Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message news ![]() > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:36:30 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > >> On 3/24/2016 1:02 PM, Janet wrote: >> > In article >, >> > says... >> >> >> >> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1 >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Julie Bove" wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You >> >>>>> Tube >> >>>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty >> >>>>> sure he >> >>>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny! >> >>>>> >> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM >> >>>> >> >>>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me. >> >>> >> >>> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***, >> >>> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics >> >>> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers, >> >>> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a >> >>> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent >> >>> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society. >> >>> >> >> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about >> >> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people >> >> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep >> >> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag. >> > >> > Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never >> > lets >> > up reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture, >> > pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms >> > etc etc etc. >> > >> > *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that >> > degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to >> > flaunt it. >> > >> > Janet UK >> > >> > >> > >> Flaunting is flaunting, regardless. I don't hang out with anyone of any >> sex or sexuality who comes across that strongly. The man on the video >> was annoying as hell. >> > > He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature. > Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective. That could be. I didn't find him annoying in that video at all. But I did look at some others and after a while they did get annoying because he tends to keep saying the same things. He actually mostly does cooking videos. He made potato encrusted mozzarella sticks in one and started a small kitchen fire. But he did say that the end result was tasty. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, lid
says... > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:11:51 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > > >On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1 > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> Julie Bove" wrote: > >>>> > >>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube > >>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he > >>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny! > >>>> > >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM > >>> > >>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me. > >> > >> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***, > >> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics > >> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers, > >> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a > >> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent > >> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society. > >> > >I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about > >it. Just like many heterosexuals are not blatant or in your face about being heterosexual... and some are :-) This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people > >but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep > >with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag. > > Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it too. I think in many cases > it's merely an excuse to draw attention to themselves. You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight people? Janet UK |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:05:54 -0000, Janet > wrote:
>In article >, lid >says... >> >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:11:51 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >> >On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote: >> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1 >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >>> Julie Bove" wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube >> >>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he >> >>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny! >> >>>> >> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM >> >>> >> >>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me. >> >> >> >> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***, >> >> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics >> >> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers, >> >> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a >> >> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent >> >> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society. >> >> >> >I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about >> >it. > > Just like many heterosexuals are not blatant or in your face about >being heterosexual... and some are :-) Indeed. > This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people >> >but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep >> >with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag. >> >> Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it too. I think in many cases >> it's merely an excuse to draw attention to themselves. > > You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their >sexuality to attract attention. Why do you assume that? >Is it any more acceptable in straight >people? No, it isn't. But you would have to admit that gays have more 'licence' to do so due to political correctness these days. And I note that females have been left out of this discussion so far. Same applies to *******s and heterosexual women who dress like whores. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote:
> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered > attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their > sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight > people? Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, lid
says... > > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:05:54 -0000, Janet > wrote: > > >In article >, lid > >says... > >> > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:11:51 -0400, jmcquown > > >> wrote: > >> > >> >On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote: > >> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1 > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Julie Bove" wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube > >> >>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he > >> >>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny! > >> >>>> > >> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM > >> >>> > >> >>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me. > >> >> > >> >> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***, > >> >> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics > >> >> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers, > >> >> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a > >> >> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent > >> >> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society. > >> >> > >> >I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about > >> >it. > > > > Just like many heterosexuals are not blatant or in your face about > >being heterosexual... and some are :-) > > Indeed. > > > This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people > >> >but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep > >> >with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag. > >> > >> Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it too. I think in many cases > >> it's merely an excuse to draw attention to themselves. > > > > You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered > >attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their > >sexuality to attract attention. > > Why do you assume that? > > >Is it any more acceptable in straight > >people? > > No, it isn't. But you would have to admit that gays have more > 'licence' to do so due to political correctness these days. They do it these days because now they can; because homosexuality is no longer a crime. Back in the 60's when hetero sex was liberated, istr many heteros being similarly overt. > And I note that females have been left out of this discussion so far. Nope. I posted " Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never letsup reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture,pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms etc etc etc. *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to flaunt it. and you replied to it. Janet UK |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: > >> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their >> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight >> people? > >Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go >overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:05:36 -0000, Janet > wrote:
>In article >, lid >says... >> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:05:54 -0000, Janet > wrote: >> >> >In article >, lid >> >says... >> >> >> >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:11:51 -0400, jmcquown > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1 >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Julie Bove" wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube >> >> >>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he >> >> >>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny! >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me. >> >> >> >> >> >> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***, >> >> >> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics >> >> >> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers, >> >> >> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a >> >> >> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent >> >> >> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society. >> >> >> >> >> >I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about >> >> >it. >> > >> > Just like many heterosexuals are not blatant or in your face about >> >being heterosexual... and some are :-) >> >> Indeed. >> >> > This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people >> >> >but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep >> >> >with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag. >> >> >> >> Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it too. I think in many cases >> >> it's merely an excuse to draw attention to themselves. >> > >> > You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >> >attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their >> >sexuality to attract attention. >> >> Why do you assume that? >> >> >Is it any more acceptable in straight >> >people? >> >> No, it isn't. But you would have to admit that gays have more >> 'licence' to do so due to political correctness these days. > > They do it these days because now they can; because homosexuality is >no longer a crime. Back in the 60's when hetero sex was liberated, istr >many heteros being similarly overt. I don't see any hetero pride Mardi Gras anywhere. >> And I note that females have been left out of this discussion so far. > > Nope. I posted > > " Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never >letsup reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, >gesture,pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, >mannerisms etc etc etc. *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot >longer for that degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable >some choose to flaunt it. > > > and you replied to it. Right you are. I don't see why 'flaunting it' should be condoned, no matter what the sexuality may be. And when do paedophiles get their turn? After all, they were born that way, no fault of their own. I don't mean to say it should be acceptable that they have the freedom to act out their sexual preference, but why are the ones who don't act on it otherwise demonised and homosexuality no longer is? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-03-25 7:13 PM, Janet B wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: >> >>> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >>> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their >>> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight >>> people? >> >> Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go >> overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. > > Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact > same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and > his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very > reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. > I hope you are not trying to use him as an example of someone who is not seen by most people as a clown. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:35:58 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2016-03-25 7:13 PM, Janet B wrote: >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: >>> >>>> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >>>> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their >>>> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight >>>> people? >>> >>> Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go >>> overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. >> >> Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact >> same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and >> his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very >> reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. >> > >I hope you are not trying to use him as an example of someone who is not >seen by most people as a clown. Nope. Just proving your point with an actual case "People who go >>> overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule" Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:05:36 -0000, Janet > wrote:
