I know, the New York Times bread doesn't need any more publicity, but
anyway, here are some pics. James and I were wondering how it would
work if I did it in a loaf pan (covered with foil) instead of the
usual pot, and though it looks weird, it's really good, as usual.

Pics at http://serenecooking.livejournal.com/17027.html

Serene
--
"I can't decide if I feel more like four ten-year-olds or ten four-year-olds." Laurie Anderson , on turning 40.

http://serenejournal.livejournal.com

Serene wrote:
> I know, the New York Times bread doesn't need any more publicity, but
> anyway, here are some pics. James and I were wondering how it would
> work if I did it in a loaf pan (covered with foil) instead of the
> usual pot, and though it looks weird, it's really good, as usual.
>
> Pics at http://serenecooking.livejournal.com/17027.html
>
> Serene

Thanks for sharing your 'adventure' pictures. I'm glad you
experimented and shared your pictures. Perhaps others without a
covered loaf pan were wondering how it might turn out. Now we know:
Good.
Dee Dee

Dee Dee wrote:
> Serene wrote:
> > I know, the New York Times bread doesn't need any more publicity, but
> > anyway, here are some pics. James and I were wondering how it would
> > work if I did it in a loaf pan (covered with foil) instead of the
> > usual pot, and though it looks weird, it's really good, as usual.
> >
> > Pics at http://serenecooking.livejournal.com/17027.html
> >
> > Serene
>
> Thanks for sharing your 'adventure' pictures. I'm glad you
> experimented and shared your pictures. Perhaps others without a
> covered loaf pan were wondering how it might turn out. Now we know:
> Good.
> Dee Dee
I agree- you did a nice job, and you answered my question about using a
different pan.