Sheldon wrote:
> Janet Bostwick wrote:
>
>>"Sheldon" wrote> > Janet Bostwick wrote:
>>
>>>>"Sheldon" wrote:
>>>>>There's no
>>>>>rule that the grinder can't be cleaned in a dishwasher but I don't
>>>>>recommend placing carbon steel , aluminum, die cast, or tinned parts in
>>>>>the dishwasher. It shouldn't take more than three minutes to clean a
>>>>>grinder by hand, no one can be that lazy they need to use a dishwasher
>>>>>to clean five measly parts.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sheldon
>>>>
>>>>If the dishwasher is already half full, there's no reason not to put
>>>>those 5 parts in there too.
>>>
>>>Yes there is... dishwashing cleanser will pit/discolor most grinder
>>>parts... that's why my admonition that I don't recommend placing
>>>grinder parts into the dishwasher. Hey, you asked (I didn't volunteer)
>>>so I'm politely answering...

Um, sorta politely, if in error about questioning.

>>>you obviously don't like my answer
>>>because you obviously already had your mind made up... you are being
>>>obnoxious and rude. **** YOU! Don't ask me anymore.

Oh, sure. Politely. Miss Manners would give you a gold star for your
"politeness." Bwah...

>>O.k., sweetie, don't get upset. BTW, I didn't ask.
>
> Of course you asked.

Um, no. She didn't ask. No questions. No question marks. Just an excuse
for Shecky to rant.

> See that superfluous comma you inserted, makes it
> a question, snidewise but a question nevertheless (in fact it asks
> permission).

Actually, linguistic moron, her comma is absolutely correct. Unlike the
comma you inserted in your sentence after "inserted." I guess you got so
excited by the word you just couldn't help yourself. Ooooh, inserted...
<pant, pant> Bring back very old memories? Navy days...?

<LOL> Her comment remains a declarative sentence. Nothing questioning
about it.

> And by transporting my name as you did

<LOL> "Transporting" your name. "Transporting" = "not deleting" on
Planet Sheldon.

> you directed your
> question directly to me alone, not to mention the small fact that you
> responded directly to my post, even reiterated "those 5 parts" that
> only I illustrated.

But there was no question. So the rest of this rambling excuse for a
rationale is just as nonsensical as your illiterate English critique.

> And you're the one who is upset... you posted the
> same thing twice... must be very important to you... your relationship
> with your dishwasher is evidently quite intimate... fuzzy, warm, and
> vibrates.

Bwah. Poor, horny Sheldon. Everything devolves to his elderly, useless
groin...

So, just another excuse for Shecky to go off on someone and sling his
meaningless insults. After all these years, you'd think he'd be better
at it.

Pastorio