|
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 19:46:05 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > >"Jeßus" > wrote in message .. . >> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:40:39 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> > wrote: >> >>>I do Facebook but this particular group leaves such a bad taste in my >>>mouth, >>>I would never join them on Facebook. I was told that the chat here was >>>nice >>>too. It wasn't. >> >> Well, Usenet is unmoderated. If you want protection from reality, you >> want forums that are moderated. No shortage of them out there... what >> are you waiting for? > >Wrong. I dislike most moderated forums. So basically you don't like either approach. I should have guessed :) >I myself have been a forum >moderator but there were very few circumstances in which I would actually >remove a post. I'm still a moderator myself and found much the same thing. Usually it's the occasional newcomer who needs to be pulled into line, the regulars (being regulars), basically moderate themselves adequately. >> Oh sorry, I just realised that would solve this particular problem for >> you. We can't have *that* happening, can we? > >No. That wouldn't solve any problem. Am I having a problem here? Seems >like *I* am not the one with the problem. No, of course not. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/3/2015 2:53 PM, wrote:
> I'm still a moderator myself Where? Rec.rabbit-killing.bullies? |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
"graham" > wrote in message ... > On 03/07/2015 2:27 AM, Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> "graham" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>> https://www.pinterest.com/pin/488781365784901140/ >>> >>> which sums up much of society as I see it! >> >> And plenty of them will get to that place sooner rather than later. >> Driving >> along a busy street can be fraught when people with their heads down >> looking >> at their phones are not looking where they are going, start to cross the >> road. >> > I was following a car the other day and it was being driven somewhat > erratically, so I decided to get past it. It was being driven by an > *elderly woman* who was *texting*!!! :( The other week I was driving on the motorway and I noticed a lassie in the next lane was texting!! We were both doing 70 mph!! I got out of her way sharpish. It is illegal here though so if she had been caught .... -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
|
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message ... > On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 5:39:39 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote: > >> The siding was not rotting. > > Sorry. You didn't say what the problem was, and I conjectured, > based on your climate. There wasn't a problem. The real estate agent just said tat was the problem. So my husband called a siding company. He said there was a problem with siding of that era but ours wasn't affected. He didn't really get into what that problem was and we haven't had any siding problems except for a few pieces. Some have problems from when my husband ripped the gutter off. Don't ask me why. But he did. Not on the house but the back house. And one piece on the house that he somehow damaged with a tool or something. Dunno the story on that. > >> That is just the excuse that the real estate >> agent used for why potential buyer bailed out at the last minute. > > Oh, a real estate agent. Well, they're basically salesmen/saleswomen, > so I just assume that when they're mouths are moving, they're lying. I know that now. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
> wrote in message ... > On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 8:06:19 PM UTC-5, Acme Bully Control wrote: >> >> On 7/2/2015 2:20 PM, wrote: >> > On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 1:31:00 PM UTC-5, Acme Bully Control >> > wrote: >> >> >> > Learn all these new phrases in summer school? You do sound >> > rather juvenile. >> >> Run out of hate to try and one-up me with? >> >> Oh I know, that only works when you bully Julie, you hateful bitch! >> >> > Ju-Ju, the attention whore, is able to take care of > herself without you defending her. If she gets to the > point of running out of lies she feigns she doesn't > know what a person is talking about or better yet she > claims her never said any such thing. So all your efforts > to defend the indefensible is for naught. > > You sound as foolish as she. Not even! Everyone here knows that there are at least half a dozen people who will happily spend hours reposting things that I've said. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
"Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > > > "graham" > wrote in message > ... >> On 03/07/2015 2:27 AM, Ophelia wrote: >>> >>> >>> "graham" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> >>>> https://www.pinterest.com/pin/488781365784901140/ >>>> >>>> which sums up much of society as I see it! >>> >>> And plenty of them will get to that place sooner rather than later. >>> Driving >>> along a busy street can be fraught when people with their heads down >>> looking >>> at their phones are not looking where they are going, start to cross the >>> road. >>> >> I was following a car the other day and it was being driven somewhat >> erratically, so I decided to get past it. It was being driven by an >> *elderly woman* who was *texting*!!! > > :( The other week I was driving on the motorway and I noticed a lassie in > the next lane was texting!! We were both doing 70 mph!! I got out of > her way sharpish. It is illegal here though so if she had been caught > .... It's illegal here too but people still do it. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
"Gary" > wrote in message ... > Ophelia wrote: >> >> What have you been cooking today? The weather is very hot here and I >> made >> salads. I cooked some kangeroo steak for my hubby for the first time but >> he >> didn't like them much. He said they are a cross between beef and liver. >> Otoh I got some moose steaks the other week which he loved:) I must look >> out for them again. > > Must be a Scotland thing. I don't think you can buy kangaroo or moose > here in the US. Unless maybe some butchers have a licence to sell this > stuff. Certainly never offered in a grocery store here. I have seen reindeer meatballs in a can. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
"Bruce" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:56:42 -0400, Gary > wrote: > >>Ophelia wrote: >>> >>> What have you been cooking today? The weather is very hot here and I >>> made >>> salads. I cooked some kangeroo steak for my hubby for the first time >>> but he >>> didn't like them much. He said they are a cross between beef and liver. >>> Otoh I got some moose steaks the other week which he loved:) I must >>> look >>> out for them again. >> >>Must be a Scotland thing. I don't think you can buy kangaroo or moose >>here in the US. Unless maybe some butchers have a licence to sell this >>stuff. Certainly never offered in a grocery store here. > > Not even in a big city? I've seen antilope and zebra for sale in a > small city in the Netherlands. I guess the advantage of zebra is that > it automatically lol -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/3/2015 3:56 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> That is the irony. The nymshifting idiots who defend her realize she >> is not able to defend herself. The best she does is to come up with >> some excuses and more lies and denial. > > Why should I have to defend myself? I haven't done anything wrong. Because they are classic BULLIES! |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 10:13:19 -0400, Gary > wrote:
> Brooklyn1 wrote: > > > > "Jeßus" wrote: > > >> Well, Usenet is unmoderated. > > > > That's not true, there are many Usenet Newsgroups that are moderated, > > some about food. > > And from what I've seen, RFC and BA.FOOD are about the only food > groups still active. Sad. :-( He lies. Ask him to name some so you can take a look at them. -- sf |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: > On 2015-07-03 4:48 PM, wrote: > > >> That's not true, there are many Usenet Newsgroups that are moderated, > >> some about food. > > > > Technically you're correct... but how many had a long term, active > > user base? They were few and far between IMO, and never lasted > > particularly long for the most part. I'd check now for active > > moderated groups, but google groups is next to useless for searching > > > Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their > own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former > administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most > people away. > That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. -- sf |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their >> own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former >> administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most >> people away. >> > That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and > harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. > Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. Whenever Carol left her husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op status he'd kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. Jill |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2015-07-03 4:48 PM, wrote: > >>> That's not true, there are many Usenet Newsgroups that are moderated, >>> some about food. >> >> Technically you're correct... but how many had a long term, active >> user base? They were few and far between IMO, and never lasted >> particularly long for the most part. I'd check now for active >> moderated groups, but google groups is next to useless for searching > > >Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their >own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former >administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most >people away. No surprise there :) There are good moderators, mostly average moderators, and some bad moderators out there. I had considerable misgivings becoming one myself, but I was asked to help out on a large forum despite that and to my own surprise it turns out I'm pretty good at it. On Usenet, I have no wish to see any censorship or moderation at all, beyond what one personally chooses to filter. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:28:02 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: >On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote: >> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their >>> own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former >>> administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most >>> people away. >>> >> That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and >> harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. >> >Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. sf's comments only confirmed Dave's claims as far as I am concerned. >Whenever Carol left her >husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op status he'd >kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. I never got much into chat myself, aside from trading files on IRC. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 03/07/2015 1:47 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, says... > >> >> Me too. Even the forums that I used to go to are dead. > > Spot the common factor > > Janet UK > Or the lowest common denominator! Graham -- |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:28:02 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: > On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote: > > On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith > > > wrote: > > > >> Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their > >> own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former > >> administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most > >> people away. > >> > > That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and > > harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. > > > Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. Whenever Carol left her > husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op status he'd > kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. > I don't think he it. I think she did using his persona (or ordered him to do it). She was a crazy, two faced, bitch, he was nice. -- sf |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/4/2015 6:02 AM, Acme Bully Control wrote:
> On 7/3/2015 1:40 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >> On 2015-07-03 3:25 PM, graham wrote: >> >>> I was following a car the other day and it was being driven somewhat >>> erratically, so I decided to get past it. It was being driven by an >>> *elderly woman* who was *texting*!!! >> >> >> >> A couple weeks ago I was driving along and an oncoming vehicle wandered >> into my lane. The driver was texting. >> > > Was Nigella driving? > > Cuz if she was, she was "asking for it".... Nigella is such a dumb bitch she asks for it alrighty! |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
"sf" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:28:02 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > >> On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote: >> > On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their >> >> own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former >> >> administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most >> >> people away. >> >> >> > That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and >> > harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. >> > >> Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. Whenever Carol left her >> husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op status he'd >> kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. >> > > I don't think he it. I think she did using his persona (or ordered > him to do it). She was a crazy, two faced, bitch, he was nice. Oh wait! Soooo... Are you telling me that there *was* another Carol here? Because I well remember someone using the name of Carol who said that she had to bake gluten free things but she could eat spelt. And she spoke of buying things at the military commissary. cshenk said there was no other Carol. Who was this person? Maybe someone who really didn't shop at the commissary or eat gluten free and was just messing with me? I also remember someone threatening to kick someone out one night. I won't name names. Haven't seen either of them around here lately but she might still be here. I was told that he is only on FB now. He and I were having a conversation and he was saying things that I thought were funny but were annoying the mod. She didn't actually kick him out but I found it a tad annoying since the two of us and Boli had been chatting prior and we were all getting along just fine. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/3/2015 1:42 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 8:06:19 PM UTC-5, Acme Bully Control wrote: >> >> On 7/2/2015 2:20 PM, wrote: >>> On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 1:31:00 PM UTC-5, Acme Bully Control wrote: >>>> >>> Learn all these new phrases in summer school? You do sound >>> rather juvenile. >> >> Run out of hate to try and one-up me with? >> >> Oh I know, that only works when you bully Julie, you hateful bitch! >> >> > Ju-Ju, the attention whore, is able to take care of > herself without you defending her. If she gets to the > point of running out of lies she feigns she doesn't > know what a person is talking about or better yet she > claims her never said any such thing. So all your efforts > to defend the indefensible is for naught. > > You sound as foolish as she. > You are so right Joann! SO foolish!! ____.-.____ [__Casa__] [___Acme Bully Control___] (d|||TROLL|||b) `|||TRASH|||` ||||||||||| ||||||||||| ||||||||||| ||||||||||| `"""""""""' \\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~// |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/4/2015 1:30 AM, Badword wrote:
> > > "Acme Bully Control" wrote > >> On 7/2/2015 3:47 PM, Badword wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Acme Bully Control" wrote in message >>> ... >>> >>> "Reliable bully control 24/7" >>> >>> >>> You don't seem to be controlling anything. > > >> And your contribution here is? > >> Yeah. > > Ad hominem. You don't seem to be controlling anything. I know you are right, it is just so hard to admit that I failed. I am sorry :-( |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/4/2015 5:25 AM, graham wrote:
> On 03/07/2015 2:27 AM, Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> "graham" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>> https://www.pinterest.com/pin/488781365784901140/ >>> >>> which sums up much of society as I see it! >> >> And plenty of them will get to that place sooner rather than later. >> Driving >> along a busy street can be fraught when people with their heads down >> looking >> at their phones are not looking where they are going, start to cross the >> road. >> > I was following a car the other day and it was being driven somewhat > erratically, so I decided to get past it. It was being driven by an > *elderly woman* who was *texting*!!! > Graham > Did they crash? NO. So STFU. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
Julie Bove wrote:
> > "Gary" > wrote in message ... > > Ophelia wrote: > >> > >> What have you been cooking today? The weather is very hot here and I > >> made > >> salads. I cooked some kangeroo steak for my hubby for the first time but > >> he > >> didn't like them much. He said they are a cross between beef and liver. > >> Otoh I got some moose steaks the other week which he loved:) I must look > >> out for them again. > > > > Must be a Scotland thing. I don't think you can buy kangaroo or moose > > here in the US. Unless maybe some butchers have a licence to sell this > > stuff. Certainly never offered in a grocery store here. > > I have seen reindeer meatballs in a can. Submitted for your approval: http://i62.tinypic.com/2e30hgl.jpg |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
In article >,
says... > > On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:08:29 -0400, Brooklyn1 > > wrote: > > >"Jeßus" wrote: > >>>"Julie Bove" wrote: > >>> > >>>>I do Facebook but this particular group leaves such a bad taste in my > >>>>mouth, > >>>>I would never join them on Facebook. I was told that the chat here was > >>>>nice too. It wasn't. > >>> > >>> Well, Usenet is unmoderated. > > > >That's not true, there are many Usenet Newsgroups that are moderated, > >some about food. > > Technically you're correct... but how many had a long term, active > user base? They were few and far between IMO, and never lasted > particularly long for the most part. > Effectively, Usenet is unmoderated, being my point. http://www.harley.com/cgi-bin/usenet...ated&x=26&y=18 &state=wholewordmatch&adult=0 Janet UK |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 2015-07-04 1:47 AM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:28:02 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > >> On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote: >>> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their >>>> own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former >>>> administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most >>>> people away. >>>> >>> That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and >>> harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. >>> >> Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. Whenever Carol left her >> husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op status he'd >> kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. >> > > I don't think he it. I think she did using his persona (or ordered > him to do it). She was a crazy, two faced, bitch, he was nice. > > Speaking of crazy two faced bitches..... didn't you call bullshit when I referred to that sort of stuff? |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/3/2015 11:59 PM, Troll Disposal Service wrote:
> On 7/4/2015 6:02 AM, Acme Bully Control wrote: >> On 7/3/2015 1:40 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>> On 2015-07-03 3:25 PM, graham wrote: >>> >>>> I was following a car the other day and it was being driven somewhat >>>> erratically, so I decided to get past it. It was being driven by an >>>> *elderly woman* who was *texting*!!! >>> >>> >>> >>> A couple weeks ago I was driving along and an oncoming vehicle wandered >>> into my lane. The driver was texting. >>> >> >> Was Nigella driving? >> >> Cuz if she was, she was "asking for it".... > > Nigella is such a dumb bitch she asks for it alrighty! > One more fraud. Aioe.org NNTP Server |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/4/2015 1:01 AM, Troll Disposal Service wrote:
> On 7/3/2015 1:42 PM, wrote: >> On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 8:06:19 PM UTC-5, Acme Bully Control wrote: >>> >>> On 7/2/2015 2:20 PM, wrote: >>>> On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 1:31:00 PM UTC-5, Acme Bully Control >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> Learn all these new phrases in summer school? You do sound >>>> rather juvenile. >>> >>> Run out of hate to try and one-up me with? >>> >>> Oh I know, that only works when you bully Julie, you hateful bitch! >>> >>> >> Ju-Ju, the attention whore, is able to take care of >> herself without you defending her. If she gets to the >> point of running out of lies she feigns she doesn't >> know what a person is talking about or better yet she >> claims her never said any such thing. So all your efforts >> to defend the indefensible is for naught. >> >> You sound as foolish as she. >> > > > You are so right Joann! SO foolish!! > > > ____.-.____ > [__Casa__] > [___Acme Bully Control___] > (d|||TROLL|||b) > `|||TRASH|||` > ||||||||||| > ||||||||||| > ||||||||||| > ||||||||||| > `"""""""""' > \\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~// > One more fraud. Aioe.org NNTP Server |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/4/2015 1:42 AM, Troll Disposal Service wrote:
> On 7/4/2015 1:30 AM, Badword wrote: >> >> >> "Acme Bully Control" wrote >> >>> On 7/2/2015 3:47 PM, Badword wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Acme Bully Control" wrote in message >>>> ... >>>> >>>> "Reliable bully control 24/7" >>>> >>>> >>>> You don't seem to be controlling anything. >> >> >>> And your contribution here is? >> >>> Yeah. >> >> Ad hominem. You don't seem to be controlling anything. > > I know you are right, it is just so hard to admit that I failed. I am > sorry :-( > One more fraud. Aioe.org NNTP Server |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/4/2015 1:56 AM, Troll Disposal Service wrote:
> On 7/4/2015 5:25 AM, graham wrote: >> On 03/07/2015 2:27 AM, Ophelia wrote: >>> >>> >>> "graham" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> >>>> https://www.pinterest.com/pin/488781365784901140/ >>>> >>>> which sums up much of society as I see it! >>> >>> And plenty of them will get to that place sooner rather than later. >>> Driving >>> along a busy street can be fraught when people with their heads down >>> looking >>> at their phones are not looking where they are going, start to cross the >>> road. >>> >> I was following a car the other day and it was being driven somewhat >> erratically, so I decided to get past it. It was being driven by an >> *elderly woman* who was *texting*!!! >> Graham >> > > Did they crash? NO. So STFU. One more fraud. Aioe.org NNTP Server |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/4/2015 2:35 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> > "sf" > wrote in message > ... >> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:28:02 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >>> On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote: >>> > On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith >>> > > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their >>> >> own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former >>> >> administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most >>> >> people away. >>> >> >>> > That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and >>> > harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. >>> > >>> Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. Whenever Carol left her >>> husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op status he'd >>> kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. >>> >> >> I don't think he it. I think she did using his persona (or ordered >> him to do it). She was a crazy, two faced, bitch, he was nice. > > Oh wait! Soooo... Are you telling me that there *was* another Carol > here? Because I well remember someone using the name of Carol who said > that she had to bake gluten free things but she could eat spelt. Damsel. I don't remember her mentioning gluten free baking or spelt but it was a *very* long time ago. > she spoke of buying things at the military commissary. cshenk said > there was no other Carol. Who was this person? Maybe someone who > really didn't shop at the commissary or eat gluten free and was just > messing with me? > AFAIK she was not affiliated with the military. There's no telling what she told you or why she said it. Jill |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/4/2015 1:47 AM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:28:02 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > >> On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote: >>> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their >>>> own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former >>>> administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most >>>> people away. >>>> >>> That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and >>> harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. >>> >> Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. Whenever Carol left her >> husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op status he'd >> kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. >> > > I don't think he it. I think she did using his persona (or ordered > him to do it). She was a crazy, two faced, bitch, he was nice. > > > <shrug> It might have been her signed in as him. I know she used to make up stuff (like telling people I was never friends with kili, RIP, when in fact kili and I talked on the phone about once a week and emailed each other a LOT.) She could have had him kicking out anyone she decided she didn't like. Water under the bridge, but it did happen. Jill |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
"Troll Disposal Service" wrote ... "julie " >Aioe.org NNTP Server Note that this is my new server, aioe. org. All other posts are forgeries. Posts from Troll Disposal Service and Acme Bully Control on any other server are illegal forgeries and frauds. Please report them promptly. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
"Troll Disposal Service" wrote in message ... One more fraud. "Troll Disposal Service" wrote ... >Aioe.org NNTP Server Note that this is my new server, aioe. org. All other posts are forgeries. Posts from Troll Disposal Service and Acme Bully Control on any other server are illegal forgeries and frauds. Please report them promptly. |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:11:40 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: > On 2015-07-04 1:47 AM, sf wrote: > > On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:28:02 -0400, jmcquown > > > wrote: > > > >> On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote: > >>> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith > >>> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their > >>>> own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former > >>>> administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most > >>>> people away. > >>>> > >>> That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and > >>> harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. > >>> > >> Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. Whenever Carol left her > >> husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op status he'd > >> kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. > >> > > > > I don't think he did it. I think she did using his persona (or ordered > > him to do it). She was a crazy, two faced, bitch, he was nice. > > > > > > > Speaking of crazy two faced bitches..... didn't you call bullshit when I > referred to that sort of stuff? > I did and still