On May 13, 1:41*pm, Nicky dsdsdsds > wrote:
You're scapegoating Jews. What else is new.
As for 911, the fingers point at who, I don't know, but many
architects and engineers say that aircraft could not have brought down
those buildings. Besides, #7 wasn't even hit by an aircraft.

On May 13, 4:33*pm, A Moose in Love >
wrote:
> On May 13, 1:41*pm, Nicky dsdsdsds > wrote:


> You're scapegoating Jews. *What else is new.
> As for 911, the fingers point at who, I don't know, but many
> architects and engineers say that aircraft could not have brought down
> those buildings. *Besides, #7 wasn't even hit by an aircraft.



I don't care who took out the towers or why, I only know that for
a while the New York skyline looked better without them. I'm an
Empire State Building guy. I don't like WTC people, they cramp my
style.

King Kong coulda taken out the WTC no problem, but he couldn't budge
the Empire State Building
TJ

On May 13, 7:28*pm, Tommy Joe > wrote:


> some crap about the wtc vs the esb


Kong coulda taken the WTC
But he couldn't take down the ESB
This new-school crap is not built to last
It falters quick, then crumbles fast

But the old-school brick of the ESB
Made it outlast the WTC
New crap comes then quickly goes
But the old school-stuff just grows and grows

Those who support the WTC
Are going to have to deal with me
Not just me, but a host of others
Who want the ESB to be number one (if we by God had our druthers)

TJ