Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>> >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>> >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >> >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >> >> John Kuthe... > > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() > Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. -- Xeno |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Xeno wrote:
> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy >>> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>> >>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>> >>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>> >>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP >>> anymore!! >>> >>> John Kuthe... >> >> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the >> previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel >> processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest >> hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >> > Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been > able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > > > > Doh! Precedent established...by the sanctimonious left... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote:
> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: > >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young > >>> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: > >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send > >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system > >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() > >>>> > >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. > >>> > >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone > >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that > >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. > >> > >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! > >> > >> John Kuthe... > > > > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() > > > Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been > able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > > > > > -- > > Xeno The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/1/2016 15:07 dsi1 wrote:
> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >> >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >> >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >> >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >> >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >> >>>> >> >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >> >>> >> >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >> >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >> >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >> >> >> >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >> >> >> >> John Kuthe... >> > >> > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >> > >> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() It has already succeeded ![]() -- Bruce |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:14:25 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> On 18/1/2016 15:07 dsi1 wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: > >> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: > >> > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > >> >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: > >> >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: > >> >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send > >> >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system > >> >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. > >> >>> > >> >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone > >> >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that > >> >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. > >> >> > >> >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! > >> >> > >> >> John Kuthe... > >> > > >> > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() > >> > > >> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been > >> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > > > > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() > > It has already succeeded ![]() > > -- > Bruce Windows is an anachronism in this modern computer era. It's like a horse and buggy on the Autobahn. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/1/2016 15:26 dsi1 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:14:25 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: >> On 18/1/2016 15:07 dsi1 wrote: >> >> > On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >> >> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> >> > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >> >> >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >> >> >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >> >> >>> > wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >> >> >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >> >> >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >> >> >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >> >> >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >> >> >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >> >> >> >> >> >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >> >> >> >> >> >> John Kuthe... >> >> > >> >> > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >> >> > >> >> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >> >> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >> > >> > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >> >> It has already succeeded ![]() >> >> -- >> Bruce > > Windows is an anachronism in this modern computer era. It's like a horse and buggy on the Autobahn. And we're all Amish. -- Bruce |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce wrote:
> On 18/1/2016 15:26 dsi1 wrote: > >> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:14:25 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: >>> On 18/1/2016 15:07 dsi1 wrote: >>> >>>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >>>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John Kuthe... >>>>>> >>>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >>>>>> >>>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >>>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >>>> >>>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >>> >>> It has already succeeded ![]() >>> >>> -- >>> Bruce >> >> Windows is an anachronism in this modern computer era. It's like a horse and buggy on the Autobahn. > > And we're all Amish. > No, you're just Moronic. Cult of your own design? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:36:42 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> On 18/1/2016 15:26 dsi1 wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:14:25 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: > >> On 18/1/2016 15:07 dsi1 wrote: > >> > >> > On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: > >> >> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: > >> >> > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: > >> >> >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young > >> >> >>> > wrote: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: > >> >> >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send > >> >> >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system > >> >> >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone > >> >> >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that > >> >> >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> John Kuthe... > >> >> > > >> >> > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() > >> >> > > >> >> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been > >> >> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > >> > > >> > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() > >> > >> It has already succeeded ![]() > >> > >> -- > >> Bruce > > > > Windows is an anachronism in this modern computer era. It's like a horse and buggy on the Autobahn. > > And we're all Amish. > > -- > Bruce The "buggy" being a fully loaded tractor-trailer with holes and faulty wheels spilling junk all over the road. The "horse" would pretty much be a horse. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dsi1 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:36:42 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: >> On 18/1/2016 15:26 dsi1 wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:14:25 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: >>>> On 18/1/2016 15:07 dsi1 wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >>>>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>>>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> John Kuthe... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >>>>>>> >>>>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >>>>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >>>>> >>>>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >>>> >>>> It has already succeeded ![]() >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bruce >>> >>> Windows is an anachronism in this modern computer era. It's like a horse and buggy on the Autobahn. >> >> And we're all Amish. >> >> -- >> Bruce > > The "buggy" being a fully loaded tractor-trailer with holes and faulty wheels spilling junk all over the road. The "horse" would pretty much be a horse. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbiR6IMf5KQ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote:
> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: > > On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > > >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: > > >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: > > >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send > > >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system > > >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() > > >>>> > > >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. > > >>> > > >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone > > >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that > > >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. > > >> > > >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! > > >> > > >> John Kuthe... > > > > > > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() > > > > > Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been > > able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Xeno > > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$! John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Kuthe wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >>>>> >>>>> John Kuthe... >>>> >>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >>>> >>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Xeno >> >> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() > > Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$! > > John Kuthe... > And you or any of the rest of us have a mass market PC due to WHOM??? ****in' A! You and Bryan are equal measures STOOOPID! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: > > On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: > > > On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > > > >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: > > > >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young > > > >>> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: > > > >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send > > > >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system > > > >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. > > > >>> > > > >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone > > > >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that > > > >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. > > > >> > > > >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! > > > >> > > > >> John Kuthe... > > > > > > > > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() > > > > > > > Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been > > > able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Xeno > > > > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() > > Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$! > > John Kuthe... You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dsi1 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >>>>>> >>>>>> John Kuthe... >>>>> >>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >>>>> >>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Xeno >>> >>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >> >> Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$! >> >> John Kuthe... > > You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. > HAL..is that you? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/01/2016 4:31 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >>>>>> >>>>>> John Kuthe... >>>>> >>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >>>>> >>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Xeno >>> >>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >> >> Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$! >> >> John Kuthe... > > You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. > Which also failed and, guess what, they don't even manufacture PC hardware these days. I wonder why that is? ;-) -- Xeno |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Xeno wrote:
>> >> You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. >> > Which also failed Nope. MS = 95% market share. And MS = IBM's old OS. You Auztarded MORON! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:31:47 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote: > On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > > On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: > > > > On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > > > > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > > > > >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: > > > > >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young > > > > >>> > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: > > > > >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send > > > > >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system > > > > >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone > > > > >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that > > > > >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. > > > > >> > > > > >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! > > > > >> > > > > >> John Kuthe... > > > > > > > > > > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() > > > > > > > > > Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been > > > > able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Xeno > > > > > > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() > > > > Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$! > > > > John Kuthe... > > You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. They don't know what they're talking about, but hot damn - they're mad as hell anyway. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:31:47 -0800 (PST), dsi1 > > wrote: > >> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >>>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >>>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John Kuthe... >>>>>> >>>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >>>>>> >>>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >>>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Xeno >>>> >>>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >>> >>> Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$! >>> >>> John Kuthe... >> >> You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. > > They don't know what they're talking about, but hot damn - they're mad > as hell anyway. > IBM = SCO Linux + MS doze. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 11:31:55 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > > On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: > > > > On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > > > > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > > > > >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: > > > > >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young > > > > >>> > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: > > > > >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send > > > > >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system > > > > >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone > > > > >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that > > > > >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. > > > > >> > > > > >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! > > > > >> > > > > >> John Kuthe... > > > > > > > > > > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() > > > > > > > > > Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been > > > > able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Xeno > > > > > > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() > > > > Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$! > > > > John Kuthe... > > You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. IBM dropped the ball, as IBM thought the money was gonna be in the hardware of the PC. Bill Gates and MicroSUCKS made the very shrewd business decision to buy outright a stinkly simple text based operating system called QDOS (for Quick and Dirty Operating System(, rebranded it as MS-DOS and LICENSED it not only to IBM but also to any Tom, Dick and Smarmy who could throw a hardware box together and speciously call it "100% IBM compatable"!!! And that is why the PC market dominated the personal computing market for so long!! John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 11:31:55 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: > On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: > > On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: > > > > On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > > > > On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other > > > > >> Guy wrote: > > > > >>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young > > > > >>> > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: > > > > >>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT > > > > >>>>>> send > > > > >>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating > > > > >>>>>> system > > > > >>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to > > > > >>> anyone > > > > >>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that > > > > >>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. > > > > >> > > > > >> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP > > > > >> anymore!! > > > > >> > > > > >> John Kuthe... > > > > > > > > > > Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make > > > > > the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest > > > > > Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the > > > > > newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() > > > > > > > > > Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never > > > > been > > > > able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Xeno > > > > > > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the > > > hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess > > > is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() > > > > Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making > > billion$! > > > > John Kuthe... > > You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. IBM dropped the ball, as IBM thought the money was gonna be in the hardware of the PC. Bill Gates and MicroSUCKS made the very shrewd business decision to buy outright a stinkly simple text based operating system called QDOS (for Quick and Dirty Operating System(, rebranded it as MS-DOS and LICENSED it not only to IBM but also to any Tom, Dick and Smarmy who could throw a hardware box together and speciously call it "100% IBM compatable"!!! And that is why the PC market dominated the personal computing market for so long!! John Kuthe... --- I kind of forgot about them until you mentioned them. I do remember when I first started working, they were considered the giants and we thought they'd take over the world! Then my friend's boyfriend got a job for Hewitt Packard and he thought they would take over the world My how things have changed! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/18/2016 9:44 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 11:31:55 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >>>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >>>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John Kuthe... >>>>>> >>>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >>>>>> >>>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >>>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Xeno >>>> >>>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >>> >>> Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and making billion$! >>> >>> John Kuthe... >> >> You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. > > IBM dropped the ball, as IBM thought the money was gonna be in the hardware of the PC. Bill Gates and MicroSUCKS made the very shrewd business decision to buy outright a stinkly simple text based operating system called QDOS (for Quick and Dirty Operating System(, rebranded it as MS-DOS and LICENSED it not only to IBM but also to any Tom, Dick and Smarmy who could throw a hardware box together and speciously call it "100% IBM compatable"!!! And that is why the PC market dominated the personal computing market for so long!! > > John Kuthe... > IBM's downfall is most remarkable. Everybody assumed they would dominate the personal computer market but that didn't happen - so much for the plans of mice and men. IBM didn't want to own exclusive rights to this second-party *******-son OS from Microsoft because they needed a fall guy just in case something went South in this new marketplace. Heck, this sounds like a shrewd move on IBM's part. IBM didn't drop the ball - they were trying to cover theirs. ![]() My wife spent some time learning IBM new OS/2 system. Hoo boy, that was some slick system. It seemed at the time this would be the future of computing. Then MS came out with Windows 3.X - and the rest is history. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dsi1 wrote:
