![]() |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs
I follow. Anyone know the details? |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
On May 21, 5:54*pm, Grant Erwin > wrote:
> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs > I follow. Anyone know the details? DAT'S CUZ VENIM FRUM BROUN REEKLUSIV SPYDIRS IZ SKARY ! |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
"Grant Erwin" > wrote in message ... > Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs > I follow. Anyone know the details? They all have this organization, "Usenet Monster - http//www.usenetmonster.com", and I cannot figure out a way for Windows Mail to delete if from there. Piedmont |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
On 21-May-2009, Grant Erwin > wrote: > Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs > I follow. Anyone know the details? I don't know the details, but I just sent a missile off to usenetmonster about one of them. Of course I know that there is only one way to deal with people that make a habit of ignoring the Golden Rule -- Brick WA7ERO (Youth is wasted on young people) |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
"Grant Erwin" > wrote in message ... > Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs > I follow. Anyone know the details? > Dunno the details, but here's what I do: In the internet headers of the offending post is a "complaints to" email address. Send to that email address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet headers. The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg cancel" messages? My best guess is that these are cancellations of the offenders trying to send out more spam. I have observed that in other newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level dies out very quickly. Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in this complaining. |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
On Thu, 21 May 2009 14:54:40 -0700, Grant Erwin wrote:
> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs > I follow. Anyone know the details? Delete all posts from usenetmonster.com. Of course you'll also killfile TFM, too, but no big loss there. I'm sure Usenetmonster will shut off this ****er's account shortly (the spammer, not TFM). They'll be back under a different ISP later this weekend. -sw |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
On Thu, 21 May 2009 22:29:01 -0700, Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:
> The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg > cancel" messages? Only users of the misconfigured AT&T servers see the cmsg's. -sw |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:
> "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message > ... >> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs >> I follow. Anyone know the details? >> > Dunno the details, but here's what I do: In the internet headers of the > offending post is a "complaints to" email address. Send to that email > address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet headers. > > The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg > cancel" messages? My best guess is that these are cancellations of the > offenders trying to send out more spam. I have observed that in other > newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level dies > out very quickly. Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in this > complaining. > > I sent off three last night after I got irritated and started exploring looking for filters. Filters on newsreaders need more uummphh! Not enough control. Piedmont |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
Grant Erwin wrote:
> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs > I follow. Anyone know the details? This is extreme but until the spam stops I created a filter where, is deleted. Looks like all start with the letter A... I hope nobody here has an A at the start of their sender, that I care about! LOL Piedmont |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
Piedmont wrote:
> I sent off three last night after I got irritated and started exploring > looking for filters. Filters on newsreaders need more uummphh! Not > enough control. > Piedmont 40tude Dialog has the best scoring/filtering mechanism out there. (don't let the fact that I'm currently posting using Seamonkey fool you <cough> ;-) -sw |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
"Lawrence Akutagawa" > wrote in message ... > > "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message > ... >> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs >> I follow. Anyone know the details? >> > Dunno the details, but here's what I do: In the internet headers of the > offending post is a "complaints to" email address. Send to that email > address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet headers. > > The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg > cancel" messages? My best guess is that these are cancellations of the > offenders trying to send out more spam. I have observed that in other > newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level dies > out very quickly. Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in this > complaining. As a followup to my post, here's an email I just received as a result of my complaints - ----- Original Message ----- From: UNM Anti-Spam Patrol To: Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 2:46 PM Subject: [UNMSUPPORT #WHU-308896]: Fw: Casio Men's Sport Watch #W94HF-3AV Hi, We have been actively working to deal with this recent, aggressive spam attack and believe that we have finally gotten things under control. Please check the announcement on our website, http://www.usenetmonster.com, which states: "NOTE - May 22, 2009 - Please note that we are aware of the spammer using multiple accounts across our servers and spamming many text groups! We believe we have the problem resolved. If you are a new user and wish to be able to post more than 100 messages a day, please contact to be whitelisted." We are continuing to monitor the situation and appreciate reports of any future spam/abuse should they occur. - Thanks, Usenet Monster Support Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: WHU-308896 Department: killthespammer@UNM Priority: Low Status: Closed |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
