In article >, says...

> In reality, I'm starting to think that Julie is the master fisherman
> here.

Not just her. You're easily fooled by female trolls.

Janet UK

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...

> You are an exception. I've never seen you be rude. It's some others here
> that are not leaving a pretty picture in my mind.

You mean rude like what you said recently? "Yeah. Keep laughing. You're
all a bunch of loons anyway!" That leaves a pretty picture in the mind of
*ALL* the people here that you're calling *ALL* of them loons?

Cheri

On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:43:19 -0400, Gary > wrote:

> sf wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:35:28 -0500, Janet Wilder >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Isn't there a saying that "fish is brain food".
> >
> > My husband's father used to say that.
> >
> > > It's very healthy for
> > > you and you live in an area where it's easy to get good quality,
> > > fresh-caught fish.
> >
> > If it doesn't put you into the poor house.
>
> That will never be a problem with you, Mercedes girl.

I have priorities and spending upwards of $20 on a pound of fish isn't
one of them.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

On Thursday, September 18, 2014 10:13:22 PM UTC-5, Cherry wrote:
>
>
>
> After that if you are diabetic a balanced diet and portion control will
> help enormously. Obviously the first thing to cut out is cane sugar.
> You can eat potatoes etc., but in smaller portions than maybe you are
> used to.
>
You ****ing stupid woman. 100 calories of dry baked potato will spike
blood sugar higher than 100 calories of cane sugar, straight from a sugar
bowl with a spoon.
>
> Cherry

--Bryan

On Thursday, September 18, 2014 10:41:00 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, September 19, 2014 3:22:32 AM UTC+1, Janet Wilder wrote:
>
>
>
> My advice to you, cut out as many carbohydrates as possible. That includes
>
> milk and milk products, breads, pastas, rice, starchy vegetables like
>
> potatoes and corn. Read labels like your life depends on it. It does.
>
>
> Whoa, that's extreme and unnecessary.
>
If you were to die of an insulin OD, this NG would be improved. I
also fixed your attribution. Please eat poorly and die soon.

--Bryan

On Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:09:10 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> On Thursday, September 18, 2014 8:41:00 PM UTC-7, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Cherry" > wrote in message
>
> > ...
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Do not forego milk just don't drink it by the glassful. If it turns out you
>
> > are insulin diabetic a small glass of half fat milk and a small banana
>
> > before going to bed is very useful in helping to ensure your blood sugar
>
> > doesn't drop too low over night. The last thing you want to have happen is
>
> > for your blood sugar to get too low and wake up having to consume sugary
>
> > stuff.
>
>
>
> >
>
> > I have no clue what half fat milk is. I don't think we get it here or if we
>
> > do it goes by another name.
>
>
>
> As whole milk (e.g. from Holsteins) is typically 4% butterfat, 2% milk
>
> would be half fat.

Whole milk *should be* 4%, but the standard is 3.25%. But take heart, as
you can always add extra cream.

--Bryan

On Saturday, September 20, 2014 5:08:18 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>
> > ...
>
> >
>
> >> Well, good. Let them. Clearly ya'll do things differently in the UK.
>
> >> And I'm rather glad that I don't live there! Sounds like a
>
> >> really miserable existence if some of the posters here are any example of
>
> >> what the people are like there. Thankfully I think the ones that move to
>
> >> the US become nice. I can't recall any nasty ones that I've met who live
>
> >> here.
>
> >
>
> > I will bear that in mind.
>
>
>
> You are an exception. I've never seen you be rude. It's some others here
>
> that are not leaving a pretty picture in my mind.

Almost everyone here detests you, and thinks that the NG would be improved
if you joined Andy. Ophelia is only nice to you because she's overly nice,
and feels sorry for complete messes like you.

