On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:05:36 -0000, Janet > wrote:

>In article >, lid
>says...
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:05:54 -0000, Janet > wrote:
>>
>> >In article >, lid
>> >says...
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:11:51 -0400, jmcquown >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>> >> >>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>> >> >>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>> >> >> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>> >> >> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>> >> >> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>> >> >> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>> >> >> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>> >> >>
>> >> >I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
>> >> >it.
>> >
>> > Just like many heterosexuals are not blatant or in your face about
>> >being heterosexual... and some are :-)
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>> > This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
>> >> >but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
>> >> >with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it too. I think in many cases
>> >> it's merely an excuse to draw attention to themselves.
>> >
>> > You must have led a very sheltered life if you haven't encountered
>> >attention-seeking heterosexual men or women who constantly exploit their
>> >sexuality to attract attention.
>>
>> Why do you assume that?
>>
>> >Is it any more acceptable in straight
>> >people?
>>
>> No, it isn't. But you would have to admit that gays have more
>> 'licence' to do so due to political correctness these days.
>
> They do it these days because now they can; because homosexuality is
>no longer a crime. Back in the 60's when hetero sex was liberated, istr
>many heteros being similarly overt.

I don't see any hetero pride Mardi Gras anywhere.

>> And I note that females have been left out of this discussion so far.
>
> Nope. I posted
>
> " Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never
>letsup reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress,
>gesture,pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks,
>mannerisms etc etc etc. *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot
>longer for that degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable
>some choose to flaunt it.
>
>
> and you replied to it.

Right you are. I don't see why 'flaunting it' should be condoned, no
matter what the sexuality may be. And when do paedophiles get their
turn? After all, they were born that way, no fault of their own. I
don't mean to say it should be acceptable that they have the freedom
to act out their sexual preference, but why are the ones who don't act
on it otherwise demonised and homosexuality no longer is?