On 2006-10-09, melissa > wrote:

> thank you (minus the people that criticized my punctuation). I'm sorry

Forget the apologies. Other than leaving out a little info, you did
nothing to apologize for. Screw the grammar police and other twits.
They pile on all the time. Come back any time.

nb

writes:
>On 2006-10-09, melissa > wrote:
>
>> thank you (minus the people that criticized my punctuation). I'm sorry
>
>Forget the apologies. Other than leaving out a little info, you did
>nothing to apologize for. Screw the grammar police and other twits.
>They pile on all the time. Come back any time.

whatever you do don't mention that you had sex, esp. with your spouse!
that's simply intolerable

tert in seattle wrote:

> whatever you do don't mention that you had sex, esp. with your spouse!
> that's simply intolerable
>
hardly intolerable.. just unnecessary to the discussion and sort of out
of place.

In article >, goomba38
@comcast.net says...
> tert in seattle wrote:
>
> > whatever you do don't mention that you had sex, esp. with your spouse!
> > that's simply intolerable
> >
> hardly intolerable.. just unnecessary to the discussion and sort of out
> of place.


Are you kidding me? This is Usenet, not your living room. I'd say that
a hefty percentage of posts in any given newsgroup thread are
"unnecessary to the discussion" and "sort of out of place."

You know, like when someone starts bitching about some sex comment,
instead of offering some on-topic suggestions to the person who
originally asked the question. My contribution was beef paillard. What
was yours?

Peri