--Bryan

On Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:22:32 PM UTC-5, Janet Wilder wrote:
> On 9/18/2014 8:10 PM, Cheryl wrote:
>
> > On 9/18/2014 3:19 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> "Roy" > wrote in message
>
> >> news:8cde25f4-29ca-4086-a9c4-
>
> >>
>
> >> I sometimes wonder if she really is a diabetic by the foods she eats.
>
> >> Something doesn't ring true at times. I'm not a diabetic but have a
>
> >> friend who is and her regimen certainly differs from Julie's.
>
> >> ===========
>
> >>
>
> >> She's definitely a diabetic and has been for many years. Different
>
> >> people have different regimens.
>
> >>
>
> >> Cheri
>
> >
>
> > It seems I am a diabetic now, too. My blood sugar has been weird but
>
> > doctor order A1C in my pre Op blood work (another back surgery on the
>
> > 29th) and it was
>
> >
>
> > "HEMOGLOBIN A1C 6.2 H <5.7 % QBA
>
> > According to ADA guidelines, hemoglobin A1c <7.0% represents
>
> > optimal control in non-pregnant diabetic patients. Different metrics
>
> > may apply to specific patient populations. Standards of Medical Care
>
> > in Diabetes-2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:s11-s66.
>
> > For the purpose of screening for the presence of diabetes
>
> > <5.7% Consistent with the absence of diabetes
>
> > 5.7-6.4 % Consistent with increased risk for diabetes (prediabetes)
>
> > >or= 6.5 % Consistent with diabetes
>
> > This assay result is consistent with a higher risk of diabetes.
>
> > Currently, no consensus exists for use of hemoglobin A1C for diagnosis
>
> > of diabetes for children."
>
> >
>
> > My blood sugar in the test was 105 but it wasn't a fasting test. So
>
> > diabetes confuses me.
>
> >
>
>
>
> A Hemoglobin A1C of 6.2 is bretty good for a diagnosed diabetic, but not
>
> a non-diabetic. I don't know about 7.0 being "optimal" as every
>
> endocrinologist my DH, of blessed memory, used would yell at him if his
>
> A1C was over 6.5
>
>
>
> 105 is good, but you really need a fasting blood glucose to make a
>
> diagnosis.
>
>
>
> My advice to you, cut out as many carbohydrates as possible. That
>
> includes milk and milk products, breads, pastas, rice, starchy
>
> vegetables like potatoes and corn. Read labels like your life depends
>
> on it. It does.
>
You should be clear that cheese is not a "milk product" to be avoided.
Neither is cream or butter.

--Bryan

On 9/20/2014 12:09 PM, Bryan-TGWWW wrote:
> Please eat poorly and die soon.
>
> --Bryan

Are you on drugs or something?

On Friday, September 19, 2014 5:21:57 AM UTC-5, Cherry wrote:
> After that if you are diabetic a balanced diet and portion control will help
>
> enormously. Obviously the first thing to cut out is cane sugar. You can
>
> eat potatoes etc., but in smaller portions than maybe you are used to. White rice is the one carb that can easily cause a spike in blood sugar.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> That's not really correct either. Cane sugar is no worse in terms of affecting blood sugar than potatoes or white bread or even rice. Or orange juice. The list goes on and on.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> Wrong. There are no nutrients in cane sugar. We don't need it. You should never exclude whole food groups. You need the nutrients they contain and so much better for you than popping a pill.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> Other starchy foods, bread and pasta again in small portions.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> Some people can do this and some can't.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> Which is why a person shouldn't be told to exclude those things until they have worked out for themselves what works for them and what doesn't.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> Do not forego milk just don't drink it by the glassful. If it turns out you are insulin diabetic a small glass of half fat milk and a small banana before going to bed is very useful in helping to ensure your blood sugar doesn't drop too low over night. The last thing you want to have happen is for your blood sugar to get too low and wake up having to consume sugary stuff.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> I have no clue what half fat milk is. I don't think we get it here or if we do it goes by another name. And your advice about the milk and banana is a
>
> super bad one! A half a sandwich or some cheese and crackers would be
>
> better. Bananas of any size are one of the worst foods for diabetics in most cases. Great if you need to raise your blood sugar quickly but that's not what you want before bed unless you are already low. And some diabetes
>
> medications have just as much potential as insulin does to cause lows. The
>
> same goes for alcohol.
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> This from the person who hasn't got the nous, wit nor intelligence to understand what 'half fat' is? Milk is good for you, again nutrition. Something that is devoid in your diet.
>
>
>
> Bananas are an excellent source of potassium, very nutritious and they are low glycemic.
>
You stupid woman, bananas are NOT low glycemic. Your brain belong on the
same shit heap as Julie's.
>
> Cherry

--Bryan

On 9/20/2014 12:31 PM, Bryan-TGWWW wrote:
> Almost everyone here detests you,


No they don't.

