I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of years,
and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing level.
(Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)

Has there been an announcement?

gloria p

Puester said...

>
> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of years,
> and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing level.
> (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>
> Has there been an announcement?
>
> gloria p


EXTRA!!! EXTRA!!!

RACHAEL RAY FULL OF SELF!

EXTRA!!!



Andy

On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:40:46 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\" Lonergan"
> wrote:

>Andy <q> :
>
>> Puester said...
>>
>>>
>>> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of years,
>>> and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing level.
>>> (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>>>
>>> Has there been an announcement?
>>>
>>> gloria p
>>
>>
>> EXTRA!!! EXTRA!!!
>>
>> RACHAEL RAY FULL OF SELF!
>>
>> EXTRA!!!
>
>It's her new money pouch. Forbes reported her income at around $6 million
>dollars in either '05 or '06. Can't remember which year.
>
>Michael

That's nothing. Oprah earns that much before she take a pee in the
morning.

Boron

"Michael "Dog3" Lonergan" > wrote

> Boron Elgar >
> :
>
>> That's nothing. Oprah earns that much before she take a pee in the
>> morning.

> That's a given. It amazes me though how RR manages to pull that much loot
> in one given year. IMO she is like one of those dolls you pull the string
> on and it yaps, yaps, yaps. *sigh* I guess that's what her followers want.

I was surprised she didn't make more, considering all her books and
shows and cookware, etc. Not that it's chump change, don't get me
wrong, just that she has so many irons in the fire.

nancy

Nancy Young wrote:
> "Michael "Dog3" Lonergan" > wrote
>
>> Boron Elgar >
>> :
>>
>>> That's nothing. Oprah earns that much before she take a pee in the
>>> morning.
>
>> That's a given. It amazes me though how RR manages to pull that much loot
>> in one given year. IMO she is like one of those dolls you pull the string
>> on and it yaps, yaps, yaps. *sigh* I guess that's what her followers want.
>
> I was surprised she didn't make more, considering all her books and
> shows and cookware, etc. Not that it's chump change, don't get me
> wrong, just that she has so many irons in the fire.

What's unknown is just how many of those irons are her own and how many
belong to the money grubbers who pimp her out then take their cut first.

"Pennyaline" > wrote

> Nancy Young wrote:

>> I was surprised she didn't make more, considering all her books and
>> shows and cookware, etc. Not that it's chump change, don't get me
>> wrong, just that she has so many irons in the fire.
>
> What's unknown is just how many of those irons are her own and how many
> belong to the money grubbers who pimp her out then take their cut first.

She's a big girl, she decides what to sign ... and her husband is a lawyer.
Whatever she agreed to, people deserve their cut.

nancy

On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:00:39 GMT, Steve Wertz
> wrote:

>On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:06:12 -0400, Nancy Young wrote:
>
>> I was surprised she didn't make more, considering all her books and
>> shows and cookware, etc.
>
>Rachel Ray books are surpassed in quantity only by Jeff Smith's
>at the used bookstores and Thrift Stores.

I've seen a few. They're useless. So is she.

Lou

On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:00:27 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\" Lonergan"
> wrote:

>Boron Elgar >
:
>
>> That's nothing. Oprah earns that much before she take a pee in the
>> morning.
>>
>> Boron
>
>That's a given. It amazes me though how RR manages to pull that much loot
>in one given year. IMO she is like one of those dolls you pull the string
>on and it yaps, yaps, yaps. *sigh* I guess that's what her followers want.
>
>Michael

I must concur. I have never been a fan. Not only do I think her 30
minute meals are mundane, but if I had someone do all the mis en place
at my house, I'd get a lot more meals finished in 30 minutes, too.

boron

Boron Elgar wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:00:27 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\" Lonergan"
> > wrote:
>
>> Boron Elgar >
>> :
>>
>
> I must concur. I have never been a fan. Not only do I think her 30
> minute meals are mundane, but if I had someone do all the mis en place
> at my house, I'd get a lot more meals finished in 30 minutes, too.
>
> boron

Isn't that a true statement!?!

kili

Boron Elgar wrote:


> I must concur. I have never been a fan. Not only do I think her 30
> minute meals are mundane, but if I had someone do all the mis en place
> at my house, I'd get a lot more meals finished in 30 minutes, too.

I've watched the show, I've never seen any prepared stuff other than
what comes in that fashion as purchased.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:21:38 -0400, Boron Elgar
> wrote:

>On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 06:00:27 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\" Lonergan"
> wrote:

>>That's a given. It amazes me though how RR manages to pull that much loot
>>in one given year. IMO she is like one of those dolls you pull the string
>>on and it yaps, yaps, yaps. *sigh* I guess that's what her followers want.
>>
>>Michael
>
>I must concur. I have never been a fan.

Well, I AM a RR fan. She's not appointment television at my house, so
that might be why. I don't mind being around "talkers", because it
means I don't have to talk so much - therefore her chatting doesn't
bother me. As far as her show is concerned, the producers don't want
dead air time so "chat" is part of the package.

>Not only do I think her 30 minute meals are mundane,

Every single meal she makes doesn't appeal to me either, but I like
her and I like how she makes meals down right simple. Even Sandra Lee
isn't horrible in that sense. Both have some good ideas although I
haven't used a single recipe from either show. (I take that back....
when I recipe search FN, I use RR recipes from time to time)

I guess the reason why I like their premise is because for too many
years I actually cooked the way many people here pretend they cook
now. Everything was fresh, from scratch and too damn complicated.
I'm looking at simplifying my life (eliminate the "complicated") and
their shows were on the cutting edge of it. Giadia is on board with
the concept too. She seems to have a higher level of fuss to her
recipes, but if you ever try one, you'll realize it's not fussy at
all.

>but if I had someone do all the mis en place at my house,
>I'd get a lot more meals finished in 30 minutes, too.

RR often talks about preparing this or that item as soon as you get
home from shopping, so you won't have to prepare it before you start
making your meal.

Pay attention!

LOL

"Plan Ahead" is the main idea she's trying to impart to the masses.


--
See return address to reply by email

Puester wrote:
>
> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of years,
> and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing level.
> (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>
> Has there been an announcement?

Rachael's been pretty thick in the middle for a while now. She's getting
hefty arms, too and just appears chunkier in general. She looks
absolutely dreadful in some of the clothes she wears on that talk show
of hers.

And someone PLEASE help that girl get her shoulders down! She's shielded
up to around her ears by them. She looks like someone's about to come at
her with a bludgeon!

<I am not!>

Puester wrote:
> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of years,
> and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing level.
> (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>
> Has there been an announcement?
>
> gloria p

She and her husband have separated after, what, maybe, 8 LONG months of
marriage due to his infidelities. I think she's just getting chunky.

kili

On Apr 14, 6:39 pm, "kilikini" > wrote:
> Puester wrote:
> > I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of years,
> > and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing level.
> > (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>
> > Has there been an announcement?
>
> > gloria p
>
> She and her husband have separated after, what, maybe, 8 LONG months of
> marriage due to his infidelities. I think she's just getting chunky.

Good for RR; that guy was a freak. Do you know where I can find out
more about their split?

Kyle wrote:
> On Apr 14, 6:39 pm, "kilikini" > wrote:
>> Puester wrote:
>>> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of
>>> years, and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing
>>> level. (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>>
>>> Has there been an announcement?
>>
>>> gloria p
>>
>> She and her husband have separated after, what, maybe, 8 LONG months
>> of marriage due to his infidelities. I think she's just getting
>> chunky.
>
> Good for RR; that guy was a freak. Do you know where I can find out
> more about their split?

I read about it in a past issue of the Enquirer, so it may or may not be
true. (FYI, my MIL brings the magazines over - I just read them in the
bathroom!) :~)

kili

"kilikini" > wrote in message
...
> Puester wrote:
> > I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of years,
> > and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing level.
> > (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
> >
> > Has there been an announcement?
> >
> > gloria p
>
> She and her husband have separated after, what, maybe, 8 LONG months of
> marriage due to his infidelities. I think she's just getting chunky.
>

Her husband was snacking between meals?

Paul

Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "kilikini" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Puester wrote:
>>> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of
>>> years, and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing
>>> level. (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>>>
>>> Has there been an announcement?
>>>
>>> gloria p
>>
>> She and her husband have separated after, what, maybe, 8 LONG months
>> of marriage due to his infidelities. I think she's just getting
>> chunky.
>>
>
> Her husband was snacking between meals?
>
> Paul

Yes, on his spit-lathen wenches' toes. <shudder>

kili

On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 23:25:42 -0500, "kilikini"
> wrote:

>Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "kilikini" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Puester wrote:
>>>> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of
>>>> years, and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing
>>>> level. (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>>>>
>>>> Has there been an announcement?
>>>>
>>>> gloria p
>>>
>>> She and her husband have separated after, what, maybe, 8 LONG months
>>> of marriage due to his infidelities. I think she's just getting
>>> chunky.
>>>
>>
>> Her husband was snacking between meals?
>>
>> Paul
>
>Yes, on his spit-lathen wenches' toes. <shudder>
>

ICK!

1. Whatta jerk.

2. How could she *not* know the real "him"? Didn't they go together
practically "forever" before they married? It was no whirlwind
romance.


--
See return address to reply by email

On Apr 14, 11:04 pm, sf wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 23:25:42 -0500, "kilikini"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >Paul M. Cook wrote:
> >> "kilikini" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >>> Puester wrote:
> >>>> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of
> >>>> years, and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing
> >>>> level. (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>
> >>>> Has there been an announcement?
>
> >>>> gloria p
>
> >>> She and her husband have separated after, what, maybe, 8 LONG months
> >>> of marriage due to his infidelities. I think she's just getting
> >>> chunky.
>
> >> Her husband was snacking between meals?
>
> >> Paul
>
> >Yes, on his spit-lathen wenches' toes. <shudder>
>
> ICK!
>
> 1. Whatta jerk.
>
> 2. How could she *not* know the real "him"? Didn't they go together
> practically "forever" before they married? It was no whirlwind
> romance.
>
> --
> See return address to reply by email- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I'm inclined to believe she didn't know the real him; that he kept
that aspect of his personality to himself (and to the women he paid to
spit on himself and otherwise abuse him_; and that RR was genuinely
freaked out when the whole thing came out. Bizarre as the story was,
I've heard of husbands & wives successfully hiding stranger stuff from
their spouses for longer.

Michael "Dog3" Lonergan said...

> I have done no research on the subject and I'm really not interested in
> RR's marital woes.


Amen!

Andy

On Apr 15, 1:14 am, "Michael \"Dog3\" Lonergan"
> wrote:
> :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 23:25:42 -0500, "kilikini"
> > > wrote:
>
> >>Paul M. Cook wrote:
> >>> "kilikini" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>>> Puester wrote:
> >>>>> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of
> >>>>> years, and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing
> >>>>> level. (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>
> >>>>> Has there been an announcement?
>
> >>>>> gloria p
>
> >>>> She and her husband have separated after, what, maybe, 8 LONG months
> >>>> of marriage due to his infidelities. I think she's just getting
> >>>> chunky.
>
> >>> Her husband was snacking between meals?
>
> >>> Paul
>
> >>Yes, on his spit-lathen wenches' toes. <shudder>
>
> > ICK!
>
> > 1. Whatta jerk.
>
> > 2. How could she *not* know the real "him"? Didn't they go together
> > practically "forever" before they married? It was no whirlwind
> > romance.
>
> I have done no research on the subject and I'm really not interested in
> RR's marital woes. I did read something about the husband's alleged fetish
> on another ng. I *think* the post was quoting an excerpt from The National
> Enquirer. If it came from The National Enquirer it HAS to be the truth...
> Right? <huge eyeroll>

You can't dismiss the whole thing that easily. The Enquirer also
published photographs of the woman (a ******* prostitute) who is the
main source for the story -- WITH Ray's husband. The Rays didn't
challenge her allegations (in fact, I think they admitted they were
heading straight for marital therapy); and now, apparently, they're
breaking up. All things considered, the story is probably true.