Hey guys, I don't post here much anymore, but what's with all the spam?
Anyway, I developed a recipe for chicken that mimics what I used to
get in some of the chicken shacks in NC years ago. Thought I'd share. -RP
http://www.nakedwhiz.com/thechicken.htm

Randy wrote:
> Hey guys, I don't post here much anymore, but what's with all the
> spam? Anyway, I developed a recipe for chicken that mimics what I
> used to get in some of the chicken shacks in NC years ago. Thought I'd
> share. -RP http://www.nakedwhiz.com/thechicken.htm

Filter on " and it will get rid of 90%. If you have the
capability of filtering out the entire googlegroups domain, all the better.
I can't, and I won't change from using OE, so the @gmail works well.
--
Dave www.davebbq.com

What is best in life? "To crush your enemies, see them driven before
you, and to hear the lamentation of the women." -- Conan

Dave Bugg wrote:

> Randy wrote:
> > Hey guys, I don't post here much anymore, but what's with all the
> > spam? Anyway, I developed a recipe for chicken that mimics what I
> > used to get in some of the chicken shacks in NC years ago. Thought
> > I'd share. -RP http://www.nakedwhiz.com/thechicken.htm
>
> Filter on " and it will get rid of 90%. If you have the
> capability of filtering out the entire googlegroups domain, all the
> better. I can't, and I won't change from using OE, so the @gmail
> works well.

Looks like Randy is using Thunderbird. As I recall, its filtering is
relatively primitive, along the lines of OE. I think (but couldn't
swear) that Subject or Sender is about it.

I'm still doing pretty well with just a keyword filter for the subject
line. Every now and then I have to add one, but it's working out pretty
well without having to blanket kill any domains.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Default User wrote:
> Dave Bugg wrote:
>
>> Randy wrote:
>>> Hey guys, I don't post here much anymore, but what's with all the
>>> spam? Anyway, I developed a recipe for chicken that mimics what I
>>> used to get in some of the chicken shacks in NC years ago. Thought
>>> I'd share. -RP http://www.nakedwhiz.com/thechicken.htm
>> Filter on " and it will get rid of 90%. If you have the
>> capability of filtering out the entire googlegroups domain, all the
>> better. I can't, and I won't change from using OE, so the @gmail
>> works well.
>
> Looks like Randy is using Thunderbird. As I recall, its filtering is
> relatively primitive, along the lines of OE. I think (but couldn't
> swear) that Subject or Sender is about it.
>
> I'm still doing pretty well with just a keyword filter for the subject
> line. Every now and then I have to add one, but it's working out pretty
> well without having to blanket kill any domains.
>
>
>
>
> Brian
>
I use TB and filtering isn't too bad, you can do things like "If sender
contains" "whatever" then "mark message read" or "If Subject contains"
"whatever" then "mark message read"

--
Steve

Steve Calvin wrote:

> Default User wrote:

> > Looks like Randy is using Thunderbird. As I recall, its filtering is
> > relatively primitive, along the lines of OE. I think (but couldn't
> > swear) that Subject or Sender is about it.
> >
> > I'm still doing pretty well with just a keyword filter for the
> > subject line. Every now and then I have to add one, but it's
> > working out pretty well without having to blanket kill any domains.

> I use TB and filtering isn't too bad, you can do things like "If
> sender contains" "whatever" then "mark message read" or "If Subject
> contains" "whatever" then "mark message read"

Yeah, that will take of a lot of the problem. When I was picking out a
newsreader some time back I looked carefully at the filtering. At the
time, I was more interested in the cross-posting trolls (or I should
say LESS intersted in them) so I wanted to be able to do some filtering
on newsgroups.

Hey, sorry if I was a bit grumpy yesterday. The spam thing is a boil on
the ass of usenet.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Default User wrote:
> Steve Calvin wrote:
>
>> Default User wrote:
>
>>> Looks like Randy is using Thunderbird. As I recall, its filtering is
>>> relatively primitive, along the lines of OE. I think (but couldn't
>>> swear) that Subject or Sender is about it.
>>>
>>> I'm still doing pretty well with just a keyword filter for the
>>> subject line. Every now and then I have to add one, but it's
>>> working out pretty well without having to blanket kill any domains.
>
>> I use TB and filtering isn't too bad, you can do things like "If
>> sender contains" "whatever" then "mark message read" or "If Subject
>> contains" "whatever" then "mark message read"
>
> Yeah, that will take of a lot of the problem. When I was picking out a
> newsreader some time back I looked carefully at the filtering. At the
> time, I was more interested in the cross-posting trolls (or I should
> say LESS intersted in them) so I wanted to be able to do some filtering
> on newsgroups.

I agree, TB is DEFIANTLY lacking in filtering crossposts but all in all
it's workable.

>
> Hey, sorry if I was a bit grumpy yesterday. The spam thing is a boil on
> the ass of usenet.

Thanks, no sweat. We all get our knickers twisted from time to time.
I've certainly done it. I think we all try not to but sometimes it just
doesn't work. Fagitaboudit. ;-)

--
Steve

Dave Bugg wrote:
> Randy wrote:
>> Hey guys, I don't post here much anymore, but what's with all the
>> spam? Anyway, I developed a recipe for chicken that mimics what I
>> used to get in some of the chicken shacks in NC years ago. Thought I'd
>> share. -RP http://www.nakedwhiz.com/thechicken.htm
>
> Filter on " and it will get rid of 90%. If you have the
> capability of filtering out the entire googlegroups domain, all the better.
> I can't, and I won't change from using OE, so the @gmail works well.
Thanks Dave, man it has been a while since I've been here. You were
just opening the barbecue place when I hung out here. If I could have
gotten better flights,I'd have been part of that wedding party. Hope
all is well. -RP

On Apr 21, 5:37 pm, "Dave Bugg" > wrote:
> Filter on " and it will get rid of 90%. If you have the
> capability of filtering out the entire googlegroups domain, all the better.
> I can't, and I won't change from using OE, so the @gmail works well.
> Dave www.davebbq.com

So this post is invisible to most, I guess. That sucks - I'm not keen
on paying for Usenet access but I guess I'd better pony up if I want
Dave to read my posts. That's on top of the distinct disadvantage of
no filters whatsoever that I get with Google - can't really block
anyone or anything.

Well, if you know Dave and don't have a gmail account, just let him
know that I'm not offended and that I won't be blocking everything
from davebbq.com

--Jeff

JeffH > wrote:
> On Apr 21, 5:37 pm, "Dave Bugg" > wrote:
> > Filter on " and it will get rid of 90%. If you have the
> > capability of filtering out the entire googlegroups domain, all the
> > better. I can't, and I won't change from using OE, so the @gmail works
> > well. Dave www.davebbq.com
>
> So this post is invisible to most, I guess. That sucks - I'm not keen
> on paying for Usenet access but I guess I'd better pony up if I want
> Dave to read my posts. That's on top of the distinct disadvantage of
> no filters whatsoever that I get with Google - can't really block
> anyone or anything.
>
> Well, if you know Dave and don't have a gmail account, just let him
> know that I'm not offended and that I won't be blocking everything
> from davebbq.com

Did you get that, Dave?

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled Veterans and their families!
I've known US vets who served as far back as the Spanish American War. They
are all my heroes! Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not
forgotten. Thanks ! ! ~Semper Fi~

Nick Cramer wrote:
> JeffH > wrote:
>> On Apr 21, 5:37 pm, "Dave Bugg" > wrote:
>>> Filter on " and it will get rid of 90%. If you have the
>>> capability of filtering out the entire googlegroups domain, all the
>>> better. I can't, and I won't change from using OE, so the @gmail
>>> works well. Dave www.davebbq.com
>>
>> So this post is invisible to most, I guess. That sucks - I'm not keen
>> on paying for Usenet access but I guess I'd better pony up if I want
>> Dave to read my posts. That's on top of the distinct disadvantage of
>> no filters whatsoever that I get with Google - can't really block
>> anyone or anything.
>>
>> Well, if you know Dave and don't have a gmail account, just let him
>> know that I'm not offended and that I won't be blocking everything
>> from davebbq.com
>
> Did you get that, Dave?

I missed the OP, but picked it up with the reply.

Jeff, all you need to do is munge your " to something like
"atgeemaledotcom" and those who filter on " won't filter you out.
I don't want to miss ya.

--
Dave www.davebbq.com

What is best in life? "To crush your enemies, see them driven before
you, and to hear the lamentation of the women." -- Conan

Dave Bugg wrote:


> Jeff, all you need to do is munge your " to something like
> "atgeemaledotcom" and those who filter on " won't filter
> you out. I don't want to miss ya.

He uses GG. I don't believe it allows munging.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

> On Apr 21, 5:37 pm, "Dave Bugg" > wrote:
> > Filter on " and it will get rid of 90%. If you have the
> > capability of filtering out the entire googlegroups domain, all the better.
> > I can't, and I won't change from using OE, so the @gmail works well.
> > Dave www.davebbq.com

I just took a look and all those spams are from some watch domain, not
from a gmail domain. I don't see any spam from gmail in recent posts
(unless you are counting my messages). You don't think that Google
filters out gmail accounts on inbound Usenet, do you? And Dave doesn't
care because he can't read my emails. And I felt I had so much to
contribute...

--Jeff

On Apr 22, 11:14*am, "Nunya Bidnits" > wrote:

> I understand filtering makes life easier but its also important to report
> these whenever possible. However don't ever send reports to abuse at
> chinanet or similar chinese domains, because they will just sell your
> address to spammers, since the majority of their hosting clients are
> internet thieves looking to steal from you or con you into sending money for
> merchandise that will never arrive.
>
> MartyB in KC-

Someone, somewhere must have actually given these guys a buck once.
They are going to keep pounding the usenet until they believe that
they won't profit again.

Never click on spam,
Never talk to telemarketers,
Never buy from door to door salesmen,
unless you want to encourage them to continue.

Cam

On 22-Apr-2008, JeffH > wrote:

> On Apr 21, 5:37 pm, "Dave Bugg" > wrote:
> > Filter on " and it will get rid of 90%. If you have the
> > capability of filtering out the entire googlegroups domain, all the
> > better.
> > I can't, and I won't change from using OE, so the @gmail works well.
> > Dave www.davebbq.com
>
> So this post is invisible to most, I guess. That sucks - I'm not keen
> on paying for Usenet access but I guess I'd better pony up if I want
> Dave to read my posts. That's on top of the distinct disadvantage of
> no filters whatsoever that I get with Google - can't really block
> anyone or anything.
>
> Well, if you know Dave and don't have a gmail account, just let him
> know that I'm not offended and that I won't be blocking everything
> from davebbq.com
>
> --Jeff

Get a free account at Teranews.

--
Brick(Youth is wasted on young people)

Grant Baxter wrote:
> Randy > wrote:
>
>> Hey guys, I don't post here much anymore, but what's with all the spam?
>> Anyway, I developed a recipe for chicken that mimics what I used to
>> get in some of the chicken shacks in NC years ago. Thought I'd share. -RP
>> http://www.nakedwhiz.com/thechicken.htm
>
> Welp - I tried "The Chicken" tonight, and all I can say is "Hotdamn
> that was gooood!!"
>
> Thanks,
>
> grant
Glad you liked it, just curious, what did you cook it on? -RP