http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/

Quack remedies trusted but not "Big Pharma"!
Graham

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham wrote:
>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/
>>
>> Quack remedies trusted but not "Big Pharma"!
>
> And Julie eats about 20 of those a day and wonders why she's all
> ****ed up.

Nope. I don't buy from any of those places. And most of what I take isn't
herbs.

On 2/9/2015 4:06 PM, graham wrote:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/
>
>
> Quack remedies trusted but not "Big Pharma"!
> Graham

Two shams don't make a right... or do they?

On 2/9/2015 8:06 PM, graham wrote:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/
>
>
> Quack remedies trusted but not "Big Pharma"!
> Graham

Old news. It was in the papers at least a week ago.

--
From somewhere very deep in the heart of Texas

On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham > wrote:

>http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/
>
>Quack remedies trusted but not "Big Pharma"!
>Graham

Interesting that you use Wal Mart in the subject line, but a coupe of
other stores are selling the same stuff. Why does Target not get a
mention?

On 2015-02-10, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

> Why does Target not get a mention?

Why didn't you read the article? Target WAS mentioned:

"Target's supplements were the least misleading of the lot..."


nb

On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:18:26 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham wrote:
> d Julie eats about 20 of those a day and wonders why she's all
> ****ed up.
>
> -sw

You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.

On 2015-02-10 12:32 PM, rosie wrote:
> On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:18:26 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham wrote: d Julie eats
>> about 20 of those a day and wonders why she's all ****ed up.
>>
>> -sw
>
> You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her
> alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.
>



Why do you feel a need to defend her? Is because she is obviously too
stupid to defend herself? There are reasons people keep dumping on her.
Aside from her constant lying, her whining about what she, her husband
and daughter can't, don't or won't eat, there is her MO of posting
messages looking for advice and then bashing every suggestion offered.

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 12:42:54 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-02-10 12:32 PM, rosie wrote:
> > On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:18:26 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham wrote: d Julie eats
> >> about 20 of those a day and wonders why she's all ****ed up.
> >>
> >> -sw
> >
> > You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her
> > alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.
> >
> this is the third time have trid to post this , and am having trouble.

I do not see the point of making nasty comments to every thing she posts. I do not know if she lies or not, I do know there are others in the group who do. If you do not like what she says, just ignore it, not say ugly things every post she makes. Save it fr something special!!!

>
>
> Why do you feel a need to defend her? Is because she is obviously too
> stupid to defend herself? There are reasons people keep dumping on her.
> Aside from her constant lying, her whining about what she, her husband
> and daughter can't, don't or won't eat, there is her MO of posting
> messages looking for advice and then bashing every suggestion offered.

On 2015-02-10 1:56 PM, rosie wrote:

>>> You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her
>>> alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.
>>>
>> this is the third time have trid to post this , and am having
>> trouble.
>
> I do not see the point of making nasty comments to every thing she
> posts. I do not know if she lies or not, I do know there are others
> in the group who do. If you do not like what she says, just ignore
> it, not say ugly things every post she makes. Save it fr something
> special!!!


You don't know that she lies? Feel free to enjoy her attention seeking
posts and see the outlandish bullshit claims she makes and how her
stories change.
>
>>
>>
>> Why do you feel a need to defend her? Is because she is obviously
>> too stupid to defend herself? There are reasons people keep dumping
>> on her. Aside from her constant lying, her whining about what she,
>> her husband and daughter can't, don't or won't eat, there is her MO
>> of posting messages looking for advice and then bashing every
>> suggestion offered.
>

In article >,
says...

> If you do not like what she says, just ignore it

If that's your best advice, why don't you follow it yourself?

Janet UK

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 3:03:11 PM UTC-6, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>
> > If you do not like what she says, just ignore it
>
> If that's your best advice, why don't you follow it yourself?
>
> Janet UK

if you will look, I rarely do any posting to anything much. And when I do I do not rip her to shreds.

On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham > wrote:

> http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/
>
> Quack remedies trusted but not "Big Pharma"!

