On Aug 2, 7:15*am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "sf" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:37:59 -0700 (PDT), Bryan
> > > wrote:
>
> >> On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 7:59:54 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:49:44 -0700 (PDT), Bryan wrote:
>
> >> > > On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:11:42 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> >> > >> Can end the entire controversy by changing the name to Chick Fil D.
>
> >> > > I like that some queer activists in Chicago are planning kiss-ins
> >> > > outside Chick-Fil-A stores.
>
> >> > And they'll probably find that will probably backfire in their kissy
>
> >> > faces. *They'll probably find that heteros that support *** "rights"
>
> >> > really don't want to see two guys getting hot and heavy in a
>
> >> > restaurant. *Or anywhere else.
>
> >> Oh, I don't think they have any business doing it in the restaurant, they
> >> should do it in the right of way in front of the free standing
> >> restaurants, and I wouldn't enjoy watching either, except that I would
> >> only experience mild aesthetic displeasure, while people whom I dearly
> >> hate would be feeling much worse. *I personally find two guys mouth
> >> kissing far more difficult to watch than if they were having graphic sex.
> >> As pro LGBT-rights as I am, I can't help my emotions. *It isn't because I
> >> think they're doing anything wrong, men's bodies just kind of gross me
> >> out--I am acrophobic and katsaridaphobic (fear of cockroaches) as well, I
> >> have my other personal weaknesses--and it's an inconvenience, especially
> >> this year when boys who have been out in 100+F temperatures come inside
> >> my house, and I find their odor repellent.
>
> >> > And the company reserves the right not to let citizens protest on
>
> >> > their private property and kick their asses out. *And anybody who
>
> >> > wants to challenge, disrespect, or cry foul about that fact of law is
>
> >> > just going to look like a kook.
>
> >> Oh, I don't question the owner from prohibiting in on the property, and
> >> they certainly have a right to ask anyone to leave, and yes, it is kooky,
> >> Boston Tea Party kooky.
>
> >> > ObFood: The side effect of this is that chicken prices just went up.
>
> >> That's *not* why chicken prices are going up, and you know it, and you
> >> snipped my hot, lipstick ******* paragraph. *Context, Steve, context..
>
> > People who were properly raised know there's a time and a place for
> > everything and it doesn't matter if they're hetero or ***.
>
> I rarely see *** men showing open acts of affection. *I mean maybe twice in
> 20 years. ********s, maybe 4 times in 20 years. *And I live in a college
> town with a lot of *** students - even an all women's college. *Straight
> couples - gotta be 10 times a month I have to endure them having near hard
> core sex in public. *Great big wet slurpy tongue kisses with loud lip
> smacking while waiting in lines, butt grabbing, breast fondling, crotch
> grabbing - you name it. *Sometimes I wonder why they don't just lie on the
> conveyer and do it. *I even stood next to a couple in a sandwich shop where
> the horny dude started to dry hump his GF when she bent over to put her bags
> down. *They could not have cared less a dozen people were watching. *I
> practically had to peel this freeky looking amorous couple off me in the
> market who got so engrossed in their open mouth kissing they started to lean
> onto me. *I almost shouted GET OFF ME but they saw my angry face in time.

Are you sure they weren't inviting you to participate? Are you in
pretty good shape? Good kisser?

>
> And I doubt homophobes experiences are any different unless like the worst
> of them they hang out near gays. *A lot of open homophobia is a guilty
> conscience from being so attracted to homosexuals.

Half the *** guys I have known have been the flamboyant campy type.
I'm not sure who finds them attractive. The other half have been
neither here nor there. I mean, unless you think Ben Stiller is hot,
the pickings are going to be slim.