Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> What is the difference? From or what I read here, I gather mashed potatoes get boiled and then mashed via a potato masher or fork or other instrument, while the smashed potatoes are just boiled and then crumbled, thus retaining more of their texture. I wait with you for a more authoritative opinion -- "mi pare sia quindi arrivato il momento di salutarti definitivamente" mardot su IHC 16.11.2012 promessa ovviamente non mantenuta [disordine ossessivo compulsivo al galoppo] |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ViLco" > wrote in message ... > Ophelia wrote: > >> What is the difference? > > From or what I read here, I gather mashed potatoes get boiled and then > mashed via a potato masher or fork or other instrument, while the smashed > potatoes are just boiled and then crumbled, thus retaining more of their > texture. > I wait with you for a more authoritative opinion ok ![]() -- -- http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ViLco wrote:
> Ophelia wrote: > >> What is the difference? > > From or what I read here, I gather mashed potatoes get boiled and then > mashed via a potato masher or fork or other instrument, while the smashed > potatoes are just boiled and then crumbled, thus retaining more of their > texture. Right. To me it's the degree of grind and consistency. Less uniform, smashed. More uniform, mashed. The scale is subjective though. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Freyburger" > wrote in message ... > ViLco wrote: >> Ophelia wrote: >> >>> What is the difference? >> >> From or what I read here, I gather mashed potatoes get boiled and then >> mashed via a potato masher or fork or other instrument, while the smashed >> potatoes are just boiled and then crumbled, thus retaining more of their >> texture. > > Right. To me it's the degree of grind and consistency. Less uniform, > smashed. More uniform, mashed. The scale is subjective though. Aye, I am getting the idea now, thanks ![]() -- -- http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ViLco wrote:
> > Ophelia wrote: > > > What is the difference? > > From or what I read here, I gather mashed potatoes get boiled and then > mashed via a potato masher or fork or other instrument, while the smashed > potatoes are just boiled and then crumbled, thus retaining more of their > texture. > I wait with you for a more authoritative opinion Maybe not authoritative but MY opinion. Basically they are the same. some people just like to say smashed. If there is a difference, imo mashed potatoes are made from boiled and smashed might be made from baked? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2012-11-27, Ophelia > wrote:
> What is the difference? One starts with an s. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:23:02 -0000, "Ophelia"
> wrote: >What is the difference? In our house- mashed- boiled & squished repeatedly to a [more or less] smooth puree smashed= small potatoes, skin on, roasted, then crushed enough to expose the flesh so it will absorb more of whatever sauce you're applying. Jim |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Elbrecht" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:23:02 -0000, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > >>What is the difference? > > In our house- > mashed- boiled & squished repeatedly to a [more or less] smooth puree > > smashed= small potatoes, skin on, roasted, then crushed enough to > expose the flesh so it will absorb more of whatever sauce you're > applying. Thanks, Jim. Is that like the recipe where you crush the potatoes gently and then finish baking? I get very confused by all these terms ![]() -- -- http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:49:45 -0000, "Ophelia"
> wrote: > > >"Jim Elbrecht" > wrote in message .. . >> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:23:02 -0000, "Ophelia" >> > wrote: >> >>>What is the difference? >> >> In our house- >> mashed- boiled & squished repeatedly to a [more or less] smooth puree >> >> smashed= small potatoes, skin on, roasted, then crushed enough to >> expose the flesh so it will absorb more of whatever sauce you're >> applying. > >Thanks, Jim. Is that like the recipe where you crush the potatoes gently >and then >finish baking? > I toss them with the sauce and serve-- Here's our favorite http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/recipe?id=7301593 Emeril Lagasse's Easter Feast Smashed Potatoes with Sour Cream and Chives >I get very confused by all these terms ![]() A few years ago I called mashed potatoes 'smashed'. Now that we have a 'smashed' recipe I need to be careful.<g> Jim |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Elbrecht" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:49:45 -0000, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > >> >> >>"Jim Elbrecht" > wrote in message . .. >>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:23:02 -0000, "Ophelia" >>> > wrote: >>> >>>>What is the difference? >>> >>> In our house- >>> mashed- boiled & squished repeatedly to a [more or less] smooth puree >>> >>> smashed= small potatoes, skin on, roasted, then crushed enough to >>> expose the flesh so it will absorb more of whatever sauce you're >>> applying. >> >>Thanks, Jim. Is that like the recipe where you crush the potatoes gently >>and then >>finish baking? >> > > I toss them with the sauce and serve-- Here's our favorite > http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/recipe?id=7301593 > Emeril Lagasse's Easter Feast Smashed Potatoes with Sour Cream and > Chives Mmm that sounds nice ![]() >>I get very confused by all these terms ![]() > > A few years ago I called mashed potatoes 'smashed'. Now that we have > a 'smashed' recipe I need to be careful.<g> Pah ![]() everyone else means ![]() -- -- http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:49:45 -0000, "Ophelia"
> wrote: > > > "Jim Elbrecht" > wrote in message > ... > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:23:02 -0000, "Ophelia" > > > wrote: > > > >>What is the difference? > > > > In our house- > > mashed- boiled & squished repeatedly to a [more or less] smooth puree > > > > smashed= small potatoes, skin on, roasted, then crushed enough to > > expose the flesh so it will absorb more of whatever sauce you're > > applying. > > Thanks, Jim. Is that like the recipe where you crush the potatoes gently > and then > finish baking? > > I get very confused by all these terms ![]() > Those were "crash" potatoes. ![]() different method so she had to come up with a different word for it. You've made that recipe, haven't you? http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2...-hot-potatoes/ -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:49:45 -0000, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > >> >> >> "Jim Elbrecht" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:23:02 -0000, "Ophelia" >> > > wrote: >> > >> >>What is the difference? >> > >> > In our house- >> > mashed- boiled & squished repeatedly to a [more or less] smooth puree >> > >> > smashed= small potatoes, skin on, roasted, then crushed enough to >> > expose the flesh so it will absorb more of whatever sauce you're >> > applying. >> >> Thanks, Jim. Is that like the recipe where you crush the potatoes gently >> and then >> finish baking? >> >> I get very confused by all these terms ![]() >> > > Those were "crash" potatoes. ![]() > different method so she had to come up with a different word for it. > You've made that recipe, haven't you? > http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2...-hot-potatoes/ I have indeed. I heard about them from Damsel. Perhaps she named them after her other half) -- -- http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:22:44 -0000, "Ophelia"
> wrote: > I heard about them from Damsel. Perhaps she named them after > her other half) There's no connection between them and what the Pioneer Woman called her potatoes. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > What is the difference? > > -- and then there are "Crashed potatoes" http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2...-hot-potatoes/ Highly recommended! Graham |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:41:24 -0700, "graham" > wrote:
> >"Ophelia" > wrote in message ... >> What is the difference? >> >> -- >and then there are "Crashed potatoes" >http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2...-hot-potatoes/ > >Highly recommended! >Graham > These potatoes were discussed here (in this newsgroup) several years ago. Didn't Damsel have something to do with it? They were all the rage here for a while. I made them once and didn't bother again. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:58:56 -0700, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:41:24 -0700, "graham" > wrote: > > > > >"Ophelia" > wrote in message > ... > >> What is the difference? > >> > >> -- > >and then there are "Crashed potatoes" > >http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2...-hot-potatoes/ > > > >Highly recommended! > >Graham > > > These potatoes were discussed here (in this newsgroup) several years > ago. Didn't Damsel have something to do with it? They were all the > rage here for a while. I made them once and didn't bother again. They made the rounds in the food blogging world. I made them twice. They're very good, but way too much work - mainly because I couldn't figure out how to stop the potatoes from sticking to the potato masher. I oiled it the second time around, but it was still an ordeal and they never turned out to be as pretty as the pictures bloggers posted. I had a much easier time with kale chips, which made the rounds about the same time. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/27/2012 11:32 AM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:58:56 -0700, Janet Bostwick > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:41:24 -0700, "graham" > wrote: >> >>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> What is the difference? >>>> >>>> -- >>> and then there are "Crashed potatoes" >>> http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2...-hot-potatoes/ >>> >>> Highly recommended! >>> Graham >>> >> These potatoes were discussed here (in this newsgroup) several years >> ago. Didn't Damsel have something to do with it? They were all the >> rage here for a while. I made them once and didn't bother again. > They made the rounds in the food blogging world. I made them twice. > They're very good, but way too much work - mainly because I couldn't > figure out how to stop the potatoes from sticking to the potato > masher. I oiled it the second time around, but it was still an ordeal > and they never turned out to be as pretty as the pictures bloggers > posted. > > I had a much easier time with kale chips, which made the rounds about > the same time. > > Yes, I've been making the Pioneer Woman recipe for Smashed for a while. -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not" in Reply To. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/27/2012 12:58 PM, James Silverton wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 11:32 AM, sf wrote: >> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:58:56 -0700, Janet Bostwick >> > wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:41:24 -0700, "graham" > wrote: >>> >>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>>> What is the difference? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> and then there are "Crashed potatoes" >>>> http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2...-hot-potatoes/ >>>> >>>> Highly recommended! >>>> Graham >>>> >>> These potatoes were discussed here (in this newsgroup) several years >>> ago. Didn't Damsel have something to do with it? They were all the >>> rage here for a while. I made them once and didn't bother again. >> They made the rounds in the food blogging world. I made them twice. >> They're very good, but way too much work - mainly because I couldn't >> figure out how to stop the potatoes from sticking to the potato >> masher. I oiled it the second time around, but it was still an ordeal >> and they never turned out to be as pretty as the pictures bloggers >> posted. >> >> I had a much easier time with kale chips, which made the rounds about >> the same time. >> >> > Yes, I've been making the Pioneer Woman recipe for Smashed for a while. > Let me add that you can save time for a small amount of potatoes by nuking them instead of boiling. -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not" in Reply To. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:58:36 -0500, James Silverton
> wrote: > On 11/27/2012 11:32 AM, sf wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:58:56 -0700, Janet Bostwick > > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:41:24 -0700, "graham" > wrote: > >> > >>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message > >>> ... > >>>> What is the difference? > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>> and then there are "Crashed potatoes" > >>> http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2...-hot-potatoes/ > >>> > >>> Highly recommended! > >>> Graham > >>> > >> These potatoes were discussed here (in this newsgroup) several years > >> ago. Didn't Damsel have something to do with it? They were all the > >> rage here for a while. I made them once and didn't bother again. > > They made the rounds in the food blogging world. I made them twice. > > They're very good, but way too much work - mainly because I couldn't > > figure out how to stop the potatoes from sticking to the potato > > masher. I oiled it the second time around, but it was still an ordeal > > and they never turned out to be as pretty as the pictures bloggers > > posted. > > > > I had a much easier time with kale chips, which made the rounds about > > the same time. > > > > > Yes, I've been making the Pioneer Woman recipe for Smashed for a while. Do you have a secret to it? -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:32:41 -0800, sf wrote: > >> They made the rounds in the food blogging world. I made them twice. >> They're very good, but way too much work - mainly because I couldn't >> figure out how to stop the potatoes from sticking to the potato >> masher. I oiled it the second time around, but it was still an ordeal >> and they never turned out to be as pretty as the pictures bloggers >> posted. > > Very easy to make somewhat pretty, although they're supposed to look > kinda "rustic". > > With country ribs: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...ream/lightbox/ > > Salmon and asparagus: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...ream/lightbox/ > > Salmon cakes: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...ream/lightbox/ > > Just the potatoes, Ma'am: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...ream/lightbox/ Yumm ![]() -- -- http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "graham" > wrote in message news ![]() > > "Ophelia" > wrote in message > ... >> What is the difference? >> >> -- > and then there are "Crashed potatoes" > http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2...-hot-potatoes/ Ahh I remember those ![]() -- -- http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:23:02 -0000, "Ophelia"
> wrote: > What is the difference? > > -- In my kitchen, the big difference is the addition of liquid and stirring/whipping... one is heavy, the other isn't. Smashed has no added liquid; it's just a potato (usually with the jacket on) mashed on the plate with a fork and a dab of butter on top. Think of the interior of a baked potato after it's been pinched and fancied up - similar to that. Mashed begins with a well peeled potato for me and has some liquid in it (potato water/milk/cream) plus butter. I also whip it with the potato masher to make it light and smooth. I do not like any lumps in my mashed potatoes. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:23:02 -0000, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > >> What is the difference? >> >> -- > In my kitchen, the big difference is the addition of liquid and > stirring/whipping... one is heavy, the other isn't. Smashed has no > added liquid; it's just a potato (usually with the jacket on) mashed > on the plate with a fork and a dab of butter on top. Think of the > interior of a baked potato after it's been pinched and fancied up - > similar to that. Mashed begins with a well peeled potato for me and > has some liquid in it (potato water/milk/cream) plus butter. I also > whip it with the potato masher to make it light and smooth. I do not > like any lumps in my mashed potatoes. Ok thanks! I like my mashed potatoes mashed up with some butter and sometimes a little cream. We also like baked potatoes, onto which we put some butter, but served just halved. -- -- http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > What is the difference? I would say that smashed usually are not mashed as well and can contain peel. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Microwave smashed potatoes | General Cooking | |||
Smashed potatoes | General Cooking | |||
Garlic Smashed Potatoes | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Garlic Smashed Potatoes | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Smashed Potatoes | Recipes (moderated) |