I think that's a big problem with most herbal medications.



--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room

On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:03:06 -0000, Janet > wrote:

> In article >,
> says...
>
> > If you do not like what she says, just ignore it
>
> If that's your best advice, why don't you follow it yourself?
>
Eeee gad!

--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2015-02-10 12:32 PM, rosie wrote:
>> On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:18:26 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham wrote: d Julie eats
>>> about 20 of those a day and wonders why she's all ****ed up.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her
>> alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.
>>
>
>
>
> Why do you feel a need to defend her? Is because she is obviously too
> stupid to defend herself? There are reasons people keep dumping on her.
> Aside from her constant lying, her whining about what she, her husband
> and daughter can't, don't or won't eat, there is her MO of posting
> messages looking for advice and then bashing every suggestion offered.

Doesn't do me any good to even try to defend myself because no matter what I
say, someone makes fun of it. There are no legitimate reasons for anyone to
dump on anyone. Unless of course you call mental illness or bullying, which
I suppose is in some way a form of mental illness a legitimate reason. It
would of course only be legitimate in the mind of the abuser.

I didn't ask for advice in this thread. In fact, I stayed out of it up
until now except to reply that I don't buy supplements at these places.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2015-02-10 1:56 PM, rosie wrote:
>
>>>> You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her
>>>> alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.
>>>>
>>> this is the third time have trid to post this , and am having
>>> trouble.
>>
>> I do not see the point of making nasty comments to every thing she
>> posts. I do not know if she lies or not, I do know there are others
>> in the group who do. If you do not like what she says, just ignore
>> it, not say ugly things every post she makes. Save it fr something
>> special!!!
>
>
> You don't know that she lies? Feel free to enjoy her attention seeking
> posts and see the outlandish bullshit claims she makes and how her stories
> change.

You people just *think* that the stories change because in your lives,
nothing ever seems to change. Well in my life, things do! You all were
hanging onto some website that I had in 2009 or thereabouts and still
commenting on it. Hello! It's 2015 now.

"Janet" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> says...
>
>> If you do not like what she says, just ignore it
>
> If that's your best advice, why don't you follow it yourself?
>
> Janet UK

AFAIK she never made any nasty comments to me.

On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:56:42 -0800 (PST), rosie >
wrote:

>On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 12:42:54 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2015-02-10 12:32 PM, rosie wrote:
>> > On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:18:26 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham wrote: d Julie eats
>> >> about 20 of those a day and wonders why she's all ****ed up.
>> >>
>> >> -sw
>> >
>> > You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her
>> > alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.
>> >
>> this is the third time have trid to post this , and am having trouble.
>
>I do not see the point of making nasty comments to every thing she posts. I do not know if she lies or not, I do know there are others in the group who do. If you do not like what she says, just ignore it, not say ugly things every post she makes. Save it fr something special!!!



Some of those here take pity on her and/or are apparently oblivious to
the fact that she's not a very nice person at all - and others here
know her for what she really is and view here either as entertainment
or with scorn... or both.

Ultimately though, you could take own advice and ignore the posts you
don't like. And maybe stop using google groups too, that wouldn't hurt
either.

On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:09:10 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>> On 2015-02-10 12:32 PM, rosie wrote:
>>> On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:18:26 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham wrote: d Julie eats
>>>> about 20 of those a day and wonders why she's all ****ed up.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her
>>> alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Why do you feel a need to defend her? Is because she is obviously too
>> stupid to defend herself? There are reasons people keep dumping on her.
>> Aside from her constant lying, her whining about what she, her husband
>> and daughter can't, don't or won't eat, there is her MO of posting
>> messages looking for advice and then bashing every suggestion offered.
>
>Doesn't do me any good to even try to defend myself because no matter what I
>say, someone makes fun of it. There are no legitimate reasons for anyone to
>dump on anyone.

Poor parenting verging on child abuse is one good reason.
The endless outlandish and ridiculous scenarios that are unique to you
(and only you) is another reason.
Regular contradictions in regards to previous claims you make is
another.

