"Brian" > wrote in message
news:t3GQh.4796$iw5.3916@trndny06...
> Kent wrote:
>
>> I was looking for an "easy to smoke" smoker where you didn't have to add
>> charcoal and smoke, as you do
>> for 8-12 hours. I ended up taking it back to Walmart.
>> At BBQ Galore[a chain scattered about the country] they have the
>> Cookshack, mentioned above. That may work
>> but they charge for a proprietary "wood product" that creates a smokey
>> flavor. I didn't want to get ripped off
>> and I want to use wood I can chop down, or at least buy in chunks
>>
>> Kent
>
> That is incorrect information. You're thinking of the Bradley smoker
> with it's proprietary wood pucks. I've been using whatever wood chunks I
> have handy in my Cookshack and am quite pleased with the end results. I've
> served my time with more labor-intensive smokers. YMMV.
>
<
You're absolutely right! It was the Bradley.
Isn't the Cookshack fairly expensive?

BTW, what does YMMV mean, and what's its
relevance to this issue, or this NG?

Kent