On 2006-09-27, > wrote:

>>Which begs the questions!
>
> KevinS gonna slap your wrist, young lady!

And rightly so. The correct expression is "bugs the question"
(preferably one question at a time) from "buggers the question", and
not --- as is often supposed --- from "beggars the question".

HTH.

--
The dark smell of dankness grew stronger and stronger.
[G.P. Taylor]

Adam Funk wrote:
> On 2006-09-27, > wrote:
>
> >>Which begs the questions!
> >
> > KevinS gonna slap your wrist, young lady!
>
> And rightly so. The correct expression is "bugs the question"
> (preferably one question at a time) from "buggers the question", and
> not --- as is often supposed --- from "beggars the question".

Interesting. I have always heard "begs the question", never "bugs
the question".

Much as the Brits must be proud of one of the three pillars of the
British Navy, I do not find "buggers the question" to be an attractive
version.

GFH

> wrote

> > >>Which begs the questions!
> > >
> > > KevinS gonna slap your wrist, young lady!
> >
> > And rightly so. The correct expression is "bugs the question"
> > (preferably one question at a time) from "buggers the question", and
> > not --- as is often supposed --- from "beggars the question".
>
> Interesting. I have always heard "begs the question", never "bugs
> the question".
>
> Much as the Brits must be proud of one of the three pillars of the
> British Navy, I do not find "buggers the question" to be an attractive
> version.

The just debug it, sheesh.

More seriously, "bugger" doesn't have the same connotation
over here. I guess we don't have the same fascination....

--oTTo--

On 2006-09-28, > wrote:

> Interesting. I have always heard "begs the question", never "bugs
> the question".
>
> Much as the Brits must be proud of one of the three pillars of the
> British Navy,

That would be "sods the question".


> I do not find "buggers the question" to be an attractive version.

NTTAWTT.

--
And on special dank midnights in August he peeks
out of the shutters and sometimes he speaks
and tells how the Lorax was lifted away. [Dr. Seuss]

> wrote:
>Adam Funk wrote:
>> On 2006-09-27, > wrote:
>> >>Which begs the questions!
>> >
>> > KevinS gonna slap your wrist, young lady!
>>
>> And rightly so. The correct expression is "bugs the question"
>> (preferably one question at a time) from "buggers the question", and
>> not --- as is often supposed --- from "beggars the question".
>
>Interesting. I have always heard "begs the question", never "bugs
>the question".

Probably because of an inadvertent vowel shift. Those can be socially
embarrassing.

Dave "and this of course opens the door for [HAMMOND] to enter the thread"
DeLaney
--
\/David DeLaney posting from "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

Adam Funk > wrote:
> On 2006-09-28, > wrote:
>
>> Interesting. I have always heard "begs the question", never "bugs
>> the question".
>>
>> Much as the Brits must be proud of one of the three pillars of the
>> British Navy,
>
> That would be "sods the question".

are you Merkins EVER going to learn the language?

"Navy" => sea => high-seas buggery => "bugs the question"
"Navvy" => land => digging through ground => "sods the question"

our Austrian neighbours are inexplicably fond of mishearding the
former as "bigs the question", though on reflection that's possibly
because as a meaningless statement it wouldn't seem at all unusual to
them in spoken language.


butting

--
I am very new to programming drivers so if I sound un-knowledgeable
then it's because I am.
-- first4internet's Ceri Coburn on writing Sony's DRM rootkit
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~butting

On 2006-09-28, David DeLaney > wrote:

> Probably because of an inadvertent vowel shift. Those can be socially
> embarrassing.

Not as bad as the Great Vowel Shift.


> Dave "and this of course opens the door for [HAMMOND] to enter the thread"
> DeLaney

Why?

--
Vielen Dank

On 2006-09-28, Bryce Utting > wrote:

>>> Much as the Brits must be proud of one of the three pillars of the
>>> British Navy,
>>
>> That would be "sods the question".
>
> are you Merkins EVER going to learn the language?
>
> "Navy" => sea => high-seas buggery => "bugs the question"
> "Navvy" => land => digging through ground => "sods the question"

The traditions of the Royal Navy are rum, buggery and the lash? That
album title just doesn't sound right.


> our Austrian neighbours are inexplicably fond of mishearding the
> former as "bigs the question", though on reflection that's possibly
> because as a meaningless statement it wouldn't seem at all unusual to
> them in spoken language.

Are you sure you're not thinking of "bigs up the question", which I
think (perhaps Kevins can help with this) is related to "pimps the
question"?

--
And on special dank midnights in August he peeks
out of the shutters and sometimes he speaks
and tells how the Lorax was lifted away. [Dr. Seuss]

Otto Bahn wrote:

> More seriously, "bugger" doesn't have the same connotation
> over here. I guess we don't have the same fascination....

Oh? Rum, buggery and brutality. All three. Which word do you
not understand?

GFH

> wrote

> > More seriously, "bugger" doesn't have the same connotation
> > over here. I guess we don't have the same fascination....
>
> Oh? Rum, buggery and brutality. All three. Which word do you
> not understand?

None. In America, "bugger" is a peice or clump of snot.

--oTTo--

Otto Bahn wrote:
> > wrote
>
>>> More seriously, "bugger" doesn't have the same connotation
>>> over here. I guess we don't have the same fascination....
>>
>> Oh? Rum, buggery and brutality. All three. Which word do you
>> not understand?
>
> None. In America, "bugger" is a peice or clump of snot.

I thought the classic formulation was "Rum, sodomy and the lash".

Alan Jones

Otto Bahn wrote:
>
> > wrote
>
> > > More seriously, "bugger" doesn't have the same connotation
> > > over here. I guess we don't have the same fascination....
> >
> > Oh? Rum, buggery and brutality. All three. Which word do you
> > not understand?
>
> None. In America, "bugger" is a peice or clump of snot.

Usually pronounced and spelled "booger," with the "oo" of "book."

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...nary&va=booger

http://www.bartleby.com/61/95/B0389500.html

--
Bob Lieblich
Bigger bagger beggar

Alan Jones wrote:
> Otto Bahn wrote:
> > > wrote
> >
> >>> More seriously, "bugger" doesn't have the same connotation
> >>> over here. I guess we don't have the same fascination....
> >>
> >> Oh? Rum, buggery and brutality. All three. Which word do you
> >> not understand?
> >
> > None. In America, "bugger" is a peice or clump of snot.
>
> I thought the classic formulation was "Rum, sodomy and the lash".

Certainly a good translation into American English.

GFH

On 2006-09-29, Otto Bahn > wrote:

> None. In America, "bugger" is a peice or clump of snot.

In the 1970s they used to fire people for saying it on the radio.

--
It was down by the dank tarn of Auber,
In the ghoul-haunted woodland of Weir.
[Poe]

"Robert Lieblich" > wrote in message ...
> Otto Bahn wrote:
> >
> > > wrote
> >
> > > > More seriously, "bugger" doesn't have the same connotation
> > > > over here. I guess we don't have the same fascination....
> > >
> > > Oh? Rum, buggery and brutality. All three. Which word do you
> > > not understand?
> >
> > None. In America, "bugger" is a peice or clump of snot.
>
> Usually pronounced and spelled "booger," with the "oo" of "book."
>
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...nary&va=booger

"Bugger" must be a NYC/Northeast thing.

--oTTo--

On 2006-10-02, Duwop > wrote:

> Adam, keep on spamming ABC, I WILL spam ARK. **** off.

I think you have your networks mixed up. This is NBC.


> I've named you. YOU will be one your friends will shit on.

Perhaps you should go back to posting school.

http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html


--
It was down by the dank tarn of Auber,
In the ghoul-haunted woodland of Weir.
[Poe]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 05:22:34 -0400, (David
DeLaney) wrote:

>Duwop > wrote:
>>Adam, keep on spamming ABC, I WILL spam ARK. **** off.
>
>You're Allowed.
>
>Makes it harder, doesn't it?
>
>>I've named you.
>
>Ah, but does he come when you call him?

Watch it, Dave, or he'll name you, too.

>>YOU will be one your friends will shit on.
>
>*snrk*
>
>You haven't been here very much, have you?
>
Wouldn't matter if he'd been here for years. Some people just aren't
ever going to geddit, I suspect because their imagination and sense of
whimsy long ago grew dank and sodden, closed to the world.
KnowwhatImean?