On Wed, 17 May 2006 08:39:46 -0500, "jmcquown"
> wrote:

>Serene wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:27:26 -0400, Karen AKA Kajikit
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 May 2006 00:45:56 GMT, The Bubbo >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually last year I chose not to donate because I knew that there
>>> were some rather shady people living in our complex and there was a
>>> high likelyhood that the food would be either vandalised by the idiot
>>> children who went around breaking the pool furniture etc, or
>>> stolen... fortunately since the building went condo all of those
>>> families are
>>> long-gone and the complex has gone many notches upmarket so I felt
>>> safe donating this year.
>>
>> So what you're saying is that you refused to give food to poor people,
>> because other poor people might take it? That, I think, takes the
>> prize today, and I've read some pretty mindboggling stuff today.
>>
>> serene
>
>"Shady" does not equal poor.

Kajikit said:

>>> stolen... fortunately since the building went condo all of those
>>> families are
>>> long-gone and the complex has gone many notches upmarket so I felt
>>> safe donating this year.

Whether or not you think that shady=poor, Kajikit drew a clear
parallel between the "many notches upmarket" and the quality of the
tenants.

serene
--
Kissing Hank's Ass is 10 years old! http://jhuger.com/kisshank
My personal blog: http://serenejournal.livejournal.com
My new cooking blog: http://serenecooking.livejournal.com