View Single Post
  #49 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 05-09-2006, 03:01 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,misc.rural,alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals
[email protected] dh@. is offline
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,652
Default "collateral included deaths in organic rice production [faq]"

On 2 Sep 2006 16:32:07 -0700, "Florida" wrote:


[email protected] wrote:
On 1 Sep 2006 21:18:40 -0700, "Rupert" wrote:

-snip-
No-one's opposed to anything being pointed out. Some people believe
Diderot's account of the matter distorts the truth, so they respond
accordingly.


They don't correct him. The only one who even pretended to provide
another impression was pearl who didn't object to "Florida's" insane
suggestion that there ae no cds, but pasted the Lindburg garbage
about the number of cds being no worse than road kill in the same area.


..sigh... Grievous work, attempting to make smart remarks to folks
who don't appear to use their 'smart' setting.


There's nothing smart about denying cds in crop production, and
especially in rice production. Instead there's only stupidity, ignorance,
and extreme dishonesty.