Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RichD wrote:
> Julie Bove wrote: > > > Minus the fiber. > > So each gram of fiber cancels one gram of carb? > Is that like, scientific? What's the chemistry? Be careful of the phrasing. It's easy to think someone claimed that a gram of fiber cancels a gram of sugar or starch. No, a gram of fiber just doesn't get listed as a sugar or starch. > If so, then consuming high fiber carbs, like oat bran, > or oatmeal, would produce lower glycemic effect? As > there are breads available, bearing the label "low > glycemic index". The glycemic load is one effect - Fiber slows digestion of everything. But when you're counting grams that's not relevant to the count. It just makes the grams slower. The science is there are at least two classes of fiber - Insoluble fiber is in the class of cellulose like wood. As humans are not related to termites we can not extract any calories at all from insoluble fiber. In one end and out the other end. Soluble fiber is not digested by enzymes that appear in the human genome but they are digested by enzymes made by our intestinal bacteria. As a result when we digest soluble fiber we absorb roughly half of its calories and our intestinal bacteria absorb roughly half of the calories. The exact fractions are very difficult to accurately measure and they differ meal to meal. Here's the fun part with soluble fiber - The calories that get absorbed are "small chain fatty acids" so they aren't carbs. Whether to count each fiber gram as 2 calories of fat is a question I have never seen addressed in any low fat discussion and low carbers don't care about fat intake. The problem with the two types of fiber is US labels are not required to tell the difference. You're free to completely deduct insoluble fiber from all of your counts but to do that you need to memorize the tables or look up every food ingredient. When I read the nutrition labels on imported foods it does not appear that other countries are required to report fiber by type either. It is not practical to treat the two types of fiber differently. The standard approach now for low carb dieters is to deduct the fiber content from their daily count and ignore any calories contributed by the fiber. Some low carbers count calories but most of the plans just teach to let the appetite lowering feature of low carb eating make portion control easy. There's an added benefit to deducting fiber for low carb dieters - Eating extra veggies early in your diet. Many low carb diets tell folks to start out at some carb count then later increase your daily quota. Many new low carbers incorrectly think that if low is good, lower must be better because they have not studied the hormones T3, leptin and cortisol and because they want to be extreme. The amount of veggies eaten to get to a net count is larger than the amount of veggies eaten to get to a total count. More veggies are better and the newbies need an automated strategy to ensure they eat more. Doing a net count delivers that function. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eat those Carbs! The ADA says you should!! | Diabetic | |||
Too many carbs! | Diabetic | |||
Carbs | Diabetic | |||
net carbs? | Diabetic | |||
Good Carbs, Bad Carbs, And Cancer | Vegan |