> On 1/18/2016 9:44 AM, John Kuthe wrote: >> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 11:31:55 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >>>>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other >>>>>>>> Guy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating >>>>>>>>>>>> system >>>>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to >>>>>>>>> anyone >>>>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP >>>>>>>> anymore!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> John Kuthe... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to >>>>>>> make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the >>>>>>> latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving >>>>>>> the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for >>>>>>> them! ![]() >>>>>>> >>>>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never >>>>>> been >>>>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Xeno >>>>> >>>>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all >>>>> the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My >>>>> guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >>>> >>>> Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and >>>> making billion$! >>>> >>>> John Kuthe... >>> >>> You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. >> >> IBM dropped the ball, as IBM thought the money was gonna be in the >> hardware of the PC. Bill Gates and MicroSUCKS made the very shrewd >> business decision to buy outright a stinkly simple text based >> operating system called QDOS (for Quick and Dirty Operating System(, >> rebranded it as MS-DOS and LICENSED it not only to IBM but also to any >> Tom, Dick and Smarmy who could throw a hardware box together and >> speciously call it "100% IBM compatable"!!! And that is why the PC >> market dominated the personal computing market for so long!! >> >> John Kuthe... >> > > IBM's downfall is most remarkable. Everybody assumed they would dominate > the personal computer market but that didn't happen - so much for the > plans of mice and men. IBM didn't want to own exclusive rights to this > second-party *******-son OS from Microsoft because they needed a fall > guy just in case something went South in this new marketplace. Heck, > this sounds like a shrewd move on IBM's part. IBM didn't drop the ball - > they were trying to cover theirs. ![]() > > My wife spent some time learning IBM new OS/2 system. Hoo boy, that was > some slick system. It seemed at the time this would be the future of > computing. Then MS came out with Windows 3.X - and the rest is history. Nabbing SCO Linux was a masterstroke by MS. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/01/2016 1:01 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 1/18/2016 9:44 AM, John Kuthe wrote: >> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 11:31:55 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 7:18:23 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 10:07:07 PM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >>>>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other >>>>>>>> Guy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating >>>>>>>>>>>> system >>>>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to >>>>>>>>> anyone >>>>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP >>>>>>>> anymore!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> John Kuthe... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to >>>>>>> make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the >>>>>>> latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving >>>>>>> the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for >>>>>>> them! ![]() >>>>>>> >>>>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never >>>>>> been >>>>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Xeno >>>>> >>>>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all >>>>> the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My >>>>> guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >>>> >>>> Which was MicroSucks' initial way of dominating the PC market and >>>> making billion$! >>>> >>>> John Kuthe... >>> >>> You probably mean IBM's initial way of dominating the PC market. >> >> IBM dropped the ball, as IBM thought the money was gonna be in the >> hardware of the PC. Bill Gates and MicroSUCKS made the very shrewd >> business decision to buy outright a stinkly simple text based >> operating system called QDOS (for Quick and Dirty Operating System(, >> rebranded it as MS-DOS and LICENSED it not only to IBM but also to any >> Tom, Dick and Smarmy who could throw a hardware box together and >> speciously call it "100% IBM compatable"!!! And that is why the PC >> market dominated the personal computing market for so long!! >> >> John Kuthe... >> > > IBM's downfall is most remarkable. Everybody assumed they would dominate > the personal computer market but that didn't happen - so much for the > plans of mice and men. IBM didn't want to own exclusive rights to this > second-party *******-son OS from Microsoft because they needed a fall > guy just in case something went South in this new marketplace. Heck, > this sounds like a shrewd move on IBM's part. IBM didn't drop the ball - > they were trying to cover theirs. ![]() I think you will find that IBM did in fact drop the ball. IBM had no concept of 'shrewd moves' and it was their arrogance that caused their own downfall in the PC marketplace. > > My wife spent some time learning IBM new OS/2 system. Hoo boy, that was > some slick system. It seemed at the time this would be the future of > computing. Then MS came out with Windows 3.X - and the rest is history. You do know that IBM partnered with Micro$oft to produce OS/2, don't you? In fact, the 'look and feel' of OS/2 went on to be used by Micro$oft in their Windows 3.X efforts. For that matter, OS/2 still exists in the form of 'eComStation'. -- Xeno |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/01/2016 3:07 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote: >> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote: >>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote: >>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send >>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system >>>>>>>> (OS) you use. ![]() >>>>>> >>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that. >>>>> >>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone >>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that >>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed. >>>> >>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!! >>>> >>>> John Kuthe... >>> >>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them! ![]() >>> >> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been >> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Xeno > > The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all > the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. You're not wrong there! ;-) > My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() > Update Alert! That plan failed aeons ago. -- Xeno |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Xeno wrote:
>> My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail. ![]() >> > Update Alert! That plan failed aeons ago. > > -- Is that why they have 95+% market share in PCs? You MORON! Are all Auztards as STUPID as you? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New (or old) computer scam | General Cooking | |||
New (or old) computer scam | General Cooking | |||
New (or old) computer scam | General Cooking | |||
New (or old) computer scam | General Cooking |