On 9/20/2014 12:53 PM, Bryan-TGWWW wrote:
> You stupid woman, bananas are NOT low glycemic. Your brain belong on the
> same shit heap as Julie's.

So what is this, your day to go off on ALL the women here?

You are a sick person.

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> You are an exception. I've never seen you be rude. It's some others
>> here that are not leaving a pretty picture in my mind.
>
> You mean rude like what you said recently? "Yeah. Keep laughing. You're
> all a bunch of loons anyway!" That leaves a pretty picture in the mind of
> *ALL* the people here that you're calling *ALL* of them loons?

Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.

On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:37:59 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> You are an exception. I've never seen you be rude. It's some others
>>> here that are not leaving a pretty picture in my mind.
>>
>> You mean rude like what you said recently? "Yeah. Keep laughing. You're
>> all a bunch of loons anyway!" That leaves a pretty picture in the mind of
>> *ALL* the people here that you're calling *ALL* of them loons?
>
>Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
>everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.

Oh, that makes all the difference...!

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> You are an exception. I've never seen you be rude. It's some others
>>> here that are not leaving a pretty picture in my mind.
>>
>> You mean rude like what you said recently? "Yeah. Keep laughing. You're
>> all a bunch of loons anyway!" That leaves a pretty picture in the mind of
>> *ALL* the people here that you're calling *ALL* of them loons?
>
> Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
> everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.

Then you should have said that.

Cheri
>

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> You are an exception. I've never seen you be rude. It's some others
>>>> here that are not leaving a pretty picture in my mind.
>>>
>>> You mean rude like what you said recently? "Yeah. Keep laughing.
>>> You're all a bunch of loons anyway!" That leaves a pretty picture in the
>>> mind of *ALL* the people here that you're calling *ALL* of them loons?
>>
>> Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
>> everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.
>
> Then you should have said that.

Well, I am just sick of it! Wouldn't matter what I said. Just attack,
attack and attack. I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
and I know there is thread drift and all but it seems whenever I try to do
that, someone turns it into something else. And always an attack on me.

On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:37:50 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> You are an exception. I've never seen you be rude. It's some others
>>>>> here that are not leaving a pretty picture in my mind.
>>>>
>>>> You mean rude like what you said recently? "Yeah. Keep laughing.
>>>> You're all a bunch of loons anyway!" That leaves a pretty picture in the
>>>> mind of *ALL* the people here that you're calling *ALL* of them loons?
>>>
>>> Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
>>> everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.
>>
>> Then you should have said that.
>
>Well, I am just sick of it! Wouldn't matter what I said. Just attack,
>attack and attack. I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
>and I know there is thread drift and all but it seems whenever I try to do
>that, someone turns it into something else. And always an attack on me.

But of course - you never take the time to ask WHY this only happens
to you and nobody else here. Your power of denial is beyond belief.

On Sunday, September 21, 2014 2:09:05 AM UTC-7, Je�us wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:37:50 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
> >"Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> >> ...
>

> >>> Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
> >>> everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.
>
> >> Then you should have said that.
>
> >Well, I am just sick of it! Wouldn't matter what I said. Just attack,
> >attack and attack. I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
> >and I know there is thread drift and all but it seems whenever I try to do
> >that, someone turns it into something else. And always an attack on me.
>
> But of course - you never take the time to ask WHY this only happens
> to you and nobody else here. Your power of denial is beyond belief.

But one feature of rfc is regulars dumping on each other. While Julie
attracts the most dumpage, she is not alone.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:04:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

> But one feature of rfc is regulars dumping on each other. While Julie
> attracts the most dumpage, she is not alone.

True.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

In article >, says...

