with lipstick!

Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.

jay

On Sep 4, 7:36*am, jay > wrote:
> with lipstick!
>
> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>
> jay

=================================
This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
Lynn in Fargo
afraid, very afraid . . .

Lynn from Fargo wrote:
> On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
>> with lipstick!
>>
>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>
>> jay
>
> =================================
> This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
> Lynn in Fargo
> afraid, very afraid . . .

Did that then googled Muslim.

OMG very scary!

jay

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay wrote:

> with lipstick!
>
> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>
> jay

Caribou Barbie is a pit bull? i don't think so. well, maybe compared to
that feeble old man.

your pal,
blake

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:17:11 -0500, jay wrote:

> Lynn from Fargo wrote:
>> On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
>>> with lipstick!
>>>
>>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>>
>>> jay
>>
>> =================================
>> This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
>> Lynn in Fargo
>> afraid, very afraid . . .
>
> Did that then googled Muslim.
>
> OMG very scary!
>
> jay

gosh, i didn't know palin was a muslim.

your pal,
blake

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay wrote:
>
>> with lipstick!
>>
>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>
>> jay
>
> Caribou Barbie is a pit bull? i don't think so. well, maybe compared to
> that feeble old man.


A Stephanie Miller fan. OK, you aren't completely bad.

Paul

On Sep 4, 7:36*am, jay > wrote:
> with lipstick!
>
> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>
> jay

Keep the political crap out of this newsgroup, please! It shows up in
plenty of other places.

N.

"jay" > wrote in message
...
> Lynn from Fargo wrote:
>> On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
>>> with lipstick!
>>>
>>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>>
>>> jay
>>
>> =================================
>> This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
>> Lynn in Fargo
>> afraid, very afraid . . .
>
> Did that then googled Muslim.
>
> OMG very scary!
>
> jay

Jesus. Another complete moron. And it isn't even a full moon.

"Lynn from Fargo" > wrote in message
...
On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
> with lipstick!
>
> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>
> jay

=================================
This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
Lynn in Fargo
afraid, very afraid . . .

Be not afraid - the beauty of this country is simple. Always remember we are
not electing a Dictator nor an Emperor, nor a King. No matter how good or
bad we have a chance every 2, 4, & 6 years to virtually change our
government.

Dimitri

blake murphy > wrote in
:

> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:17:11 -0500, jay wrote:
>
>> Lynn from Fargo wrote:
>>> On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
>>>> with lipstick!
>>>>
>>>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>>>
>>>> jay
>>>
>>> =================================
>>> This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
>>> Lynn in Fargo
>>> afraid, very afraid . . .
>>
>> Did that then googled Muslim.
>>
>> OMG very scary!
>
> gosh, i didn't know palin was a muslim.

a dominionist muslim?


lee

--
Last night while sitting in my chair
I pinged a host that wasn't there
It wasn't there again today
The host resolved to NSA.

Dimitri wrote:

> "Lynn from Fargo" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
> > with lipstick!
> >
> > Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
> >
> > jay
>
> =================================
> This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
> Lynn in Fargo
> afraid, very afraid . . .
>
> Be not afraid - the beauty of this country is simple. Always remember we
are
> not electing a Dictator nor an Emperor, nor a King. No matter how good or
> bad we have a chance every 2, 4, & 6 years to virtually change our
> government.


Yep, *exactly*...and you have to deal with the results - for better or worse
considering yer politcal stance - and then move on...some people are still
crying about so - and - so not winning whatever election. That's not real
productive...

[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be the
only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *is* fascism,
donchyaknow...it's very scary...!!! ]


--
Best
Greg

Nancy2 wrote:
> On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
>> with lipstick!
>>
>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>
>> jay
>
> Keep the political crap out of this newsgroup, please! It shows up in
> plenty of other places.
>
> N.

Only a few here can cook or discuss it so whats wrong with some
political crap on the menu? ..and even you chimed in.

lol

On Sep 4, 2:27 pm, jay > wrote:
> Nancy2 wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
> >> with lipstick!
>
> >> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>
> >> jay
>
> > Keep the political crap out of this newsgroup, please! It shows up in
> > plenty of other places.
>
> > N.
>
> Only a few here can cook or discuss it so whats wrong with some
> political crap on the menu? ..and even you chimed in.
>
> lol

But at least my post had "WOT" in front of the topic, which is more
than the OP can say. ;-)

And you can speak for yourself in the cooking area - most of the
regulars can cook and can discuss it. Can you?

N.

cybercat wrote:
> "jay" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Lynn from Fargo wrote:
>>> On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
>>>> with lipstick!
>>>>
>>>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>>>
>>>> jay
>>> =================================
>>> This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
>>> Lynn in Fargo
>>> afraid, very afraid . . .
>> Did that then googled Muslim.
>>
>> OMG very scary!
>>
>> jay
>
> Jesus. Another complete moron. And it isn't even a full moon.
>
>

You and yours are for sure the stupidest most vile things ever to show
up here. A *complete* moron would be an improvement in your case.

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay > wrote:

>Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.

Why would she even THINK about taking a pay cut?

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:

>[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be the
>only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
>permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
>dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *


I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.

You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

<sf> wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> > wrote:
>
> >[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be
the
> >only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
> >permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
> >dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *
>
>
> I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
>


I see that kind of thinking *every* single day...


> You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
> boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.


I'm not a "scared" *anything*...


--
Best
Greg

On Sep 4, 11:02�pm, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:
> <sf> wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> > > wrote:
>
> > >[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be
> the
> > >only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
> > >permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
> > >dictatorships. �But then current US liberalism *
>
> > I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
>
> I see that kind of thinking *every* single day...
>
> > You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
> > boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.
>
> I'm not a "scared" *anything*...


Yoose better be a "scared" of Barach *Steve Erkel* _Hussein_ Obama...
be very a "scared" of that mooslim muh'****er in sheep's clothing.

Sheldon wrote:

On Sep 4, 11:02?pm, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:
> <sf> wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> > > wrote:
>
> > >[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be
> the
> > >only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
> > >permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
> > >dictatorships. ?But then current US liberalism *
>
> > I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
>
> I see that kind of thinking *every* single day...
>
> > You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
> > boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.
>
> I'm not a "scared" *anything*...


Yoose better be a "scared" of Barach *Steve Erkel* _Hussein_ Obama...
be very a "scared" of that mooslim muh'****er in sheep's clothing.
----------------

GM replies:

Well, seeing that he is a *total* product of the extremely corrupt Illannoy
political machine I'd advise folks to watch their wallets at the *very*
least...

If you want the *real* inside poop - ola on some of his sleazy tactics
google "Obama/Milt Rosenberg/WGN radio"...you'll be shocked!


--
Best
Greg

<sf> wrote in message ...
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> > wrote:
>
>>[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be the
>>only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
>>permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
>>dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *
>
>
> I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
>
> You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
> boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.
>
Greg is both stupid and cowardly.

cybercat wrote:

> <sf> wrote in message ...
> > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be
the
> >>only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
> >>permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
> >>dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *
> >
> >
> > I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
> >
> > You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
> > boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.
> >
> Greg is both stupid and cowardly.


Now there's an intellectual statement, lol...

Did you get passed on to the seventh grade this year or are you still
wearing last year's dunce cap...???


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

"sf" wrote in message ...

<snip>



> You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
> boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.
>
>
> --
> I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the
> number of carats in a diamond.
>
> Mae Wes

I think you must remember "Kill a Commie for Christ week".

Dimitri

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:04:08 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay wrote:
>>
>>> with lipstick!
>>>
>>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>>
>>> jay
>>
>> Caribou Barbie is a pit bull? i don't think so. well, maybe compared to
>> that feeble old man.
>
>
> A Stephanie Miller fan. OK, you aren't completely bad.
>
> Paul

did i steal that from her? i thought it was some anonymous net wag.

<googles> o.k. i don't know if she's on the air in d.c. or not.

yourpal,
blake

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:48:15 -0700, Dimitri wrote:

> "Lynn from Fargo" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
>> with lipstick!
>>
>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>
>> jay
>
> =================================
> This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
> Lynn in Fargo
> afraid, very afraid . . .
>
> Be not afraid - the beauty of this country is simple. Always remember we are
> not electing a Dictator nor an Emperor, nor a King. No matter how good or
> bad we have a chance every 2, 4, & 6 years to virtually change our
> government.
>
> Dimitri

....and if we don't this time, i might have to throw up my hands.

your pal,
blake

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:45:45 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
> > wrote:
>
>>[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be the
>>only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
>>permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
>>dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *
>
>
> I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
>
> You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
> boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.

i hope he knows that it's bullshit...but he just might be that stupid.

yourpal,
blake

On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:24:26 -0400, Billy wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay > wrote:
>
>>Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>
> Why would she even THINK about taking a pay cut?

she certainly has more influence now than she would as v.p.

your pal,
blake

>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should
>>>be the only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps
>>>should only be permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole
>>>USSR or other dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *
>>

I think there should be a "MCINL" category on the ballot, for sure!


--
Saerah

"Welcome to Usenet, Biatch! Adapt or haul ass!"
- some hillbilly from FL

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
. ..
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:45:45 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be
>>>the
>>>only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
>>>permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
>>>dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *
>>
>>
>> I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
>>
>> You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
>> boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.
>
> i hope he knows that it's bullshit...but he just might be that stupid.
>
He's that stupid, depressing as it is that anyone could be.

"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:48:15 -0700, Dimitri wrote:
>
>> "Lynn from Fargo" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> On Sep 4, 7:36 am, jay > wrote:
>>> with lipstick!
>>>
>>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>>
>>> jay
>>
>> =================================
>> This broad is scary! Google "dominionism"
>> Lynn in Fargo
>> afraid, very afraid . . .
>>
>> Be not afraid - the beauty of this country is simple. Always remember we
>> are
>> not electing a Dictator nor an Emperor, nor a King. No matter how good or
>> bad we have a chance every 2, 4, & 6 years to virtually change our
>> government.
>>
>> Dimitri
>
> ...and if we don't this time, i might have to throw up my hands.
>
> your pal,
> blake

NO!!! PLEASE........not that!!!

In article >,
blake murphy > wrote:

> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:24:26 -0400, Billy wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay > wrote:
> >
> >>Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
> >
> > Why would she even THINK about taking a pay cut?
>
> she certainly has more influence now than she would as v.p.

If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.

The reason for Palin's retreat is obvious. She was poorly vetted.
McCain's campaign staff are stuck with her so the best they could do in
this sort period of time is to send her back to Alaska in the hopes that
she won't open her mouth in public and give us even more evidence that
she's a lying hypocrite with ideas that are totally out of step with
moderate and independent voters who McCain needs to woe over.

While Palin is back to Alaska, I hope she finds the time in her busy
life to return that $230 million she says she turned down for that
bridge to nowhere, but still hasn't returned to us American taxpayers.
And maybe when she resumes her work as Alaska's governor, she can
actually get Alaskan's off the public teat rather then supporting
lobbying efforts in Washington that cause Alaska to be the top ranked
state in receiving federal earmarks, based per capita.

On Sep 6, 8:13�am, Stan Horwitz > wrote:
> In article >,
> �blake murphy > wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:24:26 -0400, Billy wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay > wrote:
>
> > >>Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>
> > > Why would she even THINK about taking a pay cut?
>
> > she certainly has more influence now than she would as v.p.
>
> If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
> convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
> Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
> would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
> with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
> hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.
>
> The reason for Palin's retreat is obvious. She was poorly vetted.
> McCain's campaign staff are stuck with her so the best they could do in
> this sort period of time is to send her back to Alaska in the hopes that
> she won't open her mouth in public and give us even more evidence that
> she's a lying hypocrite with ideas that are totally out of step with
> moderate and independent voters who McCain needs to woe over.
>
> While Palin is back to Alaska, I hope she finds the time in her busy
> life to return that $230 million she says she turned down for that
> bridge to nowhere, but still hasn't returned to us American taxpayers.
> And maybe when she resumes her work as Alaska's governor, she can
> actually get Alaskan's off the public teat rather then supporting
> lobbying efforts in Washington that cause Alaska to be the top ranked
> state in receiving federal earmarks, based per capita.

Wow... what a vivid imagination.
Such ridiculous ASSumptions.

blake murphy wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:04:08 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
> > "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay wrote:
> >>
> >>> with lipstick!
> >>>
> >>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
> >>>
> >>> jay
> >>
> >> Caribou Barbie is a pit bull? i don't think so. well, maybe compared
to
> >> that feeble old man.
> >
> >
> > A Stephanie Miller fan. OK, you aren't completely bad.
> >
> > Paul
>
> did i steal that from her? i thought it was some anonymous net wag.
>
> <googles> o.k. i don't know if she's on the air in d.c. or not.
>


I had you pegged as the Dr. Laura Schlessinger type, blake...


--
Best
Greg

Stan Horwitz wrote:
> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:24:26 -0400, Billy wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.

Obama is a Trojan horse. What is really inside is the real mystery and
will be the big surprise. His ties are closer to the east than the west.

jay

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:05:32 -0500, Hairy wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> .. .
>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:48:15 -0700, Dimitri wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Be not afraid - the beauty of this country is simple. Always remember we
>>> are
>>> not electing a Dictator nor an Emperor, nor a King. No matter how good or
>>> bad we have a chance every 2, 4, & 6 years to virtually change our
>>> government.
>>>
>>> Dimitri
>>
>> ...and if we don't this time, i might have to throw up my hands.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
> NO!!! PLEASE........not that!!!

if you think you would enjoy four more years of bush, knock yourself out.
most rational people would not.

blake

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:12:44 -0400, cybercat wrote:

> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:45:45 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:03:32 -0500, "Gregory Morrow"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>[The way some some of these liberal Dems think is that Obama should be
>>>>the
>>>>only candidate on the Presidential ballot and that peeps should only be
>>>>permitted to vote "yes" or "no"...kinda like the 'ole USSR or other
>>>>dictatorships. But then current US liberalism *
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know how you came up with that line of thought, Greg.
>>>
>>> You're sounding like a scared conservative right now - looking for the
>>> boogeyman under your bed and in your closet.
>>
>> i hope he knows that it's bullshit...but he just might be that stupid.
>>
> He's that stupid, depressing as it is that anyone could be.

republicans have to get their cadres from somewhere.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:13:38 -0400, Stan Horwitz wrote:

> In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:24:26 -0400, Billy wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>>>
>>> Why would she even THINK about taking a pay cut?
>>
>> she certainly has more influence now than she would as v.p.
>
> If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
> convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
> Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
> would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
> with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
> hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.
>

i guess they have to sharpen up her teeth.

your pal,
blake

On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 05:33:00 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon wrote:

> On Sep 6, 8:13�am, Stan Horwitz > wrote:
>> In article >,
>> �blake murphy > wrote:
>>
<snip>
>>
>> While Palin is back to Alaska, I hope she finds the time in her busy
>> life to return that $230 million she says she turned down for that
>> bridge to nowhere, but still hasn't returned to us American taxpayers.
>> And maybe when she resumes her work as Alaska's governor, she can
>> actually get Alaskan's off the public teat rather then supporting
>> lobbying efforts in Washington that cause Alaska to be the top ranked
>> state in receiving federal earmarks, based per capita.
>
> Wow... what a vivid imagination.
> Such ridiculous ASSumptions.

stan is most certainly right about this. she was 100% behind the bridge to
nowhere until it turned out the alaskans would have to pay for some of it.
in any case, alaska got *all* the money in that appropriation, it just
wasn't used for the bridge. this has been debunked extensively, but that
doesn't deter republicans from lying about it. she also hired a lobbyist
when she was mayor of wasilla to help pry pork from uncle sugar.

as to *per capita* expenditures, here's a chart:

<http://www.slate.com/id/2199382/>

more on her pork love he

<http://www.slate.com/id/2199357/?wpisrc=newsletter>

not that i expect facts to sway you; you're too proud of your ignorance.
but other people might take note.

blake

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:49:52 -0500, jay wrote:

> Stan Horwitz wrote:
>> In article >,
>> blake murphy > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:24:26 -0400, Billy wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:36:50 -0500, jay > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Obama should have picked Oprah for VP.
>
> Obama is a Trojan horse. What is really inside is the real mystery and
> will be the big surprise. His ties are closer to the east than the west.
>
> jay

this is complete nonsense, and all but fools know it. he's written two
books and spent the last year explaining who he is.

even if it was true, i would choose it over the wonders of bush iii.

blake

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:20:51 GMT, blake murphy
>> Obama is a Trojan horse. What is really inside is the real mystery and
>> will be the big surprise. His ties are closer to the east than the west.
>>
>> jay
>
>this is complete nonsense, and all but fools know it. he's written two
>books and spent the last year explaining who he is.
>
>even if it was true, i would choose it over the wonders of bush iii.
>
>blake

Well Blake he wrote two autobio's by the time he was 45. Most men wait
until they are in their 60s +, when they have something to talk about.
Both of Obana's book did not sell very well until he started to run
for president, after 140 days in the senate. Less face it, Obama an
empty suit.

You keep trying to say that he has experience.
I have asked before, what law did he introduce and get passed?

"Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message
>
> If Palin is such a pit bull, then why did she return to Alaska after the
> convention instead of going out on the campaign trail with McCain?
> Normally at this stage of a presidential campaign, the VP on the ticket
> would be out on the stump trail giving speeches and doing interviews
> with the news media, on talk shows, etc. but this VP candidate made a
> hasty retreat back to her home state. Some pit bull that is.

So since her campaign stump does not meet your idea of the correct schedule
she is no good? Geez Stan, you have to stop obsessing about stuff that you
have no control over, have no information about and does not affect your
life. Speculation of some stuff is just plain silly.