Bruce wrote:
> On 18/1/2016 15:26 dsi1 wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:14:25 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>>> On 18/1/2016 15:07 dsi1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:50:22 PM UTC-10, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 17/01/2016 7:33 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 9:36:25 PM UTC-10, John Kuthe wrote:
>>>>>>> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 6:08:05 PM UTC-6, The New Other Guy wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500, Nancy Young
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/15/2016 2:04 PM, graham wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 15/01/2016 11:52 AM, notbob wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please, do not fall for this ruse. You computer will NOT send
>>>>>>>>>>> security alerts to a third party, no matter which operating system
>>>>>>>>>>> (OS) you use.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hope no one here would fall for that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not ONLY will your computer never sent any security alert to anyone
>>>>>>>> without your help, Microsoft is ABSOLUTELY the last place that
>>>>>>>> would get such a notice, IF such notices even existed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, me too! Especially because they don't even support Win XP anymore!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John Kuthe...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Microsoft's plan is to not support Win 7 or 8.X. They want to make the previous versions of Windows incompatible with the latest Intel processors. Their vision is their latest OS driving the newest hardware. Just like the old days! I say bully for them!
>>>>>>
>>>>> Their vision is to monetise Windows in a way that they have never been
>>>>> able to do in the past - the way Apple has monetised OSX.
>>>>
>>>> The difference being that MS does not control or manufacture all the hardware that Windows 10 will run on. This is a good thing. My guess is Microsoft plan for world domination will fail.
>>>
>>> It has already succeeded
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bruce
>>
>> Windows is an anachronism in this modern computer era. It's like a horse and buggy on the Autobahn.
>
> And we're all Amish.
>

No, you're just Moronic.

Cult of your own design?