I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food

No you don't. You come here to whine about your medical problems and
your awful family.

Janet UK

On Sunday, September 21, 2014 1:37:50 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> >
>
> > "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>
> > ...
>
> >>
>
> >> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>
> >> ...
>
> >>>
>
> >>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>
> >>> ...
>
> >>>
>
> >>>> You are an exception. I've never seen you be rude. It's some others
>
> >>>> here that are not leaving a pretty picture in my mind.
>
> >>>
>
> >>> You mean rude like what you said recently? "Yeah. Keep laughing.
>
> >>> You're all a bunch of loons anyway!" That leaves a pretty picture in the
>
> >>> mind of *ALL* the people here that you're calling *ALL* of them loons?
>
> >>
>
> >> Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
>
> >> everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.
>
> >
>
> > Then you should have said that.
>
>
>
> Well, I am just sick of it! Wouldn't matter what I said. Just attack,
>
> attack and attack. I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
>
> and I know there is thread drift and all but it seems whenever I try to do
>
> that, someone turns it into something else. And always an attack on me.



Fed up? We promise to wave goodbye as you faaaaaaade into the sunset of a life filed with problems like no one else has, you poor dear. Life just ain't fair, is it?

"Janet" > wrote in message
t...
> In article >, says...
>
> I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
>
> No you don't. You come here to whine about your medical problems and
> your awful family.
>
> Janet UK

And it seems the perfect place for her to come for that.

> wrote in message
...
> On Sunday, September 21, 2014 2:09:05 AM UTC-7, Je�us wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:37:50 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >"Cheri" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> >> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>>
>
>> >>> Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
>> >>> everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.
>>
>> >> Then you should have said that.
>>
>> >Well, I am just sick of it! Wouldn't matter what I said. Just attack,
>> >attack and attack. I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss
>> >food
>> >and I know there is thread drift and all but it seems whenever I try to
>> >do
>> >that, someone turns it into something else. And always an attack on me.
>>
>> But of course - you never take the time to ask WHY this only happens
>> to you and nobody else here. Your power of denial is beyond belief.
>
> But one feature of rfc is regulars dumping on each other. While Julie
> attracts the most dumpage, she is not alone.

Very true!!!

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:04:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

>On Sunday, September 21, 2014 2:09:05 AM UTC-7, Je�us wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:37:50 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >"Cheri" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> >> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>>
>
>> >>> Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
>> >>> everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.
>>
>> >> Then you should have said that.
>>
>> >Well, I am just sick of it! Wouldn't matter what I said. Just attack,
>> >attack and attack. I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
>> >and I know there is thread drift and all but it seems whenever I try to do
>> >that, someone turns it into something else. And always an attack on me.
>>
>> But of course - you never take the time to ask WHY this only happens
>> to you and nobody else here. Your power of denial is beyond belief.
>
>But one feature of rfc is regulars dumping on each other.

That's fairly typical for Usenet.

>While Julie attracts the most dumpage, she is not alone.

She is on her own in a specific way, IMO, with the far fetched and
contradictory things she says.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:12:10 +0100, Janet > wrote:

>In article >, says...
>
> I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
>
> No you don't. You come here to whine about your medical problems and
>your awful family.

Yep. Julie chooses to post all that stuff, with the same end result
every single time. Pretty obvious solution to that - even Julie would
be aware of it - but she keeps it going by choice.
Make of that what you will.

> wrote in message
...
On Sunday, September 21, 2014 2:09:05 AM UTC-7, Je�us wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:37:50 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
> >"Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> >> ...
>

> >>> Oh believe me I wasn't laughing when I said that. And that wasn't to
> >>> everyone here. It was to those in the thread that were attacking me.
>
> >> Then you should have said that.
>
> >Well, I am just sick of it! Wouldn't matter what I said. Just attack,
> >attack and attack. I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss
> >food
> >and I know there is thread drift and all but it seems whenever I try to
> >do
> >that, someone turns it into something else. And always an attack on me.
>
> But of course - you never take the time to ask WHY this only happens
> to you and nobody else here. Your power of denial is beyond belief.

