Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.

On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.

I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins outside Chick-Fil-A stores. The kind of folks who'd want to support the company aren't going to want their kids exposed to same sex making out. Or maybe...
"Mommy, what are those two men doing?"
"Those men are sinning against the Lord, child, and they will burn forever in Hell for what they are doing."

Send a couple of hot, young, lipstick *******s out there, and the wives would know that their husbands were having impure thoughts. I'd contribute a few bucks to fund to sponsor a couple of attractive women to walk back and forth in front of one of those stores, stopping to kiss at random times. The wives wouldn't want to eat there. Chick-Fil-A has a big problem in that their stores are primarily in metropolitan areas, where there are less backward rubes.

Oh, and Sheldon, you're welcome to suggest that because I support *** rights, that that is evidence that I'm ***. By that logic, I'm also a Black woman.

--Bryan

Bryan wrote:

> "Mommy, what are those two men doing?"
> "Those men are sinning against the Lord, child, and they will burn
> forever in Hell for what they are doing."

Some dunderheaded politicians are trying to legislate morality again.

BTW, Bryan, your line-breaker has deserted you.

On Aug 1, 3:49*pm, Bryan > wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
>
> I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins outside Chick-Fil-A stores. *The kind of folks who'd want to support the company aren't going to want their kids exposed to same sex making out. *Or maybe...
> "Mommy, what are those two men doing?"
> "Those men are sinning against the Lord, child, and they will burn forever in Hell for what they are doing."
>
> Send a couple of hot, young, lipstick *******s out there, and the wives would know that their husbands were having impure thoughts. *I'd contribute a few bucks to fund to sponsor a couple of attractive women to walk back and forth in front of one of those stores, stopping to kiss at random times.. *The wives wouldn't want to eat there. *Chick-Fil-A has a big problem in that their stores are primarily in metropolitan areas, where there are less backward rubes.
>

I have never seen any sexually attractive *******s, although we have
worked with them for 25 years, and lived next door to a couple for
fifteen years. One is my wife's auto mechanic. Some are wiry, some are
dumpy, none are sexy.

On 8/2/2012 11:42 AM, spamtrap1888 wrote:

> I have never seen any sexually attractive *******s, although we have
> worked with them for 25 years, and lived next door to a couple for
> fifteen years. One is my wife's auto mechanic. Some are wiry, some are
> dumpy, none are sexy.

That is too bad. I know a few, including my cousin. There are *******
and bisexual celebrities who are attractive, you may be aware of these
people; Drew Barrymore, Queen Latifah, Meredith Baxter, Ellen DeGeneres,
Portia de Rossi, Clementine Ford, Angelina Jolie, Jane Lynch, Anna
Paquin and many more.

Now, stop and think about how many visually, sexually attractive women
are around you?

Becca

On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:45:44 -0500, Ema Nymton >
wrote:

>On 8/2/2012 11:42 AM, spamtrap1888 wrote:
>
>> I have never seen any sexually attractive *******s, although we have
>> worked with them for 25 years, and lived next door to a couple for
>> fifteen years. One is my wife's auto mechanic. Some are wiry, some are
>> dumpy, none are sexy.
>
>That is too bad. I know a few, including my cousin. There are *******
>and bisexual celebrities who are attractive, you may be aware of these
>people; Drew Barrymore, Queen Latifah, Meredith Baxter, Ellen DeGeneres,
>Portia de Rossi, Clementine Ford, Angelina Jolie, Jane Lynch, Anna
>Paquin and many more.
>
>Now, stop and think about how many visually, sexually attractive women
>are around you?
>
>Becca

In my experience gays are no more or less physically attractive than
straights and vice versa... I've seen plenty of uglis of each. But
I've never seen a physically attractive *** male because they don't
have tits. One thing I find repulsive is that *** males miss out on
female breasts, and I've never seen a homo male with a boob
enhancement, I'm serious, notice I'm not smiling. Truth is
homosexuality is a psychosis just like schizophrenia, neither is happy
with their disease.

Former Navy man, homophobic, cat freak... hmmmmm, sounds like someone did sumfin dat made dem ashamed fer sum reason.

If what you do doesn't hurt others, do it. GLBTQQS...whatever. Be you, so long as you're not an arsehole. Sheldon, be anyone BUTT you. I can't believe anyone really cares about ethnicity, gender ID, et.al. Ah well, All in the Family wouldn't have been funny without Archie.

In article >, Brooklyn1
says...
>
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:45:44 -0500, Ema Nymton >
> wrote:
>
> >On 8/2/2012 11:42 AM, spamtrap1888 wrote:
> >
> >> I have never seen any sexually attractive *******s, although we have
> >> worked with them for 25 years, and lived next door to a couple for
> >> fifteen years. One is my wife's auto mechanic. Some are wiry, some are
> >> dumpy, none are sexy.
> >
> >That is too bad. I know a few, including my cousin. There are *******
> >and bisexual celebrities who are attractive, you may be aware of these
> >people; Drew Barrymore, Queen Latifah, Meredith Baxter, Ellen DeGeneres,
> >Portia de Rossi, Clementine Ford, Angelina Jolie, Jane Lynch, Anna
> >Paquin and many more.
> >
> >Now, stop and think about how many visually, sexually attractive women
> >are around you?
> >
> >Becca
>
> In my experience gays are no more or less physically attractive than
> straights and vice versa... I've seen plenty of uglis of each. But
> I've never seen a physically attractive *** male because they don't
> have tits. One thing I find repulsive is that *** males miss out on
> female breasts, and I've never seen a homo male with a boob
> enhancement, I'm serious, notice I'm not smiling. Truth is
> homosexuality is a psychosis just like schizophrenia, neither is happy
> with their disease.

Dude, you've never heard of gynecomastia?

On Aug 2, 12:45*pm, Ema Nymton > wrote:
> On 8/2/2012 11:42 AM, spamtrap1888 wrote:
>
> > I have never seen any sexually attractive *******s, although we have
> > worked with them for 25 years, and lived next door to a couple for
> > fifteen years. One is my wife's auto mechanic. Some are wiry, some are
> > dumpy, none are sexy.
>
> That is too bad. I know a few, including my cousin. *There are *******
> and bisexual celebrities who are attractive, you may be aware of these
> people; Drew Barrymore, Queen Latifah, Meredith Baxter, Ellen DeGeneres,
> Portia de Rossi, Clementine Ford, Angelina Jolie, Jane Lynch, Anna
> Paquin and many more.
>
> Now, stop and think about how many visually, sexually attractive women
> are around you?


A LOT. It's pretty milftastic, and even gilftastic, where I live,
especially the neighbor's wife (who I have to be careful not to covet,
obviously.) Plus I've had to carefully refrain from staring at the
neighbor kid's girlfriend when she passes by -- a very curvy Latina,
mid-20s, who always parks her car down the street. And there is one
certified knockout at work.

On Aug 2, 9:42*am, spamtrap1888 > wrote:
> On Aug 1, 3:49*pm, Bryan > wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > > Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
>
> > I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins outside Chick-Fil-A stores. *The kind of folks who'd want to support the company aren't going to want their kids exposed to same sex making out. *Or maybe...
> > "Mommy, what are those two men doing?"
> > "Those men are sinning against the Lord, child, and they will burn forever in Hell for what they are doing."
>
> > Send a couple of hot, young, lipstick *******s out there, and the wives would know that their husbands were having impure thoughts. *I'd contribute a few bucks to fund to sponsor a couple of attractive women to walk back and forth in front of one of those stores, stopping to kiss at random times. *The wives wouldn't want to eat there. *Chick-Fil-A has a big problem in that their stores are primarily in metropolitan areas, where there are less backward rubes.
>
> I have never seen any sexually attractive *******s, although we have
> worked with them for 25 years, and lived next door to a couple for
> fifteen years. One is my wife's auto mechanic. Some are wiry, some are
> dumpy, none are sexy.

You don't get out much do you? Chances are you really wouldn't know if
a beautiful woman was *** or not.

On Aug 1, 5:49*pm, Bryan > wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
>
> I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins outside Chick-Fil-A stores. *The kind of folks who'd want to support the company aren't going to want their kids exposed to same sex making out. *Or maybe...
> "Mommy, what are those two men doing?"
> "Those men are sinning against the Lord, child, and they will burn forever in Hell for what they are doing."
>
> Send a couple of hot, young, lipstick *******s out there, and the wives would know that their husbands were having impure thoughts. *I'd contribute a few bucks to fund to sponsor a couple of attractive women to walk back and forth in front of one of those stores, stopping to kiss at random times.. *The wives wouldn't want to eat there. *Chick-Fil-A has a big problem in that their stores are primarily in metropolitan areas, where there are less backward rubes.
>
> Oh, and Sheldon, you're welcome to suggest that because I support *** rights, that that is evidence that I'm ***. *By that logic, I'm also a Black woman.
>
> --Bryan

as far as I am concerned *** rights are human rights

On 8/2/2012 1:00 PM, rosie wrote:

> as far as I am concerned *** rights are human rights

My view exactly. It doesn't directly affect my life, but
right is right.

nancy

rosie wrote:
>
> as far as I am concerned *** rights are human rights

I agree with you. I don't care if someone is *** or heterosexual but I
don't want either shoved in my face. Sexual preference should be a private
thing. *** parades and protests are a sign of very messed up people to me.
Why do they think I want to see that?

I don't want to see a hetero parade either, for god's sake. Keep it in the
bedroom.

Gary

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> rosie wrote:
>>
>> as far as I am concerned *** rights are human rights
>
> I agree with you. I don't care if someone is *** or heterosexual but I
> don't want either shoved in my face. Sexual preference should be a private
> thing. *** parades and protests are a sign of very messed up people to me.
> Why do they think I want to see that?

San Fran has one a year. I am not aware of any others. It's their way of
saying to bigots that they can deal with it or die.

> I don't want to see a hetero parade either, for god's sake. Keep it in the
> bedroom.

I know what you mean. All those fornicating Rose Parade floats are over the
top.

Paul

"Paul M. Cook" wrote:
>
> "Gary" wrote:
> > I don't want to see a hetero parade either, for god's sake. Keep it in the
> > bedroom.
>
> I know what you mean. All those fornicating Rose Parade floats are over the
> top.

In real life, I'm a ******* trapped in a man's body but I'm not going to
parade around about it.

Andy wrote:

> "Someone asked me once if I was ***. I told him, 'I'm as happy as the next guy.'"
> We all laughed but he laughed louder than us put together.

I can see why you laughed. What a gut-buster! I'm laughing myself just
thinking about it. Have you thought about compiling your pearls into a
book? It would get laughed off the shelves.

On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:13:00 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

> We have a ******* parade in Austin every year. Technically it's
> *******/*** but once the *******s figured out they can go topless,
> it's mostly ******* (wouldn't want to tempt any of the *** men, after
> all).
> It's kinda screwed up and sad when you have to go topless to promote
> your cause and get attention.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponte_delle_tette

I simply could not pass up an opportunity to post this link. ;-)
Sorry. I'll be quiet now.
--
Ann's Little Brother Bob

On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 09:33:06 +0300, Bob O'Dyne
> wrote:


> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponte_delle_tette
>
> I simply could not pass up an opportunity to post this link. ;-)
> Sorry. I'll be quiet now.

It's an interesting little bit of history... and a bridge worth
finding when visiting Venice, if for no other reason than pure trivia.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On 8/4/2012 1:33 AM, Bob O'Dyne wrote:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponte_delle_tette
>
> I simply could not pass up an opportunity to post this link. ;-)
> Sorry. I'll be quiet now.

Interesting to read, thanks. This photo reminds me of San Antonio, TX.

Becca

On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 16:53:52 +1000, John John >
wrote:

>On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:13:00 -0500, Sqwertz >
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:13:58 -0400, Gary wrote:
>>
>>> I don't want to see a hetero parade either, for god's sake. Keep it in the
>>> bedroom.
>>
>>We have a ******* parade in Austin every year. Technically it's
>>*******/*** but once the *******s figured out they can go topless,
>>it's mostly ******* (wouldn't want to tempt any of the *** men, after
>>all).
>>
>>It's kinda screwed up and sad when you have to go topless to promote
>>your cause and get attention.
>
>I think there are two sides to it.
>
>John

http://www.pleasurejam.com/news/2/19...ive/2011%7C10/

On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 16:53:52 +1000, John John >
wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:13:00 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:13:58 -0400, Gary wrote:
> >
> >> I don't want to see a hetero parade either, for god's sake. Keep it in the
> >> bedroom.
> >
> >We have a ******* parade in Austin every year. Technically it's
> >*******/*** but once the *******s figured out they can go topless,
> >it's mostly ******* (wouldn't want to tempt any of the *** men, after
> >all).
> >
> >It's kinda screwed up and sad when you have to go topless to promote
> >your cause and get attention.
>
> I think there are two sides to it.
>
Yeah, the other side is the Mardi Gras parade in New Orleans where
drunken men stand in balconies throwing plastic necklaces to drunken
women who bare their breasts for a few cheap beads.


--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 08:28:43 -0700, sf > wrote:

>On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 16:53:52 +1000, John John >
>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:13:00 -0500, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:13:58 -0400, Gary wrote:
>> >
>> >> I don't want to see a hetero parade either, for god's sake. Keep it in the
>> >> bedroom.
>> >
>> >We have a ******* parade in Austin every year. Technically it's
>> >*******/*** but once the *******s figured out they can go topless,
>> >it's mostly ******* (wouldn't want to tempt any of the *** men, after
>> >all).
>> >
>> >It's kinda screwed up and sad when you have to go topless to promote
>> >your cause and get attention.
>>
>> I think there are two sides to it.
>>
>Yeah, the other side is the Mardi Gras parade in New Orleans where
>drunken men stand in balconies throwing plastic necklaces to drunken
>women who bare their breasts for a few cheap beads.

sf is just jealous because her boobs aren't worth a bead... they'd
toss schmatahs to cover them.

On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 7:59:54 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:49:44 -0700 (PDT), Bryan wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> >> Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
>
> >
>
> > I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins outside Chick-Fil-A stores.
>
>
>
> And they'll probably find that will probably backfire in their kissy
>
> faces. They'll probably find that heteros that support *** "rights"
>
> really don't want to see two guys getting hot and heavy in a
>
> restaurant. Or anywhere else.
>
Oh, I don't think they have any business doing it in the restaurant, they should do it in the right of way in front of the free standing restaurants, and I wouldn't enjoy watching either, except that I would only experience mild aesthetic displeasure, while people whom I dearly hate would be feeling much worse. I personally find two guys mouth kissing far more difficult to watch than if they were having graphic sex. As pro LGBT-rights as I am, I can't help my emotions. It isn't because I think they're doing anything wrong, men's bodies just kind of gross me out--I am acrophobic and katsaridaphobic (fear of cockroaches) as well, I have my other personal weaknesses--and it's an inconvenience, especially this year when boys who have been out in 100+F temperatures come inside my house, and I find their odor repellent.
>
> And the company reserves the right not to let citizens protest on
>
> their private property and kick their asses out. And anybody who
>
> wants to challenge, disrespect, or cry foul about that fact of law is
>
> just going to look like a kook.

Oh, I don't question the owner from prohibiting in on the property, and they certainly have a right to ask anyone to leave, and yes, it is kooky, Boston Tea Party kooky.
>
> ObFood: The side effect of this is that chicken prices just went up.
>
That's *not* why chicken prices are going up, and you know it, and you snipped my hot, lipstick ******* paragraph. Context, Steve, context.
>
> -sw

--Bryan

On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:37:59 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> wrote:

> On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 7:59:54 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:49:44 -0700 (PDT), Bryan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >
> > >> Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins outside Chick-Fil-A stores.
> >
> >
> >
> > And they'll probably find that will probably backfire in their kissy
> >
> > faces. They'll probably find that heteros that support *** "rights"
> >
> > really don't want to see two guys getting hot and heavy in a
> >
> > restaurant. Or anywhere else.
> >
> Oh, I don't think they have any business doing it in the restaurant, they should do it in the right of way in front of the free standing restaurants, and I wouldn't enjoy watching either, except that I would only experience mild aesthetic displeasure, while people whom I dearly hate would be feeling much worse. I personally find two guys mouth kissing far more difficult to watch than if they were having graphic sex. As pro LGBT-rights as I am, I can't help my emotions. It isn't because I think they're doing anything wrong, men's bodies just kind of gross me out--I am acrophobic and katsaridaphobic (fear of cockroaches) as well, I have my other personal weaknesses--and it's an inconvenience, especially this year when boys who have been out in 100+F temperatures come inside my house, and I find their odor repellent.
> >
> > And the company reserves the right not to let citizens protest on
> >
> > their private property and kick their asses out. And anybody who
> >
> > wants to challenge, disrespect, or cry foul about that fact of law is
> >
> > just going to look like a kook.
>
> Oh, I don't question the owner from prohibiting in on the property, and they certainly have a right to ask anyone to leave, and yes, it is kooky, Boston Tea Party kooky.
> >
> > ObFood: The side effect of this is that chicken prices just went up.
> >
> That's *not* why chicken prices are going up, and you know it, and you snipped my hot, lipstick ******* paragraph. Context, Steve, context.
> >

People who were properly raised know there's a time and a place for
everything and it doesn't matter if they're hetero or ***.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

In article >, sf >
wrote:

>
> People who were properly raised know there's a time and a place for
> everything and it doesn't matter if they're hetero or ***.

Which is exactly the point of the kiss-in

Malcom \"Mal\" Reynolds > wrote:

>Which is exactly the point of the kiss-in

Protesting the fact that Chick-Fil-A is sending money to organizations
that have lobbied for the death penalty for being *** in Uganda?

(Just a wild-ass guess.)

If you think this is about *** marriage or free speech you are wrong.
It is about violence and hate, and this type of protest has historically
been effective against institutionalized hate, at least sometimes.


Steve

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:37:59 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> > wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 7:59:54 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
>> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:49:44 -0700 (PDT), Bryan wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >
>> > >> Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>> > > I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins
>> > > outside Chick-Fil-A stores.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > And they'll probably find that will probably backfire in their kissy
>> >
>> > faces. They'll probably find that heteros that support *** "rights"
>> >
>> > really don't want to see two guys getting hot and heavy in a
>> >
>> > restaurant. Or anywhere else.
>> >
>> Oh, I don't think they have any business doing it in the restaurant, they
>> should do it in the right of way in front of the free standing
>> restaurants, and I wouldn't enjoy watching either, except that I would
>> only experience mild aesthetic displeasure, while people whom I dearly
>> hate would be feeling much worse. I personally find two guys mouth
>> kissing far more difficult to watch than if they were having graphic sex.
>> As pro LGBT-rights as I am, I can't help my emotions. It isn't because I
>> think they're doing anything wrong, men's bodies just kind of gross me
>> out--I am acrophobic and katsaridaphobic (fear of cockroaches) as well, I
>> have my other personal weaknesses--and it's an inconvenience, especially
>> this year when boys who have been out in 100+F temperatures come inside
>> my house, and I find their odor repellent.
>> >
>> > And the company reserves the right not to let citizens protest on
>> >
>> > their private property and kick their asses out. And anybody who
>> >
>> > wants to challenge, disrespect, or cry foul about that fact of law is
>> >
>> > just going to look like a kook.
>>
>> Oh, I don't question the owner from prohibiting in on the property, and
>> they certainly have a right to ask anyone to leave, and yes, it is kooky,
>> Boston Tea Party kooky.
>> >
>> > ObFood: The side effect of this is that chicken prices just went up.
>> >
>> That's *not* why chicken prices are going up, and you know it, and you
>> snipped my hot, lipstick ******* paragraph. Context, Steve, context.
>> >
>
> People who were properly raised know there's a time and a place for
> everything and it doesn't matter if they're hetero or ***.

I rarely see *** men showing open acts of affection. I mean maybe twice in
20 years. *******s, maybe 4 times in 20 years. And I live in a college
town with a lot of *** students - even an all women's college. Straight
couples - gotta be 10 times a month I have to endure them having near hard
core sex in public. Great big wet slurpy tongue kisses with loud lip
smacking while waiting in lines, butt grabbing, breast fondling, crotch
grabbing - you name it. Sometimes I wonder why they don't just lie on the
conveyer and do it. I even stood next to a couple in a sandwich shop where
the horny dude started to dry hump his GF when she bent over to put her bags
down. They could not have cared less a dozen people were watching. I
practically had to peel this freeky looking amorous couple off me in the
market who got so engrossed in their open mouth kissing they started to lean
onto me. I almost shouted GET OFF ME but they saw my angry face in time.

And I doubt homophobes experiences are any different unless like the worst
of them they hang out near gays. A lot of open homophobia is a guilty
conscience from being so attracted to homosexuals.

Paul

Paul M. Cook wrote:

> A lot of open homophobia is a guilty
> conscience from being so attracted to homosexuals.

Actually, that is the definition of homophobia -- fear of one's own
homerotic feelings. Some people mislabel "I hate fags" as homophobia
when it may be plain old bigotry.

On Aug 2, 7:15*am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "sf" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:37:59 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> > > wrote:
>
> >> On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 7:59:54 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:49:44 -0700 (PDT), Bryan wrote:
>
> >> > > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> >> > >> Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
>
> >> > > I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins
> >> > > outside Chick-Fil-A stores.
>
> >> > And they'll probably find that will probably backfire in their kissy
>
> >> > faces. *They'll probably find that heteros that support *** "rights"
>
> >> > really don't want to see two guys getting hot and heavy in a
>
> >> > restaurant. *Or anywhere else.
>
> >> Oh, I don't think they have any business doing it in the restaurant, they
> >> should do it in the right of way in front of the free standing
> >> restaurants, and I wouldn't enjoy watching either, except that I would
> >> only experience mild aesthetic displeasure, while people whom I dearly
> >> hate would be feeling much worse. *I personally find two guys mouth
> >> kissing far more difficult to watch than if they were having graphic sex.
> >> As pro LGBT-rights as I am, I can't help my emotions. *It isn't because I
> >> think they're doing anything wrong, men's bodies just kind of gross me
> >> out--I am acrophobic and katsaridaphobic (fear of cockroaches) as well, I
> >> have my other personal weaknesses--and it's an inconvenience, especially
> >> this year when boys who have been out in 100+F temperatures come inside
> >> my house, and I find their odor repellent.
>
> >> > And the company reserves the right not to let citizens protest on
>
> >> > their private property and kick their asses out. *And anybody who
>
> >> > wants to challenge, disrespect, or cry foul about that fact of law is
>
> >> > just going to look like a kook.
>
> >> Oh, I don't question the owner from prohibiting in on the property, and
> >> they certainly have a right to ask anyone to leave, and yes, it is kooky,
> >> Boston Tea Party kooky.
>
> >> > ObFood: The side effect of this is that chicken prices just went up.
>
> >> That's *not* why chicken prices are going up, and you know it, and you
> >> snipped my hot, lipstick ******* paragraph. *Context, Steve, context..
>
> > People who were properly raised know there's a time and a place for
> > everything and it doesn't matter if they're hetero or ***.
>
> I rarely see *** men showing open acts of affection. *I mean maybe twice in
> 20 years. ********s, maybe 4 times in 20 years. *And I live in a college
> town with a lot of *** students - even an all women's college. *Straight
> couples - gotta be 10 times a month I have to endure them having near hard
> core sex in public. *Great big wet slurpy tongue kisses with loud lip
> smacking while waiting in lines, butt grabbing, breast fondling, crotch
> grabbing - you name it. *Sometimes I wonder why they don't just lie on the
> conveyer and do it. *I even stood next to a couple in a sandwich shop where
> the horny dude started to dry hump his GF when she bent over to put her bags
> down. *They could not have cared less a dozen people were watching. *I
> practically had to peel this freeky looking amorous couple off me in the
> market who got so engrossed in their open mouth kissing they started to lean
> onto me. *I almost shouted GET OFF ME but they saw my angry face in time.

Are you sure they weren't inviting you to participate? Are you in
pretty good shape? Good kisser?

>
> And I doubt homophobes experiences are any different unless like the worst
> of them they hang out near gays. *A lot of open homophobia is a guilty
> conscience from being so attracted to homosexuals.

Half the *** guys I have known have been the flamboyant campy type.
I'm not sure who finds them attractive. The other half have been
neither here nor there. I mean, unless you think Ben Stiller is hot,
the pickings are going to be slim.

In article >, says...
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:37:59 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 7:59:54 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:49:44 -0700 (PDT), Bryan wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >> Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > > I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins
> >> > > outside Chick-Fil-A stores.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > And they'll probably find that will probably backfire in their kissy
> >> >
> >> > faces. They'll probably find that heteros that support *** "rights"
> >> >
> >> > really don't want to see two guys getting hot and heavy in a
> >> >
> >> > restaurant. Or anywhere else.
> >> >
> >> Oh, I don't think they have any business doing it in the restaurant, they
> >> should do it in the right of way in front of the free standing
> >> restaurants, and I wouldn't enjoy watching either, except that I would
> >> only experience mild aesthetic displeasure, while people whom I dearly
> >> hate would be feeling much worse. I personally find two guys mouth
> >> kissing far more difficult to watch than if they were having graphic sex.
> >> As pro LGBT-rights as I am, I can't help my emotions. It isn't because I
> >> think they're doing anything wrong, men's bodies just kind of gross me
> >> out--I am acrophobic and katsaridaphobic (fear of cockroaches) as well, I
> >> have my other personal weaknesses--and it's an inconvenience, especially
> >> this year when boys who have been out in 100+F temperatures come inside
> >> my house, and I find their odor repellent.
> >> >
> >> > And the company reserves the right not to let citizens protest on
> >> >
> >> > their private property and kick their asses out. And anybody who
> >> >
> >> > wants to challenge, disrespect, or cry foul about that fact of law is
> >> >
> >> > just going to look like a kook.
> >>
> >> Oh, I don't question the owner from prohibiting in on the property, and
> >> they certainly have a right to ask anyone to leave, and yes, it is kooky,
> >> Boston Tea Party kooky.
> >> >
> >> > ObFood: The side effect of this is that chicken prices just went up.
> >> >
> >> That's *not* why chicken prices are going up, and you know it, and you
> >> snipped my hot, lipstick ******* paragraph. Context, Steve, context.
> >> >
> >
> > People who were properly raised know there's a time and a place for
> > everything and it doesn't matter if they're hetero or ***.
>
> I rarely see *** men showing open acts of affection. I mean maybe twice in
> 20 years. *******s, maybe 4 times in 20 years. And I live in a college
> town with a lot of *** students - even an all women's college. Straight
> couples - gotta be 10 times a month I have to endure them having near hard
> core sex in public. Great big wet slurpy tongue kisses with loud lip
> smacking while waiting in lines, butt grabbing, breast fondling, crotch
> grabbing - you name it. Sometimes I wonder why they don't just lie on the
> conveyer and do it. I even stood next to a couple in a sandwich shop where
> the horny dude started to dry hump his GF when she bent over to put her bags
> down. They could not have cared less a dozen people were watching. I
> practically had to peel this freeky looking amorous couple off me in the
> market who got so engrossed in their open mouth kissing they started to lean
> onto me. I almost shouted GET OFF ME but they saw my angry face in time.
>
> And I doubt homophobes experiences are any different unless like the worst
> of them they hang out near gays. A lot of open homophobia is a guilty
> conscience from being so attracted to homosexuals.
>
> Paul

Actually I guess it depends which college town you're in. I've seen
plenty of *** and straight PDA's here in Providence, RI of all places.

The state is fairly progressive in that respect - we've had hate crimes
statutes, and Employment, Housing and Credit Non Discrimination Act
(EHCNDA)for LGB since 1996, T since 2001.

But we can't get marriage equality - the Catholic church in all their
****ing 'wisdom' sees to that.

In fact up until a couple years ago we didn't even have the right to
bury our same sex partners. We had to SHAME the legislature into passing
it with a mock funeral procession, casket, candle bearers, and all.

In article >, Sqwertz >
wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:49:44 -0700 (PDT), Bryan wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >> Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
> >
> > I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins outside
> > Chick-Fil-A stores.
>
> And they'll probably find that will probably backfire in their kissy
> faces. They'll probably find that heteros that support *** "rights"
> really don't want to see two guys getting hot and heavy in a
> restaurant. Or anywhere else.

Isn't that the point?


>
> And the company reserves the right not to let citizens protest on
> their private property and kick their asses out. And anybody who
> wants to challenge, disrespect, or cry foul about that fact of law is
> just going to look like a kook.

So a *** couple goes in and orders the food but before they pay they start
making out. The management gets upset and has to come out and ask them to leave.
They leave, they've upset other customers, they haven't paid and they've wasted
some managers time

Repeat as often as possible.



>
> ObFood: The side effect of this is that chicken prices just went up.
>
> -sw

On 8/2/2012 12:47 AM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:

> So a *** couple goes in and orders the food but before they pay they start
> making out. The management gets upset and has to come out and ask them to leave.
> They leave, they've upset other customers, they haven't paid and they've wasted
> some managers time
>
> Repeat as often as possible.

The Chik Fil A at the local mall is in the food court. I was
thinking of all different ways an orderly protest could really
gum up the works for the stand. Ten people at a time with only
one ordering the cheapest possible thing on the menu and taking
their time about it.

Anyway, I don't care about the guy's beliefs, he has a right to
think what he wants, but when he is financial supporting a cause
that makes me sick, I won't support him and I haven't been to
that chain in forever because of it.

I guess he's not big on WWJD. Like those people who didn't want
a black couple married in their church. Wow.

nancy

Nancy Young wrote:

> Anyway, I don't care about the guy's beliefs, he has a right to
> think what he wants, but when he is financial supporting a cause
> that makes me sick, I won't support him and I haven't been to
> that chain in forever because of it.

Well said.

Come to think of it, I've never eaten at one of their stores. I can't
remember the last time I even walked by one. They must all be malls.

On 8/2/2012 8:06 AM, George M. Middius wrote:
> Nancy Young wrote:
>
>> Anyway, I don't care about the guy's beliefs, he has a right to
>> think what he wants, but when he is financial supporting a cause
>> that makes me sick, I won't support him and I haven't been to
>> that chain in forever because of it.
>
> Well said.
>
> Come to think of it, I've never eaten at one of their stores. I can't
> remember the last time I even walked by one. They must all be malls.

They have restaurants here in Texas. I ate at one 9-10 yrs ago, then I
learned more about them, and I will never go back. I loved their waffle
fries, too.

Becca

In article > ,
says...
>
> On 8/2/2012 12:47 AM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
>
> > So a *** couple goes in and orders the food but before they pay they start
> > making out. The management gets upset and has to come out and ask them to leave.
> > They leave, they've upset other customers, they haven't paid and they've wasted
> > some managers time
> >
> > Repeat as often as possible.
>
> The Chik Fil A at the local mall is in the food court. I was
> thinking of all different ways an orderly protest could really
> gum up the works for the stand. Ten people at a time with only
> one ordering the cheapest possible thing on the menu and taking
> their time about it.
>
> Anyway, I don't care about the guy's beliefs, he has a right to
> think what he wants, but when he is financial supporting a cause
> that makes me sick, I won't support him and I haven't been to
> that chain in forever because of it.
>
> I guess he's not big on WWJD. Like those people who didn't want
> a black couple married in their church. Wow.
>
> nancy

Thank you! I have never eaten at a Chick-Fil-A as I've been aware of
their anti-*** sponsorships for some time.

And there's only one that's approximately 'near' me in Burlington, MA
which is 60 miles from where I live.

So there's no real reason to buy from them.

"T" > wrote in message
...
> In article > ,
> says...
>>
>> On 8/2/2012 12:47 AM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
>>
>> > So a *** couple goes in and orders the food but before they pay they
>> > start
>> > making out. The management gets upset and has to come out and ask them
>> > to leave.
>> > They leave, they've upset other customers, they haven't paid and
>> > they've wasted
>> > some managers time
>> >
>> > Repeat as often as possible.
>>
>> The Chik Fil A at the local mall is in the food court. I was
>> thinking of all different ways an orderly protest could really
>> gum up the works for the stand. Ten people at a time with only
>> one ordering the cheapest possible thing on the menu and taking
>> their time about it.
>>
>> Anyway, I don't care about the guy's beliefs, he has a right to
>> think what he wants, but when he is financial supporting a cause
>> that makes me sick, I won't support him and I haven't been to
>> that chain in forever because of it.
>>
>> I guess he's not big on WWJD. Like those people who didn't want
>> a black couple married in their church. Wow.
>>
>> nancy
>
> Thank you! I have never eaten at a Chick-Fil-A as I've been aware of
> their anti-*** sponsorships for some time.
>
> And there's only one that's approximately 'near' me in Burlington, MA
> which is 60 miles from where I live.
>
> So there's no real reason to buy from them.

It's just another fast food chain. I've never eaten at one either and
somehow my life is not deficient for it. If I never taste their products I
will have no regrets.

Paul

In article >, says...
>
> Nancy Young > wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I don't care about the guy's beliefs, he has a right to
> > think what he wants, but when he is financial supporting a cause
> > that makes me sick, I won't support him and I haven't been to
> > that chain in forever because of it.
>
>
>
> So what else is new?
>
> L.L, Bean and their Pro-life stance!

I wouldn't have such an issue with the Pro-lifers if they only would
answer the question -- what do you do once the baby is born?

And the war on contraception in this country is ludicrous.

> Bad shit happens all over the earth!

Yes, but a lot of bad shit happens because good people fail to act to
stop it.

> Like voting, it's simply a matter of opinion.
>
> That's my opinion and it's very true.
>
> Andy

"T" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, says...
>>
>> Nancy Young > wrote:
>>
>> > Anyway, I don't care about the guy's beliefs, he has a right to
>> > think what he wants, but when he is financial supporting a cause
>> > that makes me sick, I won't support him and I haven't been to
>> > that chain in forever because of it.
>>
>>
>>
>> So what else is new?
>>
>> L.L, Bean and their Pro-life stance!
>
> I wouldn't have such an issue with the Pro-lifers if they only would
> answer the question -- what do you do once the baby is born?

They do the christian thing of course, they support laws ending pre-natal
care, food stamps, schools, after school programs, school lunches, health
care, family medical leave from work, maternity leave from work etc. They
are all mouth about the sanctity of life but when it comes to paying for it,
those precious little babies can just go to hell.

> And the war on contraception in this country is ludicrous.

If men could get pregnant birth control access would be an inalienable
right.

>> Bad shit happens all over the earth!
>
> Yes, but a lot of bad shit happens because good people fail to act to
> stop it.
>
>> Like voting, it's simply a matter of opinion.

With pretty dire consequences.

Paul

Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
>

1. The Chicago alderman that started all this is just ****ed because
CFA wouldn't pay the customary bribe to get a permit. IMHO.
2. This has got to be one of the best advertising stunts ever!

--
Bob

zxcvbob wrote:

> 2. This has got to be one of the best advertising stunts ever!

Apparently so. Yesterday the company set a new one-day sales record.
Nothing help sales like good old-fashioned bigotry.