>Unless of course you call mental illness or bullying, which
>I suppose is in some way a form of mental illness a legitimate reason. It
>would of course only be legitimate in the mind of the abuser.

Haha... you /choose/ to habitually post details about your family life
here, which is dysfunctional beyond belief and for which you seem to
be mostly responsible for. Either that, or all the stories are lies on
your part. Whichever scenario is the correct one makes you fair game
as far as many of us are concerned. The fact that you and *only* you
get this attention on this group is significant.

On 2/10/2015 12:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:52:17 -0500, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/
>>>
>>> Quack remedies trusted but not "Big Pharma"!
>>> Graham
>>
>> Interesting that you use Wal Mart in the subject line, but a couple of
>> other stores are selling the same stuff. Why does Target not get a
>> mention?
>
> According to the article Walmart was the worst offender. Target was
> the least.
>
> -sw
>

My point is, other stores were involved but only WalMart gets singled
out. Walgreens did not come up. The subject line only mentions one of
the group to be criticized. If you are going to bash stores for selling
crap, bash them all.

On 2/9/2015 8:06 PM, graham wrote:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/
>
>
> Quack remedies trusted but not "Big Pharma"!
> Graham

Several stores were listed. Why are you singling out WalMart in the
subject line?

--
DreadfulBitch

I'm a nobody, nobody is perfect, therefore I'm perfect.

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 2015-02-10 12:32 PM, rosie wrote:
>>> On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:18:26 PM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham wrote: d Julie eats
>>>> about 20 of those a day and wonders why she's all ****ed up.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>>
>>> You guys are really down on Julie, why don't you just leave her
>>> alone? No matter what she says,someone jumps on it.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Why do you feel a need to defend her? Is because she is obviously too
>> stupid to defend herself? There are reasons people keep dumping on her.
>> Aside from her constant lying, her whining about what she, her husband
>> and daughter can't, don't or won't eat, there is her MO of posting
>> messages looking for advice and then bashing every suggestion offered.
>
> Doesn't do me any good to even try to defend myself because no matter what
> I say, someone makes fun of it. There are no legitimate reasons for
> anyone to dump on anyone. Unless of course you call mental illness or
> bullying, which I suppose is in some way a form of mental illness a
> legitimate reason. It would of course only be legitimate in the mind of
> the abuser.

Oh there are plenty of bullies here. Could be down to mental illness I
suppose ... I certainly don't understand the huge gratification they appear
to gain from it. Possibly think it makes them look 'clever'. *shrug* I
don't really know.

> I didn't ask for advice in this thread. In fact, I stayed out of it up
> until now except to reply that I don't buy supplements at these places.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

In article >, says...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...

> > You don't know that she lies? Feel free to enjoy her attention seeking
> > posts and see the outlandish bullshit claims she makes and how her stories
> > change.
>
> You people just *think* that the stories change because in your lives,
> nothing ever seems to change. Well in my life, things do!

You all were
> hanging onto some website that I had in 2009 or thereabouts

Which you repeatedly denied is, was or ever had been your website, and
falsely accused Bryan of creating. Now you admit it was yours all along.

THAT's an example of your lying.

Janet UK

In article >, says...
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > says...
> >
> >> If you do not like what she says, just ignore it
> >
> > If that's your best advice, why don't you follow it yourself?
> >
> > Janet UK
>
> AFAIK she never made any nasty comments to me.

Rose says anyone who does not like what they see posted, should
ignore it.

IOW if Rose doesn't like reading what posters say about YOU, she should
take her own advice and IGNORE it.

Is that still too complicated for you?

Janet UK

DreadfulBitch wrote:
>graham wrote:
>>http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/
>
>Several stores were listed. Why are you singling out WalMart in the
>subject line?

It's the only way the cowardly bullies get to kick the biggest kid on
the block. The irony is those who bash Walmart the most shop there
the most, only they'll never admit it.

Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>Sqwertz wrote:
>>Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:06:30 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m...-fake-herbals/
>>>>
>>>> Quack remedies trusted but not "Big Pharma"!
>>>> Graham
>>>
>>> Interesting that you use Wal Mart in the subject line, but a couple of
>>> other stores are selling the same stuff. Why does Target not get a
>>> mention?
>>
>> According to the article Walmart was the worst offender. Target was
>> the least.
>
>My point is, other stores were involved but only WalMart gets singled
>out. Walgreens did not come up. The subject line only mentions one of
>the group to be criticized. If you are going to bash stores for selling
>crap, bash them all.

Correct. All stores sell exactly the same products... if you buy a
fishing rod at Walmart it'll be exactly the same fishing rod bought at
Bass Pro, only at Walmart it will cost considerably less. In fact I
recently took my grands to Walmart to buy them fishing equipment
(rods, reels, tackle boxes, and lots of tackle) and I saved about 30%
over buying at Bass Pro, Amazon, or any other store. If you buy a
toaster at Walmart it'll cost considerally less than at any other
store for the exact same toaster. Most manufactured products are made
in the orient because they have the skilled labor and the US has
mostly desk drivers and pencil pushers. The US used to lead the world
in skilled craftmen but not for the past 30 years because the corrupt
grubbermint thinks freebies are more important than apprenticeship
programs. If I teach my grands to fish they have a much better chance
to never go hungry. I may be considered out of step but I think it's
far more important for today's youth to have a tool box than a cell
phone. I think it's far more valuable to teach my grands how to use a
machinist's file and a bench grinder than an x-box.

"Janet" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, says...
>>
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>
>> > You don't know that she lies? Feel free to enjoy her attention seeking
>> > posts and see the outlandish bullshit claims she makes and how her
>> > stories
>> > change.
>>
>> You people just *think* that the stories change because in your lives,
>> nothing ever seems to change. Well in my life, things do!
>
> You all were
>> hanging onto some website that I had in 2009 or thereabouts
>
> Which you repeatedly denied is, was or ever had been your website, and
> falsely accused Bryan of creating. Now you admit it was yours all along.
>
> THAT's an example of your lying.

No, Janet. I said that I *had* a website. And I did. Even my ISP wasn't
aware of a website. There was nothing there listed under my name.

On 2/11/2015 3:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote:



>
> But Walmart happened to suck the most in this report (did you read
> it?). Except for the fluke Olive Oil Report of 2009, Walmart has
> sucked the in every legitimate consumer survey and study conducted in
> the last 10 years.
>
> And this was no different. They deserve to be singled out since they
> are selling, by far, the most bogus products.
>
> -sw
>

WalMart sells more of everything. The other guys would too, if they
could. Sleazy is sleazy, they all did the same. It is like you are
saying the other stores are only a little pregnant by comparison.

In article >, says...
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >, says...
> >>
> >> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >
> >> > You don't know that she lies? Feel free to enjoy her attention seeking
> >> > posts and see the outlandish bullshit claims she makes and how her
> >> > stories
> >> > change.
> >>
> >> You people just *think* that the stories change because in your lives,
> >> nothing ever seems to change. Well in my life, things do!
> >
> > You all were
> >> hanging onto some website that I had in 2009 or thereabouts
> >
> > Which you repeatedly denied is, was or ever had been your website, and
> > falsely accused Bryan of creating. Now you admit it was yours all along.
> >
> > THAT's an example of your lying.
>
> No, Janet. I said that I *had* a website. And I did.

Here you are last month, denying it

From: "Julie Bove" >
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
Subject: OT my Frontier account
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:02:56 -0800

"I don't know what that website is or anything about it."

"It is *not* my website despite what anyone here has to say
about it."

Janet UK

On 2/11/2015 2:36 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> If I teach my grands to fish they have a much better chance
> to never go hungry.

Oh? You think they're going to live in the boonies and hunt for game
and fish for dinner? Chances are they don't live anywhere near you and
don't plan to when they grow up.

