Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Cooking Equipment (rec.food.equipment) Discussion of food-related equipment. Includes items used in food preparation and storage, including major and minor appliances, gadgets and utensils, infrastructure, and food- and recipe-related software. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anyone used this cookware sold on shopathome network?
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't used it, but their presentation really annoyed me. The "chef" they
use on the program held up an All-Clad pan cut in half to show how thin it was next to a cross section of his cookware. Then he had the audacity to mention it was clad up the sides, but said he hadn't the foggiest as to why they did that, and inferred it a was a useless thing to do! Cute! << Has anyone used this cookware sold on shopathome network? >> |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sheellah" > wrote in message ... > I haven't used it, but their presentation really annoyed me. The "chef" they > use on the program held up an All-Clad pan cut in half to show how thin it was > next to a cross section of his cookware. Then he had the audacity to mention it > was clad up the sides, but said he hadn't the foggiest as to why they did that, > and inferred it a was a useless thing to do! Cute! > So what is the advantage of clad sides to a pot? I honestly don't know. Fred The Good Gourmet http://www.thegoodgourmet.com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article > , "Fred"
> wrote: > So what is the advantage of clad sides to a pot? I honestly don't know. > > Fred > The Good Gourmet > http://www.thegoodgourmet.com I discovered something interesting - I sometimes boil a single serving of ramen noodles with frozen vegetables in a small 1 qt pot. Usually, if I do not pay attention, they will boil over in a garden variety pot I use. I found that in the small All Clad, they did not boil over as easily (or at all, depending on heat applied). The main reason is that heat was also being applied from the sides and that caused the pattern of boiled liquid to change. The rolling boil was directed inwards (instead of outwards), which minimised boil over. This was not something I expected, but I am pleased with the result. I have tons of pots that mainly only have a sandwich bottom (WMF, SUS etc). I have no major complaints, and cannot justify buying any more pots but based on the above experience, would consider buying bigger All Clad pots. Interestingly, Bridge in the Well Tooled Kitchen says that you can have food scorching at the junction between a sandwich bottom and the sides of the pot (because the stainless sides do not conduct as well) and states this as one of the reasons for preferring a copper/aluminium core extending up the sides. I have never had a scorching problem at junctions over many years of use of my sandwich bottom pots. Roland |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Food isn't one dimensional, and has sides as well as the part contacting the
pan bottom. Whether the food is touching the sides of a saute pan or skillet, or just close to it, better heat conduction up the sides will help cook the food evenly from all sides. In a saucepan or stockpot, there is usually, depending on the fill level, as much food in contact with the sides of the pan as the bottom. You want that bottom heat to radiate up the sides in order to cook evenly. It needs those clad sides to do so. << > So what is the advantage of clad sides to a pot? I honestly don't know. > > Fred > The Good Gourmet >> |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Sheellah > wrote: > ><< > So what is the advantage of clad sides to a pot? I honestly don't know. >> >Food isn't one dimensional, and has sides as well as the part contacting the >pan bottom. Whether the food is touching the sides of a saute pan or skillet, >or just close to it, better heat conduction up the sides will help cook the >food evenly from all sides. In a saucepan or stockpot, there is usually, >depending on the fill level, as much food in contact with the sides of the pan >as the bottom. You want that bottom heat to radiate up the sides in order to >cook evenly. It needs those clad sides to do so. Actually, when on a gas stove, you want that clading to keep the sides from overheating as the hot gases flow out and around the sides heating them. This causes food to scorch on the sides of thin pans when cooking on gas (but not electric) burners. Chuck Demas -- Eat Healthy | _ _ | Nothing would be done at all, Stay Fit | @ @ | If a man waited to do it so well, Die Anyway | v | That no one could find fault with it. | \___/ | http://world.std.com/~cpd |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Demas" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > Sheellah > wrote: > > > ><< > So what is the advantage of clad sides to a pot? I honestly don't know. > >> > >Food isn't one dimensional, and has sides as well as the part contacting the > >pan bottom. Whether the food is touching the sides of a saute pan or skillet, > >or just close to it, better heat conduction up the sides will help cook the > >food evenly from all sides. In a saucepan or stockpot, there is usually, > >depending on the fill level, as much food in contact with the sides of the pan > >as the bottom. You want that bottom heat to radiate up the sides in order to > >cook evenly. It needs those clad sides to do so. > > Actually, when on a gas stove, you want that clading to keep the > sides from overheating as the hot gases flow out and around the sides > heating them. This causes food to scorch on the sides of thin > pans when cooking on gas (but not electric) burners. > After reading all the benefits of clad sides on cookware I have come to the conclusion that I am an exceptionally lucky person. I say that with great surprise because I never win anything nor am I ever in the right place at the right time. I wasn't born into wealth. I don't have any exceptional physical abilities. I seem to be rather average in most respects But, for some unexplained reason, I can cook with disk bottomed cookware without experiencing any of the negative outcomes one would expect from using cookware without clad sides. It's a miracle - really, and all this on a gas range. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Vox Humana > wrote: > >"Charles Demas" > wrote in message ... >> In article >, >> Sheellah > wrote: >> > >> ><< > So what is the advantage of clad sides to a pot? I honestly don't >know. >> >> >> >Food isn't one dimensional, and has sides as well as the part contacting >the >> >pan bottom. Whether the food is touching the sides of a saute pan or >skillet, >> >or just close to it, better heat conduction up the sides will help cook >the >> >food evenly from all sides. In a saucepan or stockpot, there is usually, >> >depending on the fill level, as much food in contact with the sides of >the pan >> >as the bottom. You want that bottom heat to radiate up the sides in order >to >> >cook evenly. It needs those clad sides to do so. >> >> Actually, when on a gas stove, you want that clading to keep the >> sides from overheating as the hot gases flow out and around the sides >> heating them. This causes food to scorch on the sides of thin >> pans when cooking on gas (but not electric) burners. >> > >After reading all the benefits of clad sides on cookware I have come to the >conclusion that I am an exceptionally lucky person. I say that with great >surprise because I never win anything nor am I ever in the right place at >the right time. I wasn't born into wealth. I don't have any exceptional >physical abilities. I seem to be rather average in most respects But, for >some unexplained reason, I can cook with disk bottomed cookware without >experiencing any of the negative outcomes one would expect from using >cookware without clad sides. It's a miracle - really, and all this on a gas >range. Indeed you are lucky, or perhaps I'm impatient and cook with too high a flame. Chuck Demas -- Eat Healthy | _ _ | Nothing would be done at all, Stay Fit | @ @ | If a man waited to do it so well, Die Anyway | v | That no one could find fault with it. | \___/ | http://world.std.com/~cpd |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sheellah" > wrote in message ... > Food isn't one dimensional, and has sides as well as the part contacting the > pan bottom. Whether the food is touching the sides of a saute pan or skillet, > or just close to it, better heat conduction up the sides will help cook the > food evenly from all sides. In a saucepan or stockpot, there is usually, > depending on the fill level, as much food in contact with the sides of the pan > as the bottom. You want that bottom heat to radiate up the sides in order to > cook evenly. It needs those clad sides to do so. > > << > So what is the advantage of clad sides to a pot? I honestly don't know. > > > > Fred > > The Good Gourmet >> > > > I'm not sure I buy that argument. If the argument were that clad sides will heat the food faster, I think I'd agree. But I don't see the logic in clad sides heating more evenly. Even heating is an issue at the bottom of the pot where the heat is applied. I don't think it's an issue on the sides - at least I can't get to it logically. Fred The Good Gourmet http://www.thegoodgourmet.com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Doe" > wrote in message ... > In article > , "Fred" > > wrote: > > > So what is the advantage of clad sides to a pot? I honestly don't know. > > > > Fred > > The Good Gourmet > > http://www.thegoodgourmet.com > > > I discovered something interesting - I sometimes boil a single serving of > ramen noodles with frozen vegetables in a small 1 qt pot. Usually, if I > do not pay attention, they will boil over in a garden variety pot I use. > I found that in the small All Clad, they did not boil over as easily (or > at all, depending on heat applied). The main reason is that heat was also > being applied from the sides and that caused the pattern of boiled liquid > to change. The rolling boil was directed inwards (instead of outwards), > which minimised boil over. This was not something I expected, but I am > pleased with the result. > > I have tons of pots that mainly only have a sandwich bottom (WMF, SUS > etc). I have no major complaints, and cannot justify buying any more > pots but based on the above experience, would consider buying bigger All > Clad pots. > > Interestingly, Bridge in the Well Tooled Kitchen says that you can have > food scorching at the junction between a sandwich bottom and the sides of > the pot (because the stainless sides do not conduct as well) and states > this as one of the reasons for preferring a copper/aluminium core > extending up the sides. I have never had a scorching problem at junctions > over many years of use of my sandwich bottom pots. > > Roland I'll accept the first part of your response, not only because it is logical, but because it stems from your experience. I'm not sure it's terribly important, but I do see the point. The second part about scorching at the junctions leaves me wondering if that would only be a problem if one were to apply more gas than is necessary so the flame went up the sides. I've tested about every kind of cookware available and I do have some distinct preferences. Often, though, those preferences have little to do with performance. I find I can cook almost anything effectively in any cookware. Not as pleasantly, not as quickly, not as slowly, not with as little attention etc. - but just as effectively, I think. Personally, I've found no meaningful difference in food cooked with clad sides or with just a clad bottom. Yes, some kinds of cookware work better for high or low heat or fast or slow or liquid or dry cooking, or whatever, but most anything can be made to work if managed properly. I like All Clad stainless cookware mainly because it doesn't ever have to be replaced so it's a one time investment. It doesn't matter to me that the sides are clad. These products cook as well as any and better than some but, most importantly, are quite durable. Fred The Good Gourmet http://www.thegoodgourmet.com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since stainless doesn't conduct heat very well, and heat is applied on the