But one feature of rfc is regulars dumping on each other. While Julie
attracts the most dumpage, she is not alone.

===

Yes. Seems like everyone is always at each other's throats.

"Janet" > wrote in message
t...
> In article >, says...
>
> I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
>
> No you don't. You come here to whine about your medical problems and
> your awful family.

No. And quit insulting my family. Just because *you* think they are awful,
doesn't mean that I do. And please don't ask me who I think is awful. You
don't want to know!

In article >, says...
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> t...
> > In article >, says...
> >
> > I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
> >
> > No you don't. You come here to whine about your medical problems and
> > your awful family.
>
> No. And quit insulting my family. Just because *you* think they are awful,
> doesn't mean that I do.

!!!!!!!!!! Every comment you make about their characters and
behaviour, is negative critical and disloyal.

Janet UK

On 9/19/2014 7:58 PM, Cherry wrote:

> Again that was for Cheryl not you. You do remember Cheryl whom this
> thread is about. Cheryl as a new user is not going to have your so
> called problems.
>
> While I'm at it, I got to speak with three hospital medics last week
> and they all basically threw their hands in horror at the idea at
> re-using lancets. At least I don't take advice from some office
> worker even if he/she works for Bayer.

I've been checking my blood sugar for about a year, ever since my
fasting sugar has been kind of high. Fasting it is normally around 120
but after meals it is lower. I check 1-2 hours after eating to get an
idea of what affects my blood sugar and I'm shocked at how it is
normally lower than fasting. Some foods will spike it, but it's only
gone over 140 a couple of times after eating in the last year. The
fasting blood sugar is what concerns my doctor.

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl

On 9/20/2014 1:33 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> This is getting annoying to reply to, partly because it is too hard to
> tell who said what here.

No kidding.

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl

"Janet" > wrote in message
t...
> In article >, says...
>>
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> t...
>> > In article >, says...
>> >
>> > I am getting really fed up. I came here to discuss food
>> >
>> > No you don't. You come here to whine about your medical problems and
>> > your awful family.
>>
>> No. And quit insulting my family. Just because *you* think they are
>> awful,
>> doesn't mean that I do.
>
> !!!!!!!!!! Every comment you make about their characters and
> behaviour, is negative critical and disloyal.

Disloyal? What the hell is this? Some kind of clan or something? Every
comment I make here is taken in a negative context by you and some others.
I don't even have to make a negative comment. You just take it as such.

"Cheryl" > wrote in message
web.com...
> On 9/20/2014 1:33 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> This is getting annoying to reply to, partly because it is too hard to
>> tell who said what here.
>
> No kidding.

I don't know what the problem is with her newsreader or whatever.

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:33:29 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>I don't make anything up! Not on the newsgroups anyway.
<snip>
>Anyway... If I wanted to tell tall tales, I am certain that I have the
>ability to come up with something much more creative and less mundane
>that what I write here.

From alt.home.repair:

Message-ID: >

" We had to have our house raccoon proofed. One snatched our two cats
out the window and we never got one of them back. Totally damaged the
screen and even with the cats gone, still tried to get in numerous
times. That was a bad summer"

Julie Bove wrote:

> My mother had the one that predates this one. The one that has the pie
> shaped pieces of pictures on the front. I think some of the recipes are
> similar. I mostly made cookies from hers. The one that I just got is
> the hardbound so much thinner. I think my other one was three ring.
> Odd that they make so many different styles.

Julie, I have many editions (no newer ones though). If you start
looking for something specific, give me a holler. Can be by email too,
esp. if I seem to be absent.

BTW, I see folks are STILL at it here. You are one strong woman to put
up with this c--p for so long.

"Jean B." > wrote in message
...
> Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> My mother had the one that predates this one. The one that has the pie
>> shaped pieces of pictures on the front. I think some of the recipes are
>> similar. I mostly made cookies from hers. The one that I just got is
>> the hardbound so much thinner. I think my other one was three ring.
>> Odd that they make so many different styles.
>
> Julie, I have many editions (no newer ones though). If you start looking
> for something specific, give me a holler. Can be by email too, esp. if I
> seem to be absent.
>
> BTW, I see folks are STILL at it here. You are one strong woman to put up
> with this c--p for so long.

Thanks! I think this one has all of the recipes I need. I'm going to go
make batter bread now but not that recipe. This one has no eggs or dairy.

On 2014-09-28 12:32 AM, Jean B. wrote:

> Julie, I have many editions (no newer ones though). If you start
> looking for something specific, give me a holler. Can be by email too,
> esp. if I seem to be absent.
>
> BTW, I see folks are STILL at it here. You are one strong woman to put
> up with this c--p for so long.


I think it is the rest of us who deserve some praise for tolerating her
lies and nonsense stories for as long as we did.

Dave Smith wrote:
>Jean B. wrote:
>
>> Julie, I have many editions (no newer ones though). If you start
>> looking for something specific, give me a holler. Can be by email too,
>> esp. if I seem to be absent.
>>
>> BTW, I see folks are STILL at it here. You are one strong woman to put
>> up with this c--p for so long.
>
>I think it is the rest of us who deserve some praise for tolerating her
>lies and nonsense stories for as long as we did.

If you tolerate you are far worse an offender... if she bothers you
ignore her posts or grow thicker skin. All you prove by constantly
bitching is that you are weak minded and have nothing better to
contribute... she wins and you lose. As it stands now Julie
contributes far FAR more to this Newsgroup than you. Actually I've
never seen anything worthwhile posted by you... you're like a tin can
with a pebble, you make noise but you're worthless. At least Julie in
her own way is entertaining, you are tearfully boring.

On Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:06:05 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>
> >Jean B. wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> Julie, I have many editions (no newer ones though). If you start
>
> >> looking for something specific, give me a holler. Can be by email too,
>
> >> esp. if I seem to be absent.
>
> >>
>
> >> BTW, I see folks are STILL at it here. You are one strong woman to put
>
> >> up with this c--p for so long.
>
> >
>
> >I think it is the rest of us who deserve some praise for tolerating her
>
> >lies and nonsense stories for as long as we did.
>
>
>
> If you tolerate you are far worse an offender... if she bothers you
>
> ignore her posts or grow thicker skin. All you prove by constantly
>
> bitching is that you are weak minded and have nothing better to
>
> contribute... she wins and you lose. As it stands now Julie
>
> contributes far FAR more to this Newsgroup than you. Actually I've
>
> never seen anything worthwhile posted by you... you're like a tin can
>
> with a pebble, you make noise but you're worthless. At least Julie in
>
> her own way is entertaining, you are tearfully boring.

I do agree with that. She does make one scratch the old noggin. LOL

On 9/28/2014 6:54 PM, Kalmia wrote:

> Actually, Bove is pretty mild, as PITAs go. I recall one group years
> ago which folded after being harassed by an absolute idiot. A yahoo
> group was formed with a moderator who screened members. The troll
> went on to work her magic in a few other groups, but eventually she
> was committed, or so the story goes. Eventually trolls are felled by
> some life event we never learn of. your dog analogy. At least
> the dog can be deflea-ed and become a pleasant addition to the
> household.

rec.travel.cruises was destroyed by a troll, so everybody moved to a
Yahoo group, and now we are on Facebook. Rumor has it, our troll died.

Becca

"Becca EmaNymton" > wrote in message
...
> On 9/28/2014 6:54 PM, Kalmia wrote:
>
>> Actually, Bove is pretty mild, as PITAs go. I recall one group years
>> ago which folded after being harassed by an absolute idiot. A yahoo
>> group was formed with a moderator who screened members. The troll
>> went on to work her magic in a few other groups, but eventually she
>> was committed, or so the story goes. Eventually trolls are felled by
>> some life event we never learn of. your dog analogy. At least
>> the dog can be deflea-ed and become a pleasant addition to the
>> household.
>
> rec.travel.cruises was destroyed by a troll, so everybody moved to a Yahoo
> group, and now we are on Facebook. Rumor has it, our troll died.
>
> Becca

Always bad when someone ruins a group. I have tried a few yahoo groups but
I just don't care for the format.