 |
|
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
"sf" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:54:58 +0100, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > >> >> >> "sf" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:55:30 +0100, "Ophelia" > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> "sf" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:44:17 +0100, "Ophelia" >> >> > > >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Gary" > wrote in message >> >> >> ... >> >> >> > Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Cheri" wrote: >> >> >> >> > He's hateful here, that's all I need to know about him. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes and the arrogance that goes with it seems to infest that >> >> >> >> type. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Every single person here (and everywhere) has their good and bad >> >> >> > sides. Best to focus on the good half, imo. >> >> >> >> >> >> And when you have had enough, filter them, yes? >> >> >> >> >> >> I have! >> >> > >> >> > How do you permanently filter out someone who is so needy for >> >> > attention that they morph and frog? >> >> >> >> I can't but what I do with those, is go down the list each time I log >> >> in, >> >> and mark them as 'read'. It isn't too hard to spot them. It is the >> >> job >> >> of >> >> a minute or two. >> > >> > So you're ignoring someone you would otherwise read. >> >> How do you know that? > > Apparently you haven't figured out what the term frogger refers to. Why would you think that? Is it because you believe no one but you has a brain? -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On 2015-10-20 1:42 PM, sf wrote:
>> It's pretty sad when they throw in the towel and pull stunts like that >> to try to get attention for the idiocy that gets them filtered by so >> many people. They are throwing in the towel and admitting that they are >> complete losers. The best thing to do is to ignore them... everyone >> should ignore them. As long as they get attention their bizarre and >> dysfunctional behaviour is being reinforced. They eventually get tired >> and find somewhere else to play. > > I will say it again. How do you ignore a frogger? They are frogging > someone you want to read, so you're stuck opening the forged post. > How to ignore or how not to see? It may be difficult to avoid their bizarrely childish attention seeking behaviour, but you don't have to respond to them. Learn to ignore them. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-10-20 1:42 PM, sf wrote: > >>> It's pretty sad when they throw in the towel and pull stunts like that >>> to try to get attention for the idiocy that gets them filtered by so >>> many people. They are throwing in the towel and admitting that they are >>> complete losers. The best thing to do is to ignore them... everyone >>> should ignore them. As long as they get attention their bizarre and >>> dysfunctional behaviour is being reinforced. They eventually get tired >>> and find somewhere else to play. >> >> I will say it again. How do you ignore a frogger? They are frogging >> someone you want to read, so you're stuck opening the forged post. >> > > > How to ignore or how not to see? It may be difficult to avoid their > bizarrely childish attention seeking behaviour, but you don't have to > respond to them. Learn to ignore them. > > Like you learned to ignore Julie? |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:23:02 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>Ophelia wrote: >> >> "Cheri" wrote: >> > He's hateful here, that's all I need to know about him. >> >> Yes and the arrogance that goes with it seems to infest that type. > >Every single person here (and everywhere) has their good and bad >sides. Best to focus on the good half, imo. Like flipping a coin, it's 50/50 it'll be heads or tails... unless it's an sf coin... all tail! hehe |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:40:19 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: > On 2015-10-20 1:42 PM, sf wrote: > > >> It's pretty sad when they throw in the towel and pull stunts like that > >> to try to get attention for the idiocy that gets them filtered by so > >> many people. They are throwing in the towel and admitting that they are > >> complete losers. The best thing to do is to ignore them... everyone > >> should ignore them. As long as they get attention their bizarre and > >> dysfunctional behaviour is being reinforced. They eventually get tired > >> and find somewhere else to play. > > > > I will say it again. How do you ignore a frogger? They are frogging > > someone you want to read, so you're stuck opening the forged post. > > > > > How to ignore or how not to see? It may be difficult to avoid their > bizarrely childish attention seeking behaviour, but you don't have to > respond to them. Learn to ignore them. > Dave, are you being dense on purpose? If someone was frogging your name and your headers and I wanted to read your posts, how am I supposed know if it's you or the forger without opening the post first? -- sf |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:14:07 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote: > > > "sf" > wrote in message > ... > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:54:58 +0100, "Ophelia" > > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> "sf" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:55:30 +0100, "Ophelia" > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> "sf" > wrote in message > >> >> ... > >> >> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:44:17 +0100, "Ophelia" > >> >> > > > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> "Gary" > wrote in message > >> >> >> ... > >> >> >> > Ophelia wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> "Cheri" wrote: > >> >> >> >> > He's hateful here, that's all I need to know about him. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Yes and the arrogance that goes with it seems to infest that > >> >> >> >> type. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Every single person here (and everywhere) has their good and bad > >> >> >> > sides. Best to focus on the good half, imo. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> And when you have had enough, filter them, yes? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I have! > >> >> > > >> >> > How do you permanently filter out someone who is so needy for > >> >> > attention that they morph and frog? > >> >> > >> >> I can't but what I do with those, is go down the list each time I log > >> >> in, > >> >> and mark them as 'read'. It isn't too hard to spot them. It is the > >> >> job > >> >> of > >> >> a minute or two. > >> > > >> > So you're ignoring someone you would otherwise read. > >> > >> How do you know that? > > > > Apparently you haven't figured out what the term frogger refers to. > > Why would you think that? Is it because you believe no one but you has a > brain? In that case, why did you post such an ignorant reply? -- sf |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:27:44 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:14:07 +0100, "Ophelia" > >wrote: > >> >> >> "sf" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:54:58 +0100, "Ophelia" > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> "sf" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:55:30 +0100, "Ophelia" > >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "sf" > wrote in message >> >> >> ... >> >> >> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:44:17 +0100, "Ophelia" >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Gary" > wrote in message >> >> >> >> ... >> >> >> >> > Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Cheri" wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > He's hateful here, that's all I need to know about him. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes and the arrogance that goes with it seems to infest that >> >> >> >> >> type. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Every single person here (and everywhere) has their good and bad >> >> >> >> > sides. Best to focus on the good half, imo. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> And when you have had enough, filter them, yes? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > How do you permanently filter out someone who is so needy for >> >> >> > attention that they morph and frog? >> >> >> >> >> >> I can't but what I do with those, is go down the list each time I log >> >> >> in, >> >> >> and mark them as 'read'. It isn't too hard to spot them. It is the >> >> >> job >> >> >> of >> >> >> a minute or two. >> >> > >> >> > So you're ignoring someone you would otherwise read. >> >> >> >> How do you know that? >> > >> > Apparently you haven't figured out what the term frogger refers to. >> >> Why would you think that? Is it because you believe no one but you has a >> brain? > >In that case, why did you post such an ignorant reply? That response was maybe why we don't care much whether your posts are forged or real - do we really want to read them, either way ? |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On 2015-10-20 5:26 PM, sf wrote:
>> How to ignore or how not to see? It may be difficult to avoid their >> bizarrely childish attention seeking behaviour, but you don't have to >> respond to them. Learn to ignore them. >> > > Dave, are you being dense on purpose? If someone was frogging your > name and your headers and I wanted to read your posts, how am I > supposed know if it's you or the forger without opening the post > first? > I am not the one being dense. The children thrive on the attention they get. Internalize your outrage. Don't give them the attention they crave. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-10-20 5:26 PM, sf wrote: > >>> How to ignore or how not to see? It may be difficult to avoid their >>> bizarrely childish attention seeking behaviour, but you don't have to >>> respond to them. Learn to ignore them. >>> >> >> Dave, are you being dense on purpose? If someone was frogging your >> name and your headers and I wanted to read your posts, how am I >> supposed know if it's you or the forger without opening the post >> first? >> > > > I am not the one being dense. The children thrive on the attention they > get. Internalize your outrage. Don't give them the attention they crave. You are terminally dense. Her point was sound and this reply you made is a total obfuscation. You're a turd. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
sf wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:37:43 -0300, wrote: > >> >> That response was maybe why we don't care much whether your posts are >> forged or real - do we really want to read them, either way ? > > Ah, yes - avoid the question. I can't help but notice that you're > reading me anyway. > Some very dishonest canuckelheads out here on this subject... |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:57:33 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:20:11 -0300, wrote: > > snip >> > >> >I will say it again. How do you ignore a frogger? They are frogging >> >someone you want to read, so you're stuck opening the forged post. >> >> You must be pretty dense if you even have to ask the question, you are >> using Agent, it couldn't be easier to either ignore or kfile. > >Your stupid is showing. I start reading the posts. The first time I come across an obvious troll/forger, I right click, hit kill filters, open the kill filters and choose delete. The computer instantly searches out every posting and deletes. I never seen them again. It takes less than a minute to do -- maybe only seconds. If you do it every day they don't have an opportunity to build a lot of trash and the search and delete is amazingly quick. Janet US |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:00:58 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:37:43 -0300, wrote: > >> >> That response was maybe why we don't care much whether your posts are >> forged or real - do we really want to read them, either way ? > >Ah, yes - avoid the question. I can't help but notice that you're >reading me anyway. I was reading O's post, she is not kf'd. Nor are you for that matter but I do look at the top of your post if I click on it to make sure you are not replying to one of the trollers, which you so often do. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:54:10 -0600, Janet B >
wrote: >On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:57:33 -0700, sf > wrote: > >>On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:20:11 -0300, wrote: >> >> >snip >>> > >>> >I will say it again. How do you ignore a frogger? They are frogging >>> >someone you want to read, so you're stuck opening the forged post. >>> >>> You must be pretty dense if you even have to ask the question, you are >>> using Agent, it couldn't be easier to either ignore or kfile. >> >>Your stupid is showing. > >I start reading the posts. The first time I come across an obvious >troll/forger, I right click, hit kill filters, open the kill filters >and choose delete. The computer instantly searches out every posting >and deletes. I never seen them again. It takes less than a minute to >do -- maybe only seconds. If you do it every day they don't have an >opportunity to build a lot of trash and the search and delete is >amazingly quick. >Janet US I am using Agent and it is quick to do a kf and thereafter you never see them again. While sf is using an earlier edition of Agent, she could do it, but often she is the one replying to this troll. Sometimes I click on her posts but always glance at the top to see who she was replying to, one of the trolls, then she goes down the drain too. The more replies they get, the more incentive to continue their stupid ways. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:06:41 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > > > Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > >> On 10/18/2015 11:31 PM, Sqwertz wrote: > >> > On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:17:02 GMT, Anonymous Poster wrote: > >> > >> > > So while a few of you are busy pointing accusing fingers at > random >> > > people everybody seems to have overlooked the most > basic clues in >> > > the headers that would have excluded likely > suspects and >> > > implicated others. > >> > >> I haven't seen any of this stalking so it's someone I've killfiled > >> and probably over and over as they morph. > >> > >> No, I do not believe it's sw. > > > > Actually it was. I removed him when he went after > > alt.bread.cooking. History now. > > The only other time I've seen someone mess with somebody else's real > life was when this guy had a new job and was complaining about it > here. Sqwertz collected all the complaints and sent them to this guy's > supervisor. If you can stoop to that level, you're a low-life who can > do anything. Steve contacted me. I've backed out and he's on but the spammer is really good and tripped me up. Let this be. -- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:54:10 -0600, Janet B >
wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:57:33 -0700, sf > wrote: > > >On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:20:11 -0300, wrote: > > > > > snip > >> > > >> >I will say it again. How do you ignore a frogger? They are frogging > >> >someone you want to read, so you're stuck opening the forged post. > >> > >> You must be pretty dense if you even have to ask the question, you are > >> using Agent, it couldn't be easier to either ignore or kfile. > > > >Your stupid is showing. > > I start reading the posts. The first time I come across an obvious > troll/forger, I right click, hit kill filters, open the kill filters > and choose delete. The computer instantly searches out every posting > and deletes. I never seen them again. It takes less than a minute to > do -- maybe only seconds. If you do it every day they don't have an > opportunity to build a lot of trash and the search and delete is > amazingly quick. > Janet US How do you delete a frogger and not delete the person they are forging? -- sf |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:04:00 -0300, wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:00:58 -0700, sf > wrote: > > >On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:37:43 -0300, wrote: > > > >> > >> That response was maybe why we don't care much whether your posts are > >> forged or real - do we really want to read them, either way ? > > > >Ah, yes - avoid the question. I can't help but notice that you're > >reading me anyway. > > I was reading O's post, she is not kf'd. Nor are you for that matter > but I do look at the top of your post if I click on it to make sure > you are not replying to one of the trollers, which you so often do. Still avoiding the question about froggers. -- sf |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
cshenk wrote:
> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:06:41 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >> >>> Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>> >>>> On 10/18/2015 11:31 PM, Sqwertz wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:17:02 GMT, Anonymous Poster wrote: >>>> >>>>>> So while a few of you are busy pointing accusing fingers at >> random >> > > people everybody seems to have overlooked the most >> basic clues in >> > > the headers that would have excluded likely >> suspects and >> > > implicated others. >>>> >>>> I haven't seen any of this stalking so it's someone I've killfiled >>>> and probably over and over as they morph. >>>> >>>> No, I do not believe it's sw. >>> >>> Actually it was. I removed him when he went after >>> alt.bread.cooking. History now. >> >> The only other time I've seen someone mess with somebody else's real >> life was when this guy had a new job and was complaining about it >> here. Sqwertz collected all the complaints and sent them to this guy's >> supervisor. If you can stoop to that level, you're a low-life who can >> do anything. > > Steve contacted me. I've backed out and he's on but the spammer is > really good and tripped me up. > > Let this be. > Yes, let it be that you have thrown in with a grotesque "Groupkilla" and proven woman-stalker. You must be SOOOO proud of yourself, dearie. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
> wrote in message ... > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:00:58 -0700, sf > wrote: > >>On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:37:43 -0300, wrote: >> >>> >>> That response was maybe why we don't care much whether your posts are >>> forged or real - do we really want to read them, either way ? >> >>Ah, yes - avoid the question. I can't help but notice that you're >>reading me anyway. > > I was reading O's post, she is not kf'd. Nor are you for that matter > but I do look at the top of your post if I click on it to make sure > you are not replying to one of the trollers, which you so often do. Is anyone really interested in the posting/reading habits of others? If so, why? Cheri |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
"Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > How to ignore or how not to see? It may be difficult to avoid their > bizarrely childish attention seeking behaviour, but you don't have to > respond to them. Learn to ignore them. Oh the irony!!! Cheri |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
> wrote in message ... > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:54:10 -0600, Janet B > > wrote: > >>On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:57:33 -0700, sf > wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:20:11 -0300, wrote: >>> >>> >>snip >>>> > >>>> >I will say it again. How do you ignore a frogger? They are frogging >>>> >someone you want to read, so you're stuck opening the forged post. >>>> >>>> You must be pretty dense if you even have to ask the question, you are >>>> using Agent, it couldn't be easier to either ignore or kfile. >>> >>>Your stupid is showing. >> >>I start reading the posts. The first time I come across an obvious >>troll/forger, I right click, hit kill filters, open the kill filters >>and choose delete. The computer instantly searches out every posting >>and deletes. I never seen them again. It takes less than a minute to >>do -- maybe only seconds. If you do it every day they don't have an >>opportunity to build a lot of trash and the search and delete is >>amazingly quick. >>Janet US > > I am using Agent and it is quick to do a kf and thereafter you never > see them again. While sf is using an earlier edition of Agent, she > could do it, but often she is the one replying to this troll. > Sometimes I click on her posts but always glance at the top to see > who she was replying to, one of the trolls, then she goes down the > drain too. The more replies they get, the more incentive to continue > their stupid ways. I think a big problem here is 'which posters are trolls' because there seems to be two sets of trolls and she only recognises one. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:43:45 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote: > > wrote in message .. . >> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:00:58 -0700, sf > wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:37:43 -0300, wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> That response was maybe why we don't care much whether your posts are >>>> forged or real - do we really want to read them, either way ? >>> >>>Ah, yes - avoid the question. I can't help but notice that you're >>>reading me anyway. >> >> I was reading O's post, she is not kf'd. Nor are you for that matter >> but I do look at the top of your post if I click on it to make sure >> you are not replying to one of the trollers, which you so often do. > >Is anyone really interested in the posting/reading habits of others? If so, >why? > >Cheri If you look, you will see I answered in response to this remark by sf-- Ah, yes - avoid the question. I can't help but notice that you're reading me anyway. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
Cheri wrote:
> > "Dave Smith" > wrote in message > ... > >> How to ignore or how not to see? It may be difficult to avoid their >> bizarrely childish attention seeking behaviour, but you don't have to >> respond to them. Learn to ignore them. > > Oh the irony!!! > > Cheri > Class, Beuhler, Julie...anyone???? ;-) |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
Bruce wrote:
> The "Somebody" troll was completely innocent, as opposed to the Boner > drama. > > -- Bruce Let's not even go into your "innocence", "John'... |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
Sqwertz wrote:
> But putting his name out there made it easy for UPS > to monitor his foolish, bad-mouthing antics. > > So what are you going to do about that, Bruce? I think someone will be dealing with you in the none to distant future, little woman-stalker. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:42:37 -0600, Questa > wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote: > > But putting his name out there made it easy for UPS > > to monitor his foolish, bad-mouthing antics. > > > > So what are you going to do about that, Bruce? > > > I think someone will be dealing with you in the none to distant future, > little woman-stalker. His handcuff fetish is becoming more and more clear. -- sf |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
sf wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:42:37 -0600, Questa > wrote: > >> Sqwertz wrote: >>> But putting his name out there made it easy for UPS >>> to monitor his foolish, bad-mouthing antics. >>> >>> So what are you going to do about that, Bruce? >> >> >> I think someone will be dealing with you in the none to distant future, >> little woman-stalker. > > His handcuff fetish is becoming more and more clear. > Creepy, innit? |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
all my onions are tough
John Kuthe > wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:29:21 +0000 (UTC), > > wrote: > >>after I cook them. >> >> >>any advice appreciate >> > > Cook them lower and slower! > maybe in a microwave? thanks |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ping Jessus ....... all my onions are tough
Dave Smith > wrote:
> On 2015-10-15 5:29 PM, cycjec wrote: >> after I cook them. >> >> >> any advice appreciate >> >> > > > What I said about really dumb questions to get some attention ..... here > is a prime example. srsly, usually the onions I cook are too tough |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
all my onions are tough
Julie Bove > wrote:
> > "Je?us" > wrote in message > ... >> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:51:21 -0500, Sqwertz > >> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:29:21 +0000 (UTC), cycjec wrote: >>> >>>> after I cook them. >>>> >>>> any advice appreciate >>> >>>Nobody asked HOW you're cooking them? I thought I was sauteing them or simmering them. >> I never saw the point. How in the hell can you cook onions so they >> become tough? > I don't know. I have had onions with tough skins and on occasion, the outer > layer can be tough. But other than that, no onion problems. does the kind of onion matter? |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
all my onions are tough
On 10/22/2015 10:25 PM, cycjec wrote:
> I thought I was sauteing them or simmering them. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Omelet wrote: > >> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him... > > He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with > I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty > trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to > deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their > meds. For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the total blue. After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3 years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY MOVING IN WITH YOU? That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2 years. Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're manic depressive mixed with habitual liar. Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ping Jessus ....... all my onions are tough
On 10/22/2015 10:24 PM, cycjec wrote:
> srsly, usually the onions I cook are too tough > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Omelet wrote: > >> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him... > > He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with > I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty > trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to > deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their > meds. For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the total blue. After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3 years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY MOVING IN WITH YOU? That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2 years. Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're manic depressive mixed with habitual liar. Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
all my onions are tough
On 10/22/2015 10:23 PM, cycjec wrote:
> maybe in a microwave? > > > > thanks ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Omelet wrote: > >> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him... > > He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with > I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty > trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to > deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their > meds. For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the total blue. After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3 years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY MOVING IN WITH YOU? That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2 years. Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're manic depressive mixed with habitual liar. Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
all my onions are tough
Cindy Hamilton > wrote:
> On Thursday, October 15, 2015 at 5:33:10 PM UTC-4, cycjec wrote: >> after I cook them. >> >> >> any advice appreciate > > Add a little salt while you're frying them. will try this > If you're wet-cooking them, I can't help you. I don't like > the taste of boiled onions, so I never cook them that way. Thanks. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
all my onions are tough
Arroyo seco > wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 3:29 PM, cycjec wrote: >> after I cook them. >> >> >> any advice appreciate >> >> > Sautee gently in butter and olive oil, lower heat please, then finish > with a nice red wine vinegar... will try that |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
all my onions are tough
sf > wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:29:21 +0000 (UTC), > > wrote: > >> after I cook them. >> >> >> any advice appreciate >> > > Take the outer layers off. oh, I do that |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbaa Llorente's Stalker Revealed
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| When the going gets tough... | General Cooking | |||
| Tough Cod | General Cooking | |||
| Tough Cod | General Cooking | |||
| Why So Tough? | General Cooking | |||
| Can I use the tops of sprouting onions as I would green onions? | General Cooking | |||
![sf[_9_] is offline](https://www.foodbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
