Elmo P. Shagnasty > wrote:
> In article >,
> kmd > wrote:

> > Right, but if you look at the "more pictures link" you can see that
> > brighter/lighter metal rim underneath the black of the ceramic insert.
> > That's the heating element, exposed to the touch.

> That's not the heating element. Not at all.

> You're confused.

It may not be the heating element, but it's exactly what I was talking
about on the pot that ended up in my trash -- a metal strip that gets
much hotter than the ceramic or the plastic.


Michael

Wayne Boatwright > wrote:

>On Tue 22 Feb 2005 12:49:26p, kmd wrote in rec.food.equipment:
>
>> On 22 Feb 2005 20:26:58 +0100, Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>>
>>>[...] I wouldn't buy either unit under the circumstances. Though not
>>>identical, their design is quite similar.
>>
>> I agree. I wouldn't buy either one of those slow cookers either, given
>> the info you posted. It was, actually, pretty helpful of you to
>> provide information about a recall of a very similar product.
>>
>
>Let's both get over this, Kristen, alright? I apologize.

Okey dokey. I'm glad we found something to agree about. ;-)

--
Kristen

I beleive I'd just as soon step off the edge of the known world and
discover new colors and flavors.
-- VilleBill

On Tue 22 Feb 2005 07:43:02p, kmd wrote in rec.food.equipment:

> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>
>>On Tue 22 Feb 2005 12:49:26p, kmd wrote in rec.food.equipment:
>>
>>> On 22 Feb 2005 20:26:58 +0100, Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>>>
>>>>[...] I wouldn't buy either unit under the circumstances. Though not
>>>>identical, their design is quite similar.
>>>
>>> I agree. I wouldn't buy either one of those slow cookers either, given
>>> the info you posted. It was, actually, pretty helpful of you to
>>> provide information about a recall of a very similar product.
>>>
>>
>>Let's both get over this, Kristen, alright? I apologize.
>
> Okey dokey. I'm glad we found something to agree about. ;-)
>

Thanks, Kristen.

Wayne