do, because the chat room lasted years after they left and it's demise had zero to do with them. I could always tell when she was posting as him, but didn't let on. No idea why she did that, she had her own computer and didn't need to use his. -- sf |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On 7/4/2015 9:45 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 7/4/2015 1:47 AM, sf wrote: >> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:28:02 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >>> On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote: >>>> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice their >>>>> own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the former >>>>> administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that chased most >>>>> people away. >>>>> >>>> That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and >>>> harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. >>>> >>> Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. Whenever Carol left her >>> husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op status he'd >>> kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. >>> >> >> I don't think he it. I think she did using his persona (or ordered >> him to do it). She was a crazy, two faced, bitch, he was nice. >> >> >> > <shrug> It might have been her signed in as him. I know she used to > make up stuff (like telling people I was never friends with kili, RIP, > when in fact kili and I talked on the phone about once a week and > emailed each other a LOT.) She could have had him kicking out anyone > she decided she didn't like. Water under the bridge, but it did happen. > > Jill Nice... Same as you all have ever been, wherever you go... "Last of the Independents" "Reliable bully control 24/7" Call 1-666-GO2-HELL" ,--.--._ ------" _, \___)__ || / _/____) BAM! || \//(____) ------\ (__) `-----" |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On 7/3/2015 7:08 PM, sf wrote: > > On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 17:49:28 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > > > > > Moderated groups have their one issues. The moderators practice > > > their own form of censorship. From what I have read here, the > > > former administrators of RFC chat ruled with a heavy hand that > > > chased most people away. > > > > > That's bullshit. The site kept changing hosts and got harder and > > harder to access. People couldn't find it and lost interest. > > > Actually, I did find what Dave said to be true. Whenever Carol left > her husband (or whatever he was) alone in the chat room with Op > status he'd kick people out on a whim. It was too silly. > > Jill Umm? Which Carol? My husband has never used a computer to do more than play a game and hasn't done that since 2004 or so. I also never had OP status. -- |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:13:35 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
snip > >Umm? Which Carol? My husband has never used a computer to do more than >play a game and hasn't done that since 2004 or so. I also never had OP >status. Damsel in dis Dress and Crash Janet US |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:13:35 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > snip > > > > Umm? Which Carol? My husband has never used a computer to do more > > than play a game and hasn't done that since 2004 or so. I also > > never had OP status. > Damsel in dis Dress and Crash > Janet US Ah ok. I know both names. Grin, different Carol. neither military affiliated that i can recall. Carol -- |
48 hours of 'I don't likes' from Julie:
On Sat, 4 Jul 2015 16:07:21 +0100, Janet > wrote:
>In article >, says... >> >> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:08:29 -0400, Brooklyn1 >> > wrote: >> >> >"Jeßus" wrote: >> >>>"Julie Bove" wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>I do Facebook but this particular group leaves such a bad taste in my >> >>>>mouth, >> >>>>I would never join them on Facebook. I was told that the chat here was >> >>>>nice too. It wasn't. >> >>> >> >>> Well, Usenet is unmoderated. >> > >> >That's not true, there are many Usenet Newsgroups that are moderated, >> >some about food. >> >> Technically you're correct... but how many had a long term, active >> user base? They were few and far between IMO, and never lasted >> particularly long for the most part. > Effectively, Usenet is >unmoderated, being my point. > > http://www.harley.com/cgi-bin/usenet...ated&x=26&y=18 >&state=wholewordmatch&adult=0 Yes, but they became mostly inactive years ago. Using your link, I checked the first three listed groups - here's the last posts from the groups in question: " RFD: remove rec.games.computer.doom.announce moderated Group: rec.games.computer.doom.announce RATIONALE: remove rec.games.computer.doom.announce The last approved regular article was in April 2000, with FAQs being posted until ... 05/04/2007 by Jim Riley" And: " rec.games.computer.quake.announce - Moderator Vacancy Investigation (MVI) Group: rec.games.computer.quake.announce Moderator Vacancy Investigation (MVI) rec.games.computer.quake.announce This is a formal Moderator Vacancy Investigation (MVI), begun because ... 13/10/2004 by NAN Team" " RESULT: misc.activism.anti-fascism.tactics will be removed Group: misc.activism.anti-fascism.tactics RESULT misc.activism.anti-fascism.tactics will be removed The Last Call for Comments (LCC) on 2010-03-07 initiated a five-day period for final ... 20/03/2010 by Big-8 Management Board" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pretty much most all moderated groups have been dead for many years, and generally speaking, were not very popular at the best of times. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter