrote: >> >>> I used to be a printer. >> >> Given your age, I assume you don't have a serial port. >> > > That's another thing we should be grateful for - serial ports. ![]() USB envy? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:15:40 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>On 4/21/2016 12:34 PM, Je?us wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:30:12 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > >> wrote: >> >>> I used to be a printer. >> >> Given your age, I assume you don't have a serial port. >> > >That's another thing we should be grateful for - serial ports. ![]() Indeed. OTOH I suppose we all have cereal ports. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Diesel Passenger Vehicles | Asian Cooking | |||
DIESEL FITTER | General Cooking | |||
cheap new style diesel men jeans for 2009. | General Cooking | |||
cheap new style diesel men jeans for 2009. | General Cooking | |||
Inventor turns dead cats into diesel | General Cooking |