> In article >, lid > says... > > > > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:05:54 -0000, Janet > wrote: > > > > >In article >, lid > > >says... > > >> > > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:11:51 -0400, jmcquown > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> >On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote: > > >> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1 > > >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> Julie Bove" wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube > > >> >>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he > > >> >>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny! > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM > > >> >>> > > >> >>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me. > > >> >> > > >> >> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***, > > >> >> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics > > >> >> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers, > > >> >> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a > > >> >> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent > > >> >> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society. > > >> >> > > >> >I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about > > >> >it. > > > > > > Just like many heterosexuals are not blatant or in your face about > > >being heterosexual... and some are :-) > > > > Indeed. > > > > > This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people > > >> >but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep > > >> >with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag. > > >> > > >> Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it too. I think in many cases > > >> it's merely an excuse to draw attention to themselves. > > > > > > You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered > > >attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their > > >sexuality to attract attention. > > > > Why do you assume that? > > > > >Is it any more acceptable in straight > > >people? > > > > No, it isn't. But you would have to admit that gays have more > > 'licence' to do so due to political correctness these days. > > They do it these days because now they can; because homosexuality is > no longer a crime. Back in the 60's when hetero sex was liberated, istr > many heteros being similarly overt. > > > And I note that females have been left out of this discussion so far. > > Nope. I posted > > " Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never > letsup reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, > gesture,pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, > mannerisms etc etc etc. *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot > longer for that degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable > some choose to flaunt it. > > > and you replied to it. > > Janet UK North Carolina just passed a state law saying cities in the state can't have an LGBT anti-discrimination law on their books and Georgia will be next. Republican's running the show in NC rolled back the clock and reinstated good ole discrimination & bigotry, just like it was back in the good old days. Republican legislators were so transparent in their intent with the bill that Democrat legislators walked out in disgust, while the Republican governor sat at his desk awaiting the bill to sign... making a lie of their claims about less intrusive government and more local control. They did it because they could: nothing is in place at the national level to stop them. The Supreme Court needs to reinstate sanctions because they obviously can't do the right thing unless they are under a court order to do so. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/25/op...otry.html?_r=0 http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...on-ban/475500/ -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:13:41 -0600, Janet B >
wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > > >On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: > > > >> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered > >> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their > >> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight > >> people? > > > >Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go > >overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. > > Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact > same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and > his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very > reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. > Janet US She's happily remarried, won't fight with him, and it's eating him up. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:20:55 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:13:41 -0600, Janet B > >wrote: > >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >> >On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: >> > >> >> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >> >> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their >> >> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight >> >> people? >> > >> >Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go >> >overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. >> >> Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact >> same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and >> his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very >> reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. >> Janet US > >She's happily remarried, won't fight with him, and it's eating him up. Is she still involved with HSN? (Home Shopping Network) If so, the fact that she is doing well would be irritating Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:02:36 -0600, Janet B >
wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:20:55 -0700, sf > wrote: > > >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:13:41 -0600, Janet B > > >wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith > >> > wrote: > >> > >> >On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: > >> > > >> >> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered > >> >> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their > >> >> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight > >> >> people? > >> > > >> >Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go > >> >overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. > >> > >> Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact > >> same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and > >> his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very > >> reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. > >> Janet US > > > >She's happily remarried, won't fight with him, and it's eating him up. > > Is she still involved with HSN? (Home Shopping Network) If so, the > fact that she is doing well be irritating > Janet US No idea, I never watch any home shopping channels... I just read a little about her. She was/is a cougar. Married, divorced, and still "seeing" a man 23 years her junior (Rossano Rubicondi, the "Italian Stallion"). Good for her! -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeßus" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:05:36 -0000, Janet > wrote: > >>In article >, lid >>says... >>> >>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:05:54 -0000, Janet > wrote: >>> >>> >In article >, lid >>> >says... >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:11:51 -0400, jmcquown > >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote: >>> >> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1 >>> >> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Julie Bove" wrote: >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this >>> >> >>>> You Tube >>> >> >>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. >>> >> >>>> Pretty sure he >>> >> >>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is >>> >> >>>> funny! >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being >>> >> >> ***, >>> >> >> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' >>> >> >> histrionics >>> >> >> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers, >>> >> >> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a >>> >> >> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only >>> >> >> talent >>> >> >> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society. >>> >> >> >>> >> >I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant >>> >> >about >>> >> >it. >>> > >>> > Just like many heterosexuals are not blatant or in your face about >>> >being heterosexual... and some are :-) >>> >>> Indeed. >>> >>> > This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people >>> >> >but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep >>> >> >with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag. >>> >> >>> >> Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it too. I think in many cases >>> >> it's merely an excuse to draw attention to themselves. >>> > >>> > You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >>> >attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit >>> >their >>> >sexuality to attract attention. >>> >>> Why do you assume that? >>> >>> >Is it any more acceptable in straight >>> >people? >>> >>> No, it isn't. But you would have to admit that gays have more >>> 'licence' to do so due to political correctness these days. >> >> They do it these days because now they can; because homosexuality is >>no longer a crime. Back in the 60's when hetero sex was liberated, istr >>many heteros being similarly overt. > > I don't see any hetero pride Mardi Gras anywhere. > >>> And I note that females have been left out of this discussion so far. >> >> Nope. I posted >> >> " Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never >>letsup reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, >>gesture,pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, >>mannerisms etc etc etc. *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot >>longer for that degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable >>some choose to flaunt it. >> >> >> and you replied to it. > > Right you are. I don't see why 'flaunting it' should be condoned, no > matter what the sexuality may be. And when do paedophiles get their > turn? After all, they were born that way, no fault of their own. I > don't mean to say it should be acceptable that they have the freedom > to act out their sexual preference, but why are the ones who don't act > on it otherwise demonised and homosexuality no longer is? What would make you say they were born that way? From what I have read, many were abused themselves as children. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 5:13:45 PM UTC-6, Janet B wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > > >On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: > > > >> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered > >> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their > >> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight > >> people? > > > >Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go > >overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. > > Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact > same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and > his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very > reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. > Janet US Drumpf (his real name) is classic Narcissistic Personality Disorder! John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:34:24 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:02:36 -0600, Janet B > >wrote: > >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:20:55 -0700, sf > wrote: >> >> >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:13:41 -0600, Janet B > >> >wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >> >> >> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their >> >> >> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight >> >> >> people? >> >> > >> >> >Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go >> >> >overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. >> >> >> >> Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact >> >> same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and >> >> his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very >> >> reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. >> >> Janet US >> > >> >She's happily remarried, won't fight with him, and it's eating him up. >> >> Is she still involved with HSN? (Home Shopping Network) If so, the >> fact that she is doing well be irritating >> Janet US > >No idea, I never watch any home shopping channels... I just read a >little about her. She was/is a cougar. Married, divorced, and still >"seeing" a man 23 years her junior (Rossano Rubicondi, the "Italian >Stallion"). Good for her! I don't watch HSN either but I do read news and newsy gossip. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 06:17:54 -0600, Janet B >
wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:34:24 -0700, sf > wrote: > > >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:02:36 -0600, Janet B > > >wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:20:55 -0700, sf > wrote: > >> > >> >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:13:41 -0600, Janet B > > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered > >> >> >> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their > >> >> >> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight > >> >> >> people? > >> >> > > >> >> >Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go > >> >> >overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. > >> >> > >> >> Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact > >> >> same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and > >> >> his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very > >> >> reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. > >> >> Janet US > >> > > >> >She's happily remarried, won't fight with him, and it's eating him up. > >> > >> Is she still involved with HSN? (Home Shopping Network) If so, the > >> fact that she is doing well be irritating > >> Janet US > > > >No idea, I never watch any home shopping channels... I just read a > >little about her. She was/is a cougar. Married, divorced, and still > >"seeing" a man 23 years her junior (Rossano Rubicondi, the "Italian > >Stallion"). Good for her! > > I don't watch HSN either but I do read news and newsy gossip. > Janet US I don't read gossip or watch those shows like E. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:04:10 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > >"Jeßus" > wrote in message .. . >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:05:36 -0000, Janet > wrote: >> >>>In article >, lid >>>says... >>>> >>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:05:54 -0000, Janet > wrote: >>>> >>>> >In article >, lid >>>> >says... >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:11:51 -0400, jmcquown > >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> >On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>> >> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1 >>>> >> >> > wrote: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> Julie Bove" wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this >>>> >> >>>> You Tube >>>> >> >>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. >>>> >> >>>> Pretty sure he >>>> >> >>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is >>>> >> >>>> funny! >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being >>>> >> >> ***, >>>> >> >> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' >>>> >> >> histrionics >>>> >> >> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers, >>>> >> >> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a >>>> >> >> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only >>>> >> >> talent >>>> >> >> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant >>>> >> >about >>>> >> >it. >>>> > >>>> > Just like many heterosexuals are not blatant or in your face about >>>> >being heterosexual... and some are :-) >>>> >>>> Indeed. >>>> >>>> > This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people >>>> >> >but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep >>>> >> >with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag. >>>> >> >>>> >> Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it too. I think in many cases >>>> >> it's merely an excuse to draw attention to themselves. >>>> > >>>> > You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >>>> >attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit >>>> >their >>>> >sexuality to attract attention. >>>> >>>> Why do you assume that? >>>> >>>> >Is it any more acceptable in straight >>>> >people? >>>> >>>> No, it isn't. But you would have to admit that gays have more >>>> 'licence' to do so due to political correctness these days. >>> >>> They do it these days because now they can; because homosexuality is >>>no longer a crime. Back in the 60's when hetero sex was liberated, istr >>>many heteros being similarly overt. >> >> I don't see any hetero pride Mardi Gras anywhere. >> >>>> And I note that females have been left out of this discussion so far. >>> >>> Nope. I posted >>> >>> " Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never >>>letsup reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, >>>gesture,pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, >>>mannerisms etc etc etc. *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot >>>longer for that degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable >>>some choose to flaunt it. >>> >>> >>> and you replied to it. >> >> Right you are. I don't see why 'flaunting it' should be condoned, no >> matter what the sexuality may be. And when do paedophiles get their >> turn? After all, they were born that way, no fault of their own. I >> don't mean to say it should be acceptable that they have the freedom >> to act out their sexual preference, but why are the ones who don't act >> on it otherwise demonised and homosexuality no longer is? > >What would make you say they were born that way? From what I have read, >many were abused themselves as children. My understanding is that they are born that way. Abuse when they were young often being the trigger for them to act on their orientation rather than suppressing it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:13:43 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 06:17:54 -0600, Janet B > >wrote: > >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:34:24 -0700, sf > wrote: >> >> >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:02:36 -0600, Janet B > >> >wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:20:55 -0700, sf > wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:13:41 -0600, Janet B > >> >> >wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered >> >> >> >> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their >> >> >> >> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight >> >> >> >> people? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go >> >> >> >overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. >> >> >> >> >> >> Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact >> >> >> same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and >> >> >> his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very >> >> >> reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. >> >> >> Janet US >> >> > >> >> >She's happily remarried, won't fight with him, and it's eating him up. >> >> >> >> Is she still involved with HSN? (Home Shopping Network) If so, the >> >> fact that she is doing well be irritating >> >> Janet US >> > >> >No idea, I never watch any home shopping channels... I just read a >> >little about her. She was/is a cougar. Married, divorced, and still >> >"seeing" a man 23 years her junior (Rossano Rubicondi, the "Italian >> >Stallion"). Good for her! >> >> I don't watch HSN either but I do read news and newsy gossip. >> Janet US > >I don't read gossip or watch those shows like E. Nor do I. (what's E?) That kind of news is carried in the regular national sources -- CNN. MSNBC, Fox, etc. I scan story lines. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 14:43:33 -0600, Janet B >
wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:13:43 -0700, sf > wrote: > > >On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 06:17:54 -0600, Janet B > > >wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:34:24 -0700, sf > wrote: > >> > >> >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:02:36 -0600, Janet B > > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:20:55 -0700, sf > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:13:41 -0600, Janet B > > >> >> >wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:47:18 -0400, Dave Smith > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On 2016-03-25 11:05 AM, Janet wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered > >> >> >> >> attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their > >> >> >> >> sexuality to attract attention. Is it any more acceptable in straight > >> >> >> >> people? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Apparently not, or you wouldn't be pointing it out. People who go > >> >> >> >overboard trying to make an impression sets themselves up for ridicule. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Then Trump would be a good example of that? His hair is the exact > >> >> >> same shade as that of his first wife (a bottle she left behind?) and > >> >> >> his skin is indeed orange. Actually, his hair comb out is very > >> >> >> reminiscent of Ivana's hair style. > >> >> >> Janet US > >> >> > > >> >> >She's happily remarried, won't fight with him, and it's eating him up. > >> >> > >> >> Is she still involved with HSN? (Home Shopping Network) If so, the > >> >> fact that she is doing well be irritating > >> >> Janet US > >> > > >> >No idea, I never watch any home shopping channels... I just read a > >> >little about her. She was/is a cougar. Married, divorced, and still > >> >"seeing" a man 23 years her junior (Rossano Rubicondi, the "Italian > >> >Stallion"). Good for her! > >> > >> I don't watch HSN either but I do read news and newsy gossip. > >> Janet US > > > >I don't read gossip or watch those shows like E. > > Nor do I. (what's E?) That kind of news is carried in the regular > national sources -- CNN. MSNBC, Fox, etc. I scan story lines. > Janet US E comes on after something I listen to while I'm cooking, probably Big Bang reruns. I turn the channel as soon as I'm able. -- sf |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I just spent $100 on weird food. | Diabetic | |||
Intereting Vegan Problem - Please Help : How to get Caterers toGet/Provide Vegan Food. | Vegan | |||
weird food | Recipes |