On 22-May-2009, Piedmont > wrote: > Lawrence Akutagawa wrote: > > "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message > > ... > >> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other > >> NGs .. . . > > > > > I sent off three last night after I got irritated and started exploring > looking for filters. Filters on newsreaders need more uummphh! Not > enough control. > Piedmont I have full boolean logic word/phrase control over both msg header and full body content. I rarely use it. And the aggravation level at this time does not warrant it in my book. I will fire off a few complaints though. -- Brick WA7ERO (Youth is wasted on young people) |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
Piedmont > wrote:
> Lawrence Akutagawa wrote: > > "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message > >> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other > >> NGs I follow. Anyone know the details? > >> > > Dunno the details, but here's what I do: In the internet headers of > > the offending post is a "complaints to" email address. Send to that > > email address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet > > headers. > > > > The more folks that do this complaining, the better. See those "cmsg > > cancel" messages? My best guess is that these are cancellations of the > > offenders trying to send out more spam. I have observed that in other > > newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level > > dies out very quickly. Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in > > this complaining. > I sent off three last night after I got irritated and started exploring > looking for filters. Filters on newsreaders need more uummphh! Not > enough control. Unlike poor old MI5, this phisherman uses a different nic in each post. And he's still in the "A"'s! -- Nick, KI6VAV. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families: https://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/ Thank a Veteran! Support Our Troops: http://anymarine.com/ You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! ~Semper Fi~ USMC 1365061 |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
"Grant Erwin" > wrote in message ... > Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs > I follow. Anyone know the details? It's being worked on... Usenetmonster+other recent spam floods: http://groups.google.com/group/news....b616fd8?hl=en# Current readnews.com spam flood (forging "usenetnow.com" domain): RFD for passive UDP: http://groups.google.com/group/news....5a65090?hl=en# BOB |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
Good stuff, thanks Larry. On May 22, 2:56*pm, "Lawrence Akutagawa" > wrote: > "Lawrence Akutagawa" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > > > "Grant Erwin" > wrote in message > ... > >> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs > >> I follow. Anyone know the details? > > > Dunno the details, but here's what I do: * In the internet headers of the > > offending post is a "complaints to" email address. *Send to that email > > address a copy of both the post itself and the complete internet headers. > > > The more folks that do this complaining, the better. *See those "cmsg > > cancel" messages? *My best guess is that these are cancellations of the > > offenders trying to send out more spam. *I have observed that in other > > newsgroups whose participants diligently complain that the spam level dies > > out very quickly. *Of course, like weeds one has to be vigilent in this > > complaining. > > As a followup to my post, here's an email I just received as a result of my > complaints - > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: UNM Anti-Spam Patrol > To: > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 2:46 PM > Subject: [UNMSUPPORT #WHU-308896]: Fw: Casio Men's Sport Watch #W94HF-3AV > > Hi, > > We have been actively working to deal with this recent, aggressive spam > attack and believe that we have finally gotten things under control. Please > check the announcement on our website,http://www.usenetmonster.com, which > states: > > "NOTE - May 22, 2009 - Please note that we are aware of the spammer using > multiple accounts across our servers and spamming many text groups! We > believe we have the problem resolved. If you are a new user and wish to be > able to post more than 100 messages a day, please contact > to be whitelisted." > > We are continuing to monitor the situation and appreciate reports of any > future spam/abuse should they occur. > > - > Thanks, > > Usenet Monster Support > > Ticket Details > =================== > Ticket ID: WHU-308896 > Department: killthespammer@UNM > Priority: Low > Status: Closed- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
Nick Cramer wrote:
> Unlike poor old MI5 Now there is a blast from the past. Guess "they" finally got him. ;) -- DougW |
whazzup with this shit storm of spam?
On Fri, 22 May 2009 05:08:27 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2009 14:54:40 -0700, Grant Erwin wrote: > >> Some slimeball has apparently unleashed his venom at afb plus other NGs >> I follow. Anyone know the details? > > Delete all posts from usenetmonster.com. Of course you'll also > killfile TFM, too, but no big loss there. > > I'm sure Usenetmonster will shut off this ****er's account shortly > (the spammer, not TFM). They'll be back under a different ISP later > this weekend. <slience> He's no fun any more. -sw |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter