On 2015-07-20, jmcquown > wrote:

> Yes, I see... you and the manager are both idiots.

....and of the three of you, yer the one that ends up rankled. You
need to let it go. If Penny's considered it a win, why should you
care?

nb

On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 3:55:13 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>
> On 2015-07-20, jmcquown > wrote:
>
> > Yes, I see... you and the manager are both idiots.
>
> ...and of the three of you, yer the one that ends up rankled. You
> need to let it go. If Penny's considered it a win, why should you
> care?
>
> nb
>
>
She was just giving an example of people returning items to
get cash back without a receipt. And in this case the customer
was not even in the correct store. I don't think she has a
problem with it, but you do because she posted her example.

On 7/20/2015 5:44 PM, wrote:
> On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 3:55:13 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-07-20, jmcquown > wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I see... you and the manager are both idiots.
>>
>> ...and of the three of you, yer the one that ends up rankled. You
>> need to let it go. If Penny's considered it a win, why should you
>> care?
>>
>> nb
>>
>>
> She was just giving an example of people returning items to
> get cash back without a receipt. And in this case the customer
> was not even in the correct store. I don't think she has a
> problem with it, but you do because she posted her example.
>
It's just one of those things I clearly remember because I think the
woman was taking advantage of the "customer is always right" mentality.
I was only 18 years old but even I knew it was wrong to give that
woman a refund.

Jill

On 7/20/2015 4:55 PM, notbob wrote:
> On 2015-07-20, jmcquown > wrote:
>
>> Yes, I see... you and the manager are both idiots.
>
> ...and of the three of you, yer the one that ends up rankled. You
> need to let it go. If Penny's considered it a win, why should you
> care?
>
> nb
>

Stunts like that keep prices up for all of us. That is $10 less profit
the store made because of a scam.

On 7/20/2015 10:14 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 7/20/2015 4:55 PM, notbob wrote:
>> On 2015-07-20, jmcquown > wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I see... you and the manager are both idiots.
>>
>> ...and of the three of you, yer the one that ends up rankled. You
>> need to let it go. If Penny's considered it a win, why should you
>> care?
>>
>> nb
>>
>
> Stunts like that keep prices up for all of us. That is $10 less profit
> the store made because of a scam.

Exactly, Ed. It wasn't a "win" for anyone except for the woman who
walked away with $10.

Jill

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:30:40 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

> On 7/20/2015 10:14 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > On 7/20/2015 4:55 PM, notbob wrote:
> >> On 2015-07-20, jmcquown > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, I see... you and the manager are both idiots.
> >>
> >> ...and of the three of you, yer the one that ends up rankled. You
> >> need to let it go. If Penny's considered it a win, why should you
> >> care?
> >>
> >> nb
> >>
> >
> > Stunts like that keep prices up for all of us. That is $10 less profit
> > the store made because of a scam.
>
> Exactly, Ed. It wasn't a "win" for anyone except for the woman who
> walked away with $10.
>
> Jill
The question is: Do they do it today? If not, then the Ivy League
Eggheads who issued those decrees from On High finally figured out how
to conduct basic business in the real world.

--

sf