Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Picked up 8# of chicken backs/necks and am making stock.
I didn't remove the lumps of fat, figuring I"ll peel it off when it cools. Does the fat add anything to the stock, or would have been better served removing it beforehand? - Mike |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Michael Horowitz > wrote: > Picked up 8# of chicken backs/necks and am making stock. > I didn't remove the lumps of fat, figuring I"ll peel it off when it > cools. > > Does the fat add anything to the stock, or would have been better > served removing it beforehand? - Mike It's kinda pointless to leave it on for stock imho. I remove it. -- Peace! Om Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet> Only Irish coffee provides in a single glass all four essential food groups: alcohol, caffeine, sugar and fat. --Alex Levine |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am one of those people that thinks fat always adds flavor to everything. If it didn't, the French wouldn't cook almost everything in duck fat.
![]() As long as you don't mind skimming the fat off the top of your stock, I think it's a good idea to include it in the process. Artistic Taste |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 May 2010 18:33:29 -0500, Omelet >
wrote: >In article >, > Michael Horowitz > wrote: > >> Picked up 8# of chicken backs/necks and am making stock. >> I didn't remove the lumps of fat, figuring I"ll peel it off when it >> cools. >> >> Does the fat add anything to the stock, or would have been better >> served removing it beforehand? - Mike > >It's kinda pointless to leave it on for stock imho. >I remove it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 May 2010 18:33:29 -0500, Omelet >
wrote: >In article >, > Michael Horowitz > wrote: > >> Picked up 8# of chicken backs/necks and am making stock. >> I didn't remove the lumps of fat, figuring I"ll peel it off when it >> cools. >> >> Does the fat add anything to the stock, or would have been better >> served removing it beforehand? - Mike > >It's kinda pointless to leave it on for stock imho. >I remove it. When making stock the fat adds lots of flavor, especially poultry... the fat floating atop acts to maintain a lower simmer and also helps seal in the flavornoids. It's simple enough to remove the fat after the stock is done. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > > When making stock the fat adds lots of flavor, especially poultry... > the fat floating atop acts to maintain a lower simmer and also helps > seal in the flavornoids. *It's simple enough to remove the fat after > the stock is done. i refrigerate the stock and then remove the fat after it has hardened up. much easier to do than trying to scoop it out of the pot while warm. harriet & critters in warm & sunny socal. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "critters & me in azusa, ca" > wrote in message ... > >> >> When making stock the fat adds lots of flavor, especially poultry... >> the fat floating atop acts to maintain a lower simmer and also helps >> seal in the flavornoids. It's simple enough to remove the fat after >> the stock is done. > > > i refrigerate the stock and then remove the fat after it has hardened > up. much easier to do than trying to scoop it out of the pot while > warm. Same here! -- -- https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "brooklyn1" > wrote in message ... > On Sat, 08 May 2010 18:33:29 -0500, Omelet > > wrote: > >>In article >, >> Michael Horowitz > wrote: >> >>> Picked up 8# of chicken backs/necks and am making stock. >>> I didn't remove the lumps of fat, figuring I"ll peel it off when it >>> cools. >>> >>> Does the fat add anything to the stock, or would have been better >>> served removing it beforehand? - Mike >> >>It's kinda pointless to leave it on for stock imho. >>I remove it. > > When making stock the fat adds lots of flavor, especially poultry... > the fat floating atop acts to maintain a lower simmer and also helps > seal in the flavornoids. It's simple enough to remove the fat after > the stock is done. Never heard of flavournoids but I always removed the fat when the stock is cold. -- -- https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 May 2010 08:02:25 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote: > > >"brooklyn1" > wrote in message .. . >> On Sat, 08 May 2010 18:33:29 -0500, Omelet > >> wrote: >> >>>In article >, >>> Michael Horowitz > wrote: >>> >>>> Picked up 8# of chicken backs/necks and am making stock. >>>> I didn't remove the lumps of fat, figuring I"ll peel it off when it >>>> cools. >>>> >>>> Does the fat add anything to the stock, or would have been better >>>> served removing it beforehand? - Mike >>> >>>It's kinda pointless to leave it on for stock imho. >>>I remove it. >> >> When making stock the fat adds lots of flavor, especially poultry... >> the fat floating atop acts to maintain a lower simmer and also helps >> seal in the flavornoids. It's simple enough to remove the fat after >> the stock is done. > >Never heard of flavournoids Can you access a dictionary? >but I always removed the fat when the stock is cold. "After" can mean at any time upon completion... you need more than a dictionary. I find it easier to remove floating fat while a soup/stew is still cooking... raise the heat and the fat will collect at the pot sides... do you own a ladle? Often I don't want to wait till the next day to continue with a dish, and even if I do I will still skim off as much fat as possible before refrigerating. When I make stock I'm not going to bother for some piddling quantity, my regular stock pot is 18 quarts... it's not going into the fridge because it won't fit unless I start removing shelves plus it's too much weight all in one spot, I separate it into 2-3 smaller containers, cools faster too. I save skimmed fat in my freezer in a cardboard juice container, then come winter it feeds birds... skimmed fat really has no culinary use.... fat skimmed from cooking liquid contains much of the impurities one would otherwise remove by clarifying, plus that fat texture is just wrong for culinary use... you can feed it to a dog mixed with their dried food, I don't have a dog so it feeds wild wintering birds. Of course tenants typically just toss fat down the drain, it's not their plumbing after all. I always explain to my tenants that drain clogs; grease, hair, toys, tampons, etc. are their plumbing bill responsibility... as is pumping the septic tank. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "brooklyn1" > wrote in message ... >>Never heard of flavournoids > > Can you access a dictionary? Certainly, but that does not negate the fact that I have never heard of it. >>but I always removed the fat when the stock is cold. > > "After" can mean at any time upon completion... you need more than a > dictionary. Why? Because you can't understand that I prefer to remove the fat WHEN the stock is cold? > I find it easier to remove floating fat while a soup/stew is > still cooking... raise the heat and the fat will collect at the > pot sides... do you own a ladle? Indeed I do, and it is not unusual for me to remove floating fat while the soup/stew is still cooking. Making broth/stock is different. Often I don't want to wait till the > next day to continue with a dish, and even if I do I will still skim > off as much fat as possible before refrigerating. When I make stock > I'm not going to bother for some piddling quantity, my regular stock > pot is 18 quarts... it's not going into the fridge because it won't > fit unless I start removing shelves plus it's too much weight all in > one spot, I separate it into 2-3 smaller containers, cools faster too. Good for you, but please don't think you are original! > I save skimmed fat in my freezer in a cardboard juice container, then > come winter it feeds birds... skimmed fat really has no culinary > use.... fat skimmed from cooking liquid contains much of the > impurities one would otherwise remove by clarifying, plus that fat > texture is just wrong for culinary use... you can feed it to a dog > mixed with their dried food, I don't have a dog so it feeds wild > wintering birds. Of course tenants typically just toss fat down the > drain, it's not their plumbing after all. I always explain to my > tenants that drain clogs; grease, hair, toys, tampons, etc. are their > plumbing bill responsibility... as is pumping the septic tank. Since I am neither a tennant, nor do I toss it down the drain, I bow to your experience. -- -- https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 May 2010 10:49:12 -0400, brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2010 08:02:25 +0100, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > >> >> >>"brooklyn1" > wrote in message . .. >>> >>> When making stock the fat adds lots of flavor, especially poultry... >>> the fat floating atop acts to maintain a lower simmer and also helps >>> seal in the flavornoids. It's simple enough to remove the fat after >>> the stock is done. >> >>Never heard of flavournoids > > Can you access a dictionary? what kind of dictionary do you have, farm-boy? webster's never heard of 'flavornoids.' maybe Your Eminince meant 'flavonoids.' blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "blake murphy" > wrote in message .. . > On Sun, 09 May 2010 10:49:12 -0400, brooklyn1 wrote: > >> On Sun, 9 May 2010 08:02:25 +0100, "Ophelia" > >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>"brooklyn1" > wrote in message ... >>>> >>>> When making stock the fat adds lots of flavor, especially poultry... >>>> the fat floating atop acts to maintain a lower simmer and also helps >>>> seal in the flavornoids. It's simple enough to remove the fat after >>>> the stock is done. >>> >>>Never heard of flavournoids >> >> Can you access a dictionary? > > what kind of dictionary do you have, farm-boy? webster's never heard of > 'flavornoids.' > > maybe Your Eminince meant 'flavonoids.' Ahh yes, this I do know. Perhaps his was a typo? Thanks, blake. -- -- https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
blake wrote:
>>>> When making stock the fat adds lots of flavor, especially poultry... >>>> the fat floating atop acts to maintain a lower simmer and also helps >>>> seal in the flavornoids. It's simple enough to remove the fat after >>>> the stock is done. >>> >>>Never heard of flavournoids >> >> Can you access a dictionary? > > what kind of dictionary do you have, farm-boy? webster's never heard of > 'flavornoids.' > > maybe Your Eminince meant 'flavonoids.' Clueless AOL newbie Sheldon "Pussy" Katz is crowing, "Made you look!" The word "flavonoids" doesn't have anything to do with flavor. I used it some years ago when I was jerking a troll around, and Pussy must have gotten the term lodged in his head, where the voices told him it meant something other than what it really means. It's actually a kind of plant pigment. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.f...63d59044ed71e2 Bob |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chicken stock | General Cooking | |||
The best chicken stock ever | General Cooking | |||
Chicken stock? | General Cooking | |||
WAY too much chicken stock | General Cooking | |||
Chicken stock and stock pots | Cooking Equipment |