Jill

On 2015-02-11 21:04, Janet wrote:
> In article >, says...
>>
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> In article >, says...
>>>>
>>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> You don't know that she lies? Feel free to enjoy her attention seeking
>>>>> posts and see the outlandish bullshit claims she makes and how her
>>>>> stories
>>>>> change.
>>>>
>>>> You people just *think* that the stories change because in your lives,
>>>> nothing ever seems to change. Well in my life, things do!
>>>
>>> You all were
>>>> hanging onto some website that I had in 2009 or thereabouts
>>>
>>> Which you repeatedly denied is, was or ever had been your website, and
>>> falsely accused Bryan of creating. Now you admit it was yours all along.
>>>
>>> THAT's an example of your lying.
>>
>> No, Janet. I said that I *had* a website. And I did.
>
> Here you are last month, denying it
>
> From: "Julie Bove" >
> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
> Subject: OT my Frontier account
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:02:56 -0800
>
> "I don't know what that website is or anything about it."
>
> "It is *not* my website despite what anyone here has to say
> about it."
>
> Janet UK
>
>

Julie still subscribes to the theory that you can get away with lying
by lying again.It was just about a month ago that she got caught up in
her web of lies about her being a writer.

On 11/02/2015 7:05 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/11/2015 2:36 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> If I teach my grands to fish they have a much better chance
>> to never go hungry.
>
> Oh? You think they're going to live in the boonies and hunt for game
> and fish for dinner? Chances are they don't live anywhere near you and
> don't plan to when they grow up.
>
> Jill
I'm surprised that his grandkids are allowed anywhere near him!
Graham

"Janet" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, says...
>>
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article >, says...
>> >>
>> >> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >
>> >> > You don't know that she lies? Feel free to enjoy her attention
>> >> > seeking
>> >> > posts and see the outlandish bullshit claims she makes and how her
>> >> > stories
>> >> > change.
>> >>
>> >> You people just *think* that the stories change because in your
>> >> lives,
>> >> nothing ever seems to change. Well in my life, things do!
>> >
>> > You all were
>> >> hanging onto some website that I had in 2009 or thereabouts
>> >
>> > Which you repeatedly denied is, was or ever had been your website, and
>> > falsely accused Bryan of creating. Now you admit it was yours all
>> > along.
>> >
>> > THAT's an example of your lying.
>>
>> No, Janet. I said that I *had* a website. And I did.
>
> Here you are last month, denying it
>
> From: "Julie Bove" >
> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
> Subject: OT my Frontier account
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:02:56 -0800
>
> "I don't know what that website is or anything about it."
>
> "It is *not* my website despite what anyone here has to say
> about it."

Right. Is not. It was, back in whatever year that I put it up. And as I
said, I haven't run a website in years. The fact that vestiges of it
remained out there somewhere is not my fault. My own ISP didn't even know
about it. How Bryan found it is beyond me. At any rate, there is no
vestige of it out there now. So let's all move along now. There's nothing
here to see.

Hey! Let's all have a look at my raccoons as food post. Let's talk about
that. Huh? Icky but at least it's food related!

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 2/11/2015 2:36 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> If I teach my grands to fish they have a much better chance
>> to never go hungry.
>
> Oh? You think they're going to live in the boonies and hunt for game and
> fish for dinner? Chances are they don't live anywhere near you and don't
> plan to when they grow up.

You can go fishing at 99 Ranch Market!

"graham" > wrote in message
...
> On 11/02/2015 7:05 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 2/11/2015 2:36 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> If I teach my grands to fish they have a much better chance
>>> to never go hungry.
>>
>> Oh? You think they're going to live in the boonies and hunt for game
>> and fish for dinner? Chances are they don't live anywhere near you and
>> don't plan to when they grow up.
>>
>> Jill
> I'm surprised that his grandkids are allowed anywhere near him!
> Graham

Me too.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2015-02-11 21:04, Janet wrote:
>> In article >, says...
>>>
>>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> In article >, says...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>> You don't know that she lies? Feel free to enjoy her attention
>>>>>> seeking
>>>>>> posts and see the outlandish bullshit claims she makes and how her
>>>>>> stories
>>>>>> change.
>>>>>
>>>>> You people just *think* that the stories change because in your
>>>>> lives,
>>>>> nothing ever seems to change. Well in my life, things do!
>>>>
>>>> You all were
>>>>> hanging onto some website that I had in 2009 or thereabouts
>>>>
>>>> Which you repeatedly denied is, was or ever had been your website,
>>>> and
>>>> falsely accused Bryan of creating. Now you admit it was yours all
>>>> along.
>>>>
>>>> THAT's an example of your lying.
>>>
>>> No, Janet. I said that I *had* a website. And I did.
>>
>> Here you are last month, denying it
>>
>> From: "Julie Bove" >
>> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>> Subject: OT my Frontier account
>> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:02:56 -0800
>>
>> "I don't know what that website is or anything about it."
>>
>> "It is *not* my website despite what anyone here has to say
>> about it."
>>
>> Janet UK
>>
>>
>
> Julie still subscribes to the theory that you can get away with lying by
> lying again.It was just about a month ago that she got caught up in her
> web of lies about her being a writer.

Um, no. You and Janet and some others just like to tell lies. As I have
said many times, my life isn't like that movie, Groundhog Day where I get up
and each day is the same. Sounds like that's how it is in your world
though.

On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:51:52 -0700, graham > wrote:

>On 11/02/2015 7:05 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 2/11/2015 2:36 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> If I teach my grands to fish they have a much better chance
>>> to never go hungry.
>>
>> Oh? You think they're going to live in the boonies and hunt for game
>> and fish for dinner? Chances are they don't live anywhere near you and
>> don't plan to when they grow up.
>>
>> Jill
>I'm surprised that his grandkids are allowed anywhere near him!

He has kids??

In article >,
says...
>
> On 2/11/2015 2:36 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > If I teach my grands to fish they have a much better chance
> > to never go hungry.
>
> Oh? You think they're going to live in the boonies and hunt for game
> and fish for dinner?

You don't have to live in the boonies to be near a river lake or
coastline with fish in them.
Janet UK

In article >, says...
> >>>> You all were
> >>>>> hanging onto some website that I had in 2009 or thereabouts
> >>>>
> >>>> Which you repeatedly denied is, was or ever had been your website,
> >>>> and
> >>>> falsely accused Bryan of creating. Now you admit it was yours all
> >>>> along.
> >>>>
> >>>> THAT's an example of your lying.
> >>>
> >>> No, Janet. I said that I *had* a website. And I did.
> >>
> >> Here you are last month, denying it
> >>
> >> From: "Julie Bove" >
> >> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
> >> Subject: OT my Frontier account
> >> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:02:56 -0800
> >>
> >> "I don't know what that website is or anything about it."
> >>
> >> "It is *not* my website despite what anyone here has to say
> >> about it."
> >>
> >> Janet UK
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Julie still subscribes to the theory that you can get away with lying by
> > lying again.It was just about a month ago that she got caught up in her
> > web of lies about her being a writer.
>
> Um, no. You and Janet and some others just like to tell lies.

The above is your post archived in google. You wrote your lies, not
me.

Janet
>

Janet wrote:
>j_mcquown says...
>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> > If I teach my grands to fish they have a much better chance
>> > to never go hungry.
>>
>> Oh? You think they're going to live in the boonies and hunt for game
>> and fish for dinner?
>
> You don't have to live in the boonies to be near a river lake or
>coastline with fish in them.
> Janet UK

My grands live in the boonies and they love fishing.
New York State has plenty of fresh water fishing, especially near
where I live. NYS is a fisherman's paradise, plenty of salt water
fishing too, a mere two hours away... some of my neighors have boats
they use to cruise the Hudson River and into the Atlantic for fishing.
http://www.greatnortherncatskills.com/outdoors/fishing
http://www.hookandbullet.com/cn/fishing-greene-ny/
http://www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/95160.html