On Apr 15, 1:14 am, "Michael \"Dog3\" Lonergan"
> wrote:
> :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 23:25:42 -0500, "kilikini"
> > > wrote:
>
> >>Paul M. Cook wrote:
> >>> "kilikini" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>>> Puester wrote:
> >>>>> I saw RR briefly this morning for the first time in a couple of
> >>>>> years, and she looked pregnant to me, at the just-barely-showing
> >>>>> level. (Or maybe she just ate a TicTac before the taping.)
>
> >>>>> Has there been an announcement?
>
> >>>>> gloria p
>
> >>>> She and her husband have separated after, what, maybe, 8 LONG months
> >>>> of marriage due to his infidelities. I think she's just getting
> >>>> chunky.
>
> >>> Her husband was snacking between meals?
>
> >>> Paul
>
> >>Yes, on his spit-lathen wenches' toes. <shudder>
>
> > ICK!
>
> > 1. Whatta jerk.
>
> > 2. How could she *not* know the real "him"? Didn't they go together
> > practically "forever" before they married? It was no whirlwind
> > romance.
>
> I have done no research on the subject and I'm really not interested in
> RR's marital woes. I did read something about the husband's alleged fetish
> on another ng. I *think* the post was quoting an excerpt from The National
> Enquirer. If it came from The National Enquirer it HAS to be the truth...
> Right? <huge eyeroll>

You can't dismiss the whole thing that easily. The Enquirer also
published photographs of the woman (a ******* prostitute) who is the
main source for the story -- WITH Ray's husband. The Rays didn't
challenge her allegations (in fact, I think they admitted they were
heading straight for marital therapy); and now, apparently, they're
breaking up. All things considered, the story is probably true.