bottom of the pan only, the heat would be transferred up the sides in a not very efficient way on non fully clad cookware. There might be more of a difference in heat levels between the sides and bottom on a disk bottomed pot. I think in a fully clad pot, the sides might approach the bottom heat level after a while. There are lots of people here that seem to be engineers that can explain it better, but that's basically the premise I think. Hardly an expert on the matter ;-). Anyone? I'm not sure I buy that argument. If the argument were that clad sides will heat the food faster, I think I'd agree. But I don't see the logic in clad sides heating more evenly. Even heating is an issue at the bottom of the pot where the heat is applied. I don't think it's an issue on the sides - at least I can't get to it logically. Fred > Food isn't one dimensional, and has sides as well as the part contacting the > pan bottom. Whether the food is touching the sides of a saute pan or skillet, > or just close to it, better heat conduction up the sides will help cook the > food evenly from all sides. In a saucepan or stockpot, there is usually, > depending on the fill level, as much food in contact with the sides of the pan > as the bottom. You want that bottom heat to radiate up the sides in order to > cook evenly. It needs those clad sides to do so. > > << > So what is the advantage of clad sides to a pot? I honestly don't know. > > > > Fred > > The Good Gourmet >> The Good Gourmet |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, "Fred"
> wrote: > I'll accept the first part of your response, not only because it is logical, > but because it stems from your experience. I'm not sure it's terribly > important, but I do see the point. I dont think its a big deal either - merely a convenience. I do cook many things that do have a tendency to boil over (lentils for example) and while I can get around it by careful pot tending, having the pot design relieve me of the burden seems attractive. > I've tested about every kind of cookware available and I do have some > distinct preferences. Often, though, those preferences have little to do > with performance. I find I can cook almost anything effectively in any > cookware. Not as pleasantly, not as quickly, not as slowly, not with as > little attention etc. - but just as effectively, I think. > Fred > The Good Gourmet > http://www.thegoodgourmet.com I agree with you. My first experience with lousy cookware was trying to make couscous in a cheap thin stainless steel multi pot. I burnt a few of the vegetables slightly while the couscous was steaming in the top half. If I had not graduated to better cookware I could handle this problem easily -knowing this limitation of thin steel, I would simply stir the vegetables more frequently. This would be inconvenient, but I am sure every liability of every piece of cookware can be worked around. Likewise I have seen a multitude of good cooks (street chefs all over the world) make do with pretty meager cookware turning out very palatable stuff so I have no illusions about what it takes to produce good food. However, I love well designed cookware and it gives me great pleasure to find and use stuff that is designed well and not merely utilitarian. Lastly, on the subject of cladding going up all the way: yet another benefit offered by the New Cooks Catalog is the following - they argue that because there is more conductive metal (not merely on the bottom) the pan is more responsive because more conductive material is available to absorb and transfer heat when heat is applied and shed heat when heat is stopped (the greater surface area from where heat can be dissipated also plays a role). Again, this is not a must have feature but taken together it would appear to me that having the cladding going up all the way is indeed better design. I am sure there are very few dishes where the absolute responsiveness is critical but this is still a distinct advantage. Sadly, except for a 1 qt All Clad try me pot almost all my cookware has only a bottom sandwich disk (or none like cast iron, aluminium stuff etc). Roland |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For help in make your decision, I recommend the experts at Walter E.........................
_____ memory foam mattress | adjustable mattresses | memory pillow |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Culinary art is the art of preparing and cooking foods. The word "culinary" is defined as something related to, or connected with, cooking. A culinarion is a person working in the culinary arts. A culinarian working in restaurants is commonly known as a cook or a chef. Culinary artists are responsible for skilfully preparing meals that are as pleasing to the palate as to the eye.
______________________ SEO Dallas |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Diane Stainless Steel Cookware Sets Last edited by sscookwaresets : 04-04-2012 at 10:33 AM |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
school for culinary arts, culinary arts usa, culinary arts schools,culinary arts recipe | General Cooking | |||
Your culinary Leading Resource For culinary Information | General Cooking | |||
Your culinary Leading Resource For culinary Information | General Cooking | |||
Inbstant Review: new cookware | Cooking Equipment | |||
Sitram Cookware Review | Cooking Equipment |