Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
I follow. Anyone know the details?

On May 21, 5:54*pm, Grant Erwin > wrote:
> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
> I follow. Anyone know the details?

DAT'S CUZ VENIM FRUM BROUN REEKLUSIV SPYDIRS IZ SKARY !

"Grant Erwin" > wrote in message
...
> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
> I follow. Anyone know the details?

They all have this organization, "Usenet Monster -
http//www.usenetmonster.com", and I cannot figure out a way for Windows Mail
to delete if from there.
Piedmont

On 21-May-2009, Grant Erwin > wrote:

> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
> I follow. Anyone know the details?

I don't know the details, but I just sent a missile off to usenetmonster
about
one of them. Of course I know that there is only one way to deal with
people
that make a habit of ignoring the Golden Rule

--
Brick WA7ERO (Youth is wasted on young people)

"Grant Erwin" > wrote in message
...
> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
> I follow. Anyone know the details?
>
Dunno the details, but here's what I do: In the internet headers of the
offending post is a "complaints to" email address. Send to that email
address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet headers.

The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg
cancel" messages? My best guess is that these are cancellations of the
offenders trying to send out more spam. I have observed that in other
newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level dies
out very quickly. Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in this
complaining.

On Thu, 21 May 2009 22:29:01 -0700, Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:

> The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg
> cancel" messages?

Only users of the misconfigured AT&T servers see the cmsg's.

-sw

Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:
> "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
>> I follow. Anyone know the details?
>>
> Dunno the details, but here's what I do: In the internet headers of the
> offending post is a "complaints to" email address. Send to that email
> address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet headers.
>
> The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg
> cancel" messages? My best guess is that these are cancellations of the
> offenders trying to send out more spam. I have observed that in other
> newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level dies
> out very quickly. Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in this
> complaining.
>
>
I sent off three last night after I got irritated and started exploring
looking for filters. Filters on newsreaders need more uummphh! Not
enough control.
Piedmont

Piedmont wrote:

> I sent off three last night after I got irritated and started exploring
> looking for filters. Filters on newsreaders need more uummphh! Not
> enough control.
> Piedmont

40tude Dialog has the best scoring/filtering mechanism out there. (don't
let the fact that I'm currently posting using Seamonkey fool you <cough> ;-)

-sw

On 22-May-2009, Piedmont > wrote:

> Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:
> > "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other
> >> NGs

.. . .

> >
> >
> I sent off three last night after I got irritated and started exploring
> looking for filters. Filters on newsreaders need more uummphh! Not
> enough control.
> Piedmont

I have full boolean logic word/phrase control over both msg header
and full body content. I rarely use it. And the aggravation level at this
time does not warrant it in my book. I will fire off a few complaints
though.

--
Brick WA7ERO (Youth is wasted on young people)

Piedmont > wrote:
> Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:
> > "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message

> >> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other
> >> NGs I follow. Anyone know the details?
> >>
> > Dunno the details, but here's what I do: In the internet headers of
> > the offending post is a "complaints to" email address. Send to that
> > email address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet
> > headers.
> >
> > The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg
> > cancel" messages? My best guess is that these are cancellations of the
> > offenders trying to send out more spam. I have observed that in other
> > newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level
> > dies out very quickly. Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in
> > this complaining.

> I sent off three last night after I got irritated and started exploring
> looking for filters. Filters on newsreaders need more uummphh! Not
> enough control.

Unlike poor old MI5, this phisherman uses a different nic in each post. And
he's still in the "A"'s!

--
Nick, KI6VAV. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their
families: https://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran!
Support Our Troops: http://anymarine.com/ You are not forgotten.
Thanks ! ! ~Semper Fi~ USMC 1365061

Nick Cramer wrote:

> Unlike poor old MI5

Now there is a blast from the past. Guess "they" finally got him.

--
DougW

"Lawrence Akutagawa" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
>> I follow. Anyone know the details?
>>
> Dunno the details, but here's what I do: In the internet headers of the
> offending post is a "complaints to" email address. Send to that email
> address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet headers.
>
> The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg
> cancel" messages? My best guess is that these are cancellations of the
> offenders trying to send out more spam. I have observed that in other
> newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level dies
> out very quickly. Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in this
> complaining.
As a followup to my post, here's an email I just received as a result of my
complaints -

----- Original Message -----
From: UNM Anti-Spam Patrol
To:
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 2:46 PM
Subject: [UNMSUPPORT #WHU-308896]: Fw: Casio Men's Sport Watch #W94HF-3AV


Hi,

We have been actively working to deal with this recent, aggressive spam
attack and believe that we have finally gotten things under control. Please
check the announcement on our website, http://www.usenetmonster.com, which
states:

"NOTE - May 22, 2009 - Please note that we are aware of the spammer using
multiple accounts across our servers and spamming many text groups! We
believe we have the problem resolved. If you are a new user and wish to be
able to post more than 100 messages a day, please contact
to be whitelisted."

We are continuing to monitor the situation and appreciate reports of any
future spam/abuse should they occur.

-
Thanks,

Usenet Monster Support

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: WHU-308896
Department: killthespammer@UNM
Priority: Low
Status: Closed

Good stuff, thanks Larry.

On May 22, 2:56*pm, "Lawrence Akutagawa" >
wrote:
> "Lawrence Akutagawa" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
> >> I follow. Anyone know the details?
>
> > Dunno the details, but here's what I do: * In the internet headers of the
> > offending post is a "complaints to" email address. *Send to that email
> > address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet headers.
>
> > The more folks that do this complaining, the better. *See those "cmsg
> > cancel" messages? *My best guess is that these are cancellations of the
> > offenders trying to send out more spam. *I have observed that in other
> > newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level dies
> > out very quickly. *Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in this
> > complaining.
>
> As a followup to my post, here's an email I just received as a result of my
> complaints -
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: UNM Anti-Spam Patrol
> To:
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 2:46 PM
> Subject: [UNMSUPPORT #WHU-308896]: Fw: Casio Men's Sport Watch #W94HF-3AV
>
> Hi,
>
> We have been actively working to deal with this recent, aggressive spam
> attack and believe that we have finally gotten things under control. Please
> check the announcement on our website,http://www.usenetmonster.com, which
> states:
>
> "NOTE - May 22, 2009 - Please note that we are aware of the spammer using
> multiple accounts across our servers and spamming many text groups! We
> believe we have the problem resolved. If you are a new user and wish to be
> able to post more than 100 messages a day, please contact
> to be whitelisted."
>
> We are continuing to monitor the situation and appreciate reports of any
> future spam/abuse should they occur.
>
> -
> Thanks,
>
> Usenet Monster Support
>
> Ticket Details
> ===================
> Ticket ID: WHU-308896
> Department: killthespammer@UNM
> Priority: Low
> Status: Closed- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

On Thu, 21 May 2009 14:54:40 -0700, Grant Erwin wrote:

> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
> I follow. Anyone know the details?

Delete all posts from usenetmonster.com. Of course you'll also
killfile TFM, too, but no big loss there.

I'm sure Usenetmonster will shut off this ****er's account shortly
(the spammer, not TFM). They'll be back under a different ISP later
this weekend.

-sw

On Fri, 22 May 2009 05:08:27 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> On Thu, 21 May 2009 14:54:40 -0700, Grant Erwin wrote:
>
>> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
>> I follow. Anyone know the details?
>
> Delete all posts from usenetmonster.com. Of course you'll also
> killfile TFM, too, but no big loss there.
>
> I'm sure Usenetmonster will shut off this ****er's account shortly
> (the spammer, not TFM). They'll be back under a different ISP later
> this weekend.

<slience> He's no fun any more.

-sw

Grant Erwin wrote:
> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
> I follow. Anyone know the details?
This is extreme but until the spam stops I created a filter where,
is deleted. Looks like all start with the letter A...

I hope nobody here has an A at the start of their sender, that I care
about! LOL
Piedmont

"Grant Erwin" > wrote in message
...
> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
> I follow. Anyone know the details?

It's being worked on...

Usenetmonster+other recent spam floods:
http://groups.google.com/group/news....b616fd8?hl=en#

Current readnews.com spam flood (forging "usenetnow.com" domain): RFD
for passive UDP:
http://groups.google.com/group/news....5a65090?hl=en#


BOB