Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article <635d7e61-1f6b-4703-9349-
>, says... > > On Nov 9, 2:01*pm, "........" > wrote: > > Dear Everyone, <garbage snipped> Gee, thanks, Chemo, just what I always wanted, a repeat of a trolling post. I really wish that all of you ****ING IDIOTS who for some reason repost other people's uninteresting and annoying posts without adding anything of your own would go play in the minefield. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 06:19:26 -0500, "J. Clarke"
> wrote: > In article <635d7e61-1f6b-4703-9349- > >, says... > > > > On Nov 9, 2:01*pm, "........" > wrote: > > > Dear Everyone, > <garbage snipped> > > Gee, thanks, Chemo, just what I always wanted, a repeat of a trolling > post. > > I really wish that all of you ****ING IDIOTS who for some reason repost > other people's uninteresting and annoying posts without adding anything > of your own would go play in the minefield. > I thought the phrase was "go play with your trucks in the street". In any case, my filters are set so I don't see that garbage until somebody legitimate replies. I have no idea why I didn't see that one initially because the subject didn't have any of the key words I filter. It was probably stripped by the ISP. I wonder if any news reader has the ability to create white lists? I'm at the point where the crap a troll (that I have filtered) posts is reposted by a seemingly legitimate poster - so I see it anyway. There are a limited number of posters I want to read, so creating a list of what I want to see instead of a list a mile long of what I don't want to see might work better for me these days. -- Never trust a dog to watch your food. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|