Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/2014 4:20 PM, Ophelia wrote:
> "ImStillMags" > wrote >> On Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:42:06 PM UTC-8, John Kuthe wrote: >>> You would not like Laphroaig! >> You are correct !!! To much peat. > > Vile ![]() > Highland Park is nice - not noticeably peaty. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "S Viemeister" > wrote in message ... > On 2/13/2014 4:20 PM, Ophelia wrote: >> "ImStillMags" > wrote >>> On Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:42:06 PM UTC-8, John Kuthe wrote: >>>> You would not like Laphroaig! >>> You are correct !!! To much peat. >> >> Vile ![]() >> > Highland Park is nice - not noticeably peaty. Agree. One of the best all-around whiskys around. pavane |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "S Viemeister" > wrote in message ... > On 2/13/2014 4:20 PM, Ophelia wrote: >> "ImStillMags" > wrote >>> On Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:42:06 PM UTC-8, John Kuthe wrote: >>>> You would not like Laphroaig! >>> You are correct !!! To much peat. >> >> Vile ![]() >> > Highland Park is nice - not noticeably peaty. Yes, particularly the older ones. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/2014 5:21 PM, Ophelia wrote:
> "S Viemeister" > wrote >> Highland Park is nice - not noticeably peaty. > > Yes, particularly the older ones. > We had houseguests who gave us a big bottle of 12 yr old, and a small one of 18 yr old. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "S Viemeister" > wrote in message ... > On 2/13/2014 5:21 PM, Ophelia wrote: >> "S Viemeister" > wrote >>> Highland Park is nice - not noticeably peaty. >> >> Yes, particularly the older ones. >> > We had houseguests who gave us a big bottle of 12 yr old, and a small one > of 18 yr old. Nice but have you tried one twice that old? ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/14, 5:28 PM, Ophelia wrote:
>> We had houseguests who gave us a big bottle of 12 yr old, and a small >> one of 18 yr old. > > Nice but have you tried one twice that old? ![]() I have, and it was disappointing. Very few whiskies remain potent and complex past 25 years. Most experts hold that Scotch is best balanced between 12 and 16 years of aging. -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/2014 5:28 PM, Ophelia wrote:
> "S Viemeister" > wrote >> On 2/13/2014 5:21 PM, Ophelia wrote: >>> "S Viemeister" > wrote >>>> Highland Park is nice - not noticeably peaty. >>> >>> Yes, particularly the older ones. >>> >> We had houseguests who gave us a big bottle of 12 yr old, and a small >> one of 18 yr old. > > Nice but have you tried one twice that old? ![]() > Never - what's it like? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "S Viemeister" > wrote in message ... > On 2/13/2014 5:28 PM, Ophelia wrote: >> "S Viemeister" > wrote >>> On 2/13/2014 5:21 PM, Ophelia wrote: >>>> "S Viemeister" > wrote >>>>> Highland Park is nice - not noticeably peaty. >>>> >>>> Yes, particularly the older ones. >>>> >>> We had houseguests who gave us a big bottle of 12 yr old, and a small >>> one of 18 yr old. >> >> Nice but have you tried one twice that old? ![]() >> > Never - what's it like? He says it is stronger but very smooth and with greater depth of flavour! So there ya go ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Scotch Eggs | Recipes | |||
Scotch Teas | Recipes (moderated) |