Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat?
What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i know nothing ab out it, maybe you can talk more about it? Lee
"Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message eb.com... > What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? > What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? > > Bob > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Storrmmee" > wrote in message ... > i know nothing ab out it, maybe you can talk more about it? Lee > "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message > eb.com... >> What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? >> What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? >> >> Bob >> >> > I think of veal shanks. Not something I buy. I do buy lamb shanks occasionally (I should look for them) and make a different kind of stew ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/11/2011 3:45 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> > I think of veal shanks. Not something I buy. > > I do buy lamb shanks occasionally (I should look for them) and make a > different kind of stew ![]() > > That's what's on the menu for dinner tomorrow. I am doing lamb shanks braised in dark ale. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote in message m... > On 05/11/2011 3:45 PM, jmcquown wrote: >> > >> I think of veal shanks. Not something I buy. >> >> I do buy lamb shanks occasionally (I should look for them) and make a >> different kind of stew ![]() >> >> > > That's what's on the menu for dinner tomorrow. I am doing lamb shanks > braised in dark ale. > Sounds good to me! Next time I go to the meat market I'll look for lamb shanks. I love them! I haven't had them in a couple of years ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i never eat veal, my father and grandfather before him raised/raise cattle,
so i have the misfortune of knowing the legal definition of veal, so unless i know who abutchred it and all the particulars i can't eat it, Lee "jmcquown" > wrote in message ... > > "Storrmmee" > wrote in message > ... >> i know nothing ab out it, maybe you can talk more about it? Lee >> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message >> eb.com... >>> What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? >>> What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? >>> >>> Bob >>> >>> >> > I think of veal shanks. Not something I buy. > > I do buy lamb shanks occasionally (I should look for them) and make a > different kind of stew ![]() > > Jill > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Storrmmee" > wrote in message ... >i never eat veal, my father and grandfather before him raised/raise cattle, >so i have the misfortune of knowing the legal definition of veal, so unless >i know who abutchred it and all the particulars i can't eat it, Lee and exactly what do you think you know? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article om>, "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote:
>What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? >What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? Stew. Cheers, Phred. -- LID |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phred wrote:
>Terwilliger wrote: >>What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? >>What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? > >Stew. What used to be peasant stew. http://www.epicurious.com/recipes/fo...sso-Buco-11052 Braised breast of veal is a much better route/value. http://www.epicurious.com/recipes/fo...of-Veal-107600 Even better is one of my signature dishes: Teliatyna z Pidlyvoiu Iz Ikry (Braised Veal With Caviar Sauce) To serve 6 to 8 3 tablespoons of butter 1 cup of thinly sliced onions 1 carrot, scraped and cut into 1/2 inch rounds 4 sprigs of parsley 2 stalks of celery with their leaves, cut into 2-inch lengths 3 bay leaves 3 whole cloves 1 tablespoon of finely chopped lemon peel 3 tablespoons of vegetable oil 3 1/ 2 to 4-pounds of boneless veal, cut from either the leg or the rump and securely tied 1 cup of dry white wine (Sauvignon Blanc) Salt Freshly ground black pepper 2 teaspoons of potato starch dissolved in 2 tablespoons of cold water 2 tablespoons (1 ounce) black caviar 1/8 teaspoon of fresh lemon juice In a heavy 6-quart casserole, melt the butter over high heat. Add the onions, carrot, parsley, celery, bay leaves, cloves and lemon peel and cover the pan. Lower the heat and simmer for about 15 minutes, until the vegetables are soft but not brown. Set aside. Preheat the oven to 325° F. In a heavy 10- to 12-inch skillet, heat the 3 tablespoons of oil over high heat until a light haze forms above it. Add the veal and brown for 8 to 10 minutes, turning it every 2 or 3 minutes so that it browns evenly on all sides. Then place it on top of the vegetables in the casserole and pour in the wine. Bring to a boil over high heat, sprinkle the meat liberally with salt and a few grindings of black pepper and cover the casserole tightly. Braise in the center of the oven for 1 1/ 4 hours, turning the veal over after 45 minutes. When the veal is tender, transfer it to a heated platter, cut away the strings and carve the meat into 1/ 4 inch-thick slices. Arrange them, slightly overlapping, down the center of a large platter and cover the platter loosely with foil to keep the meat warm while you make the sauce. Quickly strain the entire contents of the casserole through a fine sieve into a bowl, pressing down hard on the vegetables with the back of a large spoon before discarding them. Skim off any surface fat and return the braised juices to the casserole. Stir in the dissolved potato starch. Then bring the sauce to a boil over high heat, stirring constantly until it is lightly thickened and smooth. Reduce the heat to low and gently stir in the caviar and lemon juice and taste for seasoning. Pour in the sauce over the veal and serve at once, or if you prefer, serve the sauce separately. =•••= |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message eb.com... > What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? > What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? > > Bob > I don't understand why there is any question here. Veal shank, braise, risotto Milanese. It is pretty standard stuff (and fantastic). |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pico Rico" > wrote in message ... > > "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message > eb.com... >> What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? >> What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? >> >> Bob >> > > I don't understand why there is any question here. Veal shank, braise, > risotto Milanese. It is pretty standard stuff (and fantastic). The term has been corrupted and is now sneaking into common usage to mean any tough chunk of meat on a bone, braised. I have seen pork shank osso buco, lamb shank osso buco, no beef yet although it will come, it will come. A chef friend attributes this change in usage to the increased expense of good veal, which has priced the dish off of many restaurants, and the apparent willingness of the Great Public to swallow (literally, in this case) a fraud-turned-common practice. pavane |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "pavane" > wrote in message ... > > "Pico Rico" > wrote in message > ... >> >> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message >> eb.com... >>> What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? >>> What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? >>> >>> Bob >>> >> >> I don't understand why there is any question here. Veal shank, braise, >> risotto Milanese. It is pretty standard stuff (and fantastic). > > The term has been corrupted and is now sneaking into common > usage to mean any tough chunk of meat on a bone, braised. > I have seen pork shank osso buco, lamb shank osso buco, > no beef yet although it will come, it will come. A chef friend > attributes this change in usage to the increased expense of > good veal, which has priced the dish off of many restaurants, > and the apparent willingness of the Great Public to swallow > (literally, in this case) a fraud-turned-common practice. > I have seen braised lamb shank listed as such. thanks for the info. this happens more and more - it may have started with people calling a certain dish cooked with beef "Shepherd's Pie". |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 6:37*am, "pavane" > wrote:
> > > I don't understand why there is any question here. *Veal shank, braise, > > risotto Milanese. *It is pretty standard stuff (and fantastic). > > The term has been corrupted and is now sneaking into common > usage to mean any tough chunk of meat on a bone, braised. > I have seen pork shank osso buco, lamb shank osso buco, > no beef yet although it will come, it will come. *A chef friend > attributes this change in usage to the increased expense of > good veal, which has priced the dish off of many restaurants, > and the apparent willingness of the Great Public to swallow > (literally, in this case) a fraud-turned-common practice. I think fraud is a pretty harsh term. To me it is a methodology and an outline for a classic dish. If you don't have veal I see nothing wrong with using lamb or pork or anything else. Here's my recipe, and I've made it with all the above and it's wonderful. http://www.hizzoners.com/southern-co...252-osso-bucco |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 10:33*am, ImStillMags > wrote:
> I think fraud is a pretty harsh term. * *To me it is a methodology and > an outline for a classic dish. *If you don't have veal I see nothing > wrong with using lamb or pork or anything else. Spoken like a former restaurant owner. The classic dish is made with veal shank. If you make it with lamb it can be delicious and it can be "in the style of" but it's not osso buco and you shouldn't call it that on your menu. Ymmv, but I think names should mean something. - aem |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "aem" > wrote in message ... On Nov 4, 10:33 am, ImStillMags > wrote: > I think fraud is a pretty harsh term. To me it is a methodology and > an outline for a classic dish. If you don't have veal I see nothing > wrong with using lamb or pork or anything else. Spoken like a former restaurant owner. The classic dish is made with veal shank. If you make it with lamb it can be delicious and it can be "in the style of" but it's not osso buco and you shouldn't call it that on your menu. Ymmv, but I think names should mean something. - aem +1 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:37:27 -0400, "pavane" >
wrote: > A chef friend > attributes this change in usage to the increased expense of > good veal, which has priced the dish off of many restaurants, > and the apparent willingness of the Great Public to swallow > (literally, in this case) a fraud-turned-common practice. If the sauce tastes good, people don't care. What about schnitzel? It's not strictly veal anymore. They make it out of pork too. Same idea. -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:37:27 -0400, "pavane" > > wrote: > >> A chef friend >> attributes this change in usage to the increased expense of >> good veal, which has priced the dish off of many restaurants, >> and the apparent willingness of the Great Public to swallow >> (literally, in this case) a fraud-turned-common practice. > > If the sauce tastes good, people don't care. What about schnitzel? > It's not strictly veal anymore. They make it out of pork too. Same > idea. yes, but if they call it veiner schnitzel, they are lying. If it is not veal, call it braised lamb shanks, etc. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
pavane wrote:
>>> What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? >>> What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? >> >> I don't understand why there is any question here. Veal shank, braise, >> risotto Milanese. It is pretty standard stuff (and fantastic). > > The term has been corrupted and is now sneaking into common > usage to mean any tough chunk of meat on a bone, braised. > I have seen pork shank osso buco, lamb shank osso buco, > no beef yet although it will come, it will come. A chef friend > attributes this change in usage to the increased expense of > good veal, which has priced the dish off of many restaurants, > and the apparent willingness of the Great Public to swallow > (literally, in this case) a fraud-turned-common practice. That's why I brought it up here. I've eaten beef shanks braised into what was called osso buco, and found myself loving it (even *more* than had the dish been made with veal). I've also seen braised lamb shanks called "osso buco" and served with polenta. My question about accompaniments stems from a discussion I had with Giusi elsewhere; she stated that she didn't believe risotto *should* be paired with osso buco. (Presumably, this is because risotto is a "primi" dish and osso buco a "segundi" dish.) She went on to state that polenta was a traditional accompaniment to that Roman dish osso buco. (She later retracted the assertion that osso buco is Roman rather than Milanese.) So if non-veal meats are not allowed to be called "osso buco", are you then forced to use a long description of the dish you're making or eating, e.g., "tied lamb shank braised with wine, garnished with mint-lemon-garlic gremolata" rather than "lamb osso buco"? Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:38:14 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote: > So if non-veal meats are not allowed to be called "osso buco", are you then > forced to use a long description of the dish you're making or eating, e.g., > "tied lamb shank braised with wine, garnished with mint-lemon-garlic > gremolata" rather than "lamb osso buco"? I'm just a peasant when it comes to these things, but lamb osso buco is enough for me. I know it's not the "real thing" and I know what they're substituting. They could say "lamb braised in the style of osso buco" but that's too stilted. -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio > My question about accompaniments stems from a discussion I had with Giusi > elsewhere; she stated that she didn't believe risotto *should* be paired > with osso buco. I said I do not ever LIKE risotto WITH things, but love it before things. If you want to argue with me in a venue away from where we werr talking, at least quote me and don't paraphrase incorrectly. >(Presumably, this is because risotto is a "primi" dish and > osso buco a "segundi" dish.) She went on to state that polenta was a > traditional accompaniment to that Roman dish osso buco. (She later > retracted > the assertion that osso buco is Roman rather than Milanese.) Again the paraphrasing. It's prino, not primi and secondo not segundi. I never saidf polenta belonged with any version of osso buco, I was promoting braised short ribs or braised pork with polenta as an ideal fall meal. Bob, this is very unattractive of you. We were calmly discussing a menu elsewhere and suddenly you want to carry the discussion here. What you really want is to have a fight that I already conceded to you in a place where you can arrange the fight as you like. It won't change that the osso buco I am served here is a very different dish from the real thing or that I don't like it. It won't change that I politely posted a link to a site showing how a Milanese chef makes osso buco. It won't ever change that I am up front and honest in an exchange and you are not. I'm ashamed of you. You are being a bully. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Giusi wrote:
>> My question about accompaniments stems from a discussion I had with Giusi >> elsewhere; she stated that she didn't believe risotto *should* be paired >> with osso buco. > > I said I do not ever LIKE risotto WITH things, but love it before things. > If you want to argue with me in a venue away from where we werr talking, > at least quote me and don't paraphrase incorrectly. So you agree that you don't believe risotto should be paired WITH osso buco? Therefore what I wrote was true, and you're just trying to start a fight where no fight existed? > Bob, this is very unattractive of you. We were calmly discussing a menu > elsewhere and suddenly you want to carry the discussion here. What you > really want is to have a fight that I already conceded to you in a place > where you can arrange the fight as you like. Giusi, this is very irrational of you. We were discussing the meaning of "osso buco" in a thread where the OP wanted dinner ideas but had not decided on anything concrete. Our discussion had wandered far afield of what she wanted to talk about. There was no "fight" in anything I wrote. I quoted Wikipedia while acknowledging that it is not a completely reliable source of information. Did you think THAT was some kind of fight? You also seem to be upset that I asked a cooking-related question of this group inspired by the discussion on RFC Facebook. And since you seem so keen for me to quote you, your comments about Usenet RFC were, "Bob, you are nuts. You very aggressively carried this to RFC whedn I said I wouldn't. So whatever.... take a poll of that bunch of yahoos". Of course, if I had said that YOU were nuts, the moderators would have kicked me right out of the forum, but YOU can get away with that kind of thing. What the HELL was aggressive about posting here? > It won't change that the osso buco I am served here is a very different > dish from the real thing or that I don't like it. It won't change that I > politely posted a link to a site showing how a Milanese chef makes osso > buco. You posted that link AFTER I'd opened the discussion here. I asked if we could move the discussion to RFC and waited.... After about 30 minutes, I posted my question here, thinking you were waiting for me to post. You got upset at my posting, and replied two hours after my initial request. How long do you think I should have waited in the face of your non-response? > It won't ever change that I am up front and honest in an exchange and you > are not. I'm ashamed of you. You are being a bully. In what was was I not "up front and honest"? You are being a drama queen playing the victim. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you could do what i do write inspired somewhere in the recipe title and you
are covered, purists know its not traditional, others have a snes of what it will taste like, Lee "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message b.com... > pavane wrote: > >>>> What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of >>>> meat? >>>> What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? >>> >>> I don't understand why there is any question here. Veal shank, braise, >>> risotto Milanese. It is pretty standard stuff (and fantastic). >> >> The term has been corrupted and is now sneaking into common >> usage to mean any tough chunk of meat on a bone, braised. >> I have seen pork shank osso buco, lamb shank osso buco, >> no beef yet although it will come, it will come. A chef friend >> attributes this change in usage to the increased expense of >> good veal, which has priced the dish off of many restaurants, >> and the apparent willingness of the Great Public to swallow >> (literally, in this case) a fraud-turned-common practice. > > That's why I brought it up here. I've eaten beef shanks braised into what > was called osso buco, and found myself loving it (even *more* than had the > dish been made with veal). I've also seen braised lamb shanks called "osso > buco" and served with polenta. > > My question about accompaniments stems from a discussion I had with Giusi > elsewhere; she stated that she didn't believe risotto *should* be paired > with osso buco. (Presumably, this is because risotto is a "primi" dish and > osso buco a "segundi" dish.) She went on to state that polenta was a > traditional accompaniment to that Roman dish osso buco. (She later > retracted > the assertion that osso buco is Roman rather than Milanese.) > > So if non-veal meats are not allowed to be called "osso buco", are you > then > forced to use a long description of the dish you're making or eating, > e.g., > "tied lamb shank braised with wine, garnished with mint-lemon-garlic > gremolata" rather than "lamb osso buco"? > > Bob > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 03:08:53 -0600, "Storrmmee"
> wrote: > you could do what i do write inspired somewhere in the recipe title and you > are covered, purists know its not traditional, others have a snes of what it > will taste like, Lee We never see veal osso buco, we only see osso bucco, so I don't see what's so hard to figure out about "lamb osso buco". We know it's lamb and We know it was cooked osso buco style. That said, I haven't ever seen lamb osso buco on a menu. -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:38:14 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote: > So if non-veal meats are not allowed to be called "osso buco", are you then > forced to use a long description of the dish you're making or eating, e.g., > "tied lamb shank braised with wine, garnished with mint-lemon-garlic > gremolata" rather than "lamb osso buco"? We do both on a menu. We'd say "lamb osso buco" and then put the description below it. -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> (She later retracted the assertion that osso buco is Roman > rather than Milanese.) Wrong point of view: ossibuchi (plural of osso buco, since in italy we call it plural) is both roman and nmilanese. And bolognese, and pugliese, and emiliano, and many many more areas of Italy since all of these areas have their versione of ossibuchi. Here in Emilia we don't use gremolada but add tomato preserve and peas, in southern italy they also add tomato and some spices, etcetere. I'd like to test the roman version since I don't know it and I'm sure they have one, and probably a hearthy one, because ossibuchi is definitely part of the Italian Cuisine. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 6:37*am, "pavane" > wrote:
> "Pico Rico" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message > web.com... > >> What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? > >> What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? > > >> Bob > > > I don't understand why there is any question here. *Veal shank, braise, > > risotto Milanese. *It is pretty standard stuff (and fantastic). > > The term has been corrupted and is now sneaking into common > usage to mean any tough chunk of meat on a bone, braised. > I have seen pork shank osso buco, lamb shank osso buco, > no beef yet although it will come, it will come. *A chef friend > attributes this change in usage to the increased expense of > good veal, which has priced the dish off of many restaurants, > and the apparent willingness of the Great Public to swallow > (literally, in this case) a fraud-turned-common practice. > Veal has always been expensive, so I can't picture a sudden trend. The trouble with non veal osso buco is the seasoning would have to change to suit pork or lamb, making the dishes quite different.Veal is about the blandest of hoofed meats. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 06:16:52 -0700, "Pico Rico" > wrote:
>I don't understand why there is any question here. Veal shank, braise, >risotto Milanese. It is pretty standard stuff (and fantastic). Yes. Perfect. And maybe sauteed asparagus with it. Lamb shank is a delicious variation, but then it's no longer osso buco. -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:04:49 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: > I will see how it works out. $13 + for three shanks, You either got small lamb shanks or your cost is less than mine. I figure $13/14 for two of them and then I pass. -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Del Rosso" > wrote in message ... > > wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 06:16:52 -0700, "Pico Rico" >> > wrote: >> >> > I don't understand why there is any question here. Veal shank, >> > braise, risotto Milanese. It is pretty standard stuff (and >> > fantastic). >> >> Yes. Perfect. And maybe sauteed asparagus with it. >> >> Lamb shank is a delicious variation, but then it's no longer osso >> buco. > > Well, it is still a bone with a hole in it, which is what osso buco means. > I don't think they'd be that picky in Italy. When it comes to food, Italians are very picky. When I was visiting my relatives, they wouldn't order a particular dish because if you want that you have it when you are in Milano, because that is where they do it right. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pico Rico wrote: > > When it comes to food, Italians are very picky. When I was visiting > my relatives, they wouldn't order a particular dish because if you > want that you have it when you are in Milano, because that is where > they do it right. That means they have a preference for one version of the dish, but it kind of proves the point that variations exist. -- Reply in group, but if emailing add one more zero, and remove the last word. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pico Rico" > wrote in message
> "Bob Terwilliger" > wrote in message > eb.com... >> What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of >> meat? What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of >> accompaniment? >> Bob >> > > I don't understand why there is any question here. Veal shank, > braise, risotto Milanese. It is pretty standard stuff (and > fantastic). What he said. But don't forget the gremolata. Felice |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pico Rico wrote:
> > I don't understand why there is any question here. Veal shank, braise, > risotto Milanese. It is pretty standard stuff (and fantastic). I've seen the dish served with various starches. Rice as a risotto, rice with a simpler sauce, mashed potato. When making it ourselves we don't always get veal. Sometimes it's from a grown up cow. Technically not Osso Buco but just as good. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? The city of Milano, home of one of the most renowned recipes for ossibuchi. > What kind of meat? Veal. > What cooking method? Stewing. > What kind of sauce? No tomato and peas (that'd be no more milanese, it would be *italian*), just butter, EVO oil, broth, white wine, onion, a very little of concentrated tomato paste and "gremolada", which is a mix of a lot of finely grated lemon zest mixed with parsley and de-salted salted anchovies. > What kind of accompaniment? For the milanese ossibuchi, risotto alla milanese wihout or with very little cheese. My evrsion differs from the milanese since I add peas, as almost all of Italy does, and I sometimes avoid both the lemon zest and the anchovies. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 7:45*am, "ViLco" > wrote:
> Bob Terwilliger wrote: > > What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? > > The city of Milano, home of one of the most renowned recipes for ossibuchi. > > > What kind of meat? > > Veal. > > > What cooking method? > > Stewing. In the US I see mostly slices of shank, not the whole thing. And when I make it using whole shanks, I use a heavy roasting pan in the oven. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 5:50*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote: > What springs to mind whensomeone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? > What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? > > Bob As far as the meat goes, I think osso buco refers to veal shanks. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 4:50*am, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote: > What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? > What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? > > Bob When I think of Osso Buco I am thinking of one of my most favorite dishes. Veal shanks, braised with red wine, Risotto or some times I will make it with mashed potatoes or Israeli couscous. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 5, 5:53*am, rosie > wrote:
> On Nov 4, 4:50*am, "Bob Terwilliger" > > wrote: > > > What springs to mind when someone mentions osso buco? What kind of meat? > > What cooking method? What kind of sauce? What kind of accompaniment? > > > Bob > > When I think of Osso Buco I am thinking of one of my most favorite > dishes. Veal shanks, braised *with red wine, Risotto or some times I > will make it with mashed potatoes or Israeli couscous. I hate risotto, btw: so little reward for so much effort, IMHO. So I would probably make polenta. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
spamtrap1888 > wrote:
> I hate risotto, btw: so little reward for so much effort, IMHO. You are probably being fed false information about how much effort it is. Steve |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Osso Buco | Recipes (moderated) | |||
The kind of posts we (ok, I am) are missing now: Osso buco | General Cooking | |||
Appetizer and Dessert to serve with Osso Buco & Risotto Milanese? | General Cooking | |||
Osso